Abstract
Flexicurity labour markets are characterised by flexible hiring/firing rules, a generous social safety net, and active labour market policies. How can such labour markets cope with the consequences of the Great Recession? This paper takes a closer look at this question considering the case of Denmark. It is found that employment adjustment is not particularly large in international comparison, but a larger burden of adjustment is along the extensive (number of employees) rather than the intensive (hours) margin. The level of job creation is high, and remains so despite the crisis, although job creation is pro-cyclical and job-separation counter-cyclical. As a consequence most unemployment spells remain short. Comparative evidence does not suggest that flexicurity markets are more prone to persistence. Crucial for this is the design of the social safety net and in particular the active labour market policy. However, it is a challenge to maintain the efficiency of the activation system in a period with high unemployment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andersen, T. M. (2011). Employment crises. Working paper in preparation.
Andersen T. M., Svarer M. (2007) Flexicurity—labour market performance in Denmark. CESifo Economic Studies 53(3): 389–429
Andersen, T. M., & Svarer, M. (2010). The role of workfare in striking a balance between incentives and insurance in the labour market. Working paper.
Bentolila S., Bertola G. (1990) Firing costs and labour demand: How bad is eurosclerosis?. Review of Economics Studies 57: 381–402
Blanchard O. (2006) European unemployment: The evolution of facts and ideas. Economic Policy 21: 5–59
Blanchard O., Tirole J. (2008) The joint design of unemployment insurance and employment protection: A first pass. Journal of European Economic Association 6: 45–77
Boeri, T., Conde-Ruiz, J. I., & Gallaso, V. (2006). The political economy of flexicurity. Workings paper 2006-15 FEDEA.
Brown, A., Merkl, C., & Snower, D. (2009). Incentives and complementarities in flexicurity. WP 1526 Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
Card D., Kluve J., Weber A. (2010) Active labour market policies: A meta analysis. Economic Journal 120: F452–F477
Christensen, R. N., & Jacobsen, R. H. (2009). Analyser af effekten af aktivering og voksen og efteruddannelse for forsikrede ledige. In CEBR.
Cunãt, A., & Melitz, M. (2007). Volatility, labour market flexibility and the pattern of comparative advantage. NBER working paper 13062.
Davoine, T., & Keuschinigg, C. (2010). Flexicurity and job reallocation. Working paper, University of St. Gallen.
Danish Economic Council. (2007). Dansk økonomi, forår 2007. Copenhagen
Eurobarometer. (2010). March. Bruxelles
European Commission. (2007). Modernising labour law to meet the challenges of the 21st Century. Green paper.
European Commission. (2009). Sustainability report 2009. European Economy 9, Bruxelles.
Graversen, B. K., Damgaard, B., & Rosendahl, A. (2007). Hurtigt i gang—evaluering af et forsøg med en tidlig og intensiv beskæftigelsesindsats for forsikrede ledige. SFI rapport 07:10.
Jespersen S., Munch J. R., Skipper L. (2008) Costs and benefits of Danish active labour market programmes. Labour Economics 15: 859–884
Jørgensen, H., & Kongshøj Madsen, P. (2007). Flexicurity and beyond—finding a new agenda for the European social model. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
Kluve, J. (2006). The effectiveness of European active labor market policy. IZA discussion paper, 2018.
Lindbeck, A. (1995). Hazardous welfare state dynamics. In American economic review, papers and proceedings, May 9–15, 1995.
Lindbeck A., Nyberg S., Weibull J. W. (2003) Social norms welfare state dynamics. Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 533–542
Ljungqvist L., Sargent T. J. (1995) The Swedish unemployment experience. European Economic Review 39: 1043–1070
Ljungqvist L., Sargent T. J. (1998) The European unemployment dilemma. Journal of Political Economy 106(3): 514–550
Lommerud, K. E., & Straume, O. R. (2010). Employment protection vs. flexicurity: On technology adoption in unionized firms. CEPR working paper 7919.
Nickell, S. J. (1986). Dynamic models of labour demand. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Layard. (Eds.), Handbook of labour economics (Vol. 2). North-Holland.
OECD. (2009). Employment outlook. Paris.
OECD. (2010). Employment outlook. Paris.
Parsons, D., Tranæs, T., & Lilleør, H. (1999). Voluntary public unemployment insurance. EPRU working paper.
Rosholm, M. (2008). Experimental evidence on the nature of the Danish employment miracle.
Rosholm M., Svarer M. (2008) Estimating the threat effect of active labour market programmes. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 110(2): 385–401
Rosholm, M., & Svarer, M. (2009). Kvantitativ analyse af “hurtig i gang 2”, Copenhagen: Arbejdsmarkedsstyrelsen.
Strøby-Jensen, C. (2008). Employment relations in Denmark—explaining flexicurity. Working paper, Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen.
Van der Noord, P. (2000). The size and role of automatic stabilizers in the 1990s and beyond. OECD working paper 230.
Van der Noord, P., Girouard, N., & André, C. (2006). Social safety nets and structural adjustment. OECD working paper 517.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Comments and suggestions from Michael Svarer, Coen Teulings, participants at the CPB-ROA conference on flexibility of the labour market, Den Haag, January 2011, and anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, T.M. A Flexicurity Labour Market in the Great Recession: The Case of Denmark. De Economist 160, 117–140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-011-9181-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-011-9181-6