Abstract
Projected production responses were derived for confined swine and beef and for milk-producing dairy cattle based on climate change projections in daily ambient temperature. Milk production from dairy cattle and the number of days to grow swine and beef cattle were simulated. Values were obtained for three central United States transects and three climate scenarios which were based on projected mean daily ambient temperatures associated with a baseline, doubling, and tripling of atmospheric greenhouse gas (CO2) levels for the period June 1 to October 31. For swine, a slight northwest to southeast gradient is evident. Transect 1 (west side) shows no losses under the doubling scenario and losses up to 22.4% under the tripling scenario. Transect 3 (east side) displays losses of over 70% under the tripling scenario. For beef, positive benefits were simulated in Transect 1 with increasing temperatures, although a northwest to southeast gradient was also evident. For dairy, no positive benefits in milk production were found due to climate effects. Projected production declines ranged from 1% to 7.2%, depending on location. However, ranges in predicted differences were less than those simulated for beef and swine. These simulations suggest regional differences in animal production due to climate change will be apparent. For small changes in climate conditions, animals will likely be able to adapt, while larger changes in climate conditions will likely dictate that management strategies be implemented. Exploration of the effects of climate changes on livestock should allow producers to adjust management strategies to reduce potential impact and economic losses due to environmental changes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amundson JL, Mader TL, Rasby RJ, Hu QS (2006) Environmental effects on pregnancy rate in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 84:3415–3420
CCCMA (2000a) Canadian center for climate modeling and analysis. Available at http://www.cccma.bc.ec.gc.ca/data/cgcmI/cgcmI_daily_data.html
CCCMA (2000b) Canadian center for climate modeling and analysis. Available at http://www.cccma.bc.ec.gc.ca/models/cgcmI.html
CCCMA (2000c) Canadian center for climate modeling and analysis. Available at http://www.cccma.bc.ec.gc.ca/data/cgcmI/cgcmI_ghga.html
Easterling WE III, Crosson PR, Rosenberg NJ, McKenney MS, Katz LA, Lemon KM (1993) Agricultural impacts of and responses to climate change in the Missouri–Iowa–Nebraska–Kansas (MINK) region. Clim Change 24:23–61
Easterling WE, Aggarwal PK, Batima P, Brander KM, Erda L, Howden SM, Kirlenko A, Morton J, Soussana J-F, Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Food, fibre and forest products. In: Parry ML, Canziana OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 273–313
Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE, Dearing MD (2002) Atmospheric CO2 as a global change driver influencing plant–animal interactions. Integr Comp Biol 42:424–430
Fox DG, Tylutki TP (1998) Accounting for the effects of environment on the nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 81:3085–3095
Frank KL, Mader TL, Harrington JA Jr, Hahn GL, Davis MS, Nienaber JA (2001) Potential climate change effects on warm-season production of livestock in the United States. ASAE Paper Number: 01-3042
Hahn GL, Morgan JA (1999) Potential consequences of climate change on ruminant livestock production. Unpublished manuscript, Workshop on Global Environmental Change/National Assessment, Omaha, NE
Hahn GL, Klinedinst PL, Wilhite DA (1992) Climate change impacts on livestock production and management. Paper 92-7037, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI
Hahn GL, Brown-Brandl T, Eigenberg RA, Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Nienaber JA (2005) Climate change and livestock: challenges and adaptive responses of animals and production systems. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on biometeorology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Bavaria, Germany
Henderson-Sellers A, McGuffie K (1997) Climate models. In: Thompson RD, Perry A (eds) Applied climatology—principles and practice. Rutledge, New York, pp 36–50
IPCC (1996) Climate 1995: the science of climatic change. In: Houghton JT, Filho LGM, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (eds) Contribution of working group I to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 572 pp
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007—impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 976 pp
Klinedinst PL, Wilhite DA, Hahn GL, Hubbard KG (1993) The potential effects of climate change on summer season dairy cattle milk production and reproduction. Clim Change 23:21–36
Mader TL (2003) Environmental stress in confined beef cattle. J Anim Sci 81(electronic supplement 2):110–119
Mader TL, Davis MS (2004) Effect of management strategies on reducing heat stress of feedlot cattle: feed and water intake. J Anim Sci 82:3077–3087
Mader TL, Davis MS, Brown-Brandl T (2006) Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 84:712–719
McGregor KM (1993) Impact of climatic change on agricultural production in Kansas: a four-crop analysis. Phys Geogr 14:551–565
Mearns LO, Katz RW, Schneider SH (1984) Extreme high-temperature events: changes in their probabilities with changes in mean temperature. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:1601–1613
Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins W, Friedlingstein P, Gaye A, Gregory J, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy J, Noda A, Raper S, Watterson I, Weaver A, Zhao ZC (2007) Global climate projections. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–846
Morgan JA, Derner JD, Milchunas DG, Pendall E (2008) Management implications of global change for Great Plains rangelands. Rangelands 30(3):18–22
NCAR, National Center for Atmospheric Research (2000). Available at http://www.cad.ucar.edu/vemap/
NRC National Research Council (1987) Predicting feed intake of food-producing animals. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
NRC National Research Council (1989) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 6th revised edition update. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
NRC National Research Council (1998) Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
NRC National Research Council (2000) Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
NRC National Research Council (2001) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Nichols DA, Ames DR, Hines RH (1980) Effect of temperature on performance of finishing swine. Kansas State University Report of Progress 338, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, pp 14–16
Nienaber JA, Hahn GL (2007) Livestock production system management responses to thermal challenges. Int J Biometeorol 52:149–157
USGCRP United States Global Change Research Program (2003) Climate change impacts on the United States the potential consequences of climate variability and change overview: tools for assessing climate change impacts. Available at http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/Library/nationalassessment/overviewtools.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mader, T.L., Frank, K.L., Harrington, J.A. et al. Potential climate change effects on warm-season livestock production in the Great Plains. Climatic Change 97, 529–541 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9615-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9615-1