Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of compression bandages, sleeves, intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and active exercise on the reduction of breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL). A systematic literature search up to the year January 2016 was performed in CINAHL, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO), PEDro and PubMed. Inclusion criteria were (1) RCTs, (2) reported adequate statistics for meta-analysis, (3) English or German language. Exclusion criteria were (1) effects of drugs, hormonal, radiation and surgical procedures, (2) studies with children, (3) non-breast cancers, lower extremity oedema, (4) impact on fatigue only, diets or sexually transmitted diseases, (5) cost-analysis only and (6) non-carcinogenic syndromes or (7) prevention of breast cancer. After scoring the methodological quality of the selected studies, data concerning volume reduction of the oedema swelling were extracted. Thirty-two studies were included in this systematic review. Nine studies were selected for the RCT-based studies and 19 studies were included in the pre–post studies-based random-effects meta-analyses. All conclusions should be taken with precautions because of the insufficient quality of the selected papers. Exercise seems beneficial in reducing oedema volume in BCRL. IPC seems beneficial in helping to reduce the oedema volume in the acute phase of treatment. Compression sleeves do not aid in the volume reduction in the acute phase; however, they do prevent additional swelling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is one of the most dreaded complications after treatment for breast cancer. The risk factors for BCRL are axillary clearance, radiation therapy, high BMI and post-operative infections [1–3]. The incidence of BCRL is related to the invasiveness of axillary lymph node extirpation, with less BCRL in sentinel node negative patients, and ranges between 12.5 and 49 % [3–6]. The pooled incidence for BCRL, taking into account the larger part of sentinel negative patients, is 16.6 % [3]. BCRL is now recognized as a chronic disease affecting most frequently the upper extremity, followed by the chest wall and breast [7]. This condition can develop directly after surgery or post-radiation therapy, although it can also occur months and even years later [4].
Women with BCRL complain of a reduced quality of life (QOL) [8] and tend to have higher rates of mental health problems [9], while shoulder stiffness and functional limitations in activities of daily living are also reported [10, 11]. Consequently, BCRL has implications on the ability to work, and hence lead to high direct and indirect monetary costs. After breast cancer treatment, women cannot return to work for 10.8 months on average, while in BCRL patients, this period is 12.9 months on average [12]. It is in the interest of the patient, the medical staff, the therapist and the insurance companies, to make the treatment as effective and as acceptable as possible.
The consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology for evaluation and managing peripheral lymphoedema [13] described the following treatment techniques for BCRL reduction: manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), compression bandaging, active exercises, and skin care. In the literature, this consensus treatment is referred to as complex decongestive therapy because the treatment is a combination of the mentioned treatment modalities. Two reviews and one meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of different treatment methods are available [14–16]. None of these reviews evaluated precisely the reduction of oedema after a comprehensive treatment or after an exercise intervention without MLD. Therefore, the aim of this present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of compression and exercise modalities for the management of BCRL. The research question for the study was as follows: What are the effects of compression (bandages) and active exercise during the intensive phase of therapy in the reduction of lymphoedema in breast cancer patients?
Method
Study search
The methods used for this systematic review were based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [17, 18]. This systematic literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases from January 2015 until January 2016. The literature search was performed in CINAHL, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). The unpublished International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the World Health Organization (WHO) was also searched. The reference list of all relevant studies was cross-referenced in order to find further literature. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered at PROSPERO (CRD42014010700).
Study selection
Two independent reviewers (MA, SM) screened titles and abstracts for eligibility. The decision to read the full text was made based upon pre-defined eligibility criteria. Keywords and combination to the PICO-model were used for the search strategy:
Population (P): female or women; Intervention (I): lymphatic drainage or lymphtape or compression bandage or sleeve or intermittent pneumatic compression (ICP) or exercise; Comparator (C): Compression bandage against control intervention or compression bandage against exercise and Outcome (O): volume or oedema reduction.
Afterwards, three independent reviewers (SR, JT, NG) read the full text and selected the studies to include in the systematic review and meta-analysis if they (1) were RCTs, (2) reported mean and SD (or standard error) or mean change and SD (or standard error) or medians and interquartile range (3) were written in English or German language and (4) mentioned one of the following keywords in the title or abstract: lymphoedema, women, mastectomy, axillary dissection or breast cancer.
