Abstract
Despite numerous investigations, the number and role of morphotypes involved in the life cycle of Phaeocystis species remain under debate. This is partly due to the application of different methodologies such as light, transmission, scanning electron microscopy and flow cytometry on specific samples. This heterogeneity of approaches results in the incomplete morphometric description of the different cell types existing within one species according to relevant criteria and the indetermination of the ploidy level of each observed stage. We review here the different morphotypes observed within each of the six Phaeocystis species recognized up to now. Four different cell types have been observed. In common to all six species is the occurrence of a scaly flagellate producing star-forming filaments (all species except P. jahnii) or not (P. globosa and P. jahnii). In three colony-forming species, P. globosa, P. pouchetii and P. antarctica, three morphotypes are observed: a flagellate with scales and filaments, a colonial cell, and a flagellate devoid of scales and filaments. In the non-colony-forming species, P. scrobiculata and P. cordata, only flagellates with scales and filaments have been observed. While suspected in P. pouchetii and P. antarctica, a haploid–diploid life cycle has only been evidenced for P. globosa. The two main prominent features of this cycle are that sexuality is prevalent in colony bloom formation and termination and that two types of vegetative reproduction exist. The ecological relevance of alternating haploid and diploid stages is not clearly apparent on the basis of existing ecological studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The genus Phaeocystis is a worldwide colony-blooming species that has a significant role in biogeochemical cycles (Schoemann et al. 2005) including the global sulphur cycle (Liss et al. 1994). Despite numerous investigations devoted to its ecophysiology and the role and impact of colonies in ecosystem processes, knowledge of some major biological features of the genus is still limited. Such is the case for the Phaeocystis life cycle and its controlling mechanisms that, 50 years after Kornmann’s (1955) classic paper, remain under debate. Problems of taxonomic confusion, lack of fine morphometric description of the different cell types within one species, and inadequacy of cell nomenclature have precluded a complete understanding of the Phaeocystis life cycle.
Since early description of the genus Phaeocystis by Lagerheim in 1893, the number of inclusive species has long been a matter of discussion (e.g. Kornmann 1955; Kashkin 1963; Parke et al. 1971; Sournia 1988; Medlin et al. 1994). This is mainly because the criteria used to distinguish Phaeocystis species were based on phenotypic characters such as the morphometry of the colonial stage, and/or physiological and biochemical properties (Jahnke and Baumann 1987; Baumann et al. 1994; Vaulot et al. 1994). Six species are now recognized based on small subunit (SSU) rDNA sequence analysis and morphological characterization. These are: P. antarctica Karsten, P. globosa Scherffel, P. pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim, P. jahnii Zingone, P. scrobiculata Moestrup and P. cordata Zingone et Chrétiennot-Dinet (Moestrup 1979; Medlin et al. 1994; Zingone et al. 1999; Edvardsen et al. 2000; Lange et al. 2002). Colonial forms have been reported for the first four species. It is now considered that probably more than six Phaeocystis species exist (Lange et al. 2002; Medlin and Zingone this issue).
Comparative descriptions of cell types existing within one species using morphometric criteria, i.e., presence/absence of body scales, flagella, haptonema and star-forming filaments, and ploidy levels have been made (e.g. Zingone et al. 1999; Peperzak et al. 2000a). However, a complete study of all morphotypes occurring within one species is still missing (Lancelot and Rousseau 2002). Our current knowledge of Phaeocystis cell types relies on composite independent investigations combining light (LM), transmission (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as well as flow cytometry. Each of these methodologies provides part of the information needed for a complete identification of the morphotype. LM is useful for observations of cell shape, size, number, presence of flagella, and swimming activity. SEM and TEM with higher resolution and magnification are needed for morphological and ultrastructural details of the cell covering, appendages and organelles. Flow cytometry is required for determining the ploidy levels of each cell type. In addition, it is essential that sample preservation and fixation procedures be fully described because such procedures may lead to methodological biases. Use of fixatives can indeed cause cell shrinkage, loss of appendages (Peperzak et al. 2000a; Wassmann et al. 2005) or colony disintegration, releasing colonial cells into the medium, and therefore lead to possible misinterpretation (Wassmann et al. 2005). This mixed approach results in a confuse nomenclature of the various cell types, i.e. solitary flagellates and nonflagellates, free-living single cells, colonial flagellates, motile free-living cells, swarmers, zoids, microflagellates and microzoospores. These terms are often used loosely, and this can lead to misinterpretation of life cycle events.
The number and role of cell types involved in the life cycle of the six Phaeocystis species, and whether these are the same within each species, are still among the main questions not yet resolved (Lancelot and Rousseau 2002). Of particular interest is the identification of the stage persisting between two colony bloom events, as well as the nature of colony-forming cells. The persistence of Phaeocystis as a flagellate between two colony blooms has been suggested (Kornmann 1955; Parke et al. 1971; Veldhuis et al. 1986; Verity et al. 1988b), but the type of flagellate was never described from field observations due to its low cell density and possible confusion with other nanoplanktonic species. On the other hand, senescent colonies or aggregates have also been proposed as over-wintering forms of P. globosa (Cadée 1991). Still unknown are factors responsible for the transition between life stages. The ecological significance of the different life cycle stages, flagellates and colonies, has recently been discussed by Verity and Medlin (2003). Further investigation is however needed to discriminate between the different flagellates that have been identified within some species.
In this paper, we review and synthesize the available information gained from field and culture observations on the different morphotypes occurring within each of the six Phaeocystis species, focusing on cell morphology and ploidy level. We also present unpublished data on the morphology of P. globosa and P. antarctica cells. The role of the different morphotypes within the life cycle will be addressed based on field and culture observations on their occurrence. Finally, the ecological relevance of the free-living and colonial stages will be discussed based on knowledge of physiology and trophic significance of the various morphotypes. Because it is the best-known species, P. globosa will be used as a model.
Morphotypes among Phaeocystis species
This section reviews the different cell types reported for the six Phaeocystis species which are considered here according to their revised taxonomic status as recommended by Baumann et al. (1994), Medlin et al. (1994) and Vaulot et al. (1994). This is particularly relevant for the species globosa, which has long been referred to as pouchetii in the previous literature (e.g., Parke et al. 1971; Kayser 1970; Admiraal and Venekamp 1986; Veldhuis et al. 1991; Davidson and Marchant 1992a). The seasonal distribution of the different cell types in the natural environment will also be considered in order to assess their role in the life cycle.
Morphotypes of P. globosa
A careful analysis of the literature published since the first description of P. globosa cells by Scherffel (1899, 1900) suggests that four morphotypes exist: diploid colonial cells, diploid flagellates, and two types of haploid flagellates.
Colonial cells
Colonial cells have 2–4 parietal chloroplasts, are deprived of body scales, haptonema, and flagella and are embedded in a mucilaginous matrix (Scherffel 1899; Kornmann 1955). They possess on their flagellar pole two short appendages, the role and nature of which being presently unknown (Fig. 1; Rousseau et al. submitted). Reported size ranges for live colonial cells are 4.5–8.0 μm (Kornmann 1955) and 5.8–10.4 μm (Rousseau et al. submitted) while they are 5.6–8.3 μm (Peperzak et al. 2000a) and 4.6–7.8 μm (Rousseau et al. submitted) for Lugol and Lugol-glutaraldehyde fixed cells. These cells are diploid (Cariou et al. 1994; Vaulot et al. 1994). They are evenly distributed in the colony 15–20 μm beneath a thin skin, and are weakly interconnected with dilute gel (Kornmann 1955; van Rijssel et al. 1997; Hamm et al. 1999). The colony skin is strong and semipermeable with pore size 1.0–4.4 nm in diameter, and presents plastic and elastic properties (Hamm et al. 1999). Diameter of colonies typically ranges from 10 μm to 8–9 mm (Kornmann 1955; Jahnke and Baumann 1987; Rousseau et al. 1990), but may occasionally reach 20–30 mm (Kayser 1970; Gieskes and Kraay 1975; Chen et al. 2002). Colonies are originally spherical but deviate into nonspherical shapes when growing larger or when subjected to hydrodynamical stress (Kornmann 1955; Bätje and Michaelis 1986; Rousseau et al. 1994).
Non-motile free-living cells from colonial origin have also been reported in P. globosa cultures. These cells are morphologically similar to colonial cells: same size range, lack of flagella, haptonema (Kornmann 1955; Rousseau et al. 1990; 1994; Peperzak 1993; Peperzak et al. 2000a; Dutz and Koski 2006), body scales (Peperzak et al. 2000a), thread-like filaments and stars (Peperzak et al. 2000a; Dutz and Koski 2006) and were assumed to have the same ploidy level, i.e., diploidy (Peperzak et al. 2000a). On this basis, non-motile free-living and colonial cells should not be considered anymore as distinct morphotypes (Peperzak et al. 2000a; Dutz and Koski 2006).
