Abstract
Recent accounting scandals involving the collapse of large corporate firms have brought into question the adequacy of ethics education within accounting programs. This paper investigates the ethical decisions of accountancy students and in particular analyses the effect of group (as opposed to individual) decision-making on ethical decisions. Final year accountancy students (sample size of 165) were randomly allocated into two experimental conditions. The participants were then presented with five (5) ethical vignettes. One experimental condition involved completing the ethical decisions as individuals (60). The other involved completing the ethical decision-making as a group of 3–4 participants (34). A consistent pattern of behaviour was observed in the analysis of individual versus group responses. Individuals displayed stronger tendencies than groups to take the extreme actions of acting either unethically or ethically (whistleblowing), whereas groups displayed stronger tendencies to take the safer (neutral) options. It was concluded that groups reached consensus decisions, in an ethical context, probably as a result of peer pressure. The significant implication of this finding is in relation to the emphasis accounting programs place on group work. Group work may enhance students’ abilities to work as a team. However, as revealed in this study’s results, group work may not be an effective means of producing the optimal decision in all subject matter areas, especially complex areas such as ethical decision-making.
Article PDF
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abdolmohammadi M. J., Gabhart D. R. L., Reeves M. F. (1997). Ethical Cognition of Business Students Individually and in Groups. Journal of Business Ethics 16(6):1717–1725
Abdolmohammadi M. J., Reeves M. F.(2003). Does Group Reasoning Improve Ethical Reasoning?. Business & Society Review 108(1):127–137
Academic Technology Services. (2006). http://www.ats.ucla.edu
Accounting Education Change Commission. (1990). ‘Objectives of Education for Accountants: Position Statement Number One’, Issues in Accounting Education, AECC Fall, 306–312
Ahadiat N., Mackie J. J. (1993). Ethics education in accounting: An investigation of the importance of ethics as a factor in the recruiting decisions of public accounting firms. Journal of Accounting Education 11(2):243–257
Armstrong M. B. (1987). Moral development and accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education 5:27–43
Baumhart R.(1968). Ethics in business. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York
Brief A. P., Dukerick J. M., Brown P. R., Brett J. F. (1996). What’s Wrong With The treadway Commission Report?. Journal of Business Ethics 15(2):183–199
Brommer M., Gratto C., Gravander J., Tuttle M. (1987). A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 6(4):265–280
Cavanaugh, G. F. and D. J. Frizsche: 1985, ‘Using Vignettes in Business Ethics Research’, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 12(2), 279–293
Chalos, P. and S. Pickard: 1985, ‘Information Choice and Cue Use: An Experiment in Group Information Processing’, Journal of Applied Psychology 70(6), 634–641
Cohen S. G., Bailey D. E. (1997). What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal of Management (23):239–290
Cohen J. R., Pant L. W., Sharp D. J. (1998). The effect of gender and academic discipline diversity on the ethical evaluations, ethical intentions and ethical orientation of potential public accounting recruits. Accounting Horizons 12(3):250
Cree, M. and G. Baring: 1991, ‘Desperately Seeking Ethics’, Australian Accountant 15(8), 21–22
Douglas P. C., Davidson R. A., Schwartz B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgements. Journal of Business Ethics 34(2):101–121
Dubinsky A.J., Loken B. (1989). Analyzing Marketing’s Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Research 19(4):83–107
Eisenhardt K M., Kahwajy J. L., Bourgeos L. J. I. (1997). How Teams Can Have a Good Fight. Harvard Business Review (75):77–85
Eynon G., Hills N. T., Stevens K. T. (1997). Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16(12–13):1297–1309
Ferrell O.C., Gresham L.G. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49(3):87–96
Ford R. C., Richardson W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13(3):205–222
Haswell S., Jubb P. (1995). Unethical tendencies. Charter 66(3):102–103
Hall E. J., Mouton J. S., Blake R. R. (1963). Group problem solving effectiveness under conditions of pooling vs. interaction. Journal of Social Psychology 59:14–157
Hill G. W. (1982). Groups versus individual performance: Are n + 1 heads better than 1?. Psychological Bulletin 91:517–539
Holloman C. R., Hendrick H. W. (1971). Problem solving in different sized groups. Personnel Psychology 24:489–500
Huck S.W., Cormier W.H., Bounds W.G.(1974). Reading statistics and research. Harper & Row, New York
Janis I. L.(1982). Groupthink (2 ed). Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Jeffrey C. (1993). Ethical development of accounting students, non-accounting business students, and liberal arts students. Issues in Accounting Education 8(1):86–97
Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16(2):366–395
Jones J., Massey D. W.,Thorne L. (2003). Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning: Insights from Past Research and Implications for the Future. Journal of Accounting Literature 22:45–103
McGrath J. E.(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs N.J
Molyneaux D. (2004). After Andersen: An Experience of Integrating Ethics into Undergraduate Accountancy Education. Journal of Business Ethics 54(4):385–398
Moore R. S., Radloff S. E. (1996) Attitudes Towards Business Ethics Held By South African Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(8):863–870
Neuman, W. L.: 2003, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (Allyn & Bacon, Boston)
Nichols M. L., Day V. E. (1982). A Comparison of Moral Reasoning of Groups and Individuals on the ”Defining Issues Test. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1):201–208
O’Leary C., Radich R. (2001). An Analysis of Australian Final Year Accountancy Students’ Ethical Attitudes. Teaching Business Ethics 5(3):235–249
Ponemon L. A., Glazer A. (1990). Accounting Education and Ethical Development: the Influence of Liberal Learning on Students and Alumni in Accounting Practice. Issues in Accounting Education 5:195–208
Preble J. F., Reichel A. (1988) Attitudes Towards Business Ethics of Future Managers in the U.S. and Israel. Journal of Business Ethics 7(1):941–949
Rest J. R.(1979). Development in Judging Moral Issues. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Preaeger Publishers Inc., New York)
Rohrbaugh J. (1979). Improving the Quality of Group Judgement: Social Judgement Analysis and the Delphi Technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 24:73–92
Schminke M. (1997). Gender Differences in Ethical Frameworks and Evaluation of Others’ Choices in Ethical Dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics 16:55–65
Selvanathan, A., S. Selvanathan, G. Keller, W. Brain and M. Bartel: 2000, Australian Business Statistics (Thomas Nelson, Australia)
Shaub M. K. (1994). An analysis of the association of traditional demographic variables with the moral reasoning of auditing students and auditors. Journal of Accounting Education 12(1):1–26
Sniezek J. A., Henry R. A. (1989). Accuracy and Confidence in Group Judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43(1):1–28
Steiner I. D (1972). Group processes and productivity. Academic Press, New York
Trevino L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review 11(3):601–617
Trevino L. K., Youngblood S. A. (1990). Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4):378–385
Welkowitz J., Ewen R. B., Cohen J.(1982). Introductory statistics for the behavioral sciences. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, San Diego CA
Whyte W.H.(1956).The organization man. Simon and Schuster, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Leary, C., Pangemanan, G. The Effect of Groupwork on Ethical Decision-Making of Accountancy Students. J Bus Ethics 75, 215–228 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9248-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9248-5