A study was excluded when the effect of (1) drugs, hormonal, radiation and surgical procedures was examined. The other exclusion criteria were studies with (2) children in the test groups, (3) non-breast cancers, (4) lower extremity oedema, (5) impact on fatigue only, (6) diets or sexually transmitted diseases, (7) cost-analysis only and (8) syndromes that are not carcinogenic nature or (9) investigation of the prevention of breast cancer.
Quality assessment
General study characteristics were extracted by two independent reviewers (MA, SM). The following information was included in this systematic review: study design, participants (N and age), intervention, outcomes and results.
The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias (RoB) tool [19] was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies by two independent reviewers (MA, SM). The RoB criteria list covers six items that represent the aspects of internal validity. Each item was scored with “−” for no, with “+” for yes and with “?” if the information was unclear. A study was defined as having a low risk of bias if all criteria were fulfilled with yes. A study had a moderate risk of bias when one or more items were rated unclear, while a study was coded as high risk of bias if one or more key domains have been rated with no. Where discrepancies existed, a third reviewer (SR) intervened to obtain a consensus.
A meta-analysis was performed if two or more studies had measured and reported the same outcome. If more than one outcome variable was reported, the reviewers (SR, JT, NG) will decide, without knowledge of the results, which outcome variable should be pooled [20]. The decision was based on the reviewers’ judgment. The main outcomes were reduction of oedema volume and reduction of arm volume.
The meta-analyses used a random-effects model. The effect sizes were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs). To explore the review questions, the following meta-analyses were conducted: (i) compression (bandage, sleeve, intermittent pneumatic pressure) versus control for reduction of oedema volume and (ii) exercise versus control for reduction of oedema volume. Furthermore, (iii) a subgroup one-arm pre–post-intervention effect analysis of compression and exercise on reduction of oedema volume was carried out.
Heterogeneity of treatment effects across the individual study estimates was investigated statistically using the Cochran’s Q statistic and its corresponding degrees of freedom and p value. Higgins’ I 2measure was used to determine how much of the observed variability can be explained by the true between-studies variability. Higgins’ proposed benchmarking was used for the interpretation of these heterogeneity measures. An I 2 around 25 % indicates that the heterogeneity might not be important, while an I2 around 50 % and I 2 around 75 % suggest that heterogeneity is moderate and substantially considerable, respectively [21].
For clinical interpretation of the findings based on the data from the included RCTs, the overall weighted standardized mean difference estimate of the meta-analysis was re-expressed in the original units using the “familiar instrument method” as proposed in the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [22]. For clinical interpretation of the findings based on the data from the included pre–post studies, the overall weighted standardized mean difference estimate of the meta-analysis was re-expressed in the original units using the “rule of thumb for effect sizes method” (i.e. Cohen’s benchmarking of effect sizes) as proposed in the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [22].
Risk for publication bias was assessed by funnel plot inspection and the classic fail-safe N algorithm.
For all analyses, p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All calculations and plots were conducted using the CMA-2 software (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 2nd version, Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA).
Results
Flow of studies through this review
Figure 1 depicts the flow process of studies in this systematic review and meta-analysis. In total, 543 articles were found. After removing duplicates and reviewing 411 titles and abstracts, 121 original articles were read in detail. Overall, 32 studies were selected and included for the systematic review, while nine studies were selected for the RCT-based meta-analyses, and 19 studies were included in the pre–post studies-based meta-analyses.
Risk of bias
Table 1 shows the RoB assessment of the included studies. Most studies lacked concealed allocation and blinding and therefore showed a moderate to high risk of BIAS.
Study characteristics
The study characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Haghighat et al. [23] and Schmitz et al. [24] included more than 100 participants in their study. The other studies showed a sample size of less than 100 participants. The intervention method and outcome varied across all included studies.
Effect of intervention
Nine RCTs could be used to evaluate the effect of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), use of a sleeve or exercise vs. control on reduction of oedema (Fig. 2).
