Introduction

Microalgae have attracted considerable attention with advantages of fast growth, short production cycle, efficient oil production and requirement of less agricultural land than is needed for growth of plant oil crops (Guan Hua et al. 2010). It utilizes sunlight efficiently and has important applications as they produce polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA; eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids), carotenes and phycobiliproteins (Reis et al. 1996). PUFA provides significant health benefits to the human population by reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases (Romieu et al. 2005).

Accumulation of lipid in the microalgae depends on diverse factors such as temperature, pH, nutritional imbalances (carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, and silicate), growth regime (autotrophic, mixotrophic and heterotrophic), age of the culture, and the specific microalgal strain (Chisti 2007).

Today, the most common procedure for cultivation of microalgae is photoautotrophic culture. However, this gives low biomass and lipid productivities due to mutual shading of cells and slow growth rate. Other modes of cultivation, such as heterotrophic and mixotrophic, have therefore been investigated. In heterotrophic cultivation, organic carbon sources are used in the absence of light, whereas in mixotrophic cultivation CO2 and an organic carbon source are simultaneously assimilated in the presence of light.

Under mixotrophic conditions, some microalgae have higher growth rates than photoautotrophic conditions (Cheirsilp and Torpee 2012) and produce compounds that are synthesized during both heterotrophic and phototrophic conditions. This has been considered as a potential alternative strategy for producing wide range of economically-viable microalgal products in a short span of time.

Heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultivation of Phaeodactylum tricornutum using glycerol produced maximal cell productivity of 21 mg h−1(Cerón García et al. 2000). Mixotrophic cultivation of Chlorella protothecoides and Nannochloropsis sp. using glucose (Heredia-Arroyo et al. 2009) and acetate (Liang et al. 2009) produced maximum biomasses of 5.9 and 2 g l−1, respectively. The mixotrophic growth of C. protothecoides was reported to produce a 69 % higher lipid yield on glucose when compared to heterotrophic metabolism (Wang and Rischer 2013).

The high cost of glucose limits its commercial feasibility as a carbon source; therefore cheaper alternatives are required. Molasses (by-product from sugarcane industry) and glycerol (by-product from biodiesel industry) can be used as potential alternative carbon sources.

In the current study, effect of different light intensities and photoperiod regimes (exposure to light/dark cycles) on cell growth rate, biomass and lipid productivity of I. galbana were investigated. In addition, fatty acid composition was determined for phototrophic and mixotrophic cultivation.

Materials and methods

Isochrysis galbana was collected from Central Institute of Brackish water Aquaculture (CIBA), Muttukadu, Chennai, India.

Culture medium

The growth medium (Conway medium) contains stock A (in g l−1): NaNO3 (100), NaH2PO4 (20), Na2EDTA (45), H3BO3 (33.6), FeCI3·6H2O (1.3), MnCl2·4H2O (0.36), trace metal solution, stock B (in g l−1): ZnCl2 (4.2), COCl2·6H2O (4), (NH4)6 MO7O2·4H2O (1.8), CuSO4·5H2O (4) and vitamin solution (in 200 ml): B12 (10 mg), B1 (thiamine) (200 mg). Conway medium was prepared by adding 1 ml stock solution A, 0.5 ml stock solution B and 0.1 ml vitamin stock solution in 1 l of filtered-sterilized seawater.

Algal cultivation using different carbon and nitrogen sources

Isochrysis galbana was cultured in 1 l Conway medium and maintained at 22–24 °C, pH 7.3–7.5 under aseptic conditions. Glucose (4, 8 and 12 g l−1), glycerol (4, 8 and 12 g l−1) and molasses (4, 8 and 12 g l−1) were used as carbon sources at light intensity of 70–75 μmol m−2 s−1 with photoperiod 18/6 h (light/dark regimes) until it reached stationary phase. Yeast extract at 2 g l−1 was used as nitrogen source. The amounts of carbon (4–12 g l−1) added were selected based on data available from literature for heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultivation of marine microalgae (Azma et al. 2011; Cerón García et al. 2000). To examine the effect of light intensity on cell growth and total lipid production, the cultures were grown at three different light intensities: 50, 100 and 150 μmol m−2 s−1. The effect of cyclic illumination was also investigated under three different photoperiod conditions, light/dark = 24/0, 12/12 and 18/6 h. All microbiological-grade carbon and nitrogen sources used in the experiments are known to be stable when subjected to sterilization at 121 °C for 15 min. For experiments with bioreactors, mixotrophic cultivation was carried out in 1 l and 5 l closed bubble-column glass photo-bioreactors containing 1 l and 3 l Conway medium with different carbon sources. The photo bioreactor was aerated with CO2-enriched air (2 % v/v CO2) at 0.4 vvm (vessel volume per minute).

