Abstract
Understanding and considering the distribution of per capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is important in designing international climate change proposals and incentives for participation. I evaluate historic international emissions distributions and forecast future distributions to assess whether per capita emissions have been converging or will converge. I find evidence of convergence among 23 member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), whereas emissions appear to be diverging for an 88-country global sample over 1960–2000. Forecasts based on a Markov chain transition matrix provide little evidence of future emissions convergence and indicate that emissions may diverge in the near term. I also review the shortcomings of environmental Kuznets curve regressions and structural models in characterizing future emissions distributions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J. E. Aldy (2005a) ArticleTitle‘An Environmental Kuznets Curve Analysis of U.S. State-Level Carbon Dioxide Emissions’ Journal of Environment and Development (EPA Special Issue) 14 IssueID1 48–72
Aldy, J. E. (2005b), Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Convergence or Divergence? RFF Discussion Paper 05–53. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. November.
R. J. Barro X. Sala-i-Martin (1992) ArticleTitle‘Convergence’ Journal of Political Economy 100 IssueID2 223–251 Occurrence Handle10.1086/261816
D. Bodansky (2004) International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches Pew Center on Global Climate Change Arlington, VA
G. A. Carlino L. O. Mills (1993) ArticleTitle‘Are U.S. Regional Incomes Converging? A Time Series Analysis’ Journal of Monetary Economics 32 335–346 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-3932(93)90009-5
Climate Action Network. (1997), Diversionary Tactics. Eco 98(6). Dec. 6. http://www. climatenetwork.org/eco/eco6_cop3.html#contents, accessed Nov. 3, 2005.
G. Elliott T. J. Rothenberg J. H. Stock (1996) ArticleTitle‘Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root’ Econometrica 64 IssueID4 813–836
P. Evans G. Karras (1996) ArticleTitle‘Convergence Revisited’ Journal of Monetary Economics 37 249–265
M. Friedman (1992) ArticleTitle‘Do Old Fallacies Ever Die?’ Journal of Economic Literature 30 2129–2231
J. T. Houghton Y. Ding D. J. Griggs M. Noguer P. J. Linden Particlevan der X. Dai K. Maskell C. A. Johnson (Eds) (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK
K. S. Im M. H. Pesaran Y. Shin (2003) ArticleTitle‘Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels’ Journal of Econometrics 115 53–74 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
InstitutionalAuthorNameIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
C. I. Jones (1997) ArticleTitle‘On the Evolution of the World Income Distribution’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 IssueID3 19–36
M. Kremer A. Onatski J. Stock (2001) ArticleTitle‘Searching for Prosperity’ Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 55 275–303 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00060-4
K. Lee M. H. Pesaran R. Smith (1997) ArticleTitle‘Growth and Convergence in a Multi-Country Empirical Stochastic Solow Model’ Journal of Applied Econometrics 12 IssueID4 357–392 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199707)12:4<357::AID-JAE441>3.0.CO;2-T
J. Leggett W. J. Pepper R. J. Swart (1992) ‘Emissions Scenarios for IPCC: An Update’ J. T. Houghton B. A. Callander S. K. Varney (Eds) Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. CUP Cambridge
J. A. List (1999) ArticleTitle‘Have Air Pollutant Emissions Converged Among U.S. Regions? Evidence from Unit Root Tests’ Southern Economic Journal 66 IssueID1 144–155
Marland, G., T. A. Boden and R. J. Andres (2003), ‘Global, Regional, and National CO2 Emissions’, in Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center.
S. Ng P. Perron (2001) ArticleTitle‘Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power’ Econometrica 69 IssueID6 1519–1554 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0262.00256
D. Quah (1993a) ArticleTitle‘Empirical Cross-Section Dynamics in Economic Growth’ European Economic Review 37 426–434 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0014-2921(93)90031-5
D. Quah (1993b) ArticleTitle‘Galton’s Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis’ Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95 IssueID4 427–443
R. Schmalensee T. M. Stoker R. A. Judson (1998) ArticleTitle‘World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 1950–2050’ Review of Economics and Statistics 80 IssueID1 15–27 Occurrence Handle10.1162/003465398557294
Soz, S. (1997), India Rejects Incorporation of New Environmental Commitments for Developing Countries (transcript of speech). Presented at the 3rd Session of the Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto, Japan, December 8. http://www.indianembassy.org/policy/Environment/soz.htm.
M. C. Strazicich J. A. List (2003) ArticleTitle‘Are CO2 Emission Levels Converging Among Industrial Countries?’ Environmental and Resource Economics 24 263–271 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022910701857
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Joseph E. Aldy: This research was supported by the Repsol YPF/John F. Kennedy School of Government Energy Policy program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s STAR program, the Switzer Foundation, and the Udall Foundation. Elsa V. Artadi, David Cutler, Gary Chamberlain, Bryan Graham, Bill Hogan, Caroline Hoxby, John List, Kip Viscusi, two anonymous referees, and seminar participants at Harvard University, the Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, and the University of Kentucky provided valuable comments on the draft manuscript. Any errors that remain are solely the responsibility of the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aldy, J.E. Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Convergence or Divergence?. Environ Resource Econ 33, 533–555 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6160-x
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6160-x