The meta-analysis for exercise yielded a SMD of −0.49 [95 % CI −0.86 to −0.11] (p = 0.011). The heterogeneity was low (Cochrane`s Q = 2.53; df = 3; p = 0.470) with I2 of 0 %. After re-expression in its original metric, the overall weighted effect size corresponded with a reduction of oedema volume of about 200 cm3.
The meta-analysis for IPC showed a SMD of −0.54 [95 % CI −1.01 to −0.064] (p = 0.026). The heterogeneity was low (Cochrane`s Q = 1.36; df = 1; p = 0.244) with I 2 of 26.3 %. After re-expression in its original metric, the overall weighted effect size corresponded with a reduction of oedema volume of about 400 cm3.
The meta-analysis for the use of a sleeve showed an overall weighted SMD of −0.15 [95 % CI −0.44 to 0.14] (p = 0.314). The heterogeneity was low (Cochrane`s Q = 0.49; df = 2; p = 0.782) with I 2 of 0 %. After re-expression in its original metric, the overall weighted effect size corresponded with a reduction of oedema volume of about 50 cm3.
Nineteen studies could be included in a meta-analysis of effect sizes from pre–post-intervention studies and from multiple-armed RCTs, of which the arm of interest was extracted and used as an individual pre–post study. This allowed for the inclusion of bandage as an extra type of compression (Fig. 3).
The meta-analysis for bandage showed a SMD of −0.33 [95 % CI −0.48 to −0.17] (p < 0.0001). The heterogeneity was low (Cochrane`s Q = 6.34; df = 7; p = 0.501) with I 2 of 0 %. Using the rule of thumb for the re-expression of the SMDs, this overall weighted SMD would correspond with a small effect size.
The meta-analysis for exercise showed a SMD of −0.074 [95 % CI −0.28 to 0.13] (p = 0.479). The heterogeneity was low (Cochrane`s Q = 0.93; df = 4; p = 0.920) with I 2 of 0 %. Using the rule of thumb for the re-expression of the SMDs, this overall weighted SMD would correspond with a small effect size.
The meta-analysis for intermittent pneumatic compression showed a SMD of 0.013 [95 % CI −0.25 to 0.28] (p = 0.926). The heterogeneity was low (Cochrane`s Q = 0.13; df = 2; p = 0.938) with I 2 of 0 %.
The meta-analysis for sleeve showed a SMD of −0.26 [95 % CI: −0.519 to 0.001] (p = 0.051). The heterogeneity was low (Cochrane`s Q = 0.74; df = 2; p = 0.690) with I 2 of 0 %. Using the rule of thumb for the re-expression of the SMDs, this overall weighted SMD would correspond with a small effect size.
Risk of publication bias was moderate. Figure 4 depicts the funnel plots for the meta-analyses based on RCTs and based on one-arm pre–post studies. No real critical funnel plot asymmetry was observed.
The “classic fail-safe N” algorithm revealed that 46 and 22 missing non-significant studies would be needed to bring the p value above the alpha level of 5 % in the RCT- and pre–post-based analysis, respectively.
Discussion
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the effect of different compression modalities (such as the use of bandage, sleeve or intermittent pneumatic compression) and exercise for the management of BCRL. First, the results from RCT’s are discussed; second, the results of the pre–post designs are discussed.
Four RCT’s reported on the effects of exercise [25–28]. Unfortunately, the exercise programs cannot be compared due to the large variation in protocol. Despite the different protocols (Yoga, Nordic Walking, Resistance training), all protocols favoured lymphoedema volume reduction. On recalculating, exercise resulted in a volume reduction of 200 ml. These results add to the knowledge that exercise is beneficial in the treatment of BCRL and does not aggravate lymphoedema [29, 30].
Two RCT’s reported from a sample of BCRL patients that additionally received IPC to the consensus treatment [23, 31]. Both IPC protocols were comparable, and a recalculation of the effect of IPC demonstrated that IPC was able to reduce lymphoedema volume to 400 ml in the intensive phase. Unfortunately the effect of IPC cannot be maintained in the maintenance phase as is demonstrated in another meta-analysis [32]. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with precaution. IPC lacks the ability to be a standalone therapy since it only stimulates the lymphatic drainage in working collectors. Therefore, IPC has a limited effect on the resorption of the interstitial oedema fluid.