Haploid flagellates
The fine structure of the flagellate stage of P. globosa was first described as P. pouchetii from TEM by Parke et al. (1971). These cells have been reported as swarmers (Scherffel 1900), microzoospores (Kornmann 1955), small and large zoids (Parke et al. 1971), microflagellates (Veldhuis et al. 1986) and micro- and mesoflagellates (Peperzak et al. 2000a). They have a rounded shape, and are smaller than colonial cells, with a diameter of 3–5 μm (Kornmann 1955); 3–6 μm (Parke et al. 1971) and 3.6–5.8 μm (Rousseau et al. submitted) for live cells observed under LM. Their small size has long been used for distinguishing them from other P. globosa cell types (e.g. Veldhuis et al. 1986) before Vaulot et al. (1994), using flow cytometry, demonstrated they were the haploid stage of P. globosa.
These flagellates are capable of rapid vegetative reproduction (Kornmann 1955; Parke et al. 1971; Rousseau et al. 1994; Vaulot et al. 1994) and swim very actively (Kornmann 1955; Parke et al. 1971). They possess two equal heterodynamic flagella, 10–15 μm in length, and a short haptonema (3–4 μm) characterized by a distal swelling. They present an anterior depression and two golden-brown plastids (Parke et al. 1971). The cell body is covered by two types of organic scales showing a pattern of radiating ridges, visible on both sides (Parke et al. 1971; Peperzak et al. 2000a). Two types of haploid flagellates were distinguished by Parke et al. (1971). One type, 3–6 μm in size, possesses two superficial, bright vesicles located on the body surface (Parke et al. 1971). These vesicles release filaments, 20 μm in length, 0.05 μm in diameter, and made of alpha-chitin (Chrétiennot-Dinet et al. 1997), which form a highly characteristic pentagonal star (Parke et al. 1971). The function of these filaments is unknown. It has been hypothesized that they could act as anchors for attachment to solid structures before colony initiation (Chrétiennot-Dinet 1999), or alternatively have a role in defense against grazers (Peperzak et al. 2000a; Dutz and Koski 2006). The other haploid flagellate, 3–5 μm in size, lacks the vesicles and filaments (Parke et al. 1971; Peperzak et al. 2000a). Such a difference in size and ability to produce filaments has also been observed in field samples for cells described as zoids (Manton and Leadbeater 1974 cited in Peperzak et al. 2000a) or meso- and microflagellates (Peperzak et al. 2000a).
These flagellates were observed in senescent cultures, swimming inside spherical colonies of various sizes, and were associated with colony disappearance (Kornmann 1955). In the natural environment and in mesocosms, large numbers of these flagellates were repeatedly reported, at the decline of P. globosa colony blooms, either inside spherical colonies (Scherffel 1899, 1900; Cadée 1991; Peperzak et al. 1998, 2000a), or released into the medium leaving ghost colonies or as free-living flagellates (Jones and Haq 1963; Admiraal and Venekamp 1986; Veldhuis et al. 1986; Verity et al. 1988b; Escaravage et al. 1995). These small-sized flagellates were observed invariably associated with the presence of chitinous filaments and stars, a feature specific to the haploid stage of P. globosa Scherffel (Vaulot et al. 1994; Zingone et al. 1999). Released from colonies at the end of the bloom, these flagellates were recorded at different periods of the year in the water column of the Channel and the Southern Bight of the North Sea, at cell densities varying from 80 × 103 cells L−1 to 220 × 103 cells L−1 (Fig. 1; Rousseau and Chrétiennot-Dinet, unpublished data). They apparently represent the life stage persisting between two blooms of colonial cells, as suggested by Kornmann (1955) and Parke et al. (1971).
Diploid flagellates
The third morphotype of P. globosa is a flagellate of the same size range as colonial cells when observed live, i.e., 4.5–8.0 μm (Kornmann 1955), 6–7 μm (Peperzak et al. 2000a) and 6.1–9.3 μm (Rousseau et al. submitted) containing two flagella and one haptonema but lacking scales, filaments and stars (Rousseau et al. submitted). This flagellate has been reported as an asexual swarmer by Kornmann (1955), as a large flagellate by Cariou et al. (1994) and Rousseau et al. (1994), and as a macroflagellate by Peperzak et al. (2000a). It typically appears in cultures within 24 h when colonial cells are released mechanically from the colony (Kornmann 1955; Rousseau et al. 1990; Cariou et al. 1994). This flagellate is diploid as no ploidy change was found during the transformation of colonial cells into flagellates (Cariou et al. 1994; Rousseau et al. 1994).
These flagellates are able to rapidly form new colonies within a day after adhesion to a surface (Kornmann 1955; Kayser 1970; Cariou et al. 1994; Rousseau et al. 1994). Inanimate particles (Rousseau et al. 1994), walls of culture vessels (Kayser 1970; Cariou et al. 1994), and diatoms (Weisse et al. 1986; Boalch 1987; Rousseau et al. 1994) have been observed as adhesion sites. This property of attachment to surfaces, specific to this life stage, led to the assumption that a benthic stage, acting as an overwintering form, exists in the natural environment (Kayser 1970). It is not clear if this flagellate is able to mitotically divide. Its rapid transformation into a colony suggests it is short-lived (Kornmann 1955; Rousseau et al. 1994), but vegetative multiplication was also reported by Kayser (1970). The short lifespan of this morphotype could well explain why it is observed only occasionally in the field (Kornmann 1955; Peperzak et al. 2000a; Rousseau et al. submitted).
Such flagellates were occasionally observed inside colonies in cultures by Kornmann (1955) who considered them as a distinct cell types, the macrozoospores, and in the natural environment (Peperzak et al. 2000a).
Morphotypes of P. pouchetii
At the present time, two P. pouchetii cell types have been confirmed based on EM observations and cytometric analysis: a diploid colonial cell and a diploid flagellate (Jacobsen 2002). However, other reports suggest that a larger flagellate could exist within the P. pouchetii life cycle (Sukhanova and Flint 2001; Wassmann et al. 2005).
Colonial cells
Diploid colonial cells are in the size range of 5–7 μm, have an anterior longitudinal groove and are deprived of filamentous appendages and scale coverings (Jacobsen 2002). Actively growing colonial cells are typically distributed in groups on lobes of cloud-like colonies (Jahnke and Baumann 1987; Gunkel 1988; Baumann et al. 1994; Rousseau et al. 1994; Jacobsen 2002). Phaeocystis pouchetii colonies, which are spherical up to 0.1 mm (Rousseau et al. 1994), have a maximum size of 1.5–2 mm (Jahnke and Baumann 1987). They are characterized by a delicate mucus which disrupts easily compared to the solid mucilage of P. globosa (van Rijssel et al. 1997; Jacobsen 2002; Wassmann et al. 2005). Non-motile free-living cells morphologically similar to colonial cells, i.e., deprived of flagella, haptonema, filamentous appendages, scales, can be found together with the colony stage due to colony disruption (Eilertsen 1989; Jacobsen 2002; Wassmann et al. 2005).
Flagellates
A filament-bearing flagellate has been described in detail by Jacobsen et al. (1996) and Jacobsen (2002) on the basis of LM and TEM observations. This flagellate, which originates from a colony when brought into culture, is round and has an average diameter of 5 μm when live. It has two golden-brown parietal chloroplasts, two heterodynamic equally long (11 μm) flagella, and a short non-coiling haptonema (1.5 μm). The cell body is covered by two types of scales, both with radiating ridges visible on both surfaces. The filaments are coiled inside one or two superficial vesicles, and form five-ray stars when unwound. Contrary to the filament-producing cell of P. globosa, this flagellate was assumed to be diploid (Jacobsen 2002). This flagellate was observed during winter, increasing in abundance prior to colonial development, and has been thought to be the precursor of the colonial stage (Jacobsen 2002; Jacobsen and Veldhuis 2005). Such flagellates were observed inside colonies at the end of spring blooms, being subsequently released in the water column (Jacobsen 2002).
