Abstract
Many of the methods currently employed to restore Chesapeake Bay populations of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, assume closed recruitment in certain sub-estuaries despite planktonic larval durations of 2–3 weeks. In addition, to combat parasitic disease, artificially selected disease tolerant oyster strains are being used for population supplementation. It has been impossible to fully evaluate these unconventional tactics because offspring from wild and selected broodstock are phenotypically indistinguishable. This study provides the first direct measurement of oyster recruitment enhancement by using genetic assignment tests to discriminate locally produced progeny of a selected oyster strain from progeny of wild parents. Artificially selected oysters (DEBY strain) were planted on a single reef in each of two Chesapeake Bay tributaries in 2002, but only in the Great Wicomico River (GWR) were they large enough to potentially reproduce the same year. Assignment tests based on eight microsatellite loci and mitochondrial DNA markers were applied to 1579 juvenile oysters collected throughout the GWR during the summer of 2002. Only one juvenile oyster was positively identified as an offspring of the 0.75 million DEBY oysters that were planted in the GWR, but 153 individuals (9.7%) had DEBY ×wild F1 multilocus genotypes. Because oyster recruitment was high across the region in 2002, the proportionately low enhancement measured in the GWR would not otherwise have been recognized. Possible causes for low enhancement success are discussed, each bearing on untested assumptions underlying the restoration methods, and all arguing for more intensive evaluation of each component of the restoration strategy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen SK, Brumbaugh RD, Schulte D (2003) Terraforming Chesapeake Bay. Virginia Marine Res. Bull. 35: 2–8
Baker P, Mann R (2003) Late stage bivalve larvae in a well-mixed estuary are not inert particles. Estuaries 26: 837–845
Banks MA, Eichert W, Olsen JB (2003) Which genetic loci have greater population assignment power?. Bioinformatics, 19: 1436–1438
Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2001) GENETIX 4.02, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France)
Bernatchez L, Duchesne P (2000) Individual-based genotype analysis in studies of parentage and population assignment: how many loci, how many alleles? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 1–12
Bierne N, Launey S, Naciri-Graven Y, Bonhomme F (1998) Early effect of inbreeding as revealed by microsatellite analyses on Ostrea edulis larvae. Genetics 148: 1893–1906
Boesch D, Burreson E, Dennison W, et al. (2001) Factors in the decline of coastal ecosystems. Science 293: 1589–1590
Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q. Rev. Biol. 74: 21–45
Brown BL, Franklin DE, Gaffney P, et al. (2000) Characterization of microsatellite loci in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Mol. Ecol. 9: 2155–2234
Brumbaugh RD, Sorabella LA, Garcia CO, Goldsborough WJ, Wesson JA (2000) Making a case for community-based oyster restoration: an example from Hampton Roads, Virginia, USA. J. Shellfish Res. 19: 467–472
Burreson EM, Ragone Calvo L (1996) Epizootiology of Perkinsus marinus disease of oysters in Chesapeake Bay, with emphasis on data since 1985. J. Shellfish Res. 15: 17–34
Campbell D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2003) AFLP utility for population assignment studies: analytical investigation and empirical comparison with microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 12: 1979–1991
Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153: 1989–2000
Cox C, Mann R (1992) Temporal and spatial changes in fecundity of eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791) in the James River, Virginia. J. Shellfish Res. 11: 49–54
Davies N, Villablanca FX, Roderick GK (1999) Determining the source of individuals: multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 14q: 17–21
Estoup A, Largiader CR, Cornuet J-M, et al. (2000) Juxtaposed microsatellite systems as diagnostic markers for admixture: an empirical evaluation with brown trout (Salmo trutta) as model organism. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1873–1886
Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567–1587
Galtsoff P (1938) Physiology of reproduction of Ostrea virginica II. Simulation of spawning in the female oyster. Biol. Bull. 75: 286–307
Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, A Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices (version 2.9.3). Institut de Zoologie et d’Ecologie Animale, Universite de Lausane, Lucerne
Guinand B, Scribner KT, Topchy A, Page KS, Punch W, Burnham-Curtis MK (2004) Sampling issues affecting accuracy of likelihood-based classification using genetical data. Environ. Biol. Fishes 69: 245–259
Hansen MM, Kenchington E, Nielsen EE (2001) Assigning individual fish to populations using microsatellite markers: methods and applications. Fish Fisher. 2: 93–112
Hare MP, Avise JC (1996) Molecular genetic analysis of a stepped multilocus cline in the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica). Evolution 50: 2305–2315
Hilbish TJ (1996) Population genetics of marine species: the interaction of natural selection and historically differentiated populations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 200: 67–83
Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, et al. (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293: 629–638
Jones GP, Milicich MJ, Emslie MJ, Lunow C (1999) Self-recruitment in a coral reef fish population. Nature 402: 802–804
Kennedy V (1996) Biology of larvae and spat. In: The Eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica (eds. Kennedy V, Newell RIE, Eble AF), p. 734. Maryland Sea Grant, College Park.
Kinlan BP, Gaines S (2003) Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: a community perspective. Ecology 84: 2007–2020
Launey S, Hedgecock D (2001) High genetic load in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Genetics 159: 255–265
Luckenbach M, Mann R, Wesson JE (1999) Oyster Reef Habitat Restoration: A Synopsis of Approaches, p. 366. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA.
