Abstract
In this article we argue that the emergence of a new form of organization – community enterprise – provides an alternative mechanism for corporations to behave in socially responsible ways. Community enterprises are distinguished from other third sector organisations by their generation of income through trading, rather than philanthropy and/or government subsidy, to finance their social goals. They also include democratic governance structures which allow members of the community or constituency they serve to participate in the management of the organisation. Partnerships between corporations and community enterprises therefore raise the possibility of corporations moving beyond philanthropic donations toward a more sustainable form of intervention involving long-term commitments to communities. At the same time they change substantively the nature of any collaboration by allowing relationships to proceed on the basis of mutual advantage, thereby broadening their appeal and scope. In doing so, partnerships build capacity and enfranchise communities in a way that avoids the paternalism that has traditionally characterised relationships between corporations and voluntary sector organisations. Power relations are transformed because partners are seen as sources of valuable assets, knowledge and expertise, rather than recipients of patronage or charity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C. A. Adams W. Hill C. B. Roberts (1998) ArticleTitle’Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour’ British Accounting Review 30 IssueID1 1–21 Occurrence Handle10.1006/bare.1997.0060
L. Alexander (1997) ArticleTitle’The New Mission for Philanthropy’ Policy Review 85 September–October
A. Amin A. Cameron R. Hudson (2002) Placing the Social Economy Routledge London
J. Andriof S. Waddock (2002) ’Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement’ J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted S. Sutherland (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield
J. Boschee (2001) ArticleTitle’Eight Basic Principles for Nonprofit Entrepreneurs’ Nonprofit World (July–August) 15–18
H. R. Bowen (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman Harper & Row New York
S. Brammer A. Millington (2003) ArticleTitle’The Effect of Stakeholder Preferences, Organizational Structure and Industry Type on Corporate Community Involvement’ Journal of Business Ethics 45 IssueID3 213–226 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024151528646
Christensen, J.: 2004, ‘Asking Do-Gooders to Prove they Do Good’, New York Times, January 3.
G. L. Clark T. Hebb (2004) ArticleTitle’Understanding Pension Fund Corporate Engagement in a Global Arena’ Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations 59 142–169
M. E. Clarkson (1995) ArticleTitle’A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’ Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 92–117
B. Cooke U. Kothari (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books London
A. Cornwall (1998) ’Gender, Participation and the Politics of Difference’ I. Guijt M. Shah (Eds) The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development IT Publications London
K. Davis (1973) ArticleTitle’The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities’ Academy of Management Journal 16 IssueID2 312–322
InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Trade and Industry (2003a) Enterprise for Communities: Proposals for a Community Interest Company DTI London
InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Trade and Industry (2003b) Working Paper: The Community Interest Test DTI London
L. Diamond (1996) ’Toward Democratic Consolidation’ L. Diamond M. Plattner (Eds) The Global Resurgence of Democracy EditionNumber2 Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore
R. Eells C. Walton (1961) Conceptual Foundations of Business Richard D. Irwin Homewood, IL
S. L. Esrock G. B. Leichty (1998) ArticleTitle’Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-presentation or Agenda Setting?’ Public Relations Review 24 IssueID3 305–319 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8
J. K. Galbraith (1967) The New Industrial State Houghton Mifflin Boston
K. Gibson (2000) ArticleTitle’The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory’ Journal of Business Ethics 26 IssueID3 245–257 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006110106408
I. Guijt M. Shah (1998) The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development IT Publications London
D. Hess N. Rogovsky T. W. Dunfee (2002) ArticleTitle’The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives’ California Management Review 44 IssueID2 110–125
R. Hooghiemstra (2000) ArticleTitle’Corporate Communication and Impression Management - New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting’ Journal of Business Ethics 27 IssueID1/2 55–68 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006400707757
B. W. Husted (2003) ArticleTitle’Governance Choices for Corporate Social Responsibility: to Contribute, Collaborate or Internalize?’ Long Range Planning 36 481–498 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0024-6301(03)00115-8
M. Friedman (1962) Capitalism and Freedom University of Chicago Press Chicago
R. M. Kanter (1989) ArticleTitle’Becoming PALs: Pooling, Allying and Linking Across Companies’ Academy of Management Executive 3 IssueID3 183–193
Kasemir, B. and A. Süess: 2002, ‘Sustainability Information and Pension Fund Investment’, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA) Discussion Paper 2002–13 (Environment and Natural Resources Program, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).
H. Kovach C. Neligan S. Burall (2003) The Global Accountability Report One World Trust London
J. Lave E. Wenger (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation Cambridge University Press Cambridge
T. Levitt (1958) ArticleTitle’The Dangers of Social Responsibility’ Harvard Business Review 36 IssueID5 41–50
R. A. Litz (1996) ArticleTitle’A Resource Based View of the Socially Responsible Firm: Stakeholder Interdependence, Ethical Awareness and Issue Responsiveness as Strategic Assets’ Journal of Business Ethics 15 IssueID12 1355–1363 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00411820
J. W. McGuire (1963) Business and Society McGraw-Hill New York
I. Maignan D. A. Ralston (2002) ArticleTitle’Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S. Insights from Businesses’ Self-presentations’ Journal of International Business Studies 33 IssueID3 497–514
C. Marsden J. Andriof (1998) ArticleTitle’Towards an Understanding of Corporate Citizenship and How to Influence it’ Citizenship Studies 2 IssueID2 329–352
D. Matten A. Crane W. Chapple (2003) ArticleTitle’Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship’ Journal of Business Ethics 45 IssueID1 109–120 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024128730308
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Council for Voluntary Organisations (2003) Response to the DTI Proposals for a Community Interest Company NCVO London
R. Paton (2003) Managing and Measuring Social Enterprises Sage London
J. Pearce (2003) Social Enterprise in Anytown Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation London
T. S. Pinkston A. B. Carroll (1996) ArticleTitle’A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations: Have They Changed?’ Journal of Business Ethics 15 IssueID2 199–206 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00705587
L. Preston J. Post (1975) Private Management and Public Policy: the Principle of Public Responsibility Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
M. E. Porter M. R. Kramer (2002) ArticleTitle’The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’ Harvard Business Review 80 IssueID12 56–68 Occurrence Handle12510538
M. D. Schlusberg (1969) ArticleTitle’Corporate Legitimacy and Social Responsibility: the Role of Law’ California Management Review 12 IssueID1 65–76
S. P. Sethi (1975) ArticleTitle’Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance’ California Management Review 17 IssueID3 58–64
N. C. Smith (2003) ’Corporate Social Responsibility: Nor Whether, But How?’, Centre for Marketing Working Paper 03–701 London Business School London
R. N. Stern S. R. Barley (1996) ArticleTitle’Organizations and Social Systems: Organization Theory’s Neglected Mandate’ Administrative Science Quarterly 41 IssueID1 146–162
J. Stiglitz (2002) Globalization and its Discontents Penguin Books London
D. L. Swanson (1995) ArticleTitle’Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model’ Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 43–64
S. Waddock M. Boyle (1995) ArticleTitle’The Dynamics of Change in Corporate Community Relations’ California Management Review 37 IssueID4 125–140
O. E. Williamson (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism The Free Press New York
D. J. Wood (1991) ArticleTitle’Corporate Social Performance Revisited’ Academy of Management Review 16 IssueID4 691–718
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tracey, P., Phillips, N. & Haugh, H. Beyond Philanthropy: Community Enterprise as a Basis for Corporate Citizenship. J Bus Ethics 58, 327–344 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-6944-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-6944-x