Abstract
Recent downward trends in corporate giving have renewed interest in the factors that shape corporate philanthropy. This paper examines the relationships between charitable contributions, firm size and industry. Improvements over previous studies include an IRS data base that covers a much broader range of firm sizes and industries as compared to previous studies and estimation using an instrumental variable technique that explicitly addresses potential simultaneity between charitable contributions and profitability. Important findings provide evidence of a cubic relationship between charitable giving and firm size and evidence of strong industry effects. The plus-minus-plus regression coefficient sign pattern for the cubic firm size model suggests that small and large firms give more relative to total receipts with lower giving ratios among medium size firms. One interpretation for this finding is that small firms are close to the communities they serve while high visibility creates a need for large firm philanthropy. Strong industry effects provide evidence of inter-industry differences in giving culture and/or different public relations requirements across industries.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson L. and Glaskiewicz J. (1988). Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 33(1):82–100
Boatsman J. R. and Gupta S. (1996). Taxes and Corporate Charity: Empirical Evidence from Micro-Level Panel Data. National Tax Journal 49(2):193–213
Brammer S. and Millington A. (2005). Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 61(1):29–44
Buckholtz A. K., Amason A. C. and Rutherford M. A. (1999). Beyond Resources: The Mediating Effects of Top Management Discretion and Values on Corporate Philanthropy. Business & Society 38(2):167–187
Burlingame D. F. and Frishkoff P. A. (1996). How Does Firm Size Affect Corporate Philanthropy? In: Burlingame D. F., Young D. R. (eds) Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 86–104
Bain J. S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Benston G. J. (1985). The Validity of Profits-Structure with Particular Reference to the FTC’s Line of Business. American Economic Review 75(1):67
Caves R. E. and Pugel T. A. (1980). Intra Industry Differences in Conduct and Performance: Viable Strategies in U.S. Manufacturing. New York University Monograph Series in Finance and Economics Monograph, 1980–1982, New York
Demsetz H. (1973). Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy. Journal of Law and Economics 16(1):1–9
Fisher F. M. and McGowan J. J. (1983). On the Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return to Infer Monopoly Profits. American Economic Review 73(1):82–97
Fry L. F., Keim G. D., Meiners R. E. (1982). Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit? Academy of Management Journal 25(1):94–106
Greene W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Griffin J. J. and Mahon J. F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate. Business & Society 36(1):5–31
Hall M. and Weiss L. W. (1967). Average Concentration Ratios and Industrial Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics 49(3):319–331
Hess D., Rogovsky N., and Dunfee T. W. (2002). The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 44(2):110–125
Johnson O. (1966). Corporate Philanthropy: An Analysis of Corporate Contributions. Journal of Business 39(4):489–504
Kedia B. L. and Kuntz E. C. (1981). The Context of Social Performance: An Empirical Study of Texas Banks. In: L. E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 3rd edn. JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., pp. 133–154
Maignan I., Ferrell O. C., Hunt G. T. M. (1999). Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(4):455–469
Maignan I. (2001). Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 30(1):57–72
Martin S. (1993). Advanced Industrial Economics. Blackwell, Oxford
Martin S. A. (1985). An Essential Grace. McClelland and Stewart, Toronto
McElroy K. M. and Siegfried J. J. (1985). The Effect of Firm Size on Corporate Philanthropy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 25(2):18–26
McGuire J. B., Sundgren A. and Schneeweis T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 31(4):854–872
Mueller D. C. (1990). The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Porter M. E. (1979). The Structure within Industries and Company Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics 61(2):214–227
Porter M. E. and Kramer M. R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80(12):57–68
Powell T. C. (1996). How Much Does Industry Matter? An Alternative Empirical Test. Strategic Management Journal 17(4):323–334
Roberts R. W. (1992). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6):595–612
Rumelt R. P. (1991). How Much Does Industry Matter. Strategic Management Journal 12(3):167–185
Saiia D. H., Carroll A. B. and Buchholtz A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as Strategy: When Corporate Charity “Begins at Home”. Business & Society 42(2):162–201
Scherer F. M. and Ross D. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston
Schmalensee R. (1985). Do Markets Differ Much? American Economic Review 75(3):341–351
Seifert B., Morris S. A. and Bartkus B. R. (2003). Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 45(3):195–211
Shepherd W. G. (1972). The Elements of Market Structure. Review of Economics and Statistics 54(1):25–37
Stigler G. J. (1963). Capital and Rates of Return in Manufacturing. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Thompson J. K., Smith H. L., Hood J. N. (1993). Charitable Contributions by Small Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 31(3):35–51
Ullmann A. A. (1985). Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms. Academy of Management Review 10(3):540–557
Useem M. (1988). Market and Institutional Factors in Corporate Contributions. California Management Review 30(2):77–88
Vidaver-Cohen D. and Altman B. W. (2000). Corporate Citizenship in the New Millennium: Foundation for an Architecture of Excellence. Business & Society Review 105(1):145–168
Waddock S. A. and Graves S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4):303–319
Wernerfelt B. and Montgomery C. (1988). Tobin’s Q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance. American Economic Review 78(1):246–250
Williams R. J. and Barrett J. D. (2000). Corporate Philanthropy, Criminal Activity, and Firm Reputation: Is There A Link? Journal of Business Ethics 26(4):341–350
Wood D. J. and Jones R. E. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3):229–267
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Christie H. Amato (Ph.D., University of Alabama) is professor of marketing at the Belk College of Business Administration, University of North Carolina, Charlotte. Dr. Amato's research interests lie in the area of strategic marketing, productivity, quality of life and ethics. She has published articles in top marketing journals including: Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Retailing, Journal of Advertising and Journal of Business Research.
Louis H. Amato (Ph.D., University of South Carolina) is professor of economics at the Belk College of Business Administration, University of North Carolina-Charlotte. Dr.␣Amato's research interests lie in the areas of market structure and profitability, productivity, quality of life and ethics. He has published articles in top journals including Southern Economic Journal, Review of Industrial Organization, and Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amato, L.H., Amato, C.H. The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving. J Bus Ethics 72, 229–241 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9167-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9167-5