Abstract
This research examines the possibility of developing a new corporate social responsibility (CSR) auditing system based on the analysis of current CSR literature and interviews conducted with a number of interested and knowledgeable stakeholders. This work attempts to create a framework for social responsibility auditing compatible with an existing commercially successful environmental audit system. The project is unusual in that it tackles the complex issue of CSR auditing with a scientific approach using Grounded Theory. On the evidence discovered to date in the literature review and the interviews, CSR seems to be perceived by many as the social strand of sustainable development. However, there is far less agreement regarding its measurement. Both the literature review and the interview analysis indicate that developing an applied CSR auditing procedure will be a challenging task. This is principally due to the lack of formal study of this complex subject, which, despite the widespread debate it has engendered, still lacks a single and broadly accepted definition. The concepts developed from the findings of this research, together with the key factors identified in a literature review of CSR, were developed into a prospective CSR audit protocol.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C. A Adams (2004) ArticleTitleThe Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting-Performance Portrayal Gap Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 17 IssueID5 731–757
G Brown (1973) ArticleTitleSome Thoughts on Grounded Theory Sociology 7 1–16 Occurrence Handle10.1177/003803857300700101
G Brundtland (Eds) (1987) Out Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development Oxford University Press Oxford
D Cambell B Craven P Shrives (2003) ArticleTitleVoluntary Social Reporting in Three FTSE Sectors: A Comment on Perception and Legitimacy Auditing and Accountability Journal 16 IssueID4 558–581
Coffey. A., B. Holbrook and P. Atkinson: 1996, ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: Technologies and Representations’, Sociological Research On-line, 1, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/socresonline.
J Cramer (2005) ArticleTitleApplying International Standards and Guidelines on Corporate Social Responsibility: An Action Plan Environmental Quality Management 14 IssueID3 71–79 Occurrence Handle10.1002/tqem.20048
G Doming (2005) ArticleTitleTrust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing Journal of Business Ethics 57 IssueID3 209–219
Elkington, J.: 1997, Cannibals with Folks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Capstone, London).
Glaser, B. G.: 2001, The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description (http://www.groundedtheory.com/soc14.html), Sociology Press, Mill Valley California.
Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss: 1967, The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategy for Qualitative Research (Weidenfed and Nicolson, London).
Gonella, C., A. Pilling and S. Zadek: 1998, Making Values Count: Contemporary Experience in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting (ACCA, London).
D Hess (1999) ArticleTitleSocial Reporting: A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness Journal of Corporate Law, Fall 25 IssueID1 41–85
Hopkins, M.: 2000, ‘The measurement of corporate social responsibility’ MHC International Limited News, November 2000.
M Hopkins (2005) ArticleTitleMeasurement of Corporate Social Responsibility International Journal of Management and Decision Making 6 IssueID3/4 1 Occurrence Handle10.1504/IJMDM.2005.006549
J Igales J Gond (2005) ArticleTitleMeasuring Corporate Social Performance in France Journal of Business Ethics 56 IssueID2 131–148
M. J Jones (2003) ArticleTitleAccounting for Biodiversity: Operationalising Environmental Accounting Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 16 IssueID5 762–789
P Kok T Wiele Particlevan der R McKenna A Brown (2001) ArticleTitleA Corporate Social Responsibility Audit within a Quality Management Framework Journal of Business Ethics 31 285–297
N Kuasirikun M Sherer (2004) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Accounting Disclosure in Thailand Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 17 IssueID4 629–660
I Maignan D. A Raltson (2002) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations Journal of International Business Studies, 3rd Quarter 33 IssueID3 497
McClenahen. J. S.: 2005, ‘Defining Social Responsibility’, Manufacturing and Society March, 64–65.
McIntosh, M., D. Leipziger, K. Jones and G. Goleman: 1998, Corporate Citizenship: Successful Strategies for Responsible Companies (FT, London).
M. P Miles L. S Munilla (2004) ArticleTitleThe Potential Impact of Social Accountability Certification on Marketing Journal of Business Ethics 50 IssueID91 1–11
G Rose (1982) Deciphering Social Research McMillan London
Rudnicki, M.: 2000, ‘Environmental and Social Responsibility as the Value in Modern politics’ paper delivered during meeting the OIKOS International Warsaw, 10 November 2000.
O Salzmann A Ionescu-Somers U Steger (2004) ArticleTitleThe Business Case for Corporate Sustainability European Management Journal 23 IssueID1 27–36
Sustain Ability: 1999, The Social Reporting Report (SustainAbility, London).
C Seale (1999) The Quality of Qualitative Research Sage Publications London
Sethi, S. P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework’, California Management Review Spring 17(3).
A Strauss J Corbin (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research Sage Publications London
C Valor (2005) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability Business and Society Review 110 IssueID2 191–212 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00011.x
S Waddock (2004) ArticleTitleCreating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real Journal of Business Ethics 50 IssueID4 313–327 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000025080.77652.a3
Wheeler, D. and M. Sillapää: 1997, The Stakeholder Corporation (Pitman, London).
R. K Yin (2003) Application of Case Study Research Sage Publications London
Zadek, S., P. Pruvan and R. Evans (eds.): 1997, Building Corporate Accountability: Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting (Earthscan, London).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morimoto, R., Ash, J. & Hope, C. Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From Theory to Practice. J Bus Ethics 62, 315–325 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5