Abstract
This study examines early embryogenesis in two species of darters, Etheostoma caeruleum and E. zonale (Teleostei: Percidae), and their hybrids. Results document the course of ontogeny from fertilization until the onset of pigmented eyes. Comparing fertilization and developmental success of conspecific versus heterospecific crosses revealed an asymmetric postmating reproductive barrier. E. caeruleum eggs treated with E. zonale sperm exhibited fertilization and developmental success similar to that of conspecific crosses. In contrast, E. zonale eggs treated with E. caeruleum sperm exhibited reduced fertilization relative to conspecific crosses and abnormal development. Development in this latter cross was compromised at all stages, but appeared to be concentrated around epiboly, or cell migration. As epiboly represents the stage of ontogeny when zygotic genes of both species jointly contribute to embryogenesis, results provide insight into the genetic mechanisms underlying postmating barriers in Etheostoma. Finally, the observed asymmetry in fertilization success is consistent with predictions based on the behavioral ecology of these species. Etheostoma zonale spawn in the open water column, whereas E.␣caeruleum bury their eggs under the substrate. The observed fertilization barrier may have therefore resulted from selection favoring increased fertilization specificity in E. zonale.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abramoff, MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with imageJ. Biophotonics Int, 11(7):36–42
Bailey RM, Etnier DA (1988) Comments on the subgenera of darters (Percidae) with descriptions of two new species from southcentral United States. Misc Publ Univ Michigan Museum Zool 175:1–48
Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts
Howard DJ (1999) Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 30:109–132
Hubbs C (1967) Geographic variations in survival of hybrids between etheostomatine fishes. Bull Texas Memorial Museum 13:1–72
Hubbs C, Strawn K (1957) Survival of F1 hybrids between fishes of the subfamily Etheostominae. Journal of Experimental Zool 134: 33–62
Kane DA, Kimmel CB 1993. The zebrafish midblastula transition. Development 119: 447–456
Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995) Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203: 253–310
Lorch PD, Servedio MR (2005) Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Evolution 59:1039–1045
Mendelson TC (2003a) Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 57:317–327
Mendelson TC (2003b) Evidence of intermediate and asymmetrical behavioral isolation between Orangethroat and Orangebelly darters (Teleostei: Percidae). Am Midland Nat 150:343–347
Page LM (1981) The genera and subgenera of darters (Percidae, Etheostomatini). Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 90:1–69
Page LM (1983) Handbook of darters. TFH Publications, Saddle Brook, New Jersey
Page LM (1985) Evolution of reproductive behaviors in Percid fishes. Illinois Nat Hist Surv Bull 33:275–295
Page LM (2000) Etheostomatinae. In: Craig JF (eds) Percid fishes: Systematics, ecology and exploitation. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, pp 225–253
Paine MD (1984) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of early ontogenies of darters (Etheostomatini). Environ Biol Fish 11:97–106
Palumbi SR (1998) Species formation and the evolution of gamete recognition loci. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH (eds) Endless forms: Species and speciation, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 271–278
Porter BA, Cavender TM, Fuerst PA (2002) Molecular phylogeny of the snubnose darters, subgenus Ulocentra (Genus Etheostoma, Family Percidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22:364–374
Simon TP, Brandt TM, Graves KG, Whiteside BG (1995) Ontogeny and description of eggs, larvae, and early juveniles of the fountain darter, Etheostoma fonticola. Southwestern Nat 40:208–215
Stauffer JR, Boltz JM, Kellogg KA, van Snik ES (1996) Microhabitat partitioning in a diverse assemblage of darters in the Allegheny River system. Environ Biol Fish 46:37–44
Tiffin P, Olson MS, Moyle LC (2001) Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 268:861–867
Welsh SA, Perry SA (1998) Habitat partitioning in a community of darters in the Elk River, West Virginia. Environ Biol Fish 51:411–419
Winn HE (1958) Comparative reproductive behavior and ecology of fourteen species of darters (Pisces: Percidae). Ecol Monogr 28:155–191
Zeh DW, Zeh JA (2000) Reproductive mode and speciation: the viviparity-driven conflict hypothesis. BioEssays 22:938–946
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendelson, T.C., Imhoff, V.E. & Iovine, M.K. Analysis of Early Embryogenesis in Rainbow and Banded Darters (Percidae: Etheostoma) Reveals Asymmetric Postmating Barrier. Environ Biol Fish 76, 351–360 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9039-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9039-y