Abstract
This study investigates the market reaction to corporate press releases announcing donations to the relief effort following the December, 2004 tsunami in Southeast Asia. Based on a sample of 79 U.S. companies, results indicate a statistically significant positive 5-day cumulative abnormal return. While differences in the timing of the press releases do not appear to have influenced market reactions, the amount of the donations did. Overall, the results appear to support Godfrey’s (Academy of Management Review 30, 777–798; 2005) assertion that philanthropic giving must be perceived as being a genuine manifestation of the firm’s underlying social responsiveness in order to increase firm value.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bartkus B. R., Morris S. A., Seifert B. 2002 Governance and Corporate Philanthropy. Business & Society, 41: 319–344
Brown S., Warner J. 1985 Using Daily Returns: The Case of Event Studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14: 3–31
Business Week: 2004, ‹Figuring Out Which Companies Gave Most’, Business Week November 29, 104
Campbell L., Gulas C. S., Gruca T. S. 1999 Corporate Giving Behavior and Decision-Maker Social Consciousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 19: 375–383
Comiteau J. 2003. Do Do-Gooders Do Better? Adweek, 44(38): 24–25
CNN.com: 2005, ‹U.S. Corporations Donate $180M for Tsunami Aid’, Cnn.com (http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/09/tsunami.corporate.giving.ap/)
Fombrun C. J. 1996 Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine September 13, 122–126
Gallanis P. J. 2000 Community Support is a Powerful Tool. Retailing Today, 39(14): 57–71
Gardberg N. A., Fombrun C. J. 2006 Corporate Citizenship: Creating Intangible Assets Across Institutional Environments. Academy of Management Review, 34: 329–346
Godfrey P. C. 2005 The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30: 777–798
Hempel J.: 2003, ‹A Corporate Cornucopia’, Business Week December 1, 96
Hempel J. and L. Gard: 2004, ‹The Corporate Givers’, Business Week November 29, 100–104
Kirkpatrick, D.: 2005, ‹The Tsunami and the Net: Global␣Awareness, Global Response’, Fortune.com (http://www.fortune.com/fortune/fastforward/0,15704,1014511,00.html)
Levine, G.: 2004, ‹Update 3: Corporations Donate Millions for Quake Aid’, Forbes.com (http://www.forbes.com/2004/12/30/1230autofacescan05.html?partner=rss)
Money-CNN.com: 2004, ‹Corporations give to Tsunami Relief’, Money-CNN.com (http://www.money-cnn.com/2004/12/30/news/fortune500/corporate_aid/)
Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. 2002 The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12): 56–68
Saiia D. H., Carroll A. B., Buchholtz A. K. 2003 Philanthropy as Strategy. Business & Society, 42: 169–201
Seifert B., Morris S. A., Bartkus B. R. 2003 Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45: 195–211
Seiler M. J. 2004 Performing Financial Studies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
Smith C. 1994 The New Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3): 105–116
Time.: 2005, ‹Sea of Sorrow’, Time January 10, 29–39
White S. 2001 The Great Payback. Hotel & Motel Management, 216(16): 64–73
Wokutch R. E., Spencer B. A. 1987 Corporate Saint and Sinners: The Effects of Philanthropic and Illegal Activity on Organizational Performance. California Management Review, 29(2), 62–77
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patten, D.M. Does the Market Value Corporate Philanthropy? Evidence from the Response to the 2004 Tsunami Relief Effort. J Bus Ethics 81, 599–607 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9534-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9534-x