From LM observation of field samples, two types of flagellates were reported within the P. pouchetii life cycle based on size criteria, i.e., large (6 μm; Sukhanova and Flint 2001; Wassmann et al. 2005) and small heart-shaped (3–4 μm; Wassmann et al. 2005) cells. The large flagellates co-occurred with colonies and were abundant, sometimes being dominant over colonial cells in terms of cell density (Sukhanova and Flint 2001; Wassmann et al. 2005). The small flagellates were found free-living (Wassmann et al. 2005) or within decaying colonies before their disappearance (Lagerheim 1896; Wassmann et al. 2005). They might well correspond to the flagellate described by Jacobsen (2002), with the size difference explained by cell shrinkage due to the use of Lugol-glutaraldehyde as sample fixative. Interestingly, small flagellate formation and their further release into the water column have been shown to originate from colonies assuming a spherical shape (Gunkel 1988; Whipple et al. this issue).
Morphotypes of P. antarctica
Three morphotypes have been observed in P. antarctica: colonial cells and two types of flagellates. Two ploidy levels have been recorded.
Colonial cells
The colonial cell of P. antarctica has no flagella, no haptonema, no scales, and no vesicles or star-forming filaments (Davidson 1985). This cell has an anterior depression and two short appendages similar to those observed on P. globosa colonial cells (Fig. 2; Chrétiennot-Dinet and Rousseau, unpublished). The size range reported for colonial cells of P. antarctica is quite large, depending on preservation and fixation procedures. Size range includes: 10 μm for live cells (Moestrup and Larsen 1992), and 3.2–7.9 μm (Mathot et al. 2000), 4.7–5.6 μm (Vaulot et al. 1994), 4–6 μm (this study) for Lugol-gluraldehyde fixed cells. Colonial cells of P. antarctica, assumed to be diploid (Vaulot et al. 1994), are evenly distributed along the periphery of colonies characterized by a solid mucus. Field P. antarctica colonies are typically spherical but can include numerous morphs with a maximum size of 9 mm (Baumann et al. 1994; Marchant and Thomsen 1994).
Flagellates
One P. antarctica flagellate bears scales and produces filaments and stars; the other is devoid of scales, filaments and stars. The scale-bearing flagellate was described in detail by Davidson (1985): it has an anterior depression, two chloroplasts with a large central pyrenoid, and bears two flagella and an haptonema. Cell size ranges between 3.5 μm and 7 μm when fixed with glutaraldehyde and observed with TEM. The two flagella are equally long (6–10 μm). The haptonema presents a bulbous tip and is 1.5–2 μm long. The body cell is covered by two types of scales with a pattern of radiating ridges visible on both sides. Thread-like material is regularly arranged within circular posterio-lateral vesicles. When deployed, the threads have a length of 25 μm and form a pentagonal star.
In the natural environment, such scale-bearing flagellates increase in number at the beginning of the colonial bloom, and decline during the bloom; they are present in large numbers after the bloom (Davidson and Marchant 1992b). Similar flagellates, that have a diameter of 5.2 μm when fixed with glutaraldehyde, two flagella of 14.3 μm in length, and filamentous appendages of 40 μm in length forming a pentagonal star, were found at the ice edge of the Weddell Sea during the austral summer (Buck and Garrison 1983). Flagellates with thread-like material were observed in the Bransfield Strait region during post-bloom period (Kang and Lee 1995). On the other hand, an increase in the abundance of small-sized free-living flagellates (2.4–5.5 μm when fixed with glutaraldehyde) was observed in the Ross Sea in early austral spring just before colony formation occurred (Mathot et al. 2000; Smith et al. 2003). Although no fine morphological description was provided, these small flagellates could well correspond to the flagellates described by Buck and Garrison (1983) and Davidson (1985), the size difference resulting from cell shrinkage and preparation for microscopic observations. Their relative abundance decreased to a minimum, while colonial cells dominated in late spring before they were observed again inside colonies (Smith et al. 2003) or as free-living cells (Putt et al. 1994) at the end of the bloom.
The second P. antarctica flagellate type has the same size as the colonial cell, ranging from 6.5 μm (Garrison and Thomsen 1993) to 7.5 μm (Fryxell 1989). This flagellate bears two flagella and a haptonema but lacks scales, filaments and stars (Fig. 2, Garrison and Thomsen 1993; Marchant and Thomsen 1994; Chrétiennot-Dinet and Rousseau, unpublished). This flagellate was formed inside and released from spherical or elongated colonies at the ice edge during austral spring (Fryxell 1989; Garrison and Thomsen 1993; Marchant and Thomsen 1994). Some 5–6 h after formation, it was found attached to the spines and processes of large diatoms (Garrison and Thomsen 1993; Marchant and Thomsen 1994) where it subsequently formed new colonies (Fryxell 1989).
Morphotypes of P. jahnii
Two cell types have been described for P. jahnii: colonial cells and flagellates (Zingone et al. 1999).
Colonial cells
Phaeocystis jahnii colonial cells possess the two short appendages typical of P. globosa and P. antarctica colonial cells, have a size of 6–8.5 μm when live and are irregularly distributed in loose, irregular colonies. Non-motile free-living cells of the same size have also been reported (Zingone et al. 1999).
Flagellates
The P. jahnii flagellate is round, 3.5–5.0 μm in diameter when observed live, and has two to four golden-brown parietal chloroplasts. It bears two unequally long flagella (8.5–12 μm and 5.5–6.5 μm), a non-coiling haptonema 3.0–4.5 μm in length, and two scale types (Zingone et al. 1999). Filaments were not observed.
Morphotype of P. cordata
Phaeocystis cordata has only been described as a flagellated cell (Zingone et al. 1999). Live cells are 3–3.5 μm long and 3–4 μm wide. They have two unequally long flagella of 5.5–7.5 μm and 4.5–6 μm in length, and a non-coiling haptonema 2.2–2.5 μm in length. They possess two scale types, both with faint radiating ridges. These cells produce filaments forming pentagonal figures.
Morphotype of P. scrobiculata
Phaeocystis scrobiculata, which has been observed occasionally in field samples and never in cultures, was only reported as a flagellate (Moestrup 1979; Hallegraeff 1983; Estep et al. 1984; Chrétiennot-Dinet unpublished data). The cell, 8 μm in length when fixed with osmium tetroxide, bears two equal flagella and a non-coiling haptonema. It is covered by a periplast of two types of scales, and produces filaments longer than 50 μm which form a nine-ray figure rather than the five-ray star observed in the other Phaeocystis species (Moestrup 1979; Hallegraeff 1983). Large differences have been reported in the length of the flagella and haptonema, and in body scale sizes (Moestrup 1979; Hallegraeff 1983; Estep et al. 1984; Hoepffner and Haas 1990) depending on the preparation procedures.
Synthesis of the observed morphotypes
A careful examination of the literature suggests that four different cell types exist within Phaeocystis species (Table 1). In common to all six species, whether colonial or not, is the occurrence of scaly flagellates (Table 1) which are of two types. One produces star-forming filaments and has been reported for all species except P. jahnii. The other, deprived of filaments and stars, has been found in P. globosa (Parke et al. 1971; Peperzak et al. 2000a) and P. jahnii (Zingone et al. 1999). These two cell types are particularly important as they provide relevant taxonomic criteria to compare and distinguish the different species of the genus. These criteria include difference in size, structure and arrangement of scales and star-forming threads (Moestrup 1979; Moestrup and Larsen 1992; Baumann et al. 1994; Medlin et al. 1994; Zingone et al. 1999; Jacobsen 2002; Lange et al. 2002). These cells have been shown to be haploid in P. globosa (Vaulot et al. 1994) but diploid in P. pouchetii (Jacobsen 2002).
In common to three colony-forming species, P. globosa, P. pouchetii and P. antarctica, is the occurrence of three cell types: a flagellate with scales and filaments, a colonial cell, and a flagellate devoid of scales and filaments (Table 1). The flagellates with scales and filaments have been observed to increase in number before colonial cell blooms, to disappear when colonial cells are present, and are massively formed inside colonies at the end of the colonial stage. The presence of larger flagellates is usually found restricted to that of colonial cells. In species that do not form colonies, P. scrobiculata and P. cordata, only flagellates with scales and filaments have been observed (Table 1).
The Phaeocystis life cycle
The haploid–diploid life cycle of P. globosa
The existence of different morphotypes, two ploidy levels related to phase changes, and the ability of both haploid and diploid stages to divide mitotically (Kornmann 1955; Rousseau et al. 1994; Vaulot et al. 1994), support the existence of a haploid–diploid life cycle in P. globosa. In such life cycles, both haploid and diploid stages are related by sexual processes, meiosis and syngamy, and both are capable of mitotic division (Fig. 3; Valero et al. 1992; Houdan et al. 2004). Based on available information from cultures and field studies presented in the previous section, the P. globosa haploid–diploid life cycle has been reconstructed (Fig. 4). The two main prominent features of this cycle are that sexuality is prevalent in colony bloom formation and termination, and that two types of vegetative reproduction exist.
