Abstract
With the advent of molecular biotechnology, plant genetic engineering techniques have opened an avenue for the genetic improvement of important vegetable crops. Vegetable crop productivity and quality are seriously affected by various biotic and abiotic stresses which destabilize rural economies in many countries. Moreover, absence of proper post-harvest storage and processing facilities leads to qualitative and quantitative losses. In the past four decades, conventional breeding has significantly contributed to the improvement of vegetable yields, quality, post-harvest life, and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, there are many constraints in conventional breeding, which can only be overcome by advancements made in modern biology. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) is an important vegetable crop, of the family Brassicaceae; however, various biotic and abiotic stresses cause enormous crop yield losses during the commercial cultivation of broccoli. Thus, genetic engineering can be used as a tool to add specific characteristics to existing cultivars. However, a pre-requisite for transferring genes into plants is the availability of efficient regeneration and transformation techniques. Recent advances in plant genetic engineering provide an opportunity to improve broccoli in many aspects. The goal of this review is to summarize genetic transformation studies on broccoli to draw the attention of researchers and scientists for its further genetic advancement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Vegetables play an important role in human nutrition and health by providing minerals, micronutrients, vitamins, antioxidants, phytosterols and dietary fiber. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) is an important vegetable crop of the family Brassicaceae (2n = 18). In India, it is still cultivated on a limited scale but its cultivation holds promise throughout the temperate and tropical regions. It is recognized as one of the most nutritious crops, especially in calcium, antioxidants, vitamin A, vitamin K, β-carotene, riboflavin and iron content (Vallejo et al. 2003; Abdel-Wahhab and Aly 2003). It has anti-cancer properties which are contributed by sulforaphane glucosinolate (Keck et al. 2003), quinone reductase, glutathione-S-transferase (Zhang et al. 1992; Fahey et al. 1997) and a high selenium content (Finley et al. 2001; Finley 2003). Environmental stress, pests and diseases cause enormous yield losses because of a limited gene pool.
Genetic manipulation is becoming an important method for broccoli improvement. Classical breeding techniques are insufficient for the genetic improvement. Plant breeders in the past several decades have used inter-specific hybridization to transfer genes between species. Sexual incompatibility barriers severely limit the possibilities for gene transfer between species, although some of the Brassica can be easily crossed using plant breeding techniques and through somatic hybridization (Puddephat et al. 1996). Thus, genetic engineering can be used to add specific characteristics to existing cultivars. However, a pre-requisite for transferring genes into plants is the availability of efficient regeneration and transformation methods.
Plant regeneration studies in broccoli have been reported by various researchers using different explants such as the peduncle (Christey and Earle 1991), anther (Chang et al. 1996), protoplasts (Kaur et al. 2006) hypocotyls (Zhong and Li 1993; Puddephat et al. 2001; Kim and Botella 2002; Ravanfar et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2011; Kumar and Srivastava 2015a; Kumar et al. 2015a), leaf tissues (Robertson and Earle 1986; Cao and Earle 2003; Farzinebrahimi et al. 2012; Kumar and Srivastava 2015a), cotyledons (Qin et al. 2006; Ravanfar et al. 2011, 2014; Kumar and Srivastava 2015a, b; Kumar et al. 2016) and petioles (Kumar et al. 2015a, b). Metz et al. (1995a, b) were the first to report Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer studies in broccoli, followed by others (Puddephat et al. 1996, 2001; Chen et al. 2004, 2007; Huang et al. 2005; Higgins et al. 2006; Bhalla and Singh 2008; Ravanfar and Aziz 2014; Gaur 2015). Plant regeneration efficiency and transformation of the broccoli is highly dependent on genotype and need to be established for each cultivar. In this paper different aspects of genetic improvement of broccoli using plant genetic engineering techniques have been reviewed to provide insight into its potential applications (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4).
Genetic transformation studies in broccoli
Being an economically important crop, genetic improvement programmes can be a reliable way to tackle the cultivation problems of the broccoli. Recent advances in plant biotechnology have enabled the introduction of various foreign genes into plant cells and regeneration of plants from the transformed cells. Broccoli and other cole crops are susceptible to several insect pests and diseases. Insect pests of agricultural importance include the cutworm (Spodoptera littoralis), cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni), cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae), cabbage fly (Delia brassicae), imported cabbage worm (Pieris rapae), cabbage butterfly (Pieris canidia), cabbage moth (Crocidolomia binotalis) and the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). The diamondback moth is considered to be the major pest of the crucifers worldwide, and has become resistant to all major categories of insecticides (Tabashnik et al. 1991).
Broccoli is highly susceptible to the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) for which no source of resistance is available among crossable germplasm. Massive use of synthetic insecticides in chemical control has given rise to major concerns about food safety and environmental pollution, apart from high chemical and labour costs. Emergence of insect resistance to chemical pesticides (Georghiou and Tajeda 1991) requires alternative methods of pest control. Important diseases include bacterial black rot (Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris) and soft rot (Erwinia carotovora), downy mildew (Peronospora parasitica), clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae), Alternaria blight (A. brassicae), cabbage yellows (Fusarium oxysporum) and cauliflower and turnip mosaic virus. While some cultivars are available with resistance to some of the diseases listed above, the majority of present day cultivars are still susceptible (Siemonsma and Piluek 1993).
Plant genetic engineering could be used to develop insect- and disease-resistant varieties by utilizing genes that cannot be transferred through traditional plant breeding techniques. The cloning of genes expressing the insecticidal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis (Hiifte and Whiteley 1991) has allowed development of transgene strategies for incorporation of resistance to a variety of lepidopteran and coleopteran insect pests in many crop plants (Fischhoff et al. 1987; Perlak et al. 1990; Bottrell et al. 1992; Fujimoto et al. 1993; Fromm et al. 1994; Sharma and Srivastava 2014a, b). Genetic engineering of broccoli for insect resistance offers a safe and attractive strategy to achieve a long lasting solution against insect/pest attack. Biotechnological improvements in crops offer many advantages, such as decreased pesticide use, environment friendly nature, decreased input costs to farmers, season-long protection independent of weather conditions, high effectivity against burrowing insects that are difficult to reach through insecticide sprays, and control at all stages of development. Resistance to fungal and viral infection has also been demonstrated in transgenic plants containing fungal resistance genes (Mora and Earle 1999, 2004), virus-resistance genes (Lomonossof 1995), including coat protein genes (Beachy et al. 1990) and, more recently, viral movement genes (Cooper et al. 1995; Tacke et al. 1996). Other traits of interest include delay of post-harvest senescence and improved quality and yield. Post-harvest senescence is quite rapid in broccoli and leads to a deterioration of crop quality. Attempts have been made by various scientists to increase the yield and quality of broccoli via genetic transformation techniques (Henzi et al. 1999; Huang et al. 2005; Higgins et al. 2006; Deng-Xia et al. 2011; Ravanfar and Aziz 2014) of agronomically important traits like aphid resistance, disease resistance, herbicide tolerance, salinity, drought tolerance and quality improvement.
