Abstract
This article elaborates and extends Sutherland’s [Principles of criminology (4th ed.), Lippincott, Philadelphia, Sutherland (1947)] concept of differential social organization, the sociological counterpart to his social psychological theory of differential association. Differential social organization contains a static structural component, which explains crime rates across groups, as well as a dynamic collective action component, which explains changes in crime rates over time. I argue that by drawing on George Herbert Mead’s [Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Mead (1934)] theories of symbolic interaction and social control, we can conceptualize organization in favor of, and against, crime as collective behavior. We can then integrate theoretical mechanisms of models of collective behavior, including social network ties, collective action frames, and threshold models of collective action. I illustrate the integrated theory using examples of social movements against crime, neighborhood collective efficacy, and the code of the street.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4 (pp. 71–81). New York: Academic.
Becker, H. S. (1953). Becoming a marijuana user. American Sociological Review, 59, 235–242.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control, vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1–45.
Blau, P. (1974). Parameters of social structure. American Sociological Review, 39, 615–635.
Blumer, H. (1939). Collective behavior. In R. E. Park (Ed.), Principles of sociology. New York: Barnes & Noble.
Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1987). Characterizing criminal careers. Science, 237, 985–991.
Burgess, R. L., & Akers R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 19, 101–113.
Carpendale, J. I. M. (2000). Kohlberg and piaget on stages of moral reasoning. Developmental Review, 20, 181–205.
Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of juvenile gangs. New York: Free.
Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (Eds.) (1987). The measurement of moral judgement, vol. 1–2. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., Lieberman, M., Fisher, K., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgement. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48, 1–124.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Coser, R. (1975). The complexity of roles as seedbed of individual autonomy. In L. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure: Essays in honor of Robert Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money. Glencoe, Illinois: Free.
Cressey, D. R. (1960). Epidemiology and individual conduct: A case from criminology. Pacific Sociological Review, 3, 47–58.
Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover.
Emerson, M. O., Yancy, G., & Chai, K. J. (2001). Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans. American Sociological Review, 66, 922–935.
Fine, G. A., & Kleinman, S. (1979). Rethinking subculture: An interactionist analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1–20.
Fireman, B., & Gamson, W. A. (1979). Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective. In M. N. Zald & J. D. McCarthy (Eds.), The dynamics of social movements (pp. 8–44). Cambridge: Winthrop.
Galliher, J. F., & Walker A. (1977). The Puzzle of the Social Origins of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Social Problems, 24, 367–376.
Gamson, W. A. (1990). Strategy of social protest (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Gaylord, M. S. & Galliher J. F. (1988). The criminology of Edwin Sutherland. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper Colophon.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420–1443.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
Grattet, R., Jenness, V., & Curry, T. (1998). The homogenization and differentiation of hate crime law in the United States, 1978–1995: Innovation and diffusion in the criminalization of bigotry. American Sociological Review, 63, 286–307.
Himmelstein, J. L. (1983). The strange career of marihuana: politics and ideology of drug control in America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Horowitz, R. (1983). Honor and the American dream. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Jenness, V., & Broad, K. (1997). Hate crimes. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Jenness, V., & Grattet, R. (2001). Making hate a crime: From social movement to law enforcement. New York: Russell Sage.
Joas, H. (1985). George Herbert Mead: A contemporary reexamination of his thought. Cambridge: Polity (translated by R. Meyer).
Killian, L., & Turner, R. (1972). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children’s orientation toward a moral order: I. Sequence in the development of moral thought. Vita Humana, 6, 11–33.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Lyons, C. J. (2006). Social (dis)organization and racially motivated crime in Chicago. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Washington.
Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: a casual modeling approach. American sociological review, 47, 489–504.
Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime and Delinquency, 34, 277–306.
Matsueda, R. L. (2006). Criminological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead. In M. Deflem (Ed.), Sociological theory and criminological research: views from Europe and the United States. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
Matsueda, R. L., & Heimer, K. (1997). A symbolic interactionist theory of role transitions, role, commitments, and delinquency. In T. Thornberry (Ed.), Advances in criminology theory: developmental theories of crime and delinquency,, vol. 7 (pp. 163–214). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: Wiley.
McCarthy, J. D. (1994). Activists, authorities, and media framing of drunk driving. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, & J. Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity (pp. 133–167). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (edited by A. J. Reck).
Miller, D. L. (1973). George Herbert Mead: Self, language, and the world. Austin, Texas: University of Texas.
Morenoff, J., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517–560.
Pattillo-McCoy, M. (1999). Black picket fences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sampson, R. J. (2004). Neighborhood and community: Collective efficacy and community safety. New Economy, 11, 106–113.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–651.
Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Revised edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shibutani, T. (1955). Reference groups as perspectives. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 562–569.
Short, J. F. Jr., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1965). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: social and rational. New York: Wiley.
Small, M. L. (2002). Culture, cohorts, and social organization theory: Understanding local participation in a latino housing project. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 1–54.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Snow, D. A., & Oliver, P. E. (1995). Social movements and collective behavior: Social psychological dimensions and considerations. In K. S. Cook, G. A., Fine & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 571–599).
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B. Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment process, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.
Sutherland, E H., (1926). The biological and sociological processes. Papers and Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Society, 20, 58–65.
Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Sutherland, E. H. (1973 [1942]). Development of the theory. In K. Schuessler (Ed.), Edwin H. Sutherland on analyzing crime (pp. 13–29). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sutherland, E. H. (1973 [1943]). Wartime crime. In K. Schuessler (Ed.), Edwin H. Sutherland on analyzing crime (pp. 120–128). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sweetser, F. L., Jr. (1942). A new emphasis for neighborhood research. American Sociological Review, 7, 525–533.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.
Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the community. Boston: Ginn and Co.
Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1958 [1918]). The polish peasant in Europe and America, vols.1 and 2. New York: Dover.
Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, R., & Killian, L. (1957). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Venkatesh, S. (2000). American project: The rise and fall of a Modern Ghetto. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsueda, R.L. Differential social organization, collective action, and crime. Crime Law Soc Change 46, 3–33 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9045-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9045-1