Phaeocystis globosa colony blooms result from sexual processes
The occurrence of haploid flagellates in the water column between two blooms of diploid colonial cells as observed in the southern North Sea (Rousseau and Chrétiennot-Dinet unpublished data) provides evidence that P. globosa colony bloom initiation and termination involve sexual processes, with the length of the diploid phase being restricted to the colony blooms. The formation of a diploid non-motile colonial cell from haploid flagellates implies that syngamy (fusion of the cytoplasm and nuclei of two haploids and subsequent zygote production) must occur at the time of colony bloom initiation. The observation of two morphologically distinguishable haploid flagellates (Parke et al. 1971; Peperzak et al. 2000a) suggests that anisogamy occurs in P. globosa, but this still awaits proof. Filaments characteristic of haploid flagellates could possibly play a role in mating. These structures have indeed been suggested to be related to sexuality (Vaulot et al. 1994) or to play a role in attachment (Chrétiennot-Dinet 1999). The inability to regenerate diploid colonial cells from clones of haploid flagellates (Parke et al. 1971; Vaulot et al. 1994) suggests that different mating types, i.e., compatible gametes able to form zygotes, exist within P. globosa (Vaulot et al. 1994). It is not known if homothallism (self-fertile colonies) or heterothallism (self-sterile colonies) is the rule in P. globosa.
Conversely, meiosis must happen to form haploid flagellates from diploid colonial cells. This may well occur during the massive production of haploid flagellates within colonies often reported at the end of the P. globosa bloom, before disappearance of the colonial stage (Rousseau et al. 1994; Peperzak et al. 2000a). Haploid flagellates are however produced in a restricted number of colonies. Most of them senesce and subsequently aggregate, being progressively invaded by various heterotrophic organisms that develop complex microbial networks (Lancelot and Rousseau 1994; Lancelot et al. 2002).
Vegetative reproduction in P. globosa
The vegetative reproduction of the diploid stage occurs through two distinct pathways involving colonial cells and diploid flagellates (Fig. 4). One consists of mitotic division of colonial cells within the colony, i.e., colony growth (Kornmann 1955; Rousseau et al. 1994; Veldhuis et al. 2005). This process can lead to colony division and budding as observed in mesocosms (Verity et al. 1988a) and in the field (Rousseau et al. 1994) but seems to be of minor importance. The second pathway involves the transition through short-lived diploid flagellates that are released from colonies and are able to reinitialize the colonial stage within a day (Kornmann 1955; Cariou et al. 1994; Rousseau et al. 1994). Diploid flagellates therefore co-occur with colonial cells and propagate the colonial stage, a pathway commonly used to produce colony cultures in the laboratory. However, its significance in the natural environment is highly questionable and is probably reduced due to the short life span of diploid flagellates (Kornmann 1955; Cariou et al. 1994). The natural occurrence of diploid flagellates in the field is difficult to estimate. It results from disruption of large colonies when the sea is stormy and under turbulent conditions (Kornmann 1955, Peperzak et al. 2000a). Occurrence of these cells, in association with non-motile free-living cells, could however also result from sample manipulation during collection, size fractionation, and incubation. The minor role of the diploid flagellate in the natural environment is also suggested by the observation of massive and synchronous generation of small colonies in the early phase of blooms (Rousseau et al. 1990). A significant vegetative reproduction would instead result in more-continuous colony production. However, this pathway could not be excluded and has been suggested to provide the inoculum for colony blooms (Cadée 1991).
Factors inducing phase changes within the P. globosa life cycle
Several factors have been hypothesized to play a role in transitions between P. globosa morphotypes. The formation of colonies from free-living cells has been related to phosphate depletion (Veldhuis and Admiraal 1987; Cariou et al. 1994), light intensity (Kornmann 1955; Peperzak 1993; Peperzak et al. 1998), chemical substances produced by vernal diatoms, especially some Chaetoceros species (Weisse et al. 1986; Boalch 1987; Rousseau et al. 1994), and turbulence (Schapira 2005; Shapira et al. 2006). The requirement of a solid substrate for cell attachment has also been suggested from the observation of small colonies attached to Chaetoceros setae at the early stage of the bloom (Fig. 1; Boalch 1987; Rousseau et al. 1994; Chrétiennot-Dinet et al. 1997).
However, a careful examination of literature shows that most studies on P. globosa colony formation have been performed in laboratory cultures using the vegetative reproduction pathway, i.e., with an inoculum of diploid flagellates originating from colony disruption (Table 2). These studies show that solid substrate, turbulence, and phosphate are factors promoting the vegetative generation of colonies (Table 2). From field observations, it appears that the vernal growth of diatoms and light level would play a key role in colony generation from haploid flagellates (Table 2). The role of light in colony formation from haploid flagellate cultures has been confirmed in laboratory studies (Kornmann 1955; Peperzak 1993). The formation of haploid flagellates in colonies at the end of a P. globosa bloom has been observed in mesocosms and related to nutrient depletion (Verity et al. 1988b; Escaravage et al. 1995) or rapid decrease in temperature (Verity et al. 1988b). Light limitation has also been suspected to play a role both in the laboratory and in the natural environment associated after sinking of healthy colonies in low ambient light conditions (Peperzak et al. 1988).
In future studies, the P. globosa life stage transition should be considered in terms of induction of sexual processes, i.e., syngamy and meiosis. The possible interplay of endogenous (biological clock) and environmental factors should be considered, as this has been shown relevant for other haptophytes such as coccolithophorids (Houdan et al. 2004). Some factors, in particular light, nutrient status, and production of gamone (pheromone for attraction, recognition of compatible cells and mating), should be investigated. Knowledge of these factors coupled to high-resolution microscopy and flow cytometry techniques would allow observation of such short-lived processes as syngamy and meiosis in cultures and in the field.
The life cycle of the other Phaeocystis species
The existence of a haploid–diploid life cycle is well supported for P. globosa. Such haploid–diploid life cycles could also possibly exist within the three other Phaeocystis colonial species, as already hypothesized for P. pouchetii (Eilertsen 1989; Jacobsen 2002) and P. antarctica (Medlin and Zingone this issue). Besides two ploidy levels, similar events to those occurring in the P. globosa life cycle were indeed observed in the bloom dynamics of these two species. Filament-bearing scaly flagellates, thought to be colony precursors (Jacobsen 2002), were observed to increase in abundance before P. pouchetii colony development. These cells and young colonies with 2–40 cells were later found attached to diatoms (mostly Chaetoceros spp; Eilersten 1989; Sukhanova and Flint 2001; Jacobsen 2002), suggesting that diatoms could be a key factor for colony initiation. At the end of the colonial stage, small-sized flagellates assumed to be scaly flagellates, are massively produced intracolonially or are found free-living (Wassmann et al. 2005). In the same way, small flagellates of P. antarctica were shown to be mostly present before and at the end of colony blooms (Putt et al. 1994; Smith et al. 2003).
Some intraspecific differences may exist however in the significance of the vegetative pathway for colony production and the occurrence of large solitary cells. As only one ploidy level (diploidy) has been identified up to now (Jacobsen, 2002), the vegetative pathway of colony formation, either for bloom initiation and propagation, seems to be predominant in P. pouchetii. Colony propagation from cells released from colonies could be particularly important. In northern studies, the contribution of colonies and flagellates was indeed shown to be highly variable depending on the site and the year investigated (Wassmann et al. 2005). Although sample preservation and handling procedures could strongly affect the observed proportion of free-living and colonial cells due to colony disintegration, large flagellates of P. pouchetii can at times exceed the abundance of colonial cells (Wassmann et al. 2005). Such high number of flagellates may reflect the more delicate nature of the P. pouchetii colony matrix compared to that of P. globosa, allowing easier colony disruption and subsequent vegetative reproduction. In addition, colony budding might be an important process for P. pouchetii colony proliferation and bloom development (Whipple et al. 2005).
The observation of only one morphotype in P. scrobiculata and P. cordata suggests either that the whole cycle has not been yet observed, or these species lose the ability to form colonies. The assumption of Vaulot et al. (1994) that filaments forming five- or nine-rayed stars are associated with haploid cells suggests that Phaeocystis would occur as haploid flagellates in oceanic and oligotrophic environments.
The haploid–diploid life cycle of Prymnesiophytes
With morphologically different types of flagellates and one non-motile cell type, P. globosa shares the features of most Haptophytes (except the Pavlovophyceae), i.e., a life cycle involving alternation of morphologically different haploid and diploid generations, each capable of independent asexual reproduction (Billard 1994; Edvardsen 2002; Billard and Inouye 2004; Houdan et al. 2004). Houdan et al. (2004) suggest from the phylogenetic distribution that this is the primitive state across the Prymnesiophyceae.