Determination of carbohydrate concentration in culture media

Glucose, glycerol, sucrose and fructose concentrations in culture media were determined using HPLC equipped with a refractive index (RI) detector and a 300 × 6.5 mm Chrompack column at 60 °C, with 5 mM H2SO4 as the eluent at 0.5 ml min−1 and a sample volume of 20 μl.

Lipid extraction protocol

Lipid was extracted from lyophilized algal biomass using a modified method of Bligh and Dyer. Freeze-dried cells (100 mg) were weighed accurately in a 15 ml centrifuge tube; 3 ml chloroform:methanol (2:1 v/v) containing 0.5 mg butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) ml−1 was added and the tube was shaken gently overnight at room temperature. After centrifugation at 2500×g for 5 min, the supernatant containing the extracted lipid was stored at 4 °C throughout the study. The extract was evaporated at 40 °C to remove solvents. The final lipid concentration was determined gravimetrically. Lipid was methylated by direct acid-catalyzed transesterification using 2 ml 4 % (v/v) H2SO4 in methanol (75 °C for 1 h).

Fatty acid analysis

The fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were extracted with hexane and analyzed by Agilent 7890 gas chromatography and a capillary column (60 m × 250 μm × 0.2 μm) with helium as a carrier gas at 0.7 ml min−1. Samples, 1 μl, were injected in the split (20:1) injection mode. The inlet and detector were at 260 °C and the oven was programmed initially at 100 °C and then raised to 250 °C in steps of 10 °C min −1 and thereafter maintained at 250 °C for 3 min. FAMEs were identified by chromatographic comparison with authentic standards.

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation) and the mean is the average of three test results per experiment. The experiments were repeated thrice to confirm the results.

Results and discussion

Effect of individual carbon sources on mixotrophic growth of Isochrysis galbana

To assess the mixotrophic potential of I. galbana, the effect of different carbon sources on biomass concentration and lipid productivity was evaluated. Conway medium with 2 g of yeast extract l−1 was used as nitrogen source. The biomass concentration was highest for glucose (3.15 g l−1), followed by molasses (2.66 g l−1) and lowest for glycerol (2.35 g l−1) at 4 g l−1 in agreement with experiments on Chlorella vulgaris by Yeh et al. (2012) and decreased with increase in level of carbon sources (Table 1). This could be attributed to substrate inhibition as observed by Mitra et al. (2012). Similar results were achieved for Tetraselmis suecica when grown at high glucose concentration (Azma et al. 2011). Light penetration was not affected for molasses at 4 g l−1 but was affected by further increase in its concentration.

Table 1 Effect of different carbon sources on growth of Isochrysis galbana cultivated in mixotrophic condition at light intensity of 70 μmol m−2 s−1 with photoperiod (18/6 h)

The lipid production was highest for glucose (0.94 g l−1), followed by molasses (0.82 g l−1) and lowest for glycerol (0.7 g l−1) at 4 g l−1(Table 1). Lipid content decreased with increase in carbon sources concentration above 4 g l−1 and this was in accordance with the results obtained by Cheirsilp and Torpee (2012). The complete utilization of glucose, glycerol and molasses were observed for initial concentration of 4 g l−1. Nearly 60 % (w/w) of carbon sources were utilized when at 8 g l−1 and 33 % (w/w) when at 12 g l−1.

Combined effects of carbon sources on biomass and lipid production

To assess the synergistic effects of carbon sources on biomass production and lipid productivity, three different combinations (glucose/glycerol, molasses/glucose and glycerol/molasses) were tested. Six different ratios (100:0, 80:20, 60:40, 40:60, 20:80, 0:100) were taken for each combination (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Isochrysis galbana cultivated at different ratios of glucose/glycerol, molasses/glucose and glycerol/molasses concentration under light intensity of 70 μmol m−2 s−1 with photoperiod (18/6 h). (100:0–6:0 g l−1, 80:20–4.8:1.2 g l−1, 60:40–3.2:2.4 g l−1, 40:60–2.4:3.2 g l−1, 20:80–1.2:4.8 g l−1, 0:100–0:6 g l−1)

Maximum biomass concentration of 6.17 g l−1 was achieved for 20:80 % (w/w) molasses/glucose (1.2:4.8 g l−1), followed by 5.34 g l−1 for 20:80 % (w/w) glycerol/glucose (4.8:1.2 g l−1) and 5.14 g l−1 for 40:60 % (w/w) molasses/glucose (2.4:3.6 g l−1) (Fig. 1). Biomass obtained using combined carbon sources (6.17 g l−1) was twice that of individual carbon sources (3.15 g l−1). Similar results were obtained for C. vulgaris with 80:20 % (w/w) of glucose/glycerol (Arroyo et al. 2010) and 20:80 % (w/w) of glucose/glycerol (Kong et al. 2013). However the lipid content (25–30 % w/w) was similar for individual and combined carbon sources. Cell growth inhibition was observed with higher glycerol and molasses concentration (Arroyo et al. 2010).

