Abstract
The SF6 gas tracer observations for puffs released near the ground during the Joint Urban 2003 (JU2003) urban dispersion experiment in Oklahoma City have been analysed. The JU2003 observations, at distances of about 100–1,100 m from the source, show that, at small times, when the puff is still within the built-up downtown domain, the standard deviation of the concentration time series, σt, is influenced by the initial puff spread due to buildings near the source and by hold-up in the wakes of large buildings at the sampler locations. This effect is parameterised by assuming an initial σto of about 42 s, leading to a comprehensive similarity formula: σt = 42 + 0.1t. The second term, 0.1t, is consistent with an earlier similarity relation, σt = 0.1t, derived from puff observations in many experiments over rural terrain. The along-wind dispersion coefficient, σx, is assumed to equal σt u, in which u is the puff speed calculated as the distance from the source to the sampler, x, divided by the time after the release that the maximum concentration is observed at the sampler. σx can be expressed as σx = σxo + 0.14x, with the initial σxo of 45 m. This initial σxo agrees with the suggestion of an initial plume spread of about 40 m, made by McElroy and Pooler from analysis of the 1960s’ St. Louis urban dispersion experiment. The puff speeds, u, are initially only about 20% of the observed wind speed, averaged over about 80 street-level and rooftop anemometers in the city, but approach the mean observed wind speed as the puffs grow vertically. The scatter in the σt data is about ± a factor of two or three at any given travel time. The maximum σt is about 250 s, and the maximum duration of the puff over the sampler, Dt, sometimes called the retention time, is about 1,100 s or 18 min for these puffs and distances.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allwine KJ, Leach MJ, Stockham LW, Shinn JS, Hosker RP, Bowers JF and Pace JC (2004). Overview of joint urban 2003–an atmospheric dispersion study in Oklahoma City Paper J7.1. 9 pages. http://ams.confex.com.. Seattle, Washington
Arnold SJ, ApSimon H, Barlow J, Belcher S, Bell M, Boddy JW, Britter R, Cheng H, Clark R, Colvile RN, Dimitroulopoulou S, Dobre A, Greally B, Kaur S, Knights A, Lawton T, Makepace A, Martin D, Neophytou M, Neville S, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Nickless G, Price C, Robins A, Shallcross D, Simmonds P, Smalley RJ, Tate J, Tomlin AS, Wang H, Walsh P (2004) Introduction to the DAPPLE air pollution project. Sci Total Environ 332(1–3):139–153. Also see www.dapple.org.uk
Britter RE and Hanna SR (2003). Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35: 469–496
Chang JC, Hanna SR, Boybeyi Z and Franzese P (2005). Use of Salt Lake City URBAN 2000 field data to evaluate the urban hazard prediction assessment capability (HPAC) dispersion model. J Appl Meteorol 44(4): 485–501
Clawson KL, Carter RG, Lacroix DJ, Biltoft CA, Hukari NF, Johnson RC, Rich JD (2005) Joint Urban 2003 (JU03) SF6 atmospheric tracer field tests. NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR ARL-254, Air Resources Lab
Doran JC, Allwine KJ, Flaherty JE, Clawson KL and Carter RG (2007). Characteristics of puff dispersion in an urban environment. Atmos Environ 41(16): 3440–3452
Draxler RR (1984). Diffusion and transport experiments. In: Randerson, D (eds) Atmospheric science and power production, pp 367–422. Springfield, VA 22161
DTRA (2004) HPAC version 4.04.011 (DVD containing model and accompanying data and document files). DTRA, 6801 Telegraph Rd., Alexandria, VA
Grimmond CSB, Su H-B, Offerle B, Crawford B, Scott SL, Zhong S, Clements C (2004) Spatial variation of heat fluxes in a suberban area of Oklahoma City. Paper 3.11. 5th AMS Urban Environ. Conf., http://ams.confex.com/AMS/AFAPURBBI0/techprogram/paper_78944.htm
Hanna SR, Britter R and Franzese P (2003). A baseline urban dispersion model evaluated with Salt Lake City and Los Angeles tracer data. Atmos Environ 37(36): 5069–5082
Hanna SR and Franzese P (2000). Alongwind dispersion–a simple similarity formula compared with observations at 11 field sites and in one wind tunnel. J Appl Meteorol 39(10): 1700–1714
Hanna SR, White J, Zhou Y (2007) Observed winds, turbulence, and dispersion in built-up downtown areas in Oklahoma city and Manhattan. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, (in press) (doi: 10.1007/s10546-007-9197-2)
Lundquist JK, Mirocha JD (2006) Interaction of nocturnal low-level jets with urban geometries as seen in JU2003 data. Paper J5.10. AMS 86th Annual Meeting, http://ams.confex.com/AMS/ Annual2006/techprogram/paper_99635.htm
Macdonald RW (2000). Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97(1): 25–45
McElroy JL and Pooler F (1968). St Louis dispersion study volume II–analysis. USDHEW PHS, NAPCA. Arlington, VA
Molina MJ and Molina LT (2004). Megacities and atmospheric pollution. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 54(6): 644–680
Williams MD, Brown M, Boswell D, Singh B, Pardyjak E (2004) Testing of the QUIC-PLUME model with wind-tunnel measurements for a high-rise building. Paper J5.3. 10 pages. AMS Fifth Urban Environment Conference, http://ams.confex.com. Vancouver
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Y., Hanna, S.R. Along-wind dispersion of puffs released in a built-up urban area. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125, 469–486 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9200-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9200-y