Abstract
The low-level flight method (LLF) has been combined with linear inverse models (IM) resulting in an LLF+IM method for the determination of area-averaged turbulent surface fluxes. With this combination, the vertical divergences of the turbulent latent and sensible heat fluxes were calculated from horizontal flights. The statistical errors of the derived turbulent surface fluxes were significantly reduced. The LLF+IM method was tested both in numerical and field experiments. Large-eddy simulations (LES) were performed to compare ‘true’ flux profiles with ‘measurements’ of simulated flights in an idealised convective boundary layer. Small differences between the ‘true’ and the ‘measured’ fluxes were found, but the vertical flux divergences were correctly calculated by the LLF+IM method. The LLF+IM method was then applied to data collected during two flights with the Helipod, a turbulence probe carried by a helicopter, and with the research aircraft Do 128 in the LITFASS-98 field campaign. The derived surface fluxes were compared with results from eddy-covariance surface stations and with large-aperture scintillometer data. The comparison showed that the LLF+IM method worked well for the sensible heat flux at 77 and 200 m flight levels, and also for the latent heat flux at the lowest level. The model quality control indicated failures for the latent heat flux at the 200 m level (and higher), which were probably due to large moisture fluctuations that could not be modelled using linear assumptions. Finally the LLF+IM method was applied to more than twenty low-level flights from the LITFASS-2003 experiment. Comparison with aggregated surface flux data revealed good agreement for the sensible heat flux but larger discrepancies and a higher statistical uncertainty for the latent heat flux
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Angevine W.M., Avery S.K., and Kok G.L. (1993). ‘Virtual Heat Flux Measurements from a Boundary-Layer Profiler-RASS Compared to Aircraft Measurements’. J. Appl. Meteorol 32:1901–1907
Bange J., Roth R. (1999). ‘Helicopter-Borne Flux Measurements in the Nocturnal Boundary Layer Over Land – a Case Study’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 92:295–325
Bange J., Beyrich F., and Engelbart D.A.M. (2002). ‘Airborne Measurements of Turbulent Fluxes during LITFASS-98: A Case Study about Method and Significance’. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 73:35–51
Berger, F.: 2002, ‘Surface Radiant and Energy Flux Densities inferred from Satellite Data for the BALTEX Watershed’. Boreal. Env. Res. pp. 343–351
Betts A., Desjardins R., MacPherson J., and Kelly R. (1990). ‘Boundary-Layer Heat and Moisture Budgets from FIFE’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 50:109–137
Betts A., Desjardins R., MacPherson J., and Kelly R. (1992). ‘Budget Analysis of the Boundary Layer Grid Flights During FIFE 1987’. J. Geophys. Res. 97:18533–18546
Beyrich F., Berger F., de Bruin H., Foken T., Kohsiek W., Richter S., and Weisensee U. (2002a). ‘Experimental Determination of Turbulent Fluxes over the Heterogeneous LITFASS Area – Selected Results from the LITFASS-98 experiment’. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 73:19–34
Beyrich F., de Bruin H.A.R., Meijninger W.M.L., Schipper J.W., and Lohse H. (2002b). ‘Results from One-Year Continuous Operation of a Large Aperture Sintillometer over a Heterogeneous Land Surface’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 105:85–97
Beyrich F., Herzog H.-J., and Neisser J. (2002c). ‘The LITFASS Project of DWD and the LITFASS-98 Experiment: The Project Strategy and the Experimental Setup’. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 73:3–18
Browne L.W.B., Antonia R.A., and Rajagopalan S. (1983). ‘The Spatial Derivative of Tempeature in a Turbulent Flow and Taylor’s Hypothesis’. Phys. Fluids 26(5):1222–1227
Brümmer B., and Thiemann S. (2002). ‘The Atmospheric Boundary Layer in an Arctic Wintertime On-Ice Air Flow’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:53–72
Burns S.P., Khelif D., Friehe C.A., Williams A.G., Hignett P., Grant A.L.M., Hacker J.M., Rogers D.P., Bradley E.F., Weller R.A., Cronin M.F., Anderson S.P., Fairall C.W., and Paulson C.A. (1999). ‘Comparison of Aircraft, Ship, and Buoy Meteorological Measurements from TOGA COARE’. J. Geophys. Res. 104:30853–30883