Genetic transformation is a potential tool for the improvement of crop plants. Recombinant DNA techniques for introducing foreign genes into plants involve the use of dominant selectable markers that are expressed at the cell and whole-plant levels (Mathews and Litz 1990). Selection and recovery of transformed cells or tissues and elimination of Agrobacterium from the cultures require the use of selective agents and/or antibiotics which is a critical feature in obtaining transgenic plants. Genes encoding antibiotic resistance and herbicide tolerance are widely employed as selective markers to identify the rare transformed cells (Vetten et al. 2003; Miki and McHugh 2004). Most of the transgenic plants produced to date were created through the use of the Agrobacterium system (Gasser and Fraley 1989; Jain 1993; Singh and Sansavini 1998; Dunwell 2000; Ranjekar et al. 2003; Cardoza and Stewart 2004; Srivastava 1997; 1998, 2003; 2012a, b, 2013). The success of this approach resulted from improvement in tissue culture and genetic engineering methods.
The first transgenic plants expressing engineered foreign genes were tobacco plants produced by the use of Agrobacterium tumefaciens as a vector (Horsch et al. 1984; De Block et al. 1984). An efficient method for introducing cloned gene(s) into plant cells was given by Fraley et al. (1983); Herrera-Estrella et al. (1983) and Zambrysky et al. (1983). Genetic transformation of plants to confer resistance to insect pests offers an ecofriendly method of crop protection. Considerable progress has been made in developing transgenic crops with resistance to the target insect-pests over the past two decades (Vaeck et al. 1987; Chakrabarty et al. 2002). Impressive results have been obtained with the expression of Bt (cry) genes, the cowpea trypsin inhibitor gene, serine proteinase inhibitor gene and cysteine proteinase inhibitor genes in various crops (Gatehouse et al. 1980; Wolfson and Murdock 1987; Houseman et al. 1989; Johnson et al. 1989; Liang et al. 1991; Bai et al. 1992; Ding et al. 1998; Jin et al. 2000; Cho et al. 2001; Awasthi 2003; Chakrabarty et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2004; Paul et al. 2005; Lingling et al. 2005; Zhao et al. 2006; Hua et al. 2009; Deng-Xia et al. 2011; Srivastava 2013; Sharma and Srivastava 2014a, b). Such transgenic plants have shown considerable promise in reducing insect damage, both under laboratory and field conditions, thus reducing the need to use pesticides for crop pest management. To protect the crop plants from insect pest attack, a massive application of pesticides not only leaves harmful residues in the food, but also causes adverse effects on non-target organisms and the environment.
Agrobacterium-mediated gene (reporter and marker) transfer studies in broccoli
Genetic transformation of broccoli has been achieved using both Agrobacterium tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes. Hosoki et al. (1989) utilized a mannopine strain of A. rhizogenes to induce hairy root cultures from inoculated leaf explants. Plants regenerated from two hairy root clones demonstrated the presence of mannopine. Toriyama et al. (1991) demonstrated genetic transformation of broccoli with A. tumefaciens. Metz et al. (1995a) described the use of A. tumefaciens to transfer a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein gene to broccoli, with the recovery of 144 insect-resistant plants. Christey et al. (1997a, b) carried out regeneration of transgenic vegetable brassicas (B. oleracea and B. campestris) via Ri-mediated transformation. Leaf explants or petioles of intact cotyledons were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4T harbouring various binary vectors. The T-DNA region of all binary vectors contained npt-II gene for kanamycin resistance, in addition to other genes. Hairy root lines grew on hormone-free medium containing kanamycin. Transgenic shoots were regenerated from all cultivars either spontaneously or after transfer of hairy roots to a hormone-containing medium. Southern analysis confirmed that plants were transgenic. Plants from all brassica types were successfully transferred to greenhouse conditions. Li et al. (1999) reported transformation of B. oleracea L. var. italica cotyledon and hypocotyl protoplasts using Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 harbouring Ti-plasmid pMOG410 containing gus and npt-II genes. Transformation was confirmed by growth on medium containing kanamycin sulphate and by β-glucuronidase assay. Puddephat et al. (2001) recovered phenotypically normal transgenic plants of Brassica oleracea L. var. italic by using hypocotyl explants with A. rhizogenes strain A4T harbouring the bacterial plasmid pRiA4 and a binary vector pMaspro: β-glucuronidase (GUS) whose T-DNA region carried the gus reporter gene. pRiA4 transfers TL sequences carrying the rol genes that induce hairy root formation. Transgenic hairy root production was increased in a difficult to transform cultivar by inclusion of 2,4-D in the medium used to resuspend A. rhizogenes prior to inoculation. Transgenic hairy roots could be selected from inoculated explants by screening root sections for GUS activity; this method eliminated the use of antibiotic resistance marker genes for selection. Cogan et al. 2001; Suri et al. 2005; Bhalla and Singh 2008; Verma et al. 2014; Dhiman et al. 2014 reported an effective protocol for genetic transformation in broccoli with npt-ll and gus genes. The putative transformants have shown amplification of npt-ll and gus, thereby indicating the presence/integration of npt-II and gus genes into the genome of transgenic broccoli. The expression of the gus gene was analyzed by using biochemical and histochemical techniques of GUS assay. The gus gene was expressed in the PCR positive transgenic plantlets of broccoli.
Direct gene (reporter and marker) transfer studies in broccoli
Direct gene transfer studies in Brassica species were initiated by Eimert and Siegemund (1992). There are only a few reports on direct gene transfer technique-mediated reporter/marker genes in Brassica species. Puddephat et al. (1994) carried out biolistic transformation of broccoli for transient expression of the β-glucuronidase gene. Efficient transient expression of the beta-glucuronidase (gus) gene had been obtained following transformation of broccoli cv. Marathon F1 cotyledons via microparticle bombardment. Cho et al. (1994) carried out transformation of Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. var. pekinensis) by particle bombardment with a tungsten particle size of 0.7–1.1 mm at a target of 3 cm. Transgenic plantlets were regenerated from leaf discs on minimal MS medium with 1 mg NAA l−1 and 5 mg BAP l−1. Tuan and Garg (2001) reported gene transformation in cotyledon and hypocotyls explants of Brassica sp. using particle bombardment. Mesophyll protoplasts of Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis were successfully transformed using polyethylene glycol (PEG) by Radchuk et al. (2002). The success of plant transformation depended on both gene transfer and plant regeneration. Parameters such as PEG and vector concentrations and heat-shock conditions were tested in experiments on transient expression of the β-glucuronidase gene and the most suitable conditions for DNA uptake were determined. Yan et al. (2004) analyzed the effect of the developmental stage of floral buds, and sucrose and surfactant concentrations on the transformation of Chinese cabbage (landrace variety Shanghaiqing) by microinjection of Agrobacterium into flower buds.
Desirable gene transfer studies in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica)
A number of desirable genes have been introduced into the genome of broocoli for the development of transgenic plants with desirable traits. Wagoner et al. (1992) developed superior regeneration and Agrobacterium infectability of broccoli tissues and the identification of a procedure for the generation of transgenic plants. They developed a method for the transfer of a gene encoding S-adenosylmethionine-hydrolase into inbred broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) germplasm, the morphogenic competence and Agrobacterium susceptibility of a wide range of tissues of varied source were examined.