These haploid and diploid phases present typically distinct patterns of scale ornamentation characteristic of each ploidy stage. The morphological difference between life stages may be minor, as is the case for Chrysochromulina polylepis (Paasche et al. 1990; Edvardsen and Paasche 1992; Edvardsen and Vaulot 1996) and Prymnesium parvum/patelliferum (Larsen and Edvardsen 1998; Larsen 1999), in which the two motile cell types are distinguished only by minor details in body scale morphology. Heteromorphic life stages of coccolithophores are more clearly differentiated and show remarkable diversity (Billard and Inouye 2004) alternating diploid heterococcolithophores and, depending on the family, five different types of haploid stages (noncalcifying motile stage, holococcoliths, aragonitic coccoliths, nannoliths and noncalcifying benthic stages; Billard and Inouye 2004). Observation of syngamy and meiosis, providing direct evidence for the existence of sexuality is, however, restricted to very few coccolithophorids species such as Pleurochrysis pseudoroscoffensis (Gayral and Fresnel 1983) and more recently Coccolithus pelagicus (Houdan et al. 2004).
The ecological relevance of the haploid–diploid life cycle of P. globosa
The advantage of haploid–diploid life cycles
Haploid–diploid life cycles are widespread among diverse sexual eukaryotic organisms such as red algae, most brown algae, many green algae, some fungi, foraminiferans, mosses, and ferns. This suggests that such life cycles result from an adaptive evolution providing selective advantages to organisms (Valero et al. 1992; Mable and Otto 1998). Based on theoretical and empirical considerations, haploid–diploid life cycles have been shown to combine advantages from sexual reproduction and those from being haploid and diploid (Kondrashov and Crow 1991; Mable and Otto 1998). The advantage of sexual reproduction is a homogenizing effect on the species gene pool, resulting in high genetic plasticity. Because there are two copies of each gene, diploidy masks deleterious recessive mutations within the genome but harbors twice as many genes capable of beneficial mutations. The larger pool of mutant alleles provides a source of genetic variability that allows a higher rate of adaptation to a changing environment (Mable and Otto 1998). By contrast, haploids express each mutation within their genome. Deleterious mutations are more efficiently eliminated and haploid populations tend to carry fewer mutations (Mable and Otto 1998).
At the ecological level, the diploid stage has been suggested to represent a r-selected strategy with high growth rates, use of inorganic nutrients, and resistance to turbulence, while the haploid stage would have a K-selected strategy, being better adapted to nutrient-limited conditions with low growth rates, motility and mixotrophy (Valero et al. 1992). The nutritional advantage of haploid over diploid cells under nutrient-limited conditions is due to their smaller size (Lewis 1985). Surface-to-volume ratios calculated for two cells of 4 μm and 8 μm in diameter, typical of live haploid and colonial cells of P. globosa, respectively, vary from 1.5 to 0.75 respectively. This suggests that haploid cells increase by a factor two their morphological potential to acquire nutrients when they are present at low concentrations. In addition, haploid cells may also halve the energetic cost of DNA replication during cell division (Lewis 1985). Maintenance of a haploid–diploid heteromorphic life cycle is generally considered as an evolutionary adaptation to an environment that is seasonally variable or contains two different niches (Stebbins and Hill 1980 cited in Valero et al. 1992).
The ecology of P. globosa morphotypes
Many tentative hypotheses have been proposed to understand the dominance, alternation and succession of P. globosa life forms, i.e., nanoplanktonic cells and large gelatinous colonies (Lancelot and Rousseau 1994; Lancelot et al. 2002; Verity and Medlin 2003). In general, these studies conclude an advantageous status accrues to the colonial stage over free-living cells due to higher growth characteristics and resistance to losses.
The success of P. globosa colonies during blooms has been related to the peculiar physiology and ecology of the gelatinous colonies (Lancelot and Rousseau 1994; Lancelot et al. 2002). The colony matrix was shown to act as an energy (Lancelot and Mathot 1985; Veldhuis and Admiraal 1985; Lancelot and Rousseau 1994) and nutrient (Fe and Mn; Schoemann et al. 2001) reservoir. This provides a competitive advantage to P. globosa colonies when resources are limiting (Lancelot and Rousseau 1994; Lancelot et al. 2002), and when nitrate is the nitrogen source (Lancelot et al. 1998), allowing higher growth rates than free-living cells (Peperzak et al. 2000b; Veldhuis et al. 2005). On the other hand, some advantages of being a free-living cell are related to a greater ability to compete under ammonium- and phosphate-limited conditions (Veldhuis et al. 1991; Riegman et al. 1992), reduced nutrient uptake (Ploug et al. 1999), and alternative nutritional modes such as phagotrophy (Verity and Medlin 2003).
Large P. globosa colonies are generally not, or insignificantly, grazed by mesozooplankton, in particular the small neritic copepods (Hansen and van Boekel 1991, Hansen et al. 1993; Gasparini et al. 2000; Verity 2000; Koski et al. 2005). This has been related to a prey-predator size mismatch, chemical deterrence, physical inhibition and/or other growth-state-related mechanisms (Verity 2000; Turner et al. 2002; Dutz et al. 2005; Long and Hay 2006). The presence of grazers has been shown to induce colony size increase (Jakobsen and Tang 2002) through the release of infochemicals (Tang 2003). The colonial skin also provides a protection to colonial cells from fast growing grazers, virus and pathogen infection, and bacterial colonization (Hamm 2000). In mesocosms, the resistance of P. globosa colonies to viral infection has been demonstrated, while free-living cells undergo severe infection and mortality (Brussaard et al. 2005). Besides the physical barrier of the colonial skin, some antimicrobial effects might also be due to the high acrylate accumulation inside the P. globosa matrix (Noordkamp et al. 2000). Contrary to the colonial form, P. globosa free-living cells may be heavily grazed by at least some microzooplankton and some stages of mesozooplankton (Admiraal and Venekamp 1986; Verity and Smayda 1989; Weisse and Scheffel-Möser 1990b; Weisse et al. 1994; Verity 2000; Tang et al. 2001; Turner et al. 2002). However, as recently shown by Long and Hay (2006), the grazing response for different copepods may vary more between different growth states of P. globosa, than compared to other prey types. Thus, further studies are needed to quantify the importance of different zooplankton grazing on this species.
A review of the P. globosa free-living cells used in physiology, grazing, and lysis experiments in field and laboratory studies shows that the morphological characterization of the cells, referred mostly as solitary, single or free-living cells, is very poor (Table 3). A careful analysis of culture and sampling procedures suggests that P. globosa free-living cells are either colonial (non-motile free-living cells) or diploid flagellates co-occurring with the colonial stage. Field studies were indeed mostly performed during the spring bloom, i.e. when diploid flagellates and colonial cells released from colonies are present (Table 3). In laboratory experiments, free-living cells were often separated from colonies using size fractionation or the vegetative pathway involving colony formation from diploid cells (Table 3). In a recent study, Dutz and Koski (2006) demonstrated that grazing losses and trophic transfer efficiency are highly dependent on the P. globosa morphotypes used. The sensitivity of flagellates bearing threads and forming stars, i.e., the haploid flagellates to protozooplankton grazing has been shown lower than that of colonial cells lacking the filamentous appendages (Dutz and Koski 2006). However, the evaluation of grazing pressure on the different Phaeocystis life forms is a complex issue that has been critically reviewed (Nejstgaard et al., this issue).
Based on the literature analysis, there is presently no experimental evidence to demonstrate a different bottom-up growth control for the P. globosa morphotypes. However, there is some evidence that haploid and diploid morphotypes belong to different trophic groups. Haploid flagellates are indeed inedible autotrophic nanoplankton while diploid flagellates and free-living colonial cells are preyed by microzooplankton.
Conclusions
Knowledge of the life stages of the different Phaeocystis species is still incomplete and is very variable. The identification of all life stages, through morphological characterization and determination of ploidy levels, are still missing for most of Phaeocystis species. Complete understanding of the life cycle events requires combining flow cytometry, electron microscopy, genetic techniques, and light microscopy on the same material, in either field samples or cultured strains. To avoid confusion, standardized nomenclature should be developed to refer to different morphotypes within different species. This should be done by scientist groups analyzing together the same material but containing different species, using both sophisticated and routine techniques. While suspected in P. pouchetii and P. antarctica, a haploid–diploid life cycle has only been confirmed for P. globosa. Further research is however needed to substantiate this life cycle, by direct observation of short-lived syngamy and meiosis, the characterisation of the mating system and capability (isogamy versus anisogamy, homothallism versus heterothallism), and the knowledge of the factors inducing sexuality. The study of genetic regulation of sexual processes will be an important step in the characterization of life cycles (Guillou and Biegala 2002).
