Abstract
This research examines how an organization, Thanksgiving Coffee, establishes and maintains its legitimacy with its constituent publics. In line with Boyd’s (2000, Journal of Public Relations Research 12(4), 341–353.) concept of actional legitimacy, Thanksgiving Coffee demonstrates a legitimation strategy addressing social issues and by responding to ethical and political questions. Applying Fisher’s (1984, Communication Monographs 51, 1–18) concepts of narrative fidelity and probability, Thanksgiving Coffee’s policies and communication activities were found to alleviate the social issues to which they were addressed and therefore reinforce perceptions of legitimacy among publics. Viewing the influence of organizations from a different perspective, this study provides an example of how the policies of an organization can have a positive impact on the broader society in which it operates.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
About the specialty coffee association. (n.d.). Specialty Coffee Association website. Retrieved June 1, 2005, from http://www.scaa.org
Aldridge H. E., Fiol C. M. (1994). Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation. Academy of Management Review 19:645–670
Baker S. (2002). The Theoretical Ground for Public Relations Practice and Ethics: A Koehnian Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 35:191–205
Boulding K. E. (1971). The Legitimacy of Economics. In: Glahe F. R. (eds). Kenneth Boulding: Collected Papers: Economics, vol. 2. Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder, CO
Boyd J. (2000). Actional Legitimation: No Crisis Necessary. Journal of Public Relations Research 12(4):341–353
Bush A. J., Bush V. D. (1994). The Narrative Paradigm as a Perspective for Improving Ethical Evaluation of Advertisements Journal of Advertising 23(3):31–42
Clifford, B.: 2002, May 2, Program to Aid Poor Coffee Growers Off to Slow Start. CBS.Market.Watch.com. Retrieved April 16, 2005, from http://www.organicconsumers.org/starbucks/purchasing.cfm
Coffee Price Increase Forecast in Russia:2005, January 10, CEE-Foodindustry.com. Retrieved June 1, 2005, from http://www.cee.foodindustry.com/news/ng-nocache.asp?id=57132
Crable, R. E. and S. L. Vibbert: 1985, `Managing Issues and Influencing Public Policy', Public Relations Review 11(2), 3–16 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7159189/
Dowling J., Pfeffer J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Pacific Sociological Review 18(1):122–136
Driscoll C., Crombie A. (2001). Stakeholder Legitimacy and the Qualified Good Neighbor: The Case or Nova Nada and JDI. Business and Society 40(4):442–471
Elsbach, K. D.: 1994, ‘Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry’, Administration Science Quarterly 39(1), 57–online
Fisher W. R. (1984). Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm: the Case of Public Moral Argument. Communication Monographs 51:1–18
Gresser C., Tickell S. (2002). Mugged, Poverty in Your Cup. Oxfam International, Boston
Hearit K. M. (1995). “Mistakes were made”: Organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy. Communication Studies 46:1–17
Iyer G. P. (1999). Business, Consumers, and Sustainable Living in an Interconnected World: A Multilateral Ecocentric Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 20:273–278
Katzeff P. (2001). The Coffee Cuppers’ Manifesto. Paul Katzeff, Fort Bragg, CA
Maurer J. G. (1971). Readings in Organizational Theory: Open Systems Approaches. Random House, New York
Metzler M. S. (2001). Responding to the Legitimacy Problems of Big Tobacco: An Analysis of the “People of Philip Morris” Image Advertising Campaign. Communication Quarterly 49(4):366–381
Parsons T. (1956). Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 1(63–85):225–239
Parsons T. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Oxford University Press, New York
Pendergrast M. (1999). Uncommon Grounds. Basic Books, New York
Pfeffer J., Salancik G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations. Harper and Row, New York
Rowland R. C. (1987). Holding Corporations Accountable: Corporate Conduct, International Codes, and Citizen Conduct. Communication Monographs 54:264–275
Stead J. G., Stead E. (2000). Eco-enterprise Strategy: Standing for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 24:313–329
Stern, R. and S. R. Barley: 1996, ‘Organizations and Social Systems: Organization Theory’s Neglected Mandate’, Administrative Science Quarterly 41, (from an online source, no page numbers provided)
Suchman, M. C.: 1995, ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’, The Academy of Management Review 20(3), 571–online
Thanksgiving Coffee web pages: 2005, April 16. Thanksgiving Coffee website. http://www.thanksgivingcoffee.com
Weber M. (1978). Economy and Society. University of California, Berkeley
Zyglidopoulos, S. C.: 2003, ‘The Issue Life Cycle: Implication for Reputation for Social Performance and Organizational Legitimacy’, Corporate Reputation Review 6(1), 70–online
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Gregory G. De Blasio teaches courses related to business communication, public relations writing, and marketing communication campaigns. His research interests include the study of communication campaigns as they relate to social issues and organizational legitimacy. Dr. De Blasio joined the Communication Department at Northern Kentucky University in 2004. His Ph.D. in communication is from Wayne State University. He received his M.A. from the Pennsylvania State University and his B.A. from William Paterson University. A past International Association of Business Communicators (IABC) board member and chapter president in Detroit, Greg has provided public relations and marketing communication counsel to clients based in Detroit and elsewhere.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Blasio, G.G. Coffee as a Medium for Ethical, Social, and Political Messages: Organizational Legitimacy and Communication. J Bus Ethics 72, 47–59 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9155-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9155-9