Biotic stress
Insect resistance
Metz et al. (1995a, b) have generated a large number of transgenic broccoli lines carrying the cry1A(c) gene, most of them causing 100 % mortality of first instar larvae of the diamond moth, a major insect pest of crucifers. Southern blots of some resistant transformants confirmed the presence of the cry1A(c) gene. Selected plants that gave 100 per cent mortality of susceptible larvae allowed the survival of a strain of diamondback moth that had evolved resistance to Bt in the field. Cao et al. (1999) developed transgenic broccoli with high levels of Bacillus thuringiensis cry1C protein to control diamondback moth larvae resistant to cry1A or cry1C. They demonstrated that a high production of cry1C protein can protect transgenic broccoli not only from susceptible DBM larvae but also from DBM selected for moderate levels of resistance of cry1C. The cry1C transgenic broccoli was also resistant to two other lepidopteran pests of crucifers (cabbage looper and imported cabbage worm). Cao and Earle (2002) studied transgene expression in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) clones propagated in vitro via leaf explants by using cry1Ac and cry1C genes from Bacillus thuringiensis associated with kanamycin and hygromycin selectable markers, respectively. PCR analysis indicated that the cry1Ac and cry1C genes were both maintained. ELISA assays showed that all of the clones produced a high level of cry1Ac protein similar to the original transgenic plant; however, most clones had significantly lower levels of cry1C protein than the original plant. Viswakarma et al. (2004) studied insect resistance of transgenic broccoli expressing a synthetic cryIA(b) gene. Broccoli has no suitable genes for insect resistance within the gene pool for transfer through conventional breeding. They optimized a protocol for the transformation of hypocotyl explants of broccoli based on transient GUS expression. A synthetic cryIA(b) gene coding for an insecticidal crystal protein of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) was transferred to the broccoli cultivar Pusa Broccoli KTS-1 by co-cultivating hypocotyl explants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Transformed plants resistant to kanamycin were regenerated.
Fungal resistance
Mora and Earle (1999) developed transgenic lines with a Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene in broccoli. An endochitinase gene from Trichoderma harzianum was introduced into broccoli via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation using npt-II (neomycin phosphotransferase-II) as the selectable marker. Twenty-four transgenic plants were obtained in a single transformation experiment, 19 of which were assayed for endochitinase activity and fungal control. The transgenic lines had endochitinase activity 15–30 times higher than control lines. However, Mora Avieles and Earle (2004) studied expression of genes encoding two pathogenesis-related plant proteins (PR-1 and PR-2) in transgenic broccoli plants expressing the Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene and in the control plants. mRNA accumulation in 2-month-old plants inoculated with Alternaria brassicicola and in non-inoculated plants was assessed by RNA hybridization, using PR-1 and PR-2 DNA sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana as probes. The non-transgenic and transgenic controls carrying a different transgene showed accumulation of PR-1 mRNA only after inoculation. In contrast, endochitinase transgenic plants produced PR-1 mRNA with and without inoculation. These results indicated that PR-1 genes normally induced by fungal infection were constitutively expressed in transgenic plants expressing heterologous endochitinase genes.
Bacterial and virus resistance
Broccoli is susceptible to bacterial and viral diseases. Important diseases include bacterial black rot (Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris) and soft rot (Erwinia carotovora), clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae), Alternaria blight (A. brassicae) and cauliflower and turnip mosaic virus (Siemonsma and Piluek 1993). There is not any literature on bacterial and viral resistance gene transfer in broccoli. So broccoli can be further improved by the transfer of bacterial and viral resistance genes using plant genetic engineering techniques.
Abiotic stress
Broccoli cultivars are commonly grown in cool climate regions of the world. The cultivar, which could also be grown on the highlands of the tropics, responds adversely to extreme temperatures and high humidity in lowlands; thus gene transformation is essential for improving its tolerance to heat stress. Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) are functionally related proteins involved in the folding and unfolding of other proteins. Their expression is increased when cells are exposed to elevated temperatures or other stresses (Narberhaus 2010; Omar et al. 2011). HSP101 appears to play a major and specific role in conferring acquired thermotolerance (Wahid et al. 2007; Su and Li 2008). Transgenic broccoli plants have shown improved tolerance to dehydration, as well as to other types of stresses (salt, heavy metals, and hydrogen peroxide) (Vinocur and Altman 2005). Ravanfar and Aziz 2014 developed heat-tolerant transgenic broccoli via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with Arabidopsis thaliana HSP 101 (AtHSP101) cDNA. A transformation efficiency of 5 % was achieved based on the positive PCR results using the optimized procedure. The expression of the luciferase reporter gene in the transformed cells and the transcription of AtHSP101 using RT-PCR confirmed the transgenic status of the regenerated plants.
Herbicide resistance
The incorporation of herbicide resistance into vegetable brassicas would enable growers to control weeds more efficiently. Basta-resistant broccoli has been produced and field-tested by Christey et al. (1997a, b) and Waterer et al. (2000). Glufosinate is a non-selective herbicide that acts by inhibiting the enzyme glutamine synthetase, resulting in the accumulation of ammonium leading to the death of the cell and ultimately the plant. Waterer et al. (2000) field tested six transgenic lines and noted that herbicide application had little effect on head quality and marketable yield of most lines. Christey et al. (1997a) field-tested four transgenic lines and also noted a normal phenotype, although plants were not sprayed in the field. Greenhouse application of Basta to seedlings demonstrated they were resistant.
Flowering control
In brassicas, the transition from vegetative growth to flowering is influenced by day length and low temperature, with some vegetables requiring a period of vernalization to induce flowering. Irwin et al. (2002) studied the control of the transition from vegetative growth to flowering mode in vegetable brassicas by insertion of genes from A. thaliana known to be important in the control of flowering. In Arabidopsis thaliana, overexpression of FCA and CONSTANS (CO) promotes early flowering and overrides the vernalization requirement. The FCA and CO genes of Arabidopsis thaliana were introduced into seven genotypes of B. oleracea and lines assessed for changes in flowering response and vernalization treatment by growth under long and short days (with and without vernalization). No major changes in flowering response were observed. Considerable variation in days to flowering was noted both with and among transgenic lines. While insertion of FCA or CO does not override the vernalization requirement, it appears to be modulated in some way. The introduction of male sterility into vegetable brassicas would aid production of hybrid seed. The only report of alteration of male sterility is by Bhalla and Smith (1998a, b), who introduced an antisense pollen-specific gene linked to a pollen-specific promoter into cauliflower and obtained the expected sterility of 50 % of pollen. Self-incompatibility prevents self-fertilization and promotes outcrossing.