At this stage, comparative studies of the autoecology and grazing sensitivity of Phaeocystis haploid and diploid cells are insufficient to demonstrate an ecological differentiation between stages and to provide support for ecological niche separation. Understanding the ecological significance of blooming as diploid cells but persisting as haploid stage throughout the year should be appraised through eco-physiological characterization of pure cultures of haploid and diploid stages combined with cell characterization (morphology and ploidy).
References
Admiraal W, Venekamp LAH (1986) Significance of tintinnid grazing during blooms of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Haptophyceae) in Dutch coastal waters. Neth J Sea Res 20:61–66
Bätje M, Michaelis H (1986) Phaeocystis pouchetii blooms in the East Frisian coastal waters (German Bight, North Sea). Mar Biol 93:21–27
Baumann MEM, Lancelot C, Brandini FP, Sakshaug E, John DM (1994) The taxonomic identity of the cosmopolitan prymnesiophyte Phaeocystis: a morphological and ecophysiological approach. In: Lancelot C, Wassmann P (eds) Ecology of Phaeocystis-dominated ecosystems. J Mar Syst 5:5–22
Billard C (1994) Life cycles. In Green JC, Leadbeater BSC (Eds) The haptophyte algae. The systematics association special, vol 51. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 167–186
Billard C, Inouye I (2004) What is new in coccolithophore biology? In: Thierstein H, Young J (Eds). Coccolithophores – from molecular processes to global impact. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–30
Boalch GT (1987) Recent blooms in the Western English Channel. Rapp PV Réun Cons Int Explor Mer.187:94–97
Brussaard CPD, Kuipers B, Veldhuis MJW (2005) A mesocosm study of Phaeocystis globosa population dynamics. I. Regulatory role of viruses in bloom control. In: Veldhuis MJW, Wassmann P (eds) Harmful algae, vol 4. pp 859–874
Buck KR, Garrison DL (1983) Protists from the ice-edge region of the Weddell Sea. Deep Sea Res 30:1261–1277
Cadée GC (1991) Phaeocystis colonies wintering in the water column? Neth. J Sea Res 28:227–230
Cariou V, Casotti R, Birrien J-L, Vaulot D (1994) The initiation of Phaeocystis colonies. J Plankton Res 16:457–470
Chen Y-Q, Wang N, Zhang P, Zhou H, Qu L-H (2002) Molecular evidence identifies bloom-forming Phaeocystis (Prymnesiophyta) from coastal waters of southeast China as Phaeocystis globosa. Biochem Syst Ecol 30:15–22
Chrétiennot-Dinet M-J, Giraud-Guille M-M, Vaulot D, Puteaux J-L, Saito H, Chanzy Y (1997) The chitinous nature of filaments ejected by Phaeocystis (Prymnesiophyceae). J Phycol 33:666–672
Chrétiennot-Dinet M-J (1999) An enigma in marine nanoplankton. The role of star-like structures produced by Phaeocystis. In: Seckbach J (ed) Enigmatic microorganisms and life in extreme environments. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 205–213
Claustre H, Poulet SA, Williams R, Marty J-C, Coombs S, Ben Mlih F, Hapette AM, Martin- Jezequel V (1990) A biochemical investigation of a Phaeocystis sp. bloom in the Irish sea. J Mar biol Ass UK. 70:197–207
Davidson AT (1985) Aspects of the biology of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Prymnesiophyceae). B Sc Thesis, University of Tasmania, 212 pp
Davidson AT, Marchant HJ (1992a) The biology and ecology of Phaeocystis (Prymnesiophyceae). In: Round FE, Chapman DJ (Eds) Progress in phycological research, vol 8. Biopress, Bristol, pp 1–45
Davidson AT, Marchant HJ (1992b) Protist abundance and carbon concentration during a Phaeocystis-dominated bloom at an Antarctic coastal site. Polar Biol 12:387–395
Dutz J, Koski M (2006) Trophic significance of solitary cells of the prymnesiophyte Phaeocystis globosa depends on cell type. Limnol Oceanogr 51(3):1230–1238
Dutz J, Klein Breteler WCM, Kramer G (2005) Inhibition of copepod feeding by exsudates and transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) derived from a Phaeocystis globosa dominated phytoplankton community. In: Veldhuis MJW, Wassmann P (eds) Harmful algae, vol 4. pp 915–940
Edvardsen B (2002). Life cycle strategies in the haptophyte genera Chrysochromulina and Prymnesium. In: Garcés E, Zingone A, Montresor M, Reguera B, Dale B (eds) Proceedings of the LIFEHAB workshop: life histories of microalgal species causing harmful blooms, vol 12. Calvia, Majorca, Spain, October 2001. Research in Enclosed Seas Series, pp 67–70
Edvardsen B, Paasche E (1992) Two motile stages of Chrysochromulina polylepis (Prymnesiophyceae): morphology, growth and toxicity. J Phycol 28:104–114
Edvardsen B, Vaulot D (1996) Ploidy analysis of the two motile forms of Chrysochromulina polylepis (Prymnesiophyceae). J Phycol 32:94–102
Edvardsen B, Eikrem W, Green JC, Andersen RA, Moon-van der Staay SY, Medlin LK (2000) Phylogenetic reconstructions of the Haptophyta inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences and available morphological data. Phycologia 39(1):19–35
Eilertsen HC (1989) Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim, a key species in Arctic marine ecosystems: life history and physiology. Rapp PV Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 188:131
Escaravage V, Peperzak L, Prins TC, Peeters JCH, Joordens JCA (1995) The development of a Phaeocystis sp. bloom in a mesocosm experiment in relation to nutrients, irradiance and coexisting algae. Ophelia 42:55–74
Estep KW, Davis PG, Hargraves PE, Sieburth JM (1984) Chloroplast containing microflagellates in natural populations of north Atlantic nanoplankton, their identification and distribution: including a description of five new species of Chrysochromulina (Prymnesiophyceae). Protistol 20:613–634
Fryxell GA (1989) Marine phytoplankton at the Weddell Sea Ice Edge: Seasonal changes at the specific level. Polar Biol 10:1–18
Gasparini S, Daro M-H, Antajan E, Tackx M, Rousseau V, Parent J-Y, Lancelot C (2000) Mesozooplankton grazing during the Phaeocystis globosa bloom in the Southern Bight of the North Sea. J Sea Res 43:345–356
Garrison DL, Thomsen HA (1993) Ecology and biology of ice biota. Berichte zur Polarforschung 121:68–74
Gayral P, Fresnel J (1983) Description, sexualité et cycle de développement d’une nouvelle Coccolithophoracée (Prymnesiophyceae): Pleurochrysis pseudoroscoffensis sp. Nov Protistologica 19:245–261
Gieskes WWC, Kraay GW (1975) The phytoplankton spring bloom in Dutch coastal waters of the North Sea. Neth J Sea Res 9:166–196
Guillou L, Biegala I (2002) Different molecular techniques to examine life cycles of phytoplankton or HAB species. In: Garcés E, Zingone A, Montresor M, Reguera B, Dale B (eds) Proceedings of the LIFEHAB workshop: life histories of microalgal species causing harmful blooms, vol 12. Calvia, Majorca, Spain, October 2001. Research in Enclosed Seas Series, pp 99–101
Gunkel J (1988) Zür Verbreitung von Phaeocystis pouchetii in Phytoplankton der Framstrasse ünter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Kolonie-bildung. PhD thesis, Kiel University, 118 pp
Hallegraeff GM (1983) Scale-bearing and loricate nanoplankton from the east Australian current. Bot Mar 26:493–515
Hamm CE, Simson DA, Merkel R, Smetacek V (1999) Colonies of Phaeocystis globosa are protected by a thin but tough skin. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 187:101–111
Hamm FC (2000) Architecture, ecology and biogeochemistry of Phaeocystis colonies. J Sea Res 43:307–315
Hansen FC, van Boekel WHM (1991) Grazing pressure of the calanoid copepod Temora longicornis on a Phaeocystis dominated spring bloom in a Dutch tidal inlet. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 78:123–129
Hansen FCR, Reckermann M, Klein Breteler WCM, Riegman R (1993) Phaeocystis blooming enhanced by copepod predation on protozoa: evidence from incubation experiments. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 102:51–57
Hoepffner N, Haas LW (1990) Electron microscopy of nanoplankton from the North Pacific Central Gyre. J Phycol 26:421–439
Houdan A, Billard C, Marie D, Not F, Saez AG, Young JR, Probert J (2004) Holococcolithophore-heterococcolithophore (Haptophyta) life cycles: flow cytometric analysis of relative ploidy levels. Systemat Biodiv 4:453–465