Three RCT’s reported on the effect of a compression sleeve in the intensive phase [33–35]. In two studies, the compression sleeve was additional to exercises [34, 35], and in one study, the compression was the only treatment provided when arm volume started to increase in comparison to pre-operative volume [33]. The effect on oedema volume reduction was limited to 50 ml. These results were to be expected since a compression sleeve is not a treatment modality to reduce volume but to maintain the leanest volume. Therefore, a sleeve should not be used in the intensive phase unless the sleeve is provided very early after onset of lymphoedema, as was the case in the study of Stout-Gergich [33]. In the treatment of severe lymphoedema, a compression sleeve should be provided by the start of the maintenance phase to limit the risk of volume increase. In a large cohort study, it was demonstrated that patients who adhere to wearing the compression sleeve have the lowest risk for regaining oedema volume [36].
For the pre–post results, we were able to extract data concerning the use of bandages, IPC, compression sleeve and exercises. These results were based on a comparison between baseline measurements and measurements taken at the end of the intervention; therefore, no control group is available. Again, all interventions relate to the intensive phase of BCRL treatment.
Eight samples from five studies were selected to demonstrate the effect of compression bandages [37–41]. Overall, it was shown that bandaging has the ability to decrease the oedema volume in the intensive phase. As demonstrated by the different samples, therapists need to be aware that the pressure provided by the bandages must be optimal [37, 38]. Compression bandaging reduces volume more and faster when compared to wearing a compression sleeve in the intensive phase of the consensus treatment [41].
Continuing with the results concerning compression sleeve, we were able to extract data from three studies [41–43]. Comparable to the results from the RCT’s, compression sleeves had a low effect on volume reduction in the intensive phase. The small reduction of volume by wearing a compression sleeve is due to the increased interstitial pressure, limiting filtration. (ref: http://www.woundsinternational.com/media/issues/212/files/content_177.pdf) As stated before, compression sleeves are more appropriate in the maintenance phase.
In contrast to the results from the RCT’s, IPC [44, 45] as well as exercise [34, 46–48] effect sizes from the pre–post-designed studies showed no benefit on volume reduction. Especially for IPC, the results demonstrated a very low effect size, confirming that IPC is not a standalone therapy. For exercises, however, it is a mixed story. Low effect sizes were found in the study that did not include compression during exercise. [34] The studies that did combine exercise and compression demonstrated a better result: Gautam et al. [47] demonstrated a 122 ml reduction during exercise.
Unfortunately, the research question “what are the effects of compression bandages and active exercise on the reduction of lymphoedema volume in breast cancer patients during the intensive phase?” could not be answered conclusively. This conclusion is based upon the many encountered limitations in the selected papers. Therefore, several limitations of the current systematic review and meta-analysis need to be discussed. Overall, we were confronted with a low number of studies that reported on the outcomes selected for this meta-analysis and unfortunately most of them had but poor to moderate methodological quality. Due to the consensus treatment proposed by the ISL, it is difficult to select studies that scope only one treatment modality. Recently, two Cochrane reviews were published concerning the added value of MLD in the consensus treatment demonstrating likewise difficulties [14, 15]. In studies reporting from the consensus treatment, no information about the separate effects of the different modalities are reported. Many of the selected studies provided a general treatment based upon the consensus treatment and added the treatment modality of interest to the experimental group [23, 25, 43]. Besides the low number of studies, sample sizes of the selected studies were also low (n ranged from 7 to 56 patients). Furthermore, a risk of publication bias cannot be excluded. However, we believe that this risk is limited since a rigorous search was performed in different databases, and no real critical asymmetry was observed in the funnel plots.
Conclusion
This systematic review and meta-analysis showed some evidence that active exercising may reduce oedema volume in BCRL. IPC seems beneficial in helping to reduce the oedema volume in the acute phase of treatment, while compression sleeves do not aid in the volume reduction in the acute phase but they do prevent additional swelling. All conclusions should be taken with precautions because of the insufficient quality of the selected papers.