In brassicas, self-incompatibility is used for hybrid seed production but has a number of drawbacks, including breakdown of incompatibility, labor intensiveness and genetic complexity of the system. In brassicas, self-incompatibility is sporophytically controlled by multiallelic genes at the S-locus. Two genes have been identified at the S-locus, SLG and SRK. SLG encodes a secreted glycoprotein in the wall of the stigma papillar cells and SRK encodes a transmembrane receptor kinase. A self-incompatible response occurs when the same S-allele is expressed in pollen and stigma. Toriyama et al. (1991) introduced an SLG gene from the B. campestris S8 homozygote and were able to alter the self-incompatibility phenotype of pollen and stigma. The self-incompatible Chinese kale and partially compatible broccoli plants were fully compatible upon self-fertilization.
Plant male sterility induced by anti- gene CYP86MF in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) reported by Huang et al. (2005). They introduced an anti-gene CYP86MF into hypocotyls of broccoli via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation and transgenic plants were obtained by kanamycin selection. The results of PCR, southern blot and northern blot indicated that anti-gene CYP86MF has been integrated into the chromosome of the transgenic plant. Hypo genetic stamina or ungerminated pollen was observed.
Post-harvest attributes and quality improvement
For enhancing shelf-life to prevent postharvest losses and quality improvement, Henzi et al. (1999) carried out Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of broccoli with an antisense 1-aminocyclopropane-1 carboxylic acid oxidase gene. Leaf explants or intact cotyledons of broccoli cultivars Green Beauty, Shogun and Green Belt were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4T harbouring the binary vector pLN35. The T-DNA of this binary vector contains genes encoding antisense-1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase and neomycin phosphotransferase-II. Shogun and Green Beauty were successfully transformed with a transformation efficiency of 35 and 17 %, respectively. Chen et al. (2001) developed a protocol for transformation of broccoli with the ipt (isopentenyl transferase) gene via Agrobacterium tumefaciens for post-harvest yellowing retardation. The ipt gene was constructed under control of senescence-associated gene promoters from Arabidopsis in the forms of pSG529 (+) and pSG766A. Evidence of transgene integration was confirmed by assays on npt- II activity of selection markers, PCR and Southern hybridization. Based on chlorophyll retention rate after 4 days of post-harvest storage at 25 °C, 31 % of transformants exhibited an effect of retarding yellowing in detached leaves with 16 % having an effect on florets and 7.2 % on both leaves and florets. RT-PCR revealed that ipt gene expression occurred early on the day of detachment. Similar results were reported by Gapper et al. (2002a, b) to alter ethylene and cytokinin biosynthesis in broccoli. Chen et al. (2004) studied ethylene-insensitive and post-harvest yellowing retardation in mutant ethylene response sensor gene transformed broccoli. Over a hundred transformants have been obtained on the selected cotyledon and hypocotyls explants. PCR and Southern analysis demonstrated integration of transgenes in the transformants. Higgins et al. (2006) produced marker-free genetically engineered broccoli with sense and antisense ACC synthase 1 and ACC oxidase 1 and 2 to extend shelf-life. An A. rhizogenes Ri vector, pRi1855: GFP was constructed to allow expression of green fluorescent protein to identify insertion of Ri Tl—DNA into plant cells. The Brassica oleracea ACC synthase 1 and ACC oxidase 1 & 2 cDNAs in sense and antisense orientations were co-transformed into GDDH33, a double haploid calabrese-broccoli cultivar. Transformation efficiency was 3.3 % producing 150 transgenic root lines, of which 18 were regenerated into mature plants. Buds from T0 lines transformed with ACC oxidase 1 and 2 constructs produced significantly less post-harvest ethylene at 20 °C than untransformed plants, and chlorophyll loss was significantly reduced in a 96 h post-harvest period. Chen et al. (2007) produced transgenic broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) with an antisense chlorophyllase gene (BoCLH1) to delay post-harvest yellowing. Southern blot analyses were conducted to eliminate the possible non-independent transformants and investigate the insertion patterns and copy numbers.
Factor affecting transformation frequency
Various factors determine the rate of transformation frequency in different species. All these factors needed to be optimized for the establishment of an effective genetic transformation protocol. Different factors which are known to affect the transformation frequency include plant species, explant type, Agrobacterium strain, preculturing time, cocultivation period, concentration of bacterial inoculum, effect of different inducers like acetosyringone and lethal dose of each agent (antibiotic). Effects of all these factors were studied by various researchers during the genetic transformation studies of different plant species (Naureby et al. 1997; Cheng et al. 1998; Ling et al. 1998; Dixit and Srivastava 1999; Awasthi 2003; Zhao et al. 2006; Thakur 2008; Husaini 2010; Sharma 2010, 2014; Sharma et al. 2011; Ahmad et al. 2012; Aggarwal 2011; Gambhir 2013; Gaur 2015). Naureby et al. (1997) investigated the influence of 150 mg timentin l−1 on the regeneration potential of Nicotiana tabacum Petit Havana SRI leaf discs and cotyledon explants and compared with the effects of 500 mg cefotaxime l−1 or 1000 mg carbenicillin l−1. They found a positive influence of timentin on shoot regeneration from leaf discs (27 % after 1 month of culture). There was no influence on shoot production from cotyledons after 1 month and generally no influence on the rooting ability. Cefotaxime did not affect shoot production from leaf discs, but had an inhibitory effect on cotyledon explant regeneration (81 % after 2 months of culture). Carbenicillin influenced shoot formation negatively as the shooting frequency for leaf disc explants was reduced to 56 % and for cotyledons to 51 % after 2 months of culture. In general, it was demonstrated that shoots arising from cotyledon explants rooted more efficiently than shoots arising from leaf disc explants. It could be concluded that the influence of timentin on tissue culture was negligible or positive as compared to those of cefotaxime or carbenicillin. Similar results have been reported by Cheng et al. (1998), who determined the effects of timentin on shoot regeneration of tobacco (Nicotiana tabaccum) and Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L.) and its use for the suppression of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and concluded that timentin may be an alternative antibiotic for the effective suppression of A. tumefaciens in genetic transformation.
Dixit and Srivastava (1999) studied the resistance level of kanamycin in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis cv. Pusa Snow Ball K1). They gave increasing doses of kanamycin (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mg l−1) to hypocotyl and cotyledon explants to find the minimum concentration of kanamycin required for the selection of putative transformed cells during transformation. A decrease in fresh weight in both hypocotyl and cotyledon tissues was observed with increasing kanamycin concentrations. Even the cauliflower tissues were sensitive to 10 mg kanamycin l−1. The non-transformed tissues did not survive on the selective medium containing kanamycin. Song et al. (2000) studied effects of kanamycin, cefotaxime and carbenicillin on morphogenesis of Chinese cabbage in tissue culture. Results showed that the 4 antibiotics had little effect on callus induction, but they had a great influence on shoot and root differentiation. Even at a very low concentration, kanamycin inhibited the differentiation of roots and shoots. Cefotaxime inhibited redifferentiation at lower concentrations and postponed morphogenesis of roots and shoots. Carbenicillin had no obvious effect on shoot and root differentiation with a frequency over 70 %. Similar results were reported by Sharma (2010, 2014), Husaini (2010), Sharma et al. (2011), Aggarwal (2011), Ahmad et al. (2012), and Gambhir 2013.
