Abstract
Crop wild relatives are an important socio-economic resource that is currently being eroded or even extinguished through careless human activities. If the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the CBD 2010 Biodiversity Target of achieving a significant reduction in the current rate of loss is to be achieved, we must first define what crop wild relatives are and how their conservation might be prioritised. A definition of a crop wild relative is proposed and illustrated in the light of previous Gene Pool concept theory. Where crossing and genetic diversity information is unavailable, the Taxon Group concept is introduced to assist recognition of the degree of crop wild relative relatedness by using the existing taxonomic hierarchy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- CBD:
-
Convention on Biological Diversity
- COP:
-
Conference of the Parties to the CBD
- CWR:
-
Crop wild relative
- FAO:
-
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations
- GM:
-
Genetic modification
- GP:
-
Gene pool
- PGR:
-
Plant genetic resources
- TG:
-
Taxon group
References
Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 1–34
Devos K. and Gale M. (1997). Comparative genetics in the grasses. Plant Molecular Biology 35: 3–15
Enneking D. and Maxted N. (1995). Narbon bean: Vicia narbonensis L. (Leguminosae). In: Smartt, J. and Simmonds, N.W. (eds) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn, pp 316–321. Longman Group, Harlow Essex
FAO (1998). The State of the World=s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome
FAO (2001). International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome
Flint M. (1991). Biological Diversity and Developing Countries: Issues and Options. Overseas Development Administration, London
Ford-Lloyd B.V. (2005). Biancardi, E., de Biaggi, M., Campbell, L.G. and Skaracis, G.N. (eds) Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Beet, pp. Science Publishers Inc, Enfield, USA
Groombridge B. and Jenkins M. (2002). World atlas of biodiversity. In: (eds) Prepared by the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, pp. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA
Harlan J. and de Wet J. (1971). Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20: 509–517
Harlan J. (1992). Crops and Man. American Society of Agronomy, Madison
Hawkes J. (1991). International workshop on dynamic in situ conservation of wild relatives of major cultivated plants: summary of final discussion and recommendations. Israel Journal of Botany 40: 529–536
Heywood V. (1994). The measurement of biodiversity and the politics of implementation. In: Forey, P., Humphries, C. and Vane-Wright, R. (eds) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation, pp 15–22. Systematic Association Special Volume 50. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Heywood V. and Zohary D. (1995). A catalogue of the wild relatives of cultivated plants native to Europe. Flora Mediterranea 5: 375–415
Johnson N. (1995). Biodiversity in the balance: approaches to setting geographic conservation priorities. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, D.C.
Kell S. and Maxted N. 2003. (compilers). Report of Workshop 1. European Crop Wild Relative Diversity Assessment and Conservation Forum – PGR Forum. www.prgforum.org.
Maxted N. (1993). A phenetic investigation of Vicia L. subgenus Vicia (Leguminosae, Vicieae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 111: 155–182
Maxted N., Ford-Lloyd B. and Hawkes J. (1997a). Plant Genetic Conservation: the In situ Approach. Chapman & Hall, London, 1–451
Maxted N., Hawkes J., Guarino L. and Sawkins M. (1997b). The selection of taxa for plant genetic conservation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 44: 337–348
Maxted N., Mabuza-Dlamini P., Moss H., Padulosi S., Jarvis A. and Guarino L. (2004). African Vigna: an Ecogeographic Study. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy
Meilleur B. and Hodgkin T. (2004). Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 663–684
Mitteau M. and Soupizet F. 2000. Preparation of a preliminary list of priority target species for in situ conservation in Europe. In: Laliberté B., Maggioni L., Maxted N. and Negri V. (eds). (compilers). ECP/GR In situ and On-farm Conservation Network Report of a Task Force on Wild Species Conservation in Genetic Reserves and a Task Force on On-farm Conservation and Management Joint meeting, 18–20 May 2000. Isola PolveseItaly.
Schlosser S., Reichhoff L. and Hanelt P. (1991). Wildpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag Berlin GmbH, Nutzung und Schutz
N. Vavilov. 1920. The law of homologous series in variation. Proceedings of the III All-Russian plant breeding conference, Saratov, p. 16
Vavilov N. (1922). The law of homologous series in variation. Journal of Genetics 12: 47–89
Wilkinson M., Sweet J. and Poppy G. (2003). Risk assessment of GM plants: avoiding the gridlock. Trends in Plant Science 8: 208–212
Zeven A. and Zhukovsky P. (1975). Dictionary of Cultivated Plants and Their Centres of Diversity. Excluding ornamentals, forest trees and lower plants. PUDOC, Wageningen
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S. et al. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. Biodivers Conserv 15, 2673–2685 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-5409-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-5409-6