Busch U., Hofmann M., Jacobi C., and Roth R. (1996). ‘Errors in Aircraft Measurements of Turbulent Fluxes in a Boundary Layer with Strong Convection’. Phys. Chem. Earth 21:393–397
Chou S.-H., Atlas D., and Yeh E.-N. (1985). ‘Turbulence in a Convective Marine Atomospheric Boundary Layer’. J. Atmos. Sci. 43:547–564
Cleugh H.A., Raupach M.R., Briggs P.R., and Coppin P.A. (2004). ‘Regional-Scale Heat and Water Vapour Fluxes in an Agricultural Landscape: An Evaluation of CBL Budget Methods at OASIS’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 110:99–137
Corsmeier U., Hankers R., and Wieser A. (2001). ‘Airborne Turbulence Measurements in the Lower Troposphere Onboard the Research Aircraft Dornier 128-6. D-IBUF’. Meteorol. Z., N. F 4:315–329
de Arellano J.V.-G., Gioli B., Miglietta F., Jonker H.J.J., Baltink H.K., Hutjes R.W.A., and Holtslag A.A.M. (2004). ‘Entrainment Process of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’. J. Geophys. Res 109(D18110), doi:10.1029/2004JD004725
Deardorff J.W. (1970). ‘Convective Velocity and Temperature Scales for the Unstable Planetary Boundary Layer and for Rayleigh Convection’. J. Atmos. Sci 27:1211–1213
Deardorff J.W. (1974). ‘Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Height and Mean Structure of a Heated Planetary Boundary Layer’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 7:81–106
Deardorff J.W. (1980). ‘Stratocumulus-Capped Mixed Layers derived from a Three-Dimensional Model’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 18:495–527
Denmead O.T., Raupach M.R., Dunin F.X., Cleugh H.A., and Leuning R. (1996). ‘Boundary Layer Budgets for Regional Estimates of Scalar Fluxes’. Global Change Biol 2:255–264
Desjardins R.L., MacPherson J.I., Schuepp P.H., and Karanja F. (1989). ‘An Evaluation of Aircraft Flux Measurements of CO2 Water Vapor and Sensible Heat’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 47:55–69
Durand P., Dupuis H., Lambert D., Bnech B., Druilhet A., Katsaros K., Taylor P., and Weill A. (1998). ‘Comparison of Sea Surface Flux Measured by Instrumented Aircraft and Ship during SOFIA and SEMAPHORE Experiments’. J. Geophys. Res 103(C11):25125–25136
Engelbart D.A.M., and Bange J. (2002). ‘Determination of Boundary-Layer Parameters using Wind Profiler/RASS and Sodar/RASS in the Frame of the LITFASS-Project’. Theor. Appl. Climatol 73:53–65
Flamant C., Pelon J., Flamant P.H., and Durand P. (1997). ‘LIDAR Determination of the Entrainment Zone Thickness at the Top of the Unstable Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 83:247–284
Grant A. (1986). ‘Observations of Boundary Layer Structure Made during the 1981 KONTUR Experiment’. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc 112:825–841
Grossman R.L. (1992a). ‘Convective Boundary Layer Budgets of Moisture and Sensible Heat over an Unstressed Prairie’. J. Geophys. Res 97:18425–18438
Grossman R.L. (1992b). ‘Sampling Errors in the Vertical Fluxes of Potential Temperature and Moisture Measured by Aircraft During FIFE’. J. Geophys. Res 97:18439–18443
Grunwald J., Kalthoff N., Corsmeier U., and Fiedler F. (1996). ‘Comparison of Areally Averaged Turbulent Fluxes over Non-Homogeneous Terrain: Results from the EFEDA-Field Experiment’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 77:105–134
Grunwald J., Kalthoff N., Fiedler F., and Corsmeier U. (1998). ‘Application of Different Flight Strategies to Determine Areally Averaged Turbulent Fluxes’. Contr. Atmos. Phys 71:283–302
Gryning S.-E., and Batchvarova E. (1999). ‘Regional Heat Flux over the NOPEX Area Estimated from the Evolution of the Mixed Layer’. Agric. For. Meteorol 98–99:159–167
Haenel H.-D., and Grünhage L. (1999). ‘Footprint Analysis: A Closed Analytical Solution Based on Height-Dependent Profiles of Wind Speed And Eddy Viscoxity’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 93:395–409
Hankers, R.: 1989, ‘The Equipment of a Research Aircraft with Emphasis on Meteorological Experiments’, in Soc. of Flight Test Eng., 20th Ann. Symp. Reno, Nevada, 7 pp
Heinemann G. (2002). ‘Aircraft-based Measurements of Turbulence Structures in the Katabatic Flow over Greenland’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 103:49–81