Effect of photoperiod and light intensity on biomass of Isochrysis galbana

The same species of microalga responds differently to varying light intensities and photoperiods (Danesi et al. 2004). Three best combinations of carbon sources [20:80 % (w/w) molasses/glucose, 80:20 % (w/w) glucose/glycerol, 40:60 % (w/w) molasses/glucose] that gave higher biomass concentration and lipid content were selected for further optimization studies and the results were summarized in Tables 2, 3 and 4. The stationary phase of 120–144 h was observed for all the cell growth patterns (Figs. 2, 3, 4).

Table 2 Maximum cell density, specific growth rate and lipid productivity of Isochrysis galbana at different light intensities and photoperiod cycles for molasses/glucose (20:80 w/w–1.2/4.8 g l−1)
Table 3 Maximum cell density, specific growth rate and lipid productivity of Isochrysis galbana at different light intensities and photoperiod cycles for glycerol/glucose (20:80 w/w–1.2:4.8 g l−1)
Table 4 Maximum cell density, specific growth rate and lipid productivity of Isochrysis galbana at different light intensities and photoperiod cycles for molasses/glucose (40:60 w/w–2.4:3.2 g l−1)
Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of three different photoperiods (12/12, 18/6 and 24/0 h) on growth of Isochrysis galbana cultured at light intensities of 50, 100 and 150 μmol m−2 s−1 supplemented with molasses/glucose (20:80–1.2:4.8 g l−1)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of three different photoperiods (12/12, 18/6 and 24/0 h) on growth of Isochrysis galbana cultured at light intensities of 50, 100 and 150 μmol m−2 s−1 supplemented with glucose/glycerol (80:20–4.8:1.2 g l−1)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of three different photoperiods (12/12, 18/6 and 24/0 h) on growth of Isochrysis galbana cultured at light intensities of 50, 100 and 150 μmol m−2 s−1 supplemented with molasses/glucose (40:60–2.4:3.2 g l−1)

Under continuous illumination, the photoperiod of 24:0 h for varying light intensities (50, 100 and 150 μmol m−2 s−1) less biomass productivity was observed (Figs. 2, 3, 4). This is because of the decrease in growth rate observed for a total photoperiod (24:0 h) as reported in earlier studies (Richmond 2004). A similar pattern was observed for all three media combinations (molasses/glucose, glucose/glycerol and molasses/glucose) used in this study.

Availability and intensity of light are major factors controlling productivity of photosynthetic cultures (Qin 2005). We have observed reduced biomass productivity at higher light intensity of 150 μmol m−2 s−1 under all three photoperiods. This may be due to occurrence of photo-inhibition (Wahidin et al. 2012).

The highest biomass, 8.35 g l−1, was achieved with a light intensity of 100 μmol m−2 s−1 under photoperiod of (18/6 h) using molasses/glucose (20:80 w/w) (Alkhamis and Qin 2013; Liu et al. 2013; Wahidin et al. 2012) (Tables 2, 3, 4). This was 4.5 times higher than that (1.88 g l−1) obtained by Picardo et al. (2013). The corresponding lipid productivity was 0.45 g l−1 day−1.

Fatty acid profiling

Fatty acid composition of I. galbana comprised of 25–29 % (w/w) saturated, 23–27 % (w/w) monounsaturated and 36–42 % (w/w) PUFA. The major fatty acids present were palmitic acid (16:0), palmitoleic acid (16:1 n-7), eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6 n-3). Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) (22:5 n-3) at 2–3 % (w/w) was also observed in PUFA (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Fatty acid profiles of photoautotrophic and mixotrophic culture of Isochrysis galbana under light intensity of 100 μmol m−2 s−1 with photoperiod (18/6 h) at 144 h and molasses/glucose (20:80–1.2:4.8 g l−1) for mixotrophic cultivation

Minor variations in fatty acid profile of I. galbana were observed when cultivated under phototrophic and mixotrophic conditions. In mixotrophic condition, the levels of saturated fatty acids increased with decrease in the levels of mono- and poly-unsaturated fatty acids.

Studies reported by Yoshioka et al. (2012) showed that I. galbana cultivated under various light conditions contained 26.2–29.4 % (w/w) saturated, 23.2–25.2 % (w/w) monounsaturated, and 45.5–50.5 % (w/w) PUFA. These results were in accordance with the fatty acid profile observed in our study.

In the present work, effects on biomass and lipid production for three best carbon source combinations were studied under different photoperiods and light intensities. Maximum cell density of 8.35 g l−1 was