Abstract
The purpose of this work is to elaborate an empirically grounded mathematical model of the magnitude of consequences component of “moral intensity” (Jones, Academy of Management Review 16(2),366, 1991) that can be used to evaluate different ethical situations. The model is built using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1980) and empirical data from the legal profession. One contribution of our work is that it illustrates how AHP can be applied in the field of ethics. Following a review of the literature, we discuss the development of the model. We then illustrate how the model can be used to rank-order three well-known ethical reasoning cases in terms of the magnitude of consequences. The work concludes with implications for theory, practice, and future research. Specifically we discuss how this work extends the previous work by Collins (Journal of Business Ethics 8, 1, 1989) regarding the nature of harm variable. We also discuss the contribution this work makes in the development of ethical scenarios used to test hypotheses in the field of business ethics. Finally, we discuss how the model can be used for after-action review, contribute to organizational learning, train employees in ethical reasoning, and aid in the design and development of decision support systems that support ethical reasoning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Argyris, D. & Schon, C. (1978). Organizational Learning. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co (NY).
Ahmad, N.: 2005, ‹The Design, Development and Analysis of a Multi Criteria Decision Support System Model: Performance Benchmarking of Small to Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprise (SME)’, Doctorate, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Ahmad, N., G. R. Simons, and D. Berg: 2006, ‹The Integration of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Data Envelopment Analysis in a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problem’, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 5(2), 263–276
Baird, L., Holland, P. & Deacon, S. (1999). Learning from action: Imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference. Organizational Dynamics, 27(4), 19–31. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(99)90027-X
Belton, V., & Gear, T. (1983). On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega, 11, 228–230. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6
Belton, V. & Stewart, T.J.(2002), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, An Integrated Approach, Boston: Kluwer.
Chae, B., Paradice, D., Courtney, J.F., & Cagle, C.J. (2005). Incorporating an ethical perspective into problem formulation: implications for decision support systems design. Decision Support Systems, 40(2), 197–212. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.02.002
Cheney, T.: 2006, ‹A Decision Making Model to Enhance Corporate Ethics/Business Ethics/Social Responsibility,’ Business Renaissance Quarterly Pasadena 1(3), 15
Chia, A. & Mee, S. (2000). Lim. “The effects of issue characteristics on the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 255–269. doi:10.1023/A:1006392608396
Choo, E.U., Schoner, B., & Wedley, W.·C. (1999). Interpretation of criteria weights in multi-criteria decision making. Computers and Industrial Engineering Journal, 37, 527–541. doi:10.1016/S0360-8352(00)00019-X
Collins, D. (1989). Organizational Harm, Legal Condemnation And Stakeholder Retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 1. doi:10.1007/BF00382011
Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgement. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
Davis, M. A., N. B. Johnson and D. G. Ohmer: 1998, ‹Issue-Contingent Effects on Ethical Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Comparison’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(4), 373–389. doi:10.1023/A:1005760606745
Douglas, P.C., Davidson, R.A. & Schwartz, B.N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orienta tion on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121. doi:10.1023/A:1012261900281
15. Dubinsky, A.J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19(2), 83–107. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(89)90001-5
Janet M Dukerich, Mary J Waller, Elizabeth George, George P Huber. “Moral intensity and managerial problem solving. “Journal of Business Ethics 1 24.1 (2000): 29–38.
Ferrell, O.C., & Gresham, L.G. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96. doi:10.2307/1251618
Franke, G.R., Crown, D.F., & Spake, D.F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.920
Giacobbe, R. W. and M. Segal: 2006, A Framework for the Evaluation of Marketing Research Practices. Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, San Antonio, TX, November 2006
Goldin, I. M., K. D. Ashley and R. L. Pinkus: 2001, Introducing PETE: Computer Support for Teaching Ethics. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, St. Louis, Missouri, United States. ICAIL ‹01 (ACM Press, New York, NY), pp. 94–98
Harrington, S.J. (1997). A test of a person–issue contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 363–375. doi:10.1023/A:1017900615637
Hunt, S.D. & Vitell, S.J. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5. doi:10.1177/027614678600600103
Jones, T.M. (1991). “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An.” Academy of Management. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366. doi:10.2307/258867
Kelley, Patricia C and Elm, Dawn R. (2003). “The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones’s Issue-Contingent Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 139–154. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004594.61954.73
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The Meaning and Measurement of Moral Development. Worcester, MA, Clark University Press.