Conclusion
Several published reports demonstrate genetic transformation in broccoli. All accounts of transformation within this crop utilize direct gene transfer and Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer techniques. In general, most published accounts of transformation have indicated somewhat limited success. With depleting natural resources and a changing global climate, conventional agricultural practices alone are unable to sustain the quality and quantity of the produce. With advent of modern molecular biotechnology, newer tools permitting gene transfer across the species: transgenics, have opened an avenue for solving an age-old problem. Some of the limitations in transgenic applications need to be resolved for wider application and acceptance of transgenic technology. Environmental risks such as cross-pollination with closely related wild relatives of the crop plants and effect of transgene products on human health and environment need to be assessed carefully on a case-by-case basis. Moreover, there are widespread concerns about the use of antibiotic- and herbicide-resistance genes as selectable markers from the point of view of ecological and human safety. Use of alternative methods to obtain marker-free transgenic plants may enhance public acceptance of transgenic crops (Vetten et al. 2003). Development of binary vectors or mini-chromosomes for multiple gene transfer (Goderis et al. 2002) and improvement in transformation technology for vegetable crops may further increase our capability to introduce traits with long lasting value. This review provides an insight into the various plant genetic transformation studies carried out by researchers in broccoli for biotic and abiotic stress tolerant genes, herbicide resistance genes, flowering control genes, post harvest attributes and quality improvement genes along with the various factors affecting the transformation frequency.
References
Abdel-wahhab MA, Aly SE (2003) Antioxidants and radical scavenging properties of vegetable extracts in rats fed aflatoxin-contaminated diet. J Agric Food Chem 51:2409–2414
Aggarwal G (2011) Studies on Agrobacterium-mediated insect resistance gene transfer studies in Himalayan poplar (Populus ciliata Wall.) and molecular analysis of regenerated plantlets. Ph.D. Thesis, Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India
Aggarwal G, Gaur A, Srivastava DK (2015) Establishment of high frequency shoot regeneration system in Himalayan poplar (Populus ciliata Wall. Ex Royle) from petiole explants using Thidiazuron cytokinin as plant growth regulator. J For Res. doi:10.1007/11676-015-0048-6
Ahmad MZ, Hussain I, Muhammad A, Ali S, Ali GM, Roomi Z, Zia MA, Ijaz A (2012) Factor affecting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice chitinase gene in Solanum tuberosum L. Afr J Biotechnol 11:9716–9723
Awasthi M (2003) Agrobacterium- mediated insect resistance gene (cry1Ab) transfer studies in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis). Ph. D. Thesis. Dr Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India
Awasthi M, Srivastava DK (2013) Pyramiding of Bt-genes (cry1Ab and cry1Aa) in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) for insect resistance using an Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer technique. In: Proceedings of National symposium on Plant tissue culture and biotechnology for food and nutritional security, Abstract, p 72
Bai YY, Mao HZ, Cao XL, Tang T, Wu D, Chen DD, Li WG, Fu WJ, You CB, Ding Y (1992) Transgenic cabbage plants with insect tolerance. Curr Plant Sci Biotechnol Agric 15:156–159
Bardhan SK, Sharma C, Srivastava DK (2013) Genetic transformation studies in agronomical important plant Solanum melongena L. through different seedling explants. Crop Improv 40:156–162
Beachy RN, Loesch-Fies S, Turner NE (1990) Coat protein-mediated resistance against viral infection. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28:451–474
Bhalla PL, Singh MB (2008) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Brassica napus and Brassica oleracea. Nat Protoc 3:181–189
Bhalla PL, Smith N (1998a) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of cauliflower Brassica oleracea var. botrytis. Mol Breed 4:531–541
Bhalla PL, Smith NA (1998b) Comparison of shoot regeneration potential from seedling explants of Australian cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) varieties. Aust J Agric Res 49:1261–1266
Bottrell DG, Aguda RM, Gould FL, Theunis W, Demayo CG, Magalit VF (1992) Potential strategies for prolonging the usefulness of Bacillus thuringiensis in engineered rice. Korean J Appl Entomol 31:247–255
Cao J, Earle ED (2002) Transgene expression in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) clones propagated in vitro via leaf explants. Plant Cell Rep 21:789–796
Cao J, Tang JD, Strizhov N, Shelton AM, Earle ED (1999) Transgenic broccoli with high levels of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C protein control diamondback moth larvae resistant to Cry1A or Cry1C. Mol Breed 5(2):131–141
Cardoza V, Stewart CN (2004) Brassica biotechnology: progress in cellular and molecular biology. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 40:542–551
Chakrabarty R, Viswakarma N, Bhat SR, Kirti PB, Singh BD, Chopra VL (2002) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cauliflower: optimization of protocol and development of Bt-transgenic cauliflower. J Biosci 27(25):495–502
Chang YM, Liou PC, Hsiao CH (1996) Anther culture of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) and broccoli (B. oleracea L. var. italica). I. Varieties, developmental stages and cultural medium relation with regeneration. J Agric Res China 45:35–46
Chen LO, Hwang JY, Wang YH, Chen YT, Shaw J (2004) Ethylene insensitive and post-harvest yellowing retardation in mutant ethylene response sensor gene transformed broccoli. Mol Breed 14:199–213
Chen LO, Chin HL, Kelkarc SM, Chang YM, Shawa JF (2007) Transgenic broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) with antisense chlorophyllase (BOCLH1) delays post harvest yellowing. Plant Sci 174:25–31
Cheng ZM, Schnurr JA, Kapaun JA (1998) Timentin as an alternative antibiotic for suppression of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in genetic transformation. Plant Cell Rep 17:646–649
Cho HS, Lee YH, Suh SC, Kin DH, Kin HI (1994) Transformation of gus gene into Chinese cabbage (Brassica compestris var. pekinensis) by particle bombardment. J Agric Sci Technol 36:181–186
Cho HS, Cao J, Ren JP, Earle ED (2001) Control of lepidopteran insect pests in transgenic Chinese cabbage (Brassica compestris ssp. pekinensis) transformed with a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis cryIAc gene. Plant Cell Rep 20:1–7
Christey MC, Earle ED (1991) Regeneration of Brassica oleracea from peduncle explants. HortSci 26:1069–1072
Christey MC, Sinclair BK, Braun RH, Wyke L (1997a) Regeneration of transgenic vegetable brassicas (B. oleracea and B. campestris) via Ri-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep 16:587–593
Christey MC, Braun RH, Reader JK (1997a) Field testing genetically modified vegetable brassicas. Crop Info Confidential Report No 437
Cogan N, Harvey E, Robinson H, Lynn J, Pin D, Newbury HJ, Puddephat I (2001) The effects of anther culture and plant genetic background on Agrobacterium rhizogenes—mediated transformation of commercial cultivars and derived double haploid Brassica oleracea. Plant Cell Rep 20:755–762
