Abstract
The discourse on CRS began late in Spain. Its permeation into political institutions also began later than in many Western countries. The Spanish government neither contributed nor reacted to the green paper Corporate social responsibility. A business contribution to sustainable development, published by the European Commission in 2002. However, the publication of this document gave the definitive impulse for the start of the Spanish debate on CSR. After this initial impulse, the debate rapidly developed into a consolidated field of discourse. This field is the object of the present paper. Here, we seek to elaborate on a concept of corporate social citizenship viewed as a “field of discourse”, which is being produced by an epistemic community, at Spanish yet also at a global level. Thus, we seek to depict the contours of the Spanish discourse on CSR, researching its evolution over the last 5 years. We focus on its main actors, the central topics on its agendas, the conflicts that are appearing, and how they are being dealt with. In order to achieve these objectives, we focus primarily on the transcription of 61 speeches made by different stakeholders at the Spanish Parliament during 2005. This initiative of the Spanish Parliament is unique of its kind. A special sub-commission was created to discuss the role that Spanish public institutions should play regarding corporate social responsibility. Sixty-one experts from different areas (academia, business, trade unions, and NGOs) were invited to present their views on CSR. Members of the sub-commission had the opportunity to discuss with these experts the nature, limits, results and evolution of CSR, seeking with special interest their opinions on the role that the Spanish Government should play in the consolidation of CSR in Spain. The thesis of this paper is that through an exhaustive analysis of the transcriptions of these interventions at the Spanish Parliament, we can identify who constitutes the Spanish epistemic community on CSR. We can also trace the main contours of this field of discourse, to identify the main actors in its development (particularly, of course, on the binding point between CRS and government) and the main issues discussed, as well as the “hot topics”. The presentation will also locate the uniqueness of this debate generated in parliament within the context of the wider Spanish debate on CSR.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albareda L. et al. 2006, The Government’s Role in Promoting Corporate Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and UK From the Relational State Perspective. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 386–400
Canadian Business For Social Responsibility 2001, An Overview of Selected Canadian, European and International Practices, Toronto: CBSR
EC: 2002, Corporate Social Responsibility. A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development, http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/soc-dial/Csr/csr2002_col_en.pdf
EC 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility. National public policies in the European Union. Brussels: EC, Employment & Social Affairs
EC: 2006, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility, http://www.jussemper.org/Resources/Corporate%20Activity/Resources/IMPLEMENTINGPARTNERSHIPJOBS.pdf
Fiske J.: 1982, Introduction to Communication Studies. London: Methuen
Grant D., Keenoy T., Oswick C.: 1998, Discourse and Organization. London: Sage Publications
Haas, P.: 1992, “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination”. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35
Jørgensen M., Phillips L.: 2002, Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage Publications
Lozano J. M. et al. 2008, Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility. Public Policies Beyond Regulation and Voluntary Compliance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Matten D., Moon J.: 2008, “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424
Moon, J.: 2004, Government as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility, ICCSR Research Paper Series, n. 24
Phillips N., Hardy C.: 2002, Discourse Analysis. Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: Sage Publications
Roome N., 2005: The Implications of National Agendas for CSR. In: Habisch A., Jonker J., Wegner M., Schmidpeter R. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe. Berlin: Springer
Schreiber, T. and C. Moring: 2001, ‘Codification of Knowledge Using Discourse Analysis’, 11th Nordic Conference on Information and Documentation, Reykjavik, http://www.bokis.is/iod2001/papers/Schreiber_paper.doc
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cantó-Milà, N., Lozano, J.M. The Spanish Discourse on Corporate Social Responsibility. J Bus Ethics 87 (Suppl 1), 157–171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9810-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9810-4