Summary
One of the more problematic and dreaded complications of breast cancer is lymphoedema. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of lymphoedema 6-months following breast cancer treatment and to examine potential risk factors among a population-based sample of women residing in South-East Queensland (n=176). Women were defined as having lymphoedema if the difference between the sum of arm circumferences (SOAC) of the treated and untreated sides was >5 cm (prevalence=11.9%) or >10% (prevalence=0.6%), their multi- frequency bioelectrical impedance (MFBIA) score was ≥3 standard deviations above the reference impedance score (prevalence=11.4%), or they reported ‘yes’ when asked if arm swelling had been present in the previous 6 months (prevalence=27.8%). Of those with lymphoedema defined by MFBIA, only 35% were detected using the SOAC method (difference > 5 cm), while 65% were identified via the self-report method (i.e., respective sensitivities). Specificities for SOAC (difference > 5 cm) and self-report were 88.5% and 76.9%, respectively. When examining associations between presence of lymphoedema and a range of characteristics, findings also varied depending on the method used to assess lymphoedema. Nevertheless, one of the more novel and significant findings was that being treated on the non-dominant, compared to dominant, side was associated with an 80% increased risk of having lymphoedema (MFBIA). Our work raises questions about the use of circumferences as the choice of measurement for lymphoedema in both research and clinical settings, and assesses MFBIA as a potential alternative.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J Petrek M Heelan (1998) ArticleTitleIncidence of breast carcinoma-related lymphedema Cancer 83 2776–2781 Occurrence Handle9874397 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981215)83:12B+<2776::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-V Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FovFOqsQ%3D%3D
S Ramos L O’Donnell G Knight (1999) ArticleTitleEdema volume, not timing, is the key to success in lymphedema treatment Am J Surg 178 311–315 Occurrence Handle10587190 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00185-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Flt1CksQ%3D%3D
A Williams A Vadgama P Franks P Mortimer (2002) ArticleTitleA randomized controlled crossover study of manual lymphatic drainage therapy in women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema Eur J Cancer Care 11 254–261 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00312.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jjtVCqsg%3D%3D
K Bland R Perczyk W Du C Rymal P Koppolu R McCrary K Carolin M Kosir (2003) ArticleTitleCan a practicing surgeon detect early lymphedema reliably? Am J Surg 186 509–513 Occurrence Handle14599616 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.003
C Ozaslan B Kuru (2004) ArticleTitleLymphedema after treatment of breast cancer Am J Surg 187 69–72 Occurrence Handle14706589 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.amjsurg.2002.12.003
B Cornish M Chapman C Hirst B Mirolo I Bunce L Ward B Thomas (2001) ArticleTitleEarly diagnosis of lymphedema using multiple frequency bioimpedance Lymphology 34 2–11 Occurrence Handle11307661 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvotlKkug%3D%3D
B Cornish L Ward B Thomas I Bunce (1998) ArticleTitleQuantification of lymphoedema using multi-frequency bioimpedance Appl Radiat Isot 49 651–652 Occurrence Handle9569568 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0969-8043(97)00266-2 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXit1ehsLw%3D
B Cornish I Bunce L Ward L Jones B Thomas (1996) ArticleTitleBioelectrical impedance for monitoring the efficacy of lymphoedema treatment programmes Breast Cancer Res Tr 38 169–176 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01806671 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD3MrgtVY%3D
L Ward I Bunce B Cornish B Mirolo B Thomas L Jones (1992) ArticleTitleMultifrequency bioelectrical impedance augments the diagnosis and management of lymphedema in post-mastectomy patients Eur J Clin Invest 22 751–754 Occurrence Handle1478244 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2362.1992.tb01440.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC383gs1Q%3D
Ward L, Piller N, Cornish B: Single or multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of lymphoedema? In: Proceedings of the XI International Conference on Electrical Bio-Impedance, Oslo, Norway, 2001
M Brennan (1992) ArticleTitleLymphedema following the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a focused review J Pain Symptom Manage 7 41–47 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0885-3924(92)90122-X
M Kissin G Querci della Rovere D Easton G Westbury (1986) ArticleTitleRisk of lymphedema following the treatment of breast cancer Br J Surg 73 580–584 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimB2s%2FotFc%3D Occurrence Handle3730795 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800730723
D Larson M Weinstein I Goldberg B Silver A Recht B Cady W Silen J Harris (1986) ArticleTitleEdema of the arm as a function of the extent of axillary surgery in patient with stage I-II carcinoma of the breast treated with primary radiotherapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12 1575–1582 Occurrence Handle3759582 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiD3cjosVM%3D
S Powell A Taghian L Kachnic J Coen S Asaad (2003) ArticleTitleRisk of lymphedema after regional nodal irradiation with breast conservation therapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55 1209–1215 Occurrence Handle12654429
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayes, S., Cornish, B. & Newman, B. Comparison of methods to diagnose lymphoedema among breast cancer survivors: 6-month follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89, 221–226 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-2045-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-2045-x