Manel S, Gaggiotti OE, Waples RS (2005) Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 20: 136–142
Mann R (2000) Restoring the oyster reef communities in the Chesapeake Bay: A commentary. J. Shellfish Res. 19: 335–339
Milbury CA (2003) Using mitochondrial DNA markers to monitor oyster stock enhancement in the Choptank River, Chesapeake Bay. MS thesis, University of Delaware
Milbury CA, Meritt DW, Newell RIE, Gaffney PM (2004) Mitochondrial DNA markers allow monitoring of oyster stock enhancement in the Chesapeake Bay. Mar. Biol. 145: 351–359
Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 164–165
Neigel JE (1997) A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating gene flow from genetic markers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 105–128
Paetkau D, Shields GF, Strobeck C (1998) Gene flow between insular, coastal and interior populations of brown bears in Alaska. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1283–1292
Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A (2004) Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol. Ecol. 13: 55–65
Palumbi S (1996) Macrospatial genetic structure and speciation in marine taxa with high dispersal abilities. In: Ferraris J, Palumbi S (eds), Molecular Zoology: Advances, Strategies, and Protocol. Wiley, New York, pp. 101–117
Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet J-M, et al. (2004) GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J. Hered. 95: 536–539
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959
Ragone Calvo L, Burreson EM (2003) Status of the major oyster diseases in Virginia—2002. A summary of the annual monitoring program. In: Virginia Institute of Marine Science Marine Resource Reports. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia.
Ragone Calvo L, Calvo GW, Burreson EM (2003) Dual disease resistance in a selectively bred eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, strain tested in Chesapeake Bay. Aquaculture 220: 69–87
Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9197–9201
Reeb CA, Avise JC (1990) A genetic discontinuity in a continuously distributed species: mitochondrial DNA in the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Genetics 124: 397–406
Reece KS, Ribeiro WL, Gaffney PM, Carnegie RB, Allen SK (2004) Microsatellite marker development and analysis in the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica): confirmation of null alleles and non-Mendelian segregation ratios. J. Hered. 95: 346–352
Roques S, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (1999) Potential of microsatellites for individual assignment: the North Atlantic redfish (genus Sebastes) species complex as a case study. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1703–1717
Rose CG, Paynter KT, Hare MP (2006) Isolation by distance in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, in Chesapeake Bay. J. Hered.
Shanks AL, Grantham BA, Carr MH (2003) Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 13: S159–S169
Siegel DA, Kinlan BP, Gaylord B, Gaines SD (2003) Lagrangian descriptions of marine larval dispersal. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 260: 83–96
Southworth M, Harding JM, Mann R (2004) The Status of Virginia’s Public Oyster Resource 2003, p.55. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA.
Southworth M, Mann R (1998) Oyster reef broodstock enhancement in the Great Wicomico River, Virginia. J. Shellfish Res. 17: 1101–1114
Swearer SE, Caselle JE, Lea DW, Warner RR (1999) Larval retention and recruitment in an island population of a coral-reef fish. Nature 402: 799–802
Thompson R, Newell R, Kennedy V, Mann R (1996) Reproductive processes and early development. In: Kennedy V, Newell RIE, Eble AF (eds), The Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica. Maryland Sea Grant, College Park, pp. 335–370
Thorrold SR, Jones GP, Hellberg ME, et al. (2002) Quantifying larval retention and connectivity in marine populations with artificial and natural markers. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70: 291–308
Thorrold SR, Latkoczy C, Swart PK, Jones CM (2001) Natal homing in a marine fish metapopulation. Science 291: 297–299
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2003) Final Decision Document Amendment Section 704(b) as Amended, Chesapeake Bay oyster Recovery Phase III, Great Wicomico River, Virginia, p. 117. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, Norfolk, VA
Wang JL, Ryman N (2001) Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conserv. Biol. 15: 1619–1631
Waples RS (1998) Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J. Hered. 89: 438–450
Waples RS, Do C (1994) Genetic risk associated with supplementation of Pacific Salmonids: captive broodstock programs. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 310–329
Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370
Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1999) Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: Fst ≠ 1/(4Nm+1). Heredity 82: 117–125
Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163: 1177–1191
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to the cooperative efforts of several oyster restoration organizations and individuals that facilitated this research. In Maryland, construction of the artificial oyster reef and planting of DEBY oysters was done by the Oyster Recovery Partnership at the direction of Charlie Frentz. We␣appreciate help with spat collections by Cori Milbury, Stephanie Tobash, Horn Point hatchery interns and the Hare lab. In Virginia, coordination with restoration activities was achieved with the help of Rob Brumbaugh and Tommy Leggett of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation who oversaw nursery culture and planting of DEBYs in the GWR. We thank P.G. Ross, Jr., Alan Birch, Joshua Smith, Julie Stubbs and Gail Scott for help with spat collection and processing. Helpful comments have been provided by H. Wang, R. Mann, J. Harding, M. Southworth, W. Delport and members of the Hare lab. This work was funded by the Oyster Disease Research Program of NOAA/Sea Grant. VIMS contribution 2710.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hare, M., Allen, S., Bloomer, P. et al. A genetic test for recruitment enhancement in Chesapeake Bay oysters, Crassostrea virginica, after population supplementation with a disease tolerant strain. Conserv Genet 7, 717–734 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9108-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9108-3