Cooper B, Lapidot M, Heick JA, Beachy RN (1995) A defective movement protein of TMV in transgenic plants confers resistance to multiple viruses whereas the functional analogue increases susceptibility. Virology 206:307–313
De Block M, Herrera-Estrella L, Van-Montagu M, Schell J, Zambryski P (1984) Expression of foreign genes in regenerated plants and in their progeny. Eur Mol Biol Org J 3:1681–1689
Deng-Xia Y, Lei C, Yu-Mei L, Mu Z, Yang-Yong Z, Zhi-Yuan F, Li-Mei Y (2011) Transformation of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) with Bt cry1Ba3 gene for control of diamondback moth. Agric Sci China 10:1693–1700
Dhiman K, Verma S, Srivastava DK (2014) Plant regeneration, genetic transformation and expression of gus gene in broccoli. Veg Sci 41:129–134
Ding LC, Hu CY, Yeh KW, Wang PJ (1998) Development of insect resistant transgenic cauliflower plants expressing the trypsin inhibitor gene isolated from local sweet potato. Plant Cell Rep 17:854–860
Dixit S, Srivastava DK (1999) Kanamycin sensitivity in cultured tissues of cauliflower. J Appl Hortic 1:94–96
Dunwell JM (2000) Transgenic approaches to crop improvement. J Exper Bot 51:487–496
Eimert K, Siegemund F (1992) Transformation of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis)—an experimental survey. Plant Mol Biol 19:485–490
Fahey JW, Zhang Y, Talalay P (1997) Broccoli sprouts: an exceptionally rich source of inducers of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10367–10372
Farzinebrahimi R, Taha RM, Fadainasab M, Mokhtar S (2012) In vitro plant regeneration, antioxidant and antibacterial studies on broccoli, Brassica oleracea var. italica. Pak J Bot 44:2117–2122
Finley JW (2003) Reduction of cancer risk by consumption of selenium-enriched plants: enrichment of broccoli with selenium increases the anticarcinogenic properties of broccoli. J Med Food 6:19–26
Finley JW, Ip C, Lisk DJ, Davis CD, Hintze KG, Whanger PD (2001) Cancer-protective properties of high-selenium broccoli. J Agric Food Chem 49:2679–2683
Fischhoff DA, Bowdish KS, Perlak FJ, Marrone PG, McCormick SH, Niedermeyer JG, Dean DA, Kusano-Kretzmer K, Mayer EJ, Rochester DE, Rogers SG, Fraley RT (1987) Insect tolerant transgenic tomato plants. Bio/Technology 5:807–813
Fl Perlak, Deaton RW, Armstrong TA, Fuchs RL, Sims SR, Greenplate JT, Fischhoff DA (1990) Insect resistant cotton plants. Biotechnology 8:939–943
Fraley RT, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Sanders PS, Flick JS, Adams SP, Bittner ML, Brand LA, Fink CL, Fry JS, Galluppi GR, Goldberg SB, Hoffman NL, Woo SC (1983) Expression of bacterial genes in plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:4803–4807
Fromm M, Armstrong C, Blasingame A, Brown S, Duncan D, Deboer D, Hairston B, Howe A, McCaul S, Neher M, Pajeau M, Parker G, Pershing J, Petersen B, Santino C, Sanders P, Sato S, Sims S, Thorton T (1994) Production of insect resistant corn. J BioI Chern Suppl 18A:77
Fujimoto H, Itoh K, Yamamoto M, Kyozuka J, Shimamoto K (1993) Insect resistant rice generated by introduction of a modified delta-endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. Bio/Technology 11:1151–1155
Gambhir G (2013) Studies on Agrobacterium-mediated insect resistance gene transfer in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) and molecular analysis of regenerated plantlets. Ph. D. Thesis. Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni. Solan (H.P.), India
Gapper NE, Coupe SA, McKenzie MJ, Christey MC, Lill RE, Jameson PE (2002a) Characterization of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) plants harbouring a harvest-specific antisense ACC oxidase gene. Microb Molec 26–29 November, Christchurch, p 57
Gapper NE, McKenzie MJ, Christey MC, Braun RH, Coupe SA, Lill RE, Jameson PE (2002b) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation to alter ethylene and cytokinin biosynthesis in broccoli. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 70:41–50
Gasser CS, Fraley RT (1989) Genetically engineered plants for crop improvement. Science 244:1293–1299
Gatehouse AMR, Gatehous JA, Boulter D (1980) Isolation and characterization of trypsin inhibitors from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Phytochemistry 19:751–756
Gaur (2015) Studies on Agrobacterium-mediated insect resistance gene [cry1A(a)] transfer in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis). Ph.D. Thesis, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India
Georghiou GP, Tajeda LA (1991) The occurrence of resistance to pesticides in arthropods. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome
Goderis IJWM, DeBolle MFC, Francois IEJA, Wouters PFJ, Broekaert WF, Cammue BPA (2002) A set of modular plant transformation vectors allowing flexible insertion of up to six expression units. Plant Mol Biol 50:17–27
Henzi MX, Christey MC, McNeil DL, Davies KM (1999) Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of broccoli with an antisense 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase gene. Plant Sci 143(1):53–62
Henzi MX, Christey MC, McNeil DL (2000) Factors that influence Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica). Plant Cell Rep 19:994–999
Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, Van-Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Expression of chimeric genes transferred into plant cell using a Ti-plasmid vector. Nature 303:209–213
Higgins JD, Newbury HJ, Barbara DJ, Muthumeenakshi S, Puddephat IJ (2006) Production of marker-free genetically engineered broccoli with sense and antisense ACC synthase 1 and ACC oxidase 1 and 2 to extend shelf life. Mol Breed 17:7–20
Hiifte H, Whiteley HR (1991) Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53:242–255
Horsch RB, Fraley RT, Rogers SG, Sanders PR, Llyod A, Hoffman N (1984) Inheritance of functional foreign genes in plants. Science 223:496–498
Hosoki T, Kigo T, Shiraishi K (1989) Transformation and regeneration of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) mediated by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 60:71–75
Houseman JG, Downe AER, Philogene BJR (1989) Partial characterization of proteinase activity in the larval mid gut of European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae). Canad J Zool 67:864–868
Hua WF, Chen CH, Yuan LG, Min WL (2009) Transformation of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) using activation tagging plasmid. Acta Botan Bor-Occid Sin 29:905–909
Huang K, Jiashu C, Xiaolin Y, Wanzhi Y, Gang L, Xiang X (2005) Plant male sterility induced by antigene CYP86MF in Brassica oleracea L. var. italica. Agric Sci China 4:806–810
Huang K, Qiuyun W, Juncleng L, Zheng J (2011) Optimization of plant regeneration from broccoli. Afr J Biotechnol 10:4081–4085
Husaini AM (2010) Pre- and post-agroinfection strategies for efficient leaf disk transformation and regeneration of transgenic strawberry plants. Plant Cell Rep 29:97–110
Irwin JA, Bird N, Richardson A, Sparrow P, Townsend T, Dean C, Coupland G, Dale P. (2002) Control of the transition from vegetative to flowering mode in horticultural Brassicas. In: McVetty PBE, Schlosser K, Quiros CF (eds) Abstracts of the 13th Crucifer Genetics Workshop, California, p 108
Jain SM (1993) Recent advances in plant genetic engineering. Curr Sci 64:714–724