Jacobsen A (2002) Morphology, relative DNA content and hypothetical life cycle of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Prymnesiophyceae) with special emphasis on the flagellated cell type. Sarsia 87:338–349
Jacobsen A, Bratbak G, Heldal M (1996) Isolation and characterization of virus infecting Phaeocystis pouchetii (Prymnesiophyceae). J Phycol 32:923–927
Jacobsen A, Veldhuis MJW (2005) Growth characteristics of flagellated cells of Phaeocystis pouchetii revealed by diel changes in cellular DNA content. In: Veldhuis MJW, Wassmann P (eds) Harmful Algae, vol 4. pp 811–821
Jahnke J, Baumann M (1987) Differentiation between Phaeocystis pouchetii (Har.) Lagerheim and Phaeocystis globosa Scherffel. Colony shapes and temperature tolerances. Hydrobiol Bull 21:141–147
Jakobsen HH, Tang KW (2002) Effects of protozoan grazing on colony formation in Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae) and the potential costs and benefits. Aquat Microb Ecol 27:261–273
Jones PGW, Haq SM (1963). The distribution of Phaeocystis in the eastern Irish sea. J Cons Intern Expl Mer 28:8–20
Kang SH, Lee S (1995) Antarctic phytoplankton assemblage in the western Bransfield Strait region, February 1993: composition, biomass, and mesoscale distributions. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 129:253–267
Kashkin NI (1963). Materials on the ecology of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim, 1893 (Chrysophyceae) II. Habitat and specifications of biogeographical characteristics. Okeanologiya, Moscow 3:697–705
Kayser H (1970) Experimental-ecological investigations on Phaeocystis pouchetii (Haptophyceae): cultivation and waste water test. Helgoländer Wiss. Meeresunt 20:195–212
Kondrashov AS, Crow JF (1991) Haploidy or diploidy: which is better? Nature 351:314–317
Kornmann P (1955) Beobachtungen an Phaeocystis-Kulturen. Helgoländer Wiss Meeresunt 5:218–233
Koski M, Dutz J, Klein Breteler WCM (2005). Selective grazing of Temora longicornis in different stages of a Phaeocystis globosa bloom – a mesocosm study. In: Veldhuis MJW, Wassmann P (eds) Harmful Algae 4:915–927
Lagerheim G (1893) Phæocystis, nov. gen., grundadt på Tetraspora Poucheti Har. Botaniska Notiser, pp 32–33
Lagerheim G (1896). Ueber Phæocystis Poucheti (Har.) Lagerh., eine Plankton-Flagellate. Öfversigt af K. Vetensk.-Akad. Förhanlingar, Stockholm 4:277–288
Lancelot C, Mathot S (1985) Biochemical fractionation of primary production by phytoplakton in Belgian coastal waters during short- and long-term incubations with 14C-bicarbonate. Mar Biol 86:219–226
Lancelot C, Rousseau V (1994) Ecology of Phaeocystis: the key role of colony forms. In: Green JC, Leadbeater BSC (eds) The Haptophyte Algae, vol 51. Clarenton Press, Oxford, pp 229–245
Lancelot C, Rousseau V (2002) Life cycle in Haptophyta. In: Garcés E, Zingone A, Montresor M., Reguera B, Dale B (eds) Proceedings of the LIFEHAB workshop: life histories of microalgal species causing harmful blooms, vol 12. Calvia, Majorca, Spain, October 2001, Research in Enclosed Seas Series, pp 88–90
Lancelot et al. (1991) Dynamics of Phaeocystis blooms in nutrient enriched coastal zones. In: Lancelot C, Billen G, Barth H (eds) Proceedings of the third workshop Plymouth, March 6–7, 1990, pp 106. Water Pollution Research report 23
Lancelot C, Keller MD, Rousseau V, Smith WO, Mathot S (1998) Autecology of the marine Haptophyte Phaeocystis sp. In: Anderson DM, Cembella AD, Hallagraeff GM (Eds) Physiological ecology of harmful algal blooms, vol. G 41. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 209–224
Lancelot C, Rousseau V, Schoemann V, Becquevort S (2002). On the ecological role of the different life forms of Phaeocystis. In: Garcés E, Zingone A, Montresor M., Reguera B, Dale B (eds) Proceedings of the workshop LIFEHAB: Life histories of microalgal species causing harmful blooms, vol 12. Calvia, Majorca, Spain, octobre 2001. Research in Enclosed Seas series, pp 71–75
Lange M, Chen Y-Q, Medlin LK (2002) Molecular genetic delineation of Phaeocystis species (Prymnesiophyceae) using coding and non-coding regions of nuclear and plastid genomes. Eur J Phycol 37:77–92
Larsen A (1999) Prymnesium parvum and P. patelliferum (Haptophyta) – one species. Phycologia 38:541–543
Larsen A, Edvardsen B (1998) Relative ploidy levels in Prymnesium parvum and P. patelliferum (Haptophyta) analyzed by flow cytometry. Phycologia 37(6):412–424
Lewis WM (1985). Nutrient scarcity as an evolutionary cause of haploidy. Am Nat 125:692–701
Liss PS, Malin G, Turner SM, Holligan PM (1994) Dimethyl sulphide and Phaeocystis: a review. In: Lancelot C, Wassmann P (eds) Ecology of Phaeocystis-dominated ecosystems. J Mar Syst 5:41–53
Long JD, Hay ME (2006) When intraspecific exceeds interspecific variance: Effects of phytoplankton morphology and growth phase on copepod feeding and fitness. Limnol Oceanogr 51:988–996
Mable BK, Otto SP (1998) The evolution of life cycles with haploid and diploid phases. BioEssays 20:453–462
Marchant H, Thomsen HA (1994) Haptophytes in polar waters. In: Green JC, Leadbeater BSC (Eds). The haptophyte algae, vol 51. Clarenton Press, Oxford, pp 209–228
Mathot S, Smith WOJ, Carlson CA, Garrison DL, Gowing MM, Vickers CL (2000) Carbon partitioning within Phaeocystis antarctica (prymnesiophyceae) colonies in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. J Phycol 36:1049–1056
Medlin LK, Lange M, Baumann MEM (1994) Genetic differentiation among three colony-forming species of Phaeocystis: further evidence for the phylogeny of the Prymnesiophyta. Phycologia 33:199–212
Medlin LK and Zingone A (this issue) A taxonomic review of the genus Phaeocystis. Biogeochemistry
Moestrup Ø (1979) Identification by electron microscopy of marine nanoplankton from New Zealand, including the description of four new species. N Z J Bot 17:61–95
Moestrup Ø, Larsen J (1992) Potentially toxic phytoplankton. 1. Haptophyceae (Prymnesiophyceae). In: Lindley JS (ed) ICES identification leaflets for plankton No 179. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen, pp 11
Nejstgaard JC, Tang KW, Steinke M, Dutz J, Koski M, Antajan E, Long JD (this issue) Zooplankton grazing on Phaeocystis: a quantitative status and future challenges. Biogeochemistry. this volume
Noordkamp JB, Gieskes WWC, Gottschal JC, Forney LJ, Van Rijssel M (2000) Acrylate in Phaeocystis colonies does not affect the surrounding bacteria. J Sea Res 43:287–296
Paasche E, Edvardsen B, Eikrem W (1990) A possible alternate stage in the life cycle of Chrysochromulina polylepis Manton et Parke (Prymnesiophyceae). Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 100:91–99
Parke M, Green JC, Manton I (1971) Observations on the fine structure of zoids of the genus Phaeocystis (Haptophyceae). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 51:927–941
Peperzak L (1993) Daily irradiance governs growth rate and colony formation of Phaeocystis (Prymnesiophyceae). J Plankton Res 15:809–821
Peperzak L, Colijn F, Gieskes WWC, Peeters JCH (1998) Development of the diatom-Phaeocystis spring bloom in the Dutch coastal zone of the North Sea: the silicon depletion versus the daily irradiance threshold hypothesis. J Plankton Res 20:517–537
Peperzak L, Colijn F, Vrieling EG, Gieskes WWC, Peeters JCH (2000a) Observations of flagellates in colonies of Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae): a hypothesis for their position in the life cycle. J Plankton Res 22:2181–2203
Peperzak L, Duin RMN, Colijn F, Gieskes WWC (2000b) Growth and mortality of flagellates and non-flagellate cells of Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae). J Plankton Res 22:107–119
Ploug H, Stolte W, Jørgensen BB (1999) Diffusive boundary layers of the colony-forming plankton alga, Phaeocystis sp. – implications for nutrient uptake and cellular growth. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1959–1967
Putt M, Miceli G, Stoecker DK (1994) Association of bacteria with Phaeocystis sp. in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 105:179–189