References
Tsai RJ, Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Snetselaar LG, Zamba GK, Scott-Conner C (2009) The risk of developing arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors. Ann Surg Oncol 16(7):1959–1972
Zhu YQ, Xie YH, Liu FH, Guo Q, Shen PP, Tian Y (2014) Systemic analysis on risk factors for breast cancer related lymphedema. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP 15(16):6535–6541
DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S (2013) Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14(6):500–515
Petrek JA, Senie RT, Peters M, Rosen PP (2001) Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis. Cancer 92(6):1368–1377
Verbelen H, Gebruers N, Beyers T, De Monie AC, Tjalma W (2014) Breast edema in breast cancer patients following breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147(3):463–471. doi:10.1007/s10549-014-3110-8
Gebruers N, Verbelen H, De Vrieze T, Coeck D, Tjalma W (2015) Incidence and time path of lymphedema in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96(6):1131–1139
Netopil BC (2010) Häufigkeit sekundärer Arm-, Mamma-und Thoraxwandödeme nach Mammakarzinomtherapie heutzutage: eine retrospektive Studiemit 1000 einseitig am Mammakarzinom operierten Patientinnen (mit Erstdiagnose von 2000–2007). Universitätsbibliothek Giessen
Chachaj A, Malyszczak K, Pyszel K, Lukas J, Tarkowski R, Pudelko M, Andrzejak R, Szuba A (2010) Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Psychooncology 19(3):299–305. doi:10.1002/pon.1573
Vassard D, Olsen MH, Zinckernagel L, Vibe-Petersen J, Dalton SO, Johansen C (2010) Psychological consequences of lymphoedema associated with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 46(18):3211–3218. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.041
Kwan W, Jackson J, Weir LM, Dingee C, McGregor G, Olivotto IA (2002) Chronic arm morbidity after curative breast cancer treatment: prevalence and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 20(20):4242–4248
Verbelen H, Gebruers N, Eeckhout FM, Verlinden K, Tjalma W (2014) Shoulder and arm morbidity in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144(1):21–31
Fantoni SQ, Peugniez C, Duhamel A, Skrzypczak J, Frimat P, Leroyer A (2010) Factors related to return to work by women with breast cancer in northern France. J Occup Rehabil 20(1):49–58. doi:10.1007/s10926-009-9215-y
ISL (2013) The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2013 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 46(1):1–11
Ezzo J, Manheimer E, McNeely ML, Howell DM, Weiss R, Johansson KI, Bao T, Bily L, Tuppo CM, Williams AF, Karadibak D (2015) Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 5:CD003475. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2
Stuiver MM, ten Tusscher MR, Agasi-Idenburg CS, Lucas C, Aaronson NK, Bossuyt PM (2015) Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper-limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of developing lymphoedema after breast cancer therapy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2:CD009765. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009765.pub2
Huang TW, Tseng SH, Lin CC, Bai CH, Chen CS, Hung CS, Wu CH, Tam KW (2013) Effects of manual lymphatic drainage on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 11:15. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-11-15
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–e34. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA, Cochrane Bias Methods G, Cochrane Statistical Methods G (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928
Tschopp M, Sattelmayer MK, Hilfiker R (2011) Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis. Age Ageing 40(5):549–556. doi:10.1093/ageing/afr005
Higgins J, Green S (2010) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention version 5.0. 2, 2009
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Haghighat S, Lotfi-Tokaldany M, Yunesian M, Akbari ME, Nazemi F, Weiss J (2010) Comparing two treatment methods for post mastectomy lymphedema: complex decongestive therapy alone and in combination with intermittent pneumatic compression. Lymphology 43(1):25–33
Schmitz KH, Ahmed RL, Troxel A, Cheville A, Smith R, Lewis-Grant L, Bryan CJ, Williams-Smith CT, Greene QP (2009) Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema. N Engl J Med 361(7):664–673. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810118
Kim DS, Sim Y, Jeong HJ, Kim GC (2010) Effect of Active Resistive Exercise on Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91(12):1844–1848. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.008
Loudon A, Barnett T, Piller N, Immink MA, Visentin D, Williams AD (2012) The effect of yoga on women with secondary arm lymphoedema from breast cancer treatment. BMC Complement Altern Med 12:66. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-66