Jin RG, Liu YB, Tabashnik BE, Borthakur D (2000) Development of transgenic cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) for insect resistance by Agrobacterium tumefaciens—mediated transformation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36(4):231–237
Johnson R, Narvaez J, An G, Ryan C (1989) Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: effects on natural defense against Manduca sexta larve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:9871–9875
Kaur ND, Vyvadilova M, Klima M, Bechyne M (2006) A simple procedure for mesophyll protoplast culture and plant regeneration in Brassica oleracea L. and Brassica napus L. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 3:103–110
Keck AS, Qiao Q, Jeffery EH (2003) Food matrix effects on bioactivity of broccoli-derived sulforaphane in liver and colon of f344 rats. J Agric Food Chem 51:3320–3327
Kim JH, Botella JR (2002) Callus induction and plant regeneration from broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) for transformation. J Plant Biol 45:177–181
Kumar P, Srivastava DK (2015a) Effect of potent cytokinin thidiazuron (TDZ) on in vitro morphogenic potential of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica), an important vegetable crop. Indian J Plant Physiol 20:317–323
Kumar P, Srivastava DK (2015b) High frequency organogenesis in hypocotyl, cotyledon, leaf and petiole explants of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica), an important vegetable crop. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 21:279–285
Kumar P, Srivastava DK (2015c) Biotechnological application in in vitro plant regeneration studies of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica), an important vegetable crop: a review. Biotechnol. doi:10.1007/s10529-015-2031-x
Kumar P, Gaur A, Srivastava DK (2015) Morphogenic response of leaf and petiole explants of broccoli using thidiazuron. J Crop Improv 29:432–446
Kumar P, Gambhir G, Gaur A, Srivastava DK (2016) Molecular analysis of genetic stability in tissue culture raised plants of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica). Curr Sci 109:1470–1475
Li G, Zhong X, Li X (1999) Transformation of Brassica oleracea var. italica cotyledon and hypocotyl protoplasts with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Acta Agric Shanghai 15:28–32
Liang C, Brookhart G, Feng GH, Reeck GR, Kramer KJ (1991) Inhibition of digestive proteinases of stored grain coleopteran by oryzacystatin, a cystein proteinase inhibitor from rice seed. FEBS Lett 278:139–142
Ling HQ, Kriseleit D, Ganal MW (1998) Effect of ticarcillin/potassium clavulanate on callus growth and shoot regeneration in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Plant Cell Rep 17:843–847
Lingling L, Jianjun L, Ming S, Liyun L, Bihao C (2005) Study on transformation of cowpea trypsin inhibitor gene into cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis). Afr J Biotechnol 4:45–49
Lomonossof GP (1995) Pathogen-derived resistance to plant viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 33:323–343
Mathews H, Litz RE (1990) Kanamycin sensitivity of mango somatic embryos. HortSci 25:965–966
Metz TD, Dixit TR, Earle ED (1995a) Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) and cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata). Plant Cell Rep 15:287–292
Metz TD, Roush RT, Tang JD, Shelton AM, Earle ED (1995b) Transgenic broccoli expressing a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein: implications for pest resistance management strategies. Mol Breed 4:309–317
Miki B, McHugh S (2004) Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants: applications, alternatives and biosafety. J Biotechnol 107:193–232
Mora Avieles MA, Earle ED (2004) Expression of pathogenesis related gene in transgenic broccoli and canola plants expressing Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene. Revis Chap Seric Hortic 10:141–146
Mora AA, Earle ED (1999) Transformation of broccoli with Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene. Crucif Newsl 21:57–58
Narberhaus F (2010) Translational control of bacterial heat shock and virulence genes by temperature-sensing mRNAs. RNA Biol 7:84–89
Naureby B, Billing K, Wyndaele R (1997) Influence of the antibiotic timetin on plant regeneration compared to carbencillin & cefotaxime in concentrations suitable for elimination of Agrobacterium tumefaciencs. Plant Sci 123:169–177
Omar SA, Fu QT, Chen MS, Wang GJ, Song SQ, Elsheery NI, Xu ZF (2011) Identification and expression analysis of two small heat shock protein cDNAs from developing seeds of biodiesel feedstock plant Jatropha curcas. Plant Sci 181:632–637
Park YD, Kim HS, Kang BK (2000) The effects of plant growth regulators, AgNO3, dark treatment, and antibiotics on shoot induction from cotyledon and hypocotyl of Chinese cabbage. HortSci 35:422–450
Paul A, Sharma SR, Sresty TVS, Devi S, Bala S, Kumar PS, Pardha SP, Frutos R, Altosaar I, Kumar PA (2005) Transgenic cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) resistant to diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Indian J Biotechnol 4:72–77
Puddephat IJ, Thompson N, Robinson HT, Sandhu P, Henderson J (1994) Biolistic transformation of broccoli for transient expression of β-glucuronidase gene. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 74(6):714–720
Puddephat IJ, Riggs TJ, Fenning TM (1996) Transformation of Brassica oleracea L.: a critical review. Mol Breed 2(3):185–210
Puddephat IJ, Robinson HT, Fenning TM, Barbara DJ, Morton A, Pink DAC (2001) Recovery of phenotypically normal transgenic plants of Brassica oleracea L. var. italica upon Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated co-transformation and selection of transformed hairy roots by GUS assay. Mol Breed 7:229–242
Qin Y, Li HL, Guo YD (2006) High frequency embryogenesis, regeneration of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) and analysis of genetic stability by RAPD. Sci Hortic 111:203–208
Radchuk VV, Ryschka U, Schumann G, Klock E (2002) Genetic transformation of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) by direct DNA uptake into mesophyll protoplasts. Physiol Plant 114:429–438
Ranjekar PK, Patnakar A, Gupta V, Bhatnagar R, Bentur J, Kumar PA (2003) Genetic engineering of crop plants for insect resistance. Curr Sci 84:412–422
Ravanfar SA, Aziz MA (2014) Shoot tip regeneration and optimization of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) cv. Green Marvel. Plant Biotechnol, 9:27–36
Ravanfar SA, Aziz MA, Kadir MA, Rashid AA, Sirchi MHT (2009) Plant regeneration of Brassica oleracea var. italica (broccoli) cv. Green marvel was affected by plant growth regulators. Afr J Biotechnol 8:2523–2528
Ravanfar SA, Aziz MA, Kadir MA, Rashid AA, Haddadi F (2011) In vitro shoot regeneration and acclimatization of Brassica oleracea var. italica cv. Green marvel. Afr J Biotechnol 10:5614–5619
Ravanfar SA, Aziz MA, Rashid AA, Shahida S (2014) In vitro adventitious shoot regeneration from cotyledon explant of Brassica oleracea subsp. italica and Brassica oleracia subsp. capitata using TDZ and NAA. Pak J Bot 46:329–335
Robertson D, Earle ED (1986) Plant regeneration from leaf protoplasts of Brassica oleracea L. var. italica. Plant Cell Rep 5:61–64
Sharma C (2010) Studies on Agrobacterium- mediated insect resistance gene transfer in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Ph.D. Thesis. Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India