Riegman R, Noordeloos A, Cadée GC (1992) Phaeocystis blooms and eutrophication of the continental coastal zones of the North Sea. Mar Biol 112:479–484
Rousseau V, Mathot S, Lancelot C (1990) Calculating carbon biomass of Phaeocystis sp. from microscopic observations. Mar Biol 107:305–314
Rousseau V, Vaulot D, Casotti R, Cariou V, Lenz J, Gunkel J, Baumann M (1994) The life cycle of Phaeocystis (Prymnesiophyceae): evidence and hypotheses. In: Lancelot C, Wassmann P (eds) Ecology of Phaeocystis-dominated ecosystems. J Mar Syst 5:23–40
Schapira M (2005) Dynamique spatio-temporelle de Phaeocystis globosa en Manche Orientale: effets de la turbulence et des apports sporadiques en sels nutritifs. PhD Thesis. Université de Lille, France, 316 pp
Schapira M, Seuront L, Gentilhomme V (2006) Effects of small-scale turbulence on Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae) growth and life cycle. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 335(1):27–38
Scherffel A (1899) Phaeocystis globosa n. sp. (Vorläufige Mittheilung). Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 17:317–318
Scherffel A (1900) Phaeocystis globosa nov. spec. nebst einigen Betrachtungen über die Phylogenie niederer, insbesondere brauner Organismen. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen Abteilung Helgoland NF Bd 4:1–29
Schoemann V, Wollast R, Chou L, Lancelot C (2001) Effects of photosynthesis on the accumulation of Mn and Fe by Phaeocystis colonies. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1065–1076
Schoemann V, Becquevort S, Stefels J, Rousseau V, Lancelot C (2005). Phaeocystis blooms in the global ocean and their controlling mechanisms: a review. J Sea Res 53:43–66
Smith WOJr, Dennett MR, Mathot S, Caron D (2003) The temporal dynamics of the flagellated and colonial stages of Phaeocystis antarctica in the Ross Sea. Deep-Sea Res II 50:605–617
Sournia A (1988) Phaeocystis (Prymnesiophyceae): How many species? Nova Hedwigia 47:211–217
Sukhanova IN, Flint MV (2001) Phaeocystis pouchetii at the Eastern Bering Sea Shelf. Oceanology 41:75–85
Tang KW (2003). Grazing and colony size development in Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae): the role of a chemical signal. J Plankt Res 25(7):831–842
Tang KW, Jacobsen HH, Visser AW (2001) Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae) and the planktonic food web: feeding, growth, and trophic intercations among grazers. Limnol Oceanogr 46(8):1860–1870
Turner JT, Ianora A, Esposito F, Carotenuto Y, Miralto A (2002). Zooplankton feeding ecology: does a diet of Phaeocystis support good copepod grazing, survival, egg production and egg hatching success. J Plankton Res 24(11):1185–1195
Valero M, Richerd S, Perrot V, Destombe C (1992) Evolution of alternation of haploid and diploid phases in life cycles. Trends Ecol Evol 7(1):25–29
van Boekel WHM, Veldhuis MJW (1990) Regulation of alkaline phosphatase synthesis in Phaeocystis sp. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 61:281–289
van Rijssel M, Hamm CE, Gieskes WWC (1997) Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae) colonies: hollow structures built with small amounts of polysaccharides. Eur J Phycol 32:185–192
Vaulot D, Birrien J-L, Marie D, Casotti R, Veldhuis MJ, Kraay GW, Chrétiennot-Dinet M-J (1994) Morphology, ploidy, pigment composition and genome size of cultured strains of Phaeocystis (Prymnesiophyceae). J Phycol 30:1022–1035
Veldhuis MJW, Admiraal W (1985) Transfer of photosynthetic products in gelatinous colonies of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Haptophyceae) and its effect on the measurement of excretion rate. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 26:301–304
Veldhuis MJW, Admiraal W (1987) Influence of phosphate depletion on the growth and colony formation of Phaeocystis pouchetii. Mar Biol 95:47–54
Veldhuis MJW, Colijn F, Venekamp LAH (1986) The spring bloom of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Haptophyceae) in Dutch coastal waters. Neth J Sea Res 20:37–48
Veldhuis MJW, Colijn F, Admiraal W (1991) Phosphate utilization in Phaeocystis pouchetii (Haptophyceae). Mar Ecol 12:53–62
Veldhuis MJW, Brussaard CPD, Noordeloos AAM (2005) Living in a Phaeocystis colony: a way to be successful algal species. In: Veldhuis MJW, Wassmann P (eds) Harmful Algae 4:841–858
Verity PG (2000). Grazing experiments and model simulations of the role of mesozooplankton in Phaeocystis food webs. J Sea Res 43:317–344
Verity PG, Smayda TJ (1989) Nutritional value of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Prymnesiophyceae) and other phytoplankton for Acartia spp. (Copepoda): Ingestion, egg production, and growth of nauplii. Mar Biol 100:161–171
Verity PG, Medlin LK (2003) Observations on colony formation by the cosmopolitan phytoplankton genus Phaeocystis. J Mar Syst 423:153–164
Verity PG, Villareal TA, Smayda TJ (1988a) Ecological investigations of blooms of colonial Phaeocystis pouchetii. I. Abundance, biochemical composition and metabolic rates. J Plankton Res 10:219–248
Verity PG, Villareal TA, Smayda TJ (1988b) Ecological investigations of blooms of colonial Phaeocystis pouchetii. II. The role of life cycle phenomena in bloom termination. J Plankton Res 10:749–766
Wassmann P, Ratkova T, Reigstad M (2005) The contribution of single and colonial cells of Phaeocystis pouchetii to spring and summer blooms in the north-eastern North Atlantic. In: Veldhuis MJW, Wassmann P (eds) Harmful algae, vol 4. pp 823–840
Weisse T, Scheffel-Möser U (1990). Growth and grazing loss rates in single-celled Phaeocystis sp. (Prymnesiophyceae). Mar Biol 106:153–158
Weisse T, Grimm N, Hickel W, Martens P (1986) Dynamics of Phaeocystis pouchetii blooms in the Wadden Sea of Sylt (German Bight, North Sea). Est Coast Shelf Sc 23:171–182
Weisse T, Tande K, Verity P, Hansen F, Gieskes W (1994) The trophic significance of Phaeocystis blooms. In: Lancelot C, Wassmann P (eds) Ecology of Phaeocystis-dominated ecosystems. J Mar Syst 5:67–79
Whipple SJ, Patten BC, Verity PG (2005) Colony growth and evidence for colony multiplication in Phaeocystis pouchetii (Prymnesiophyceae) isolated from mesocosm blooms. J Plank Res 27:495–501
Whipple SJ, Patten BC, Verity PG, Nejstgaard JC, Long JD, Anderson JT, Jacobsen A, Larsen A, Martinez-Martinez A, and Borrett, SR (this issue) Gaining integrated understanding of Phaeocystis spp. (Prymnesiophyceae) life cyle through model-driven laboratory and mesocosm studies. Biogeochemistry
Zingone A, Chrétiennot-Dinet M-J, Lange M, Medlin L (1999) Morphological and genetic characterization of Phaeocystis cordata and P. Jahnii (Pymnesiophyceae), two new species from the Mediterranean Sea. J Phycol 35:1322–1337
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to François Lantoine from the laboratory of Banyuls (France) for providing the electron microscopy photographs of the diploid flagellate of Phaeocystis globosa. We also thank J. Nejstgaard for his helpful comments on grazing issues, and C. Lancelot for fruitful discussion on life cycle. We thank B. Patten for detailed recommendations of an early draft and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. The present review is a contribution to the SCOR WG 120 “Phaeocystis, major link in the biochemical cycling of climate-relevant elements.” V. Rousseau has been supported by the advanced modelling and research on eutrophication (AMORE) project of the Belgian Programme “Scientific Support Plan for a Sustainable Development Policy—Sustainable Management of the North Sea” funded by the Belgian Science Policy under contract EV/11/19. P. Verity and S. Whipple have been supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grant OPP-00-83381.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rousseau, V., Chrétiennot-Dinet, MJ., Jacobsen, A. et al. The life cycle of Phaeocystis: state of knowledge and presumptive role in ecology. Biogeochemistry 83, 29–47 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9085-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9085-3