Abstract
We design a socially-efficient water tariff in the institutional context of England, where water metering is largely optional and non-metered households are levied proportional to the rateable value (RV) of their property. Within this context, it is theoretically demonstrated that: the larger the RV, the more likely the household to opt for metering; and the larger the RV, the smaller the Demand Effect of Metering (DEM; the fall in water consumption resulting from metering). These two hypotheses are confirmed with econometric analyses using datasets provided by a water company operating in East Anglia, England. The results signify an adverse-selection problem: wealthier households are more likely to opt for metering, yet they are expected to exhibit a smaller DEM once a meter is installed. In order to overcome this, we propose a two-part tariff for metered households consisting of: a variable charge levied proportional to water consumption at a uniform price; and a progressive standing charge to place a heavier burden on wealthier households. The latter component has a potentially major role in attaining social efficiency of metering, by encouraging poorer households to install meters whilst discouraging wealthier ones. The optimal two-part tariff is determined empirically.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anglian Water (2009a) Annual report and accounts 2009
Anglian Water (2009b) Community and environmental report 2009
Anglian Water (2011) Tariffs and charges. http://www.anglianwater.co.uk/household/your-account/tariffs/ Cited 1 May 2011
Arbués F, García-Valiña MA, Martínez-Espiñeira R (2003) Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review. J Soc Econ 32: 81–102. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00005-2
Cowan S (2010) The welfare economics of optional water metering. Econ J 120: 800–815. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02307.x
Dalhuisen JM, Florax R, de Groot H, Nijkamp P (2003) Price and income elasticities of residential water demand: a meta-analysis. Land Econ 79: 292–308. doi:10.3368/le.79.2.292
Dresner S, Ekins P (2006) Design of environmentally and socially conscious water metering tariffs for the UK. J Environ Plan Manag 49(6): 909–928. doi:10.1080/09640560600947048
Environment Agency (2008a) Water resources in England and Wales—current state and future pressures. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK. http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/GEHO1208BPAS-E-E.pdf. Cited 1 Aug 2012
Environment Agency (2008b) The costs and benefits of moving to full water metering. Science Report SC070016/SR1 (WP2). Environment Agency, Bristol, UK. http://www.swanforum.com/uploads/5/7/4/3/5743901/_env_agency.pdf. Cited 1 Aug 2012
Environment Agency (2010) Underground, under threat—the state of groundwater in England and Wales. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/GEHO0906BLDB-E-E.pdf. Cited 1 Aug 2012
Herrington P (2007) Waste not, want not? Water tariffs for sustainability. A report to WWF-UK, centre for sustainable energy. The CREATE Centre, UK
Kennickell A, Kwast M (1997) Who uses electronic banking? Results from the 1995 survey of consumer finances. Board of governors of the federal reserve system, finance and economics discussion paper series: 1997/35
Kyle J (2009) Economic and econometric analysis of the demand effect of water metering. Unpublished MPhil thesis, University of East Anglia
Manski CF, Lerman SR (1977) The estimation of choice probabilities from choice-based samples. Econometrica 45: 1977–1988
OECD (2010) Pricing water resources and water and sanitation services. OECD studies on water, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/9789264083608-en
Office of National Statistics (2011) Regional profile: east of England. http://www.statistics.gov.uk. Cited 1 September 2011
OFWAT (2010) Delivering sustainable water—of what’s strategy. http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/aboutofwat/reports/. Cited 1 September 2011
StataCorp (2009) Stata statistical software: release 11. StataCorp LP, College Station
Ueda T (2010) Demand effects and social welfare of water metering in East Anglia. Unpublished MSc thesis, University of East Anglia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ueda, T., Moffatt, P.G. A Socially Efficient Water Tariff Under the English Optional Metering Scheme. Environ Resource Econ 54, 495–523 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9603-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9603-1