Abstract
There have been many attempts during the history of applied ethics that have tried to develop a theory of moral reasoning. The goal of this paper is to explicate one aspect of the debate between various attempts of offering a specific method for resolving moral dilemmas. We contrast two kinds of deliberative methods: deliberative methods whose goal is decision-making and deliberative methods that are aimed at gaining edifying perspectives. The decision-making methods assessed include the traditional moral theories like utilitarianism and Kantianism, as well as second order principles, such as principlism and specified principlism. In light of this assessment, we suggest taking a closer look at two perceptive models, casuistry and particularism. These models are used for dealing with moral dilemmas that provide for edifying perspectives rather than decision-making. These perceptive models, though less scientific and not as good at prescribing an action, are more human in the sense that they enrich our moral sensibilities and enhance our understanding of the meaning of the situation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aristotle (1980). The Nicomachean Ethics Trans. W.D. Ross. Oxford University Press, Oxford, IV pp. 1
Beauchamp T. L., Childress J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York
Brody B. A. (1988). Life and Death in Decision Making. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York
Calkins M. (2001). Casuistry and the Business Case Method. Business Ethics Quarterly 11(2):237–259
Calkins M. (2002). Casuistry, Virtue Ethics, and Biotechnology. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(3): 305–330
Cavangah G. F., Moberg D. J., Velasquez M. (1995). Making Business Ethics Practical. Business Ethics Quarterly 5: 299–418
Dancy J.: 2000, The Particularist’s Progress, in B. Hooker and M. Little (eds.), Moral Particularism (Oxford University Press).
Dancy J.: 2004, Ethics without Principles (Oxford University Press).
DeGrazia D. (1992). Moving Forward in Bioethical Theory: Theories, Cases and Specified Principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17(5):511–539
Fisher J. (2001). Lessons for Business Ethics from Bioethics. Journal of Business Ethics 34: 15–24
Foot P. (2002). Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Foucault M.: 1988, Technologies of the Self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, in L. H. Martin, H. Gutman and P. H. Hutton (eds.), University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst
Gert B., Culver C., Clouser K. D. (2000). Common Morality versus Specified Principlism: Reply to Richardson. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 308–322
Geva A. (2000). Moral Decision Making in Business: A Phase-model. Business Ethics Quarterly 10(4): 773–803
Hooker, B and Little M. (eds): 2000, Moral Particularism (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Ilitis A. S. (2000). Bioethics as Methodological Case Resolution: Specification, Specified Principlism and Casuistry. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 271–284
Jonsen A. R., Toulmin S. (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. University of California, Los Angeles
Jonsen A. R.: 1991, Of Balloons and Bicycles or the Relationship Between Ethical Theory and Practical Judgment. The Hastings Center Report Sept–Oct, v21, no. 5, p. 14(3).
Jonsen A. R. (2000). Strong on Specification. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 348–360
Kaebnick E. G. (2000). On the Intersection of Casuistry and Particularism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10(4):307–332
Kant I. (1971). The Doctrine of Virtue: Part II of the Metaphysic of Morals. trans. Mary J. Gregor. University of Pennsylvania Press, Pennsylvania, p. 23
Kuczewski M. G. (1997). Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C
MacIntyre A. (1984). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana
MacIntyre A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality?. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana
Mill J. S.: 1962, Utilitarianism, On Liberty and Essay on Bentham, in M. Wanock (ed.) (Meridian Book, NY), p. 277.
McDowell J. (1979). Virtue and Reason. The Monist 62: 331–350
Nussbaum M. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Raz J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Richardson H. S. (1990). Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19: 279–310
Richardson H. S. (2000). Specifying, Balancing and Interpreting Bioethical Principles. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 285–307
Shiner R.: 1988, Ethical Justification and Case-By-Case Reasoning, in D. Odegard (ed.), Ethics and Justification (Academic Printing and Publishing, Edmonton, AB)
Solomon R. C. (1993). Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business. Oxford University Press, New York
Strong C. (1997). Ethics in Reproductive and Prenatal Medicine: A New Framework. Yale University Press, NY
Trevino L., Nelson K. (1990). Managing Business Ethics. John Wiley and Sons, NY, pp. 80–90
Velasquez M. (2002). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Prentice Hall, NJ, pp. 129–132
Wallace J. D. (1996). Ethical Norms, Particular Cases. Ithaca, Cornell University Press
Wiggins D. (1998). Needs, Values Truth 3rd Edition. Clanderon Press, Oxford
Williams B. (1966). Consistency and Realism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40(supp): 1–22
Winch P. (1972). Ethics Actions. London, Routledge and Keagen Paul
Wisdom J.: 1991, Proof and Explanation (University Press of America)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Yotam Lurie is a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy and Ethics at the Department of Management at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. Lurie holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research focuses on a variety of issues in applied ethics, particularly within the context of business and professional ethics.
Robert Albin is a Lecturer in Philosophy and Ethics and the Chair of the Department of Liberal Arts and Sciences at Sapir College, which is located in the Negev Region, Israel. He holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Research interests are in the fields of Philosophy of Culture and applied ethics with a special interest in journalistic ethics. He published a book on the topic: A Chronicle of the Decline of Rationality: Ethics in the Practice of Journalism, 2004. (in Hebrew).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lurie, Y., Albin, R. Moral Dilemmas in Business Ethics: From Decision Procedures to Edifying Perspectives. J Bus Ethics 71, 195–207 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9134-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9134-1