Abstract
Large disparities between willingness to accept (WTA) and willingness to pay (WTP) based values of statistical life are commonly encountered in empirical studies. Standard economic theory suggests that if a public good is easily substitutable there should be no marked disparity between WTA and WTP values for the good, though the disparity increases with reduced substitutability. However, psychologists have shown that people often treat gains and losses asymmetrically and tend to require a substantially larger increase in wealth to compensate for a loss than the amount they would be willing to pay for an equivalent gain. Although most transport projects may aim to improve safety, situations arise when a relaxation of an existing regulation saves resources but increases the risk of death and injuries. A survey was recently carried out in New Zealand to determine people’s willingness to pay to reduce road risks and their willingness to accept compensation for an increase in risk. This paper reports the disparity observed between the two measures and considers some of the problems posed for policymakers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J. Baron J. Greene (1996) ArticleTitle‘Determinants of Insensitivity to Quantity in Valuation of Public Goods: Contribution, Warm Glow, Budget Constraints, Availability and Prominence’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2 107–125 Occurrence Handle10.1037/1076-898X.2.2.107
I. J. Bateman A. Munro B. Rhodes C. Starmer R. Sugden (1997) ArticleTitle‘A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 IssueID2 479–505 Occurrence Handle10.1162/003355397555262
J. Beattie J. Covey P. Dolan L. Hopkins M. Jones-Lee N. Pidgeon a. Robinson A. Spencer (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation, Part 1: Caveat Investigator’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17 5–25 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007711416843
Burton A., S. Chilton and M. Jones (2000), ‘The WTA/WTP Discrepancy – A Preliminary Qualitative Examination’, Environmental Values 9, 481–491.
D. L. Coursey J. L. Hovis W. D. Schulze (1987) ArticleTitle‘The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 IssueID3 679–690 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1884223
W. R. Dubourg M. Jones-Lee G. Loomes (1997) ArticleTitle‘Imprecise Preferences and Survey Design in Contingent Valuation’ Economica 64 681–702 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0335.00106
Guria, J. C, W. Jones, M. W. Jones-Lee, J. Leung, G. Loomes and M. Keall (1999), The Values of Statistical Life and Prevention of Injuries. Draft Report.
W. M. Hanemann (1991) ArticleTitle‘Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’ American Economic Review 81 IssueID3 635–646
D. Kahneman J. L. Knetsch R. H. Thaler (1990) ArticleTitle‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’ Journal of Political Economy 98 1325–1348 Occurrence Handle10.1086/261737
D. Kahneman I. Ritov D. Schkade (1999) ArticleTitle‘Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions? An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19 203–235 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007835629236
A. Krupnick A. Alberini M. Cropper N. Simon B. O’Brien R. Goeree M. Heintzelman (2002) ArticleTitle‘Age, Health and the Willingness To Pay for Mortality Risk Reductions: A Contingent Valuation Study of Ontario Residents’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24 161–186 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014020027011
T. R. Miller J. C. Guria (1991) The Value of Statistical Life in New Zealand: Market Research on Road Safety Land Transport Division, Ministry of Transport Wellington
J. F. Shogren S. Y. Shin D. J. Hayes J. B. Kliebenstein (1994) ArticleTitle‘Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept’ American Economic Review 84 IssueID1 255–270
Sugden, R. (1999), ‘Public Goods and Contingent Valuation’, Chapter 5, pp. 131--152, and ‘Alternatives to the Neo-classical Theory of Choice’, Chapter 6, pp. 152--181 in I. Bateman I and K. Willis, eds., Valuing Environmental Preferences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A. Tversky D. Kahneman (1991) ArticleTitle‘Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 1039–1061 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2937956
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guria, J., Leung, J., Jones-Lee, M. et al. The Willingness to Accept Value of Statistical Life Relative to the Willingness to Pay Value: Evidence and Policy Implications. Environ Resource Econ 32, 113–127 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6030-6
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6030-6