Malicka I, Stefanska M, Rudziak M, Jarmoluk P, Pawlowska K, Szczepanska-Gieracha J (2011) Wozniewski M (2011) The influence of Nordic walking exercise on upper extremity strength and the volume of lymphoedema in women following breast cancer treatment. Isokinet Exerc Sci 19(4):295–304
McKenzie DC, Kalda AL (2003) Effect of upper extremity exercise on secondary lymphedema in breast cancer patients: a pilot study. J Clin Oncol 21(3):463–466
Kwan ML, Cohn JC, Armer JM, Stewart BR, Cormier JN (2011) Exercise in patients with lymphedema: a systematic review of the contemporary literature. J Cancer Surviv 5(4):320–336
Paramanandam VS, Roberts D (2014) Weight training is not harmful for women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a systematic review. J Physiother 60(3):136–143. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2014.07.001
Szuba A, Achalu R, Rockson SG (2002) Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression. Cancer 95(11):2260–2267
Shao Y, Qi K, Zhou QH, Zhong DS (2014) Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Pump for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Oncol Res Treat 37(4):170–174. doi:10.1159/000360786
Stout Gergich NL, Pfalzer LA, McGarvey C, Springer B, Gerber LH, Soballe P (2008) Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedema. Cancer 112(12):2809–2819. doi:10.1002/cncr.23494
Vale TCP, Guimaraes TD, Libanori D (2011) Baruffi SM (2011) Synergistic effect of low elastic compression sleeves in the treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. J Phlebol Lymphol 4(1):5–9
Johansson K, Tibe K, Weibull A, Newton RC (2005) Low intensity resistance exercise for breast cancer patients with arm lymphedema with or without compression sleeve. Lymphology 38(4):167–180
Vignes S, Porcher R, Arrault M, Dupuy A (2007) Long-term management of breast cancer-related lymphedema after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101(3):285–290. doi:10.1007/s10549-006-9297-6
Damstra RJ, Partsch H (2009) Compression therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized, controlled comparative study of relation between volume and interface pressure changes. J Vasc Surg 49(5):1256–1263. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.018
Partsch H, Damstra RJ, Mosti G (2011) Dose finding for an optimal compression pressure to reduce chronic edema of the extremities. Int Angiol 30(6):527–533
Johansson K, Albertsson M, Ingvar C, Ekdahl C (1999) Effects of compression bandaging with or without manual lymph drainage treatment in patients with postoperative arm lymphedema. Lymphology 32(3):103–110
Kasseroller RG, Brenner E (2010) A prospective randomised study of alginate-drenched low stretch bandages as an alternative to conventional lymphologic compression bandaging. Support Care Cancer 18(3):343–350. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0658-7
King M, Deveaux A, White H, Rayson D (2012) Compression garments versus compression bandaging in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 20(5):1031–1036. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1178-9
Maldonado GE, Perez CA, Covarrubias EE, Cabriales SA, Leyva LA, Perez JC, Almaguer DG (2011) Autologous stem cells for the treatment of post-mastectomy lymphedema: a pilot study. Cytotherapy 13(10):1249–1255. doi:10.3109/14653249.2011.594791
Dayes IS, Whelan TJ, Julian JA, Parpia S, Pritchard KI, D’Souza DP, Kligman L, Reise D, LeBlanc L, McNeely ML, Manchul L, Wiernikowski J, Levine MN (2013) Randomized trial of decongestive lymphatic therapy for the treatment of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(30):3758–3763. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.45.7192
Ridner SH, Murphy B, Deng J, Kidd N, Galford E, Bonner C, Bond SM, Dietrich MS (2012) A randomized clinical trial comparing advanced pneumatic truncal, chest, and arm treatment to arm treatment only in self-care of arm lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(1):147–158. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1795-5
Johansson K, Lie E, Ekdahl C, Lindfeldt J (1998) A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema. Lymphology 31(2):56–64
Letellier M, Towers A, Cohen R (2008) Aqualymphatic exercise as an alternative therapy for lympedema management following breast cancer: a randomized controlled pilot study… 17th International Congress on Palliative Care, September 23-26, 2008/Palais Des Congres, Montreal, Canada. J Palliat Care 24(3):215
Gautam AP, Maiya AG, Vidyasagar MS (2011) Effect of home-based exercise program on lymphedema and quality of life in female postmastectomy patients: pre-post intervention study. J Rehabil Res Dev 48(10):1261–1268. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2010.05.0089
