Abstract
Biodiversity monitoring is criticized for being insufficiently relevant to the needs of managers and ineffective in integrating information into decision-making. We examined conservation management interventions resulting from 2½ years of monitoring by 97 rangers and 350 community volunteers over 1 million hectares of Philippine protected areas. Before this monitoring scheme was established, there was little collaboration between local people and park authorities, and park monitoring was restricted to assessments of the quantity of extracted timber. As a result of the scheme, 156 interventions were undertaken in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems. In total 98% of these interventions were meaningful and justified, 47% targeted the three most serious threats to biodiversity at the site, and 90% were implemented without external support, suggesting that the interventions were relevant and could be sustained over time at the local level. The mean time from sampling to decision-making was only 97 days, probably because 82% of the interventions were initiated by the same people and institutions that had compiled the underlying data, bypassing potential government bureaucracy. Many of the interventions were jointly undertaken by community members and the management authorities or consisted of local bylaws in support of park management. As a result of the monitoring, indigenous resource use regulation schemes were re-established with government recognition in several parks. The monitoring led to more diversified and realistic management responses on the part of the authorities, including a more socially acceptable and effective approach to enforcement. Of the four field monitoring techniques used, the most participatory one generated more interventions aimed at ensuring a continued resource supply for local communities (χ23 = 69.1, p <0.01). Although this suggests that the interest of community members is associated with their possibilities to influence the flow of ecosystem goods and services, the 156 interventions targeted, directly or indirectly, all known globally threatened species of mammals, birds and butterflies in the parks.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
H.T. Andrianandrasana J. Randriamahefasoa J. Durbin R.E. Lewis J.H. Ratsimbazafy (2005) ArticleTitleParticipatory ecological monitoring of the Alaotra wetland in Madagascar Biodivers. Conserv. 14 2757–2774
A. Balmford P. Crane A.P. Dobson R.E. Green G.M. Mace (2005) ArticleTitleThe 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360 221–228 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rstb.2004.1599
M.A.D. Barcelona (2004) Let the rural folks do the talking. Focus group discussion as a tool for monitoring biodiversity and resource use in remote barangays of the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park College of Mass Communication, University of the Philippines Diliman, the Philippines
J.S. Brashares M.K. Sam (2005) ArticleTitleHow much is enough? Estimating the minimum sampling required for effective monitoring of African reserves Biodivers. Conserv. 14 2709–2722
N.J. Collar N.A.D. Mallari B.R. Tabaranza SuffixJr. (1999) Threatened Birds of the Philippines. The Haribon Foundation/BirdLife International Red Data Book Bookmark Makati City, The Philippines
Danida (2000) Towards `Best' Practice in Biodiversity Conservation in Southern Africa Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs Copenhagen, Denmark
F. Danielsen D.S. Balete M.K. Poulsen M. Enghoff C.M. Nozawa A.E. Jensen (2000) ArticleTitleA simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country Biodivers. Conserv. 9 1671–1705 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026505324342
F. Danielsen C.G. Treadaway (2004) ArticleTitlePriority conservation areas for butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) in the Philippine islands Anim. Conserv. 7 79–92 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1367943003001215
F. Danielsen N.D. Burgess A. Balmford (2005) ArticleTitleMonitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches Biodivers. Conserv 14 2507–2542
InstitutionalAuthorNameDENR (1992) National Integrated Protected Area System Act R. A. No. 7586 and Implementing Rules and Regulations DAO 25, Series of 1992 DENR PAWB, Manila
InstitutionalAuthorNameDENR (2000) Guidelines on the Implementation of the Biodiversity Monitoring System (BMS) in Protected Areas DENR PAWB, Manila
InstitutionalAuthorNameDENR (2001) Adoption of Prescribed Methods in Monitoring Biodiversity DENR PAWB, Manila
J. Fowler L. Cohen (1988) Statistics for Ornithologists British Trust for Ornithology Norfolk, UK
R.E. Green A. Balmford P.R. Crane G.M. Mace J.D. Reynolds R.K. Turner (2005) ArticleTitleA framework for improved monitoring of biodiversity: Responses to the World Summit on Sustainable Development Conserv. Biol. 19 56–65 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00289.x
L.R. Heaney N.A.D. Mallari (2002) ArticleTitleA preliminary analysis of current gaps in the protection of threatened Philippine terrestrial mammals Sylvatrop. Techn. J. Phil. Ecos. Nat. Res. 10 28–39
N.J. Hockley J.P.G. Jones F.B. Andriahajaina A. Manica E.H. Ranambitsoa J.A. Randriamboahary (2005) ArticleTitleWhen should communities and conservationists monitor exploited resources? Biodivers. Conserv 14 2795–2806
IUCN. 2003. 2003 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.redlist.org.