Sharma P (2014) Studies on chitinase gene transfer in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and molecular analysis of transgenic plantlets. Ph.D. Thesis. Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India
Sharma C, Srivastava DK (2013) Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of tomato using petiole explants. Crop Improv 40:44–49
Sharma P, Srivastava DK (2014a) In vitro plant regeneration from cotyledon and hypocotyls tissues of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Solan Vajr). Vegetos 27:151–160
Sharma P, Srivastava DK (2014b) Effect of hygromycin on tomato cultures and its application in Agrobacterium—mediated tomato transformation. Crop Improv 41:43–49
Sharma C, Srivastava DK, Aggarwal G (2011) Effect of cefotaxime with kanamycin on regeneration efficiency and Agrobacterium growth in tomato plants. J Plant Sci Res 27:227–230
Siemonsma JS, Piluek K (eds) (1993) Plant resources of Southeast Asia No 8: vegetables. Pudoc Scientific Publishers, Wageningen
Singh Z, Sansavini S (1998) Genetic transformation and fruit crop improvement. Plant Breed Rev 16:87–134
Song Z, Jiang FW, Xiang ZC, Tang WY (2000) Effect of antibiotics on morphogenesis of Chinese cabbage in tissue culture. J Shandong Agric Univ 31(4):385–388
Srisvastava DK (1998) Biotechnology in the development of vegetable crops resistant to insect pests. In: Kohli UK, Korla BN, Narayan R (eds) Advances in breeding and seed production of commercial vegetables, pp 183–186
Srivastava DK (1997) Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer in plants—a review. In: Pareek LK (ed) Trends in plant tissue culture and biotechnology. Agrobotanical Publication, India, pp 17–30
Srivastava DK (2003) Genetic transformation and crop improvement. In: Arora JK, Marwaha SS, Grover RK (eds) Biotechnological strategies in agro-processing. Asiatech Publisher, India, pp 251–273
Srivastava DK (2012a) Genetic improvement of plants using Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer technique. In: Proceedings of National symposium on impact of plant tissue culture on advances in plant biology, pp 97–98
Srivastava DK (2012b) Genetic engineering of crop plants for insect resistance. In: Proceedings of National seminar on plant cell, tissue and organ culture: emerging trends, pp 6–7
Srivastava DK (2013) Genetic improvement of Populus deltoids and Populus ciliata using Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer technique. In: Proceedings of BIT’S 4th annual world DNA and genome day, p 701
Srivastava DK, Gambhir G, Sharma P (2013) Plant cell and tissue culture techniques in crop improvement. In: Panesar PS, Marwaha SS (eds) Biotechnology in agriculture and food processing: opportunities and challenges. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 73–131
Su PH, Li HM (2008) Arabidopsis stromal 70-kd heat shock proteins are essential for plant development and important for thermotolerance of germinating seeds. Plant Physiol 146(3):1231–1241
Suri SS, Saini ARK, Ramawat KG (2005) High Frequency Regeneration and Agrobacterium tumefaciens- mediated Transformation of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). Eur J Hort Sci 70:71–78
Tabashnik BE, Finson N, Johnson MW (1991) Managing resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis: lessons from the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Econ Entomol 84:49–55
Tacke E, Salamini F, Rohde W (1996) Genetic engineering of potato for broad-spectrum protection against virus infection. Nat Biotechnol 14:1597–1601
Toriyama K, Stein JC, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB (1991) Transformation of Brassica oleracea with an S-locus gene from B. campestris changes the self-incompatibility phenotype. Theor Appl Genet 81:769–776
Tuan VD, Garg GK (2001) Gene transformation in Brassica sp. using particle bombardment technique. Omonrice 9:36–40
Vaeck M, Reynaeris A, Hofte H, Jansens S, DeBeukleer MD, Dean C, Zabeau M, Van Montagu M, Leemans J (1987) Transgenic plants protected from insect attack. Nature 328:33–37
Vallejo F, Garcia-viguera C, Tomas-barberan FA (2003) Changes in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) health-promoting compounds with inflorescence development. J Agric Food Chem 51:3776–3782
Verma H, Gambhir G, Srivastava DK (2014) Genetic transformation studies in broccoli (Brassica oleracia L. var. italica) with npt-II and gus genes. In: National conference on “Perspectives & Trends in Plant Sciences and Biotechnology” organized by Department of Botany, Punjab University Chandigarh & Society for Plant Research(SPR), India, pp 143–144
Vetten DN, Wolters AM, Raemakers K, Meer IV, Stege RT, Heeres E, Heeres P, Visser R (2003) A transformation method for obtaining marker-free plants of a cross pollinating and vegetatively propagated crop. Nat Biotechnol 21:439–442
Vinocur B, Altman A (2005) Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:123–132
Viswakarma N, Bhattacharya RC, Chakrabarty R, Dargan S, Bhat SR, Kirti PB, Shastri NV, Chopra VL (2004) Insect resistance of transgenic plants i.e. broccoli (‘Pusa Broccoli KTS-1’) expressing a synthetic cryIA(b) gene. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 79:182–188
Wagoner WJ, Kellogg JA, Bestwick RK, Stamp JA (1992) Superior regeneration and Agrobacterium infectability of broccoli and cauliflower tissues and the identification of a procedure for the generation of transgenic plants. HortSci 27:620–621
Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61:199–223
Waterer D, Lee S, Scoles G, Keller W (2000) Field evaluation of herbicide-resistant transgenic broccoli. HortSci 35:930–932
Wolfson JL, Murdock LL (1987) Suppression of larvae of colarodo potato beetle growth and development by digestive proteinase inhibitor. Entomol Exp Appl 44:235–240
Yan JY, He Y, Cao JS (2004) Factors affecting transformation efficiency by micro-injecting Agrobacterium into flower bud of Chinese cabbage. Agric Sci China 3:44–51
Zambrysky P, Joose H, Genetello C, Leemans J, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Ti-plasmid vector for the introduction of DNA into plant cells without alteration of their normal regeneration capacity. Eur Mol Biol Org J 2:2143–2150
Zhang YS, Talalay P, Cho CG, Posner G (1992) A major inducer of anticarcinogenic protective enzymes from broccoli: isolation and elucidation of structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:2399–2403
Zhang JJ, Liu F, Luo C, Yao L, Zhao H, Huang Y (2004) Genetic transformation of Chinese cabbage with a inducible potato pinII gene and the bioassay for Pieris rapae L. resistance. Acta Hortic Sin 31:193–198
Zhao J, Liang A, Zhu Z, Tang Y (2006) Regeneration of Chinese cabbage transgenic plants expressing antibacterial peptide gene and cowpea trypsin inhibitor gene. Euphytica 150(3):397–406
Zhong ZX, Li X (1993) Plant regeneration from hypocotyl protoplasts culture of Brasscia oleracea L. var. italica. Acta Agric Shanghai 9:13–18
Acknowledgments
The senior author (PK) thankfully acknowledges the award of Department of Science & Technology (DST), Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research (INSPIRE) fellowship, New Delhi, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, P., Srivastava, D.K. Biotechnological advancement in genetic improvement of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica), an important vegetable crop. Biotechnol Lett 38, 1049–1063 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-016-2080-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-016-2080-9