Johansson K, Klernas P, Weibull A, Mattsson S (2014) A home-based weight lifting program for patients with arm lymphedema following breast cancer treatment: a pilot and feasibility study. Lymphology 47(2):51–64
Godoy Mde F, Pereira MR, Oliani AH, Godoy JM (2012) Synergic effect of compression therapy and controlled active exercises using a facilitating device in the treatment of arm lymphedema. Int J Med Sci 9(4):280–284. doi:10.7150/ijms.3272
Kim do S, Sim YJ, Jeong HJ, Kim GC (2010) Effect of active resistive exercise on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91(12):1844–1848. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.008
Kozanoglu E, Basaran S, Paydas S, Sarpel T (2009) Efficacy of pneumatic compression and low-level laser therapy in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphoedema: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 23(2):117–124. doi:10.1177/0269215508096173
Letellier ME, Towers A, Shimony A, Tidhar D (2014) Breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled pilot and feasibility study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil/Assoc Acad Physiatr 93(9):751–759. doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000089 quiz 760-751
Loudon A, Barnett T, Piller N, Immink MA, Williams AD (2014) Yoga management of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomised controlled pilot-trial. BMC Complement Altern Med 14:214. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-214
Maher J, Refshauge K, Ward L, Paterson R, Kilbreath S (2012) Change in extracellular fluid and arm volumes as a consequence of a single session of lymphatic massage followed by rest with or without compression. Support Care Cancer 20(12):3079–3086. doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1433-8
Malicka I, Rosseger A, Hanuszkiewicz J, Wozniewski M (2014) Kinesiology Taping reduces lymphedema of the upper extremity in women after breast cancer treatment: a pilot study. Prz Menopauzalny 13(4):221–226. doi:10.5114/pm.2014.44997
Pilch U, Wozniewski M, Szuba A (2009) Influence of compression cycle time and number of sleeve chambers on upper extremity lymphedema volume reduction during intermittent pneumatic compression. Lymphology 42(1):26–35
Randheer S, Kadambari D, Srinivasan K, Bhuvaneswari V, Bhanumathy M, Salaja R (2011) Comprehensive decongestive therapy in postmastectomy lymphedema: an Indian perspective. Indian J Cancer 48(4):397–402. doi:10.4103/0019-509x.92250
Ridner SH, Poage-Hooper E, Kanar C, Doersam JK, Bond SM, Dietrich MS (2013) A pilot randomized trial evaluating low-level laser therapy as an alternative treatment to manual lymphatic drainage for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Oncol Nurs Forum 40(4):383–393. doi:10.1188/13.onf.383-393
Schmitz KH, Troxel AB, Cheville A, Grant LL, Bryan CJ, Gross CR, Lytle LA, Ahmed RL (2009) Physical Activity and Lymphedema (the PAL trial): assessing the safety of progressive strength training in breast cancer survivors. Contemp Clin Trials 30(3):233–245. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2009.01.001
Sitzia J, Sobrido L, Harlow W (2002) Manual lymphatic drainage compared with simple lymphatic drainage in the treatment of post-mastectomy lymphoedema. Physiotherapy 88(2):99–107
Szuba A, Achalu R (2002) Rockson SG (2002), Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression. Cancer 95(11):2260–2267
Tsai HJ, Hung HC, Yang JL, Huang CS, Tsauo JY (2009) Could Kinesio tape replace the bandage in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast-cancer-related lymphedema? A pilot study. Support Care Cancer 17(11):1353–1360. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0592-8
Uzkeser H, Karatay S, Erdemci B, Koc M, Senel K (2013) Efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage and intermittent pneumatic compression pump use in the treatment of lymphedema after mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer. doi:10.1007/s12282-013-0481-3
Miller L (1998) Exercise in the management of breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Innovatios Breast Cancer Care 3:101–106
Hanson E (2004) MotionVExercises for Lymphoedema. Yukin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Trial registration: PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014010700.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogan, S., Taeymans, J., Luginbuehl, H. et al. Therapy modalities to reduce lymphoedema in female breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 159, 1–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3919-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3919-4