Abstract
The problem of avoiding dangerous climate change requires analysis from many disciplines. Mainstream economic thinking about the problem has shifted with the Stern Review from a single-discipline focus on cost-benefit analysis to a new inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary risk analysis, already evident in the IPCC Third Assessment Report. This shift is more evidence of the failure of the traditional, equilibrium approach in general to provide an adequate understanding of observed behaviour, either at the micro or macro scale. The economics of the Stern Review has been accepted by governments and the public as mainstream economic thinking on climate change, when in some critical respects it represents a radical departure from the traditional treatment. The conclusions regarding economic policy for climate change have shifted from “do little, later” to “take strong action urgently, before it is too late”. This editorial sets out four issues of critical importance to the new conclusions about avoiding dangerous climate change, each of which have been either ignored by the traditional literature or treated in a misleading way that discounts the insights from other disciplines: the complexity of the global energy-economy system (including the poverty and sustainability aspects of development), the ethics of intergenerational equity, the understanding from engineering and history about path dependence and induced technological change, and finally the politics of climate policy.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ackerman F (2004) Priceless benefits, costly mistakes: what’s wrong with cost–benefit analysis? Real-World Econ Rev 25:2–7
Ackerman F, Finlayson IJ (2007) The economics of inaction on climate change: a sensitivity analysis. Climate Policy 6(5):509–526
Ackerman F, Heinzerling L (2004) Priceless: on knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York, The New Press
Ackerman F, Nadal A (eds) (2004) The flawed foundations of general equilibrium: critical essays on economic theory. Routledge, London
Akerlof G (2007) The missing motivation in macroeconomics. AEA presidential address, January 2007
Arrow KJ (1950) A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Polit Econ 58(4):328–346
Arrow KJ (1967) Samuelson Collected. J Polit Econ 75(5):730–737
Arrow KJ (2007) Global climate change: a challenge to policy economists, economists’ voice. http://www.bepress.com/ev. Cited June
Arrow KJ, Cline W, Maler KJ, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz J (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting and economic efficiency. In: Bruce J, Lee H, Haites E (eds) Climate change 1995—economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–44
Arthur WB (1994) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, Michigan
Azar C, Lindgren K (2003) Catastrophic events and stochastic cost–benefit analysis of climate change. Clim Change 56:245–255
Baer P, Mastrandrea M (2006) High stakes designing emissions pathways to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. IPPR, London
Barker T (1996a) Essay review: a review of managing the global commons: the economics of global change, by William D Nordhaus. Energy Environ 7(1):85–88
Barker T (1996b) Space–time economics. Cambridge Econometrics, Cambridge
Barker T (1998) The use of energy-environment-economy models to inform greenhouse gas mitigation policy. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 16(2):133–131
Barker T, Pan H, Köhler J, Warren R, Winne S (2006) Decarbonizing the global economy with induced technological change: scenarios to 2100 using E3MG. Energy J 27:241–258
Barker T, Qureshi MS, Koehler J (2006) The costs of greenhouse-gas mitigation with induced technological change: a meta-analysis of estimates in the literature. 4CMR, Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Barker T, Jenkins K (2007) The costs of avoiding dangerous climate change: estimates derived from a meta-analysis of the literature. A briefing paper for the United Nations Human Development Report 2007
Barker TI, Bashmakov A, Alharthi M, Amann L, Cifuentes J, Drexhage M, Duan O, Edenhofer B, Flannery M, Grubb M, Hoogwijk FI, Ibitoye CJ, Jepma WA, Pizer K, Yamaji ‘Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective’ Chapter 11 in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Beinhocker E (2006) The origin of wealth: evolution, complexity and the radical remaking of economics. Random House Business Books, London
Boulding K (1992) Towards a new economics. Edward Elgar, Brookfield
Broome J (1992) Counting the cost of global warming. White House Press, Cambridge, UK
Broome J (2006) Valuing policies in response to climate change: some ethical issues. A contribution to the work of the Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change
Broome J (2008) Why economics needs ethical theory. In: Basu K, Kanbur R (eds) Welfare, development, philosophy and social science: essays for Amartya Sen’s 75th birthday, vol. 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cline WR (1991) The economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101(407):920–37
Cline WR (1992) The economics of global warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
Colander D, Holt R, Rosser Jr JB (2004) The changing face of mainstream economics. Rev Polit Econ 6(4):485–499
Dasgupta P (2005) What do economists analyze and why: values or facts? Econ Philos 21:221–278
Dasgupta P (2007) Comments on the Stern Review’s Economics of Climate Change. Natl Inst Econ Rev 199:4–7
Dasgupta P (2008) Discounting climate change. Rev Environ Econ Policy (in press)
David P (2001) Path dependence, its critics, and the quest for ‘historical economics’. In Garrouste P, Ioannides S (eds) Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas: past and present. Edward Elgar, London
Deaton, A (2007) Letter from America—On transatlantic vices, or Stern in America. Royal Economic Society, Newletter, October
DeCanio S (2003) Economic models of climate change a critique. Macmillan, New York
DeLong JB, Summers LH (2001) The new economy: background, historical perspective, questions, and speculations. Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp 11–43
Dequech D (2007) Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics. J Post Keynes Econ 30(2):279–302
Dietz S, Hope C, Stern N, Zenghelis D (2007) Reflections on the Stern Review (1): a robust case for strong action to reduce the risks of climate change. World Econ 8(1):121–168
Dietz S, Hope C, Patmore N (2007) Some economics of ‘dangerous’ climate change: reflections on the Stern Review. Glob Environ Change 17:311–325
Felipe J, Fisher FM (2003) Aggregation in production functions: what applied economists should know. Metroeconomica 54:208–262