Isaac P.R., Mcaneney J., Leuning R., and Hacker J.M. (2004). ‘Comparison of Aircraft and Ground-based Flux Measurements during OASIS95’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 110:39–67
Jacobi C., Scherf A., Siemer A.H., and Roth R. (1995). ‘On the Influence of Sensor Ineria on the Estimation of Turbulent Fluxes from Aircraft Measurements’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 76:97–108
Kelly R.D., Smith E.A., and MacPherson J.I. (1992). ‘A Comparison of Surface Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes from Aircraft and Surface Measurements in FIFE 1987’. J. Geophys. Res 97:18445–18453
Lambert D., and Durand P. (1998). ‘Aircraft to Aircraft Intercomparison during SEMAPHORE’. JGR 103(C11):25109–25123
Lenschow D.H., and Stankov B.B. (1986). ‘Length Scales in the Convective Boundary Layer’. J. Atmos. Sci 43:1198–1209
Lenschow D.H., Mann J., and Kristensen L. (1994). ‘How Long is Long Enough When Measuring Fluxes and Other Turbulence Statistics’. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol 11:661–673
Linné, H., Hennemuth, B., Bösenberg, J., and Ertel, K.: 2006, ‘Water Vapour Flux Profiles in the Convective Boundary Layer’, Theor. Appl. Climatol., in press
Lumley, L., and Panofsky, H.: 1964. The Structure of Atmospheric Turbulence, John Wiley & Sons. 239 pp
Mahrt L., and Ek M. (1993). ‘Spatial Variability of Turbulent Fluxes and Roughness Lengths in HAPEX-MOBILHY’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 65:381–400
Mahrt L., Vickers D., Sun J., and McCaughey J.H. (2001). ‘Calculation of Area-Averaged Fluxes: Application to BOREAS’. J. Appl. Meteorol 40:915–920
Mann J., and Lenschow D.H. (1994). ‘Errors in Airborne Flux Measurements’. J. Geophys. Res D 99:14519–14526
Muschinski A., and Wode C. (1998). ‘First In-Situ Evidence for Co-Existing Sub-Meter Temperature and Humidity Sheets in the Lower Free Troposphere’. J. Atmos. Sci 55:2893–2906
Piacsek S.A., and Williams G.P. (1970). ‘Conservation Properties of Convection Difference Schemes’. J. Comput. Phys 6:392–405
Powell D., and Eldekin C. (1974). ‘An Investigation of the Application of Taylor’s Hypothesis to Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence’. J. Atmos. Sci 31:990–1002
Raasch S., and Harbusch G. (2001). ‘An Analysis of Secondary Circulations and their Effects Caused by Small-Scale Surface Inhomogeneities Using Large-Eddy Simulation’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 101:31–59
Raasch S., and Schröter M. (2001). ‘PALM – A Large-Eddy Simulation Model Performing on Massively Parallel Computers’. Meteorol. Z 10:363–372
Roth R., Hofmann M., and Wode C. (1999). ‘Geostrophic Wind, Gradient Wind, Thermal Wind, and the Vertical Windprofile – an Exemplary Analysis within a Planetary Boundary Layer over Arctic Sea-Ice’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 92:327–339
Scherf A., and Roth R. (1997). ‘Estimates of Area-Averaged Turbulent Energy Fluxes in a Convectively Driven Boundary Layer Using Aircraft Measurements’. Phys. Chem. Earth 21:399–403
Schröter M., Bange J., and Raasch S. (2000). ‘Simulated Airborne Flux Measurements in a LES Generated Convective Boundary Layer’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 95:437–456
Spieß, T., Zittel, P., and Bange, J.: 2004, ‘The Role of the Helicopter-Borne Turbulence Probe Helipod in Joint Field Campaigns’, in AMS: Eighth Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface. Seattle, USA, P 7.6, 6 pp
Tarantola A. (1987). Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 613 pp
Taylor G. (1938). ‘The Spectrum of Turbulence’. Proc. Roy. Soc A 165:476–484
Wolff M., and Bange J. (2000). ‘Inverse Method as an Analysing Tool for Airborne Measurements’. Meteorol. Z., N. F 9:361–376
Zittel, P., Spieß, T., and Bange, J.: 2004, ‘The Calculation of the Statistical Error of Measured Turbulent Fluxes – Considerations and Improvement’, in AMS: 17th Conference on Probability and Statistics in the Atmospheric Sciences. Seattle, USA, 6.7, 5 pp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bange, J., Zittel, P., Spieß, T. et al. A New Method for the Determination of Area-Averaged Turbulent Surface Fluxes from Low-Level Flights Using Inverse Models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119, 527–561 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9040-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9040-6