R.S. Kennedy P.C. Gonzales E.C. Dickinson H.C. Miranda SuffixJr. T.H. Fisher (2000) A guide to the Birds of the Philippines Oxford University Press Oxford, UK
J. Loh R.E. Green T. Ricketts J. Lamoreux M. Jenkins V. Kapos J. Randers (2005) ArticleTitleThe Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 360 289–295 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rstb.2004.1584
N.A.D. Mallari B.R. Tabaranza SuffixJr. M.J. Crosby (2001) Key Conservation Sites in the Philippines Haribon Foundation, BirdLife International DENR and Bookmark, Manila
InstitutionalAuthorNameNORDECO and DENR. (1998a) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, The Philippines DENR, Manila and NORDECO Copenhagen
InstitutionalAuthorNameNORDECO and DENR. (1998b) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Bataan Natural Park, The Philippines DENR, Manila and NORDECO Copenhagen
InstitutionalAuthorNameNORDECO and DENR. (1998c) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park, The Philippines DENR, Manila and NORDECO Copenhagen
InstitutionalAuthorNameNORDECO and DENR (2002) DENR Biodiversity Monitoring System Implementation Results from Eight Protected Areas January 1999–June 2001, The Philippines DENR Manila
D.O. Obura S. Wells J. Church C. Horrill (2002) ArticleTitleMonitoring of fish and fish catches by local fishermen in Kenya and Tanzania Mar. Freshwater Res. 53 215–222 Occurrence Handle10.1071/MF01151
M.K. Poulsen K. Luanglath (2005) ArticleTitleProjects comeprojects go: Lessons from participatory monitoring in southern Laos Biodivers. Conserv 14 2591–2610
R.L. Roberts P.F. Donald I.J. Fischer (2005) ArticleTitleWordbirds: Developing a web-based data collection system for the global monitoring of bird distribution and abundance Biodivers. Conserv 14 2807–2820
D.P. Robertson R.B. Hull (2001) ArticleTitleBeyond biology: toward a more public ecology for conservation Conserv. Biol. 15 970–979 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004970.x
D. Sheil (2001) ArticleTitleConservation and biodiversity monitoring in the tropics: realities, priorities and distractions Conserv. Biol. 15 1179–1182 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041179.x
D. Sheil A. Lawrence (2004) ArticleTitleTropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration Trend Ecol. Evol. 19 634–638 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.019
W.L. Thompson G.C. White C. Gowan (1998) Monitoring Vertebrate Populations Academic Press London
E. Topp-Jørgensen M.K. Poulsen J.F. Lund J.F. Massao (2005) ArticleTitleCommunity-based monitoring of natural resource use and forest quality in montane forests and miombo woodlands in Iringa DistrictTanzania Biodivers. Conserv 14 2653–2677
A.J. Uychiaoco H.O. Arceo S.J. Green M.T. De la Cruz P.A. Gaite P.M. Aliño (2005) ArticleTitleMonitoring and evaluation of reef protected areas by local fishers in the Philippines: tightening the adaptive management cycle Biodivers. Conserv 14 2775–2794
I. Watson P. Novelly (2004) ArticleTitleMaking the biodiversity monitoring system sustainable: Design issues for large-scale monitoring systems Austral Ecol. 29 16–30 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01350.x
N.G. Yoccoz J.D. Nichols T. Boulinier (2001) ArticleTitleMonitoring of biological diversity in space and time Trend Ecol. Evol. 16 446–453 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02205-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Danielsen, F., Jensen, A., Alviola, P. et al. Does Monitoring Matter? A Quantitative Assessment of Management Decisions from Locally-based Monitoring of Protected Areas. Biodivers Conserv 14, 2633–2652 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8392-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8392-z