Felipe J, McCombie JSL (2005) How sound are the foundations of the aggregate production function (in Symposium on the Aggregate Production Function). East Econ J 31(3):467–488
Foley D (2006) Adam’s fallacy: a guide to economic theology. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts
Frederick S, Loeenstein G, O’Donohue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit XL:351–401
Gowdy J (2005) Towards a new welfare economics for sustainability. Ecol Econ 53:211–222
Gritsevskyi A, Nakicenovic N (2000) Modelling uncertainty of induced technological change. Energy Policy 28(13):907–22
Hare RM (1981) Moral thinking. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hasselmann KS, Hasselmann R, Giering, Ocaña V, Storch Hv (1997) Sensitivity study of optimal CO2 emission paths using a simplified Structural Integrated Assessment Model (SIAM). Clim Change 37:345–386
Hasselmann K (1999) Intertemporal accounting of climate change: harmonizing economic efficiency and climate stewardship. Clim Change 41:333–350
Heal G (1997) Discounting and climate change. Clim Change 37:335–343
Heinzerling L, Ackerman F (2007) Law and economics for a changing world. Harv Law Policy Rev 1(2):331–362
Hodgson GM (2007) Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream? Evol Inst Econ Rev 4(1):7–25
Hoel M, Sterner T (2007) Discounting and relative prices. Clim Change 84:265–280
Holt R (2007) What is Post Keynesian economics? In: Forstater M, Mongiovi G, Pressman S (eds) Post Keynesian macroeconomics. Routledge, London
Hope C (2003): The marginal impacts of CO2, CH4 and SF6 emissions. Judge Institute of Management Research Paper 2003/10, University of Cambridge, UK
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva: IPCC
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1989) Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291
Katzner D (2003) Why mathematics in economics? J Post Keynes Econ 25(4):561–573
Keynes JM (1973) The general theory and after, collected writings, vol. XIV. Macmillan, London
Kirman AP (1992) Whom or what does the representative individual represent? J of Econ Perspect 6(2):117–136
Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA
Köhler J, Grubb M, Popp D, Edenhofer O (2006) The transition to endogenous technical change in climate-economy models. The Energy Journal 27:17–55
Maddison A (2001) The world economy: a millennial perspective. OECD, Paris
Maréchal K (2007) The economics of climate change and the change of climate in economics. Energy Policy 35:5181–5194
Mastrandrea MD, Schneider SH (2001) Integrated assessment of abrupt climatic changes. Climate Policy 1:433–449
Mastrandrea MD, Schneider SH (2004) Probabilistic integrated assessment of “dangerous” climate change. Science 304:571–575
Mirowski P (1989) More heat than light economics as social physics: physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge University Press, UK
Mirowski P (2002) Machine dreams economics becomes a cyborg science: light economics as social physics: physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge University Press, UK
Munda G (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrogott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science 78. Springer, Berlin, pp 953–986
Nelson JA (2006) Economics for humans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Nelson JA (2008) Economists, value judgments, and climate change: a view from feminist economics. Ecol Econ 65:441–447
Nelson RH (2001) Economics as religion from Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond. State University Press, Pennsylvania
Nordhaus WD (1991a) A sketch of the economics of the greenhouse effect. Am Econ Rev 81(2):146–50
Nordhaus WD (1991b) To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101(7):920–37
Nordhaus WD (1993) Optimal greenhouse-gas reductions and tax policy in the “DICE” Model. Am Econ Rev 83(2):313–317
Nordhaus WD (1994) Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change. MIT, Cambridge, MA
Nordhaus WD (1997) Discounting in economics and climate change. Clim Change 37:315–328
Nordhaus WD (2007a) A review of the Stern Review on the economics of global warming. J Econ Lit 45(3):686–702
Nordhaus WD (2007b) The challenge of global warming: economic models and environmental policy, July 24, 2007, Yale
Nordhaus WD Boyer J (2000) Warming the world: economic models of global warming. MIT, Cambridge, Mass
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Padilla E (2004) Climate change, economic analysis and sustainable development. Environ Values 13:523–544
Pearce DW, Cline WR, Achanta AN, Fankhauser S, Pachauri RK, Tol RSJ, Vellinga P (1996) The social costs of climate change: greenhouse damages and the benefits of control. In: Bruce J, Lee H, Haites E (eds) Climate Change 1995—economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 125–44
Popp D (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices. Am Econ Rev 92(1):160–180
Price C (2005) An intergenerational perspective on effects of environmental changes: discounting the future's viewpoint. In Innes JL, Hickey GM, Hoen HF (eds) Forestry and environmental change: socioeconomic and political dimensions. Report 5 IUFRO Task Force on environmental change
Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts
Robbins L (1932) An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Macmillan, London
Samuelson PA, Nordhaus WD (2001) Economics, 17 edition. McGraw-Hill, New York
Stern N (2006/2007) The economics of climate change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (References are to the book, published in 2007)
Tol RSJ (2005) The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 33(16):2064–2074
Tol RSJ (2007) The social cost of carbon: trends, cutliers and catastrophes. Economics Discussion Papers, 2007-44. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2007-44
Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2007) A review of the Stern Review. World Econ 7(4):233–250
van den Bergh JCJM (2004) Optimal climate policy is a utopia: from quantitative to qualitative cost-benefit analysis. Ecol Econ 48:385–393
Weintraub ER (2002) How economics became a mathematical science. Duke University Press, Durham, NC
Weitzman ML (2007) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/weitzman/files/modeling.pdf. Cited Dec 5, 2007
Williams BAO (1985) Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Routledge, London
Yohe GW (1989) A study guide to accompany Samuelson & Nordhaus. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barker, T. The economics of avoiding dangerous climate change. An editorial essay on The Stern Review. Climatic Change 89, 173–194 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9433-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9433-x