Abstract
Geoengineering research has historically been inhibited by fears that the perceived availability of a technological fix for climate change, such as the deployment of space-based deflectors, may undermine greenhouse gas abatement efforts. I develop a game theoretic model to show that the credible threat of unilateral geoengineering may instead strengthen global abatement and lead to a self-enforcing climate treaty with full participation. A ‘rogue nation’ may wish to unilaterally geoengineer if it faces extreme climate damages (as with Tuvalu), or if there are minimal local side effects from geoengineering, such as hydrological cycle disruption or stratospheric ozone depletion. However, the costly global side effects of geoengineering may make it individually rational for other countries to reduce emissions to the level where this rogue nation no longer wishes to unilaterally geoengineer. My results suggest a need to model the impacts of a “selfish geoengineer” intent only on maximizing net domestic benefits, as well as a “benevolent geoengineer” out to restore global mean temperature and minimize global side effects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aldy JE, Barrett S, Stavins RN (2003) Thirteen plus one: a comparison of global climate policy architectures. Clim Policy 3(4):373–397
Angel R (2006) Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(46):17184–17189. doi:10.1073/pnas.0608163103
Bala G, Duffy PB, Taylor KE (2008) Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(22):7664–7669. doi:10.1073/pnas.0711648105
Ban-Weiss GA, Caldeira K (2010) Geoengineering as an optimization problem. Environ Res Lett 5(034009):1–9
Barrett S (1994) Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxf Econ Pap 46:878–894
Barrett S (1997) The strategy of trade sanctions in international environmental agreements. Resour Energy Econ 19(4):345–361
Barrett S (2005) The theory of international environmental agreements. In: Mäler K-G, Vincent JR (eds) Handbook of environmental economics, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1458–1516
Barrett S (2006) Climate treaties and “breakthrough” technologies. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 96(2):22–25
Barrett S (2008) The incredible economics of geoengineering. Environ Resour Econ 39(1):45–54
Barrett S (2011) Climate treaties and approaching catastrophes. Working Paper
Barrett S, Stavins R (2003) Increasing participation and compliance in international climate change agreements. Int Environ Agreem-P 3(4):349–376
Blackstock JJ, Battisti DS, Caldeira K, Eardley DM, Katz JI, Keith DW, Patrinos AAN, Schrag DP, Socolow RH, Koonin SE (2009) Climate Engineering Responses to Climate Emergencies. Novim, Santa Barbara
Bodansky D (1996) May we engineer the climate? Clim Change 33(3):309–321
Boucher O, Lowe JA, Jones CD (2009) Implications of delayed actions in addressing carbon dioxide emission reduction in the context of geo-engineering. Clim Change 92:261–273
Brovkin V, Petoukhov V, Claussen M, Bauer E, Archer D, Jaeger C (2009) Geoengineering climate by stratospheric sulfur injections: earth system vulnerability to technological failure. Clim Change 92(3/4):243–259
Carraro C (1998) Beyond Kyoto: a game theoretic perspective. Prepared for OECD workshop, “Climate Change and Economic Modelling. Background Analysis for the Kyoto Protocol,” Paris
Chou P, Sylla C (2008) The formation of an international environmental agreement as a two-stage exclusive cartel formation game with transferable utilities. Int Environ Agreem-P 8(4):317–341. doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9082-6
Cicerone RJ (2006) Geoengineering: encouraging research and overseeing implementation. Clim Change 77:221–226
EcoEquity and Christian Aid (2006) Greenhouse development rights
Finus M (2008) Game theoretic research on the design of international environmental agreements: insights, critical remarks, and future challenges. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 2(1):29–67
Finus M, Saiz ME, Hendrix EMT (2009) An empirical test of new developments in coalition theory for the design of international environmental agreements. Environ Dev Econ 14:117–137. doi:10.1017/s1355770x08004634
Fleming JR (2007) The climate engineers. Wilson Quarterly (Spring 2007): 46–60
Fleming JR (2010) Fixing the Sky. The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control. Columbia University Press, New York
Frankel J (2008) An elaborated proposal for global climate policy architecture: specific formulas and emission targets for all countries in all decades. Discussion Paper 08–08, Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, Cambridge
Heckendorn P, Weisenstein D, Fueglistaler S, Luo BP, Rozanov E, Schraner M, Thomason LW, Peter T (2009) The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone. Environ Res Lett 4:045108
Irvine PJ, Ridgwell A, Lunt DJ (2010) Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts. Geophys Res Lett 37(L18702):1–6. doi:10.1029/2010GL044447
Jones A, Haywood J, Boucher O (2009) Climate impacts of geoengineering marine stratocumulus clouds. J Geophys Res 114:D10106. doi:10.1029/2008JD011450
Keith DW (2000) Geoengineering the climate: history and prospect. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25(1):245–284
Kotowitz Y (2008) Moral hazard. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics online, Palgrave Macmillan
Lin AC (2009) Geoengineering governance. Issues Leg Scholars 8(3):1–24
Lunt DJ, Ridgwell A, Valdes PJ, Seale A (2008) “Sunshade World”: a fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12710. doi:10.1029/2008gl033674
MacCracken MC (2009) On the possible use of geoengineering to moderate specific climate change impacts. Environ Res Lett 4:045107. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045107
Matthews HD, Caldeira K (2007) Transient climate-carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(24):9949–9954. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700419104
Matthews HD, Cao L, Caldeira K (2009) Sensitivity of ocean acidification to geoengineered climate stabilization. Geophys Res Lett 36:L10706
Michaelson J (1998) Geoengineering: a climate change Manhattan Project. Stanf Environ Law J 17:73–140
Moreno-Cruz J (2010) Mitigation and the geoengineering threat. Working Paper
Naik V, Wuebbles DJ, DeLucia EH, Foley JA (2003) Influence of geoengineered climate on the terrestrial biosphere. Environ Manag 32(3):373–381
North DC, Weingast BR (1989) Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutional governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. J Econ Hist 49(4):803–832
Olson M (1993) Dictatorship, democracy, and development. Am Polit Sci Rev 87(3):567–576
Ridgwell A, Singarayer JS, Hetherington AM, Valdes PJ (2009) Tackling regional climate change by leaf albedo bio-geoengineering. Curr Biol 19:146–150
Robock A, Oman L, Stenchikov GL (2008) Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. J Geophys Res 113:D16101. doi:10.1029/2008jd010050
Robock A, Marquardt A, Kravitz B, Stenchikov GL (2009) Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 36:L19703
Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the climate. Science, governance and uncertainty. The Royal Society, London
Schelling TC (1996) The economic diplomacy of geoengineering. Clim Change 33:303–307
Schneider SH (1996) Geoengineering: could-or should-we do it? Clim Change 33(3):291–302
Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tilmes S, Müller R, Salawitch R (2008) The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes. Science 320(5880):1201–1204. doi:10.1126/science.1153966
Tilmes S, Garcia RR, Kinnison DE, Gettelman A, Rasch PJ (2009) Impact of geoengineered aerosols on the troposphere and stratosphere. J Geophys Res 114:D12305. doi:10.1029/2008JD011420
Trenberth KE, Dai A (2007) Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 34:L15702
Victor DG (2008) On the regulation of geoengineering. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(2):322–336. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grn018
Victor DG, Morgan MG, Apt J, Steinbruner J, Rich K (2009) The geoengineering option. Foreign Aff 88(2):64–76
Virgoe J (2009) International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change. Clim Change 95:103–119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Millard-Ball, A. The Tuvalu Syndrome. Climatic Change 110, 1047–1066 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0102-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0102-0