Abstract
This paper addresses the impact of endogenous technology through research and development (R&D) on the timing of climate change policy. We develop a model with a stock pollutant (carbon dioxide) and abatement technological change through R&D, and we use the model to study the interaction between carbon taxes and innovation externalities. Our analysis shows that the timing of optimal emission reduction policy strongly depends on the set of policy instruments available. When climate-specific R&D targeting instruments are available, policy has to use these to step up early innovation. When these instruments are not available, policy has to steer innovation through creating demand for emission saving technologies. That is, carbon taxes should be high compared to the Pigouvian levels when the abatement industry is developing. Finally, we calibrate the model in order to explore the magnitude of the theoretical findings within the context of climate change policy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Bovenberg AL, de Mooij RA (1994) Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. Am Econ Rev 84: 1085–1089
BP Statistical Review of World Energy. June 2006. http://www.bp.com/productlanding.do?categorupId=6929&contentId=7044622
Bramoulle Y, Olson LJ (2005) Allocation of pollution abatement under learning by doing. J Public Econ 89: 1935–1960
Chou C, Shy O (1993) The crowding-out effects of long duration of patents. Rand J Econ 24(2): 304–312
Dixit A, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67: 297–308
Encaoua D, Ulph D (2004) Catching-up or leapfrogging? The effects of competition on innovation and growth. Updated version of report 2000.97. Economie Mathematique et Applications, Paris
Gerlagh R, Lise W (2005) Carbon taxes: a drop in the ocean, or a drop that erodes the stone? The effect of carbon taxes on technological change. Ecol Econ 54: 241–260
Gerlagh R, van der Zwaan BCC (2004) A sensitivity analysis on timing and costs of greenhouse gas abatement, calculations with DEMETER. Clim Change 65: 39–71
Gerlagh R, Kverndokk S, Rosendahl KE (2008) Linking environmental and innovation policy, Nota di Lavoro 53.2008, FEEM—Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
Golombek R, Hoel M (2005) Climate policy under technology spillover. Environ Res Econ 31: 201–227
Goulder LH, Mathai K (2000) Optimal CO2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change. J Environ Econ Manag 39: 1–38
Greaker M, Pade L-L, Optimal CO2 abatement and technological change—should emission taxes start high to spur R&D? Discussion paper 548, Statistics Norway, Norway
Grübler A, Messner S (1998) Technological change and the timing of mitigation measures. Energy Econ 20: 495–512
Ha-Duong M, Grubb MJ, Hourcade JC (1997) Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement. Nature 390: 270–273
Hartman R, Kwon OS (2005) Sustainable growth and the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Dyn Control 29: 1701–1736
Hart R (2008) The timing of taxes on CO2 emissions when technological change is endogenous. J Env Econ Manag 55: 194–212
Hoel M (1996) Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors. J Public Econ 59: 17–32
IEA (2002) Renewables information 2002. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2005) World energy outlook 2005. OECD/IEA, Paris
IPCC (1995) Climate change 1994. Radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emission scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA
IPCC (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios (SRES). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA(1996) The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA
Isoard S, Soria A (2001) Technical change dynamics: evidence from the emerging renewable energy technologies. Energy Econ 23: 619–636
Iwaisako T, Futagami K (2003) Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. J Econ 78: 239–258
Judd KL (1985) On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53: 567–585
Knapp KE (1999) Exploring energy technology substitution for reducing atmoshperic carbon emissions. Energy J 20(2): 121–143
Kverndokk S, Rosendahl KE, Rutherford TF (2004) Climate policies and induced technological change: which to choose, the carrot or the stick?. Environ Res Econ 27(1): 21–41
Kverndokk S, Rosendahl KE (2007) Climate policies and learning by doing: impacts and timing of technology subsidies. Res Energy Econ 29: 58–82
Lieberman MB (1984) The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. Rand J Econ 15: 213–228
Liski M (2002) Taxing average emissions to overcome the shutdown problem. J Public Econ 85: 363–384
Manne A, Richels R (2004) The impact of learning-by-doing on the timing and costs of CO 2 abatement. Energy Econ (Special Issue) 26: 603–619
Nordhaus WD (1969) Theory of innovation, an economic theory of technological change. Am Econ Rev 59: 18–28
Nordhaus WD (2002) Modeling induced innovation in climate-change policy. In: Grübler A, Nakicenovic N, Nordhaus WD (eds), Modeling induced innovation in climate-change policy, Chap. 9. Resources for the Future Press, Washington
Popp D (2004) ENTICE: endogenous technological change in the DICE model of global warming. J Environ Econ Manag 48: 742–768
Rivers N, Jaccard M (2006) Choice of environmental policy in the presence of learning by doing. Energy Econ 28: 223–242
Romer PM (1987) Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. Am Econ Rev 77(2): 56–62
Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5): 71–102
Rosendahl KE (2004) Cost-effective environmental policy: implications of induced technological change. J Environ Econ Manag 48: 1099–1121
Söderholm P, Klaassen G (2007) Wind power in Europe: a simultaneous innovation-diffusion model. Energy Res Econ 36: 163–190
Söderholm P, Sundqvist T (2006) Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies. Renew Energy 32: 2559–2578
Stern review on the economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA
van der Zwaan BCC, Gerlagh R, Klaassen GAJ, Schrattenholzer L (2002) Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling. Energy Econ 24: 1–19
Wigley TML, Richels R, Edmonds JA (1996) Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 379: 240–379
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerlagh, R., Kverndokk, S. & Rosendahl, K.E. Optimal Timing of Climate Change Policy: Interaction Between Carbon Taxes and Innovation Externalities. Environ Resource Econ 43, 369–390 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9271-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9271-y