Loe, T., Ferrell, L. & Mansfield, P. (2000). A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204. doi:10.1023/A:1006083612239
Mancherjee, K. and Sodan, A. C. 2004. Can computer tools support ethical decision making?. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 34, 2 (Sep. 2004), 1.
Marshall, B., & Dewe, P. (1997). An investigation of the components of moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(5), 521–529. doi:10.1023/A:1017929418329
May, D.R. & Pauli, K.P. (2002). The Role of Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision-making. Business & Society, 41(1), 84–117. doi:10.1177/0007650302041001006
McMahon, J.M., & Harvey, R.J. (2006). An Analysis of the Factor Structure of Jones’ Moral Intensity Construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(4), 381–404. doi:10.1007/s10551–006-0006-5
McMahon, J. & Harvey, R. (2007). “The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 72(4), pages 335-357.
Millet, Ido (1998). “Ethical decision making using the analytic hierarchy process,” Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11): 1197-1204 August 1998.
Monga, M.: 2007, `Managers' Moral Reasoning: Evidence from Large Indian Manufacturing Organisations', Journal of Business Ethics 71(2), 179
Morris, Sara A, McDonald, Robert A. “The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. “Journal of Business Ethics 14.9 (1995): 715.
Nash, L.: 1981, ‹Ethics Without the Sermon’, Harvard Business Review 59, 76–90
Prosser, W.L., & Keaton, W.P. Prosser and Keaton on the law of torts (5th edition), St. Paul: West, 1984
Joseph G P Paolillo, Scott J Vitell. “An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making. “Journal of Business Ethics 1 35.1 (2002): 65–74.
Rest, J. (1979). Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota.
Rest, J. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York, Praeger.
Rest, J., Thoma, S., & Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 5. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.5
Rest, J., Thoma, S., Narvaez, D., & Bebeau, M. (1997). Alchemy and Beyond: Indexing the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 498–507. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.498
Rest, J.R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S.J., & Bebeau, M.J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.644
Rest, J.R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S.J., & Bebeau, M.J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 381. doi:10.1080/713679390
Saaty, T.L. (1980). “The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” McGraw-Hill: NY.
Saaty, T.L. (2000), Fundamentals of Decision-Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T.L., & Vargas, L.G.(1991). Prediction, Projection and Forecasting in Applications of the Analytical Hierarchy Process in economics, finance, politics, games and sports. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schoner, B., E. U. Choo and W. C. Wedley: 1997, ‹A Comment on “Rank Disagreement: A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Methodologies”’, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6, 197–200. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1099-1360(199707)6:4<197::AID-MCDA137>3.0. CO;2-6
Searing, D. R.: 1998, Harps Ethical Analysis Methodology Method Description Version 2.0.0 (Taknosys Software Corp.)
Senge, P. “The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization,” Doubleday/Currency, 1990.
Shafter, W.E. (2002). Effects of materiality, risk, and ethical perceptions on fraudulent reporting by financial executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(3), 243–262.
Singer, Ming, Mitchell, Sarah, Turner, Julie. (1998). Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgments: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (17.5), 527–541.
Stein, E. W.: 1999, ‹Designing a Decision Support System to Foster Ethical Reasoning’, working paper
Stein, E. W.: 2004, A Decision Support System to Support Ethical Reasoning (Decision Sciences Institute, Boston, MA) (abstract)
Stein, E. W.: 2005, The Ethix System: Supporting Ethical Decision Making Using IT. Northeast Conference of Decision Science Institute, Philadelphia, PA, March 2005
Trevino, L.K. (1986). Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management, Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601. doi:10.2307/258313
Tsalikis, J., Seaton, B. & Shepherd, P. (2008). Relative Importance Measurement of the Moral Intensity Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 613–626. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9458-5
Weber, J.: 1990, `Managers Moral Reasoning: Assessing their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas', Human Relations 43(7), 687–702
Weber, J. (1991). Adapting Kohlberg to Enhance the Assessment of Managers Moral Reasoning. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(3), 295–317. doi:10.2307/3857615
Weber, James. (1996). Influences upon managerial moral decision making: Nature of the harm and magnitude of consequences. Human Relations 49.1, 1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, E.W., Ahmad, N. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Construct a Measure of the Magnitude of Consequences Component of Moral Intensity. J Bus Ethics 89, 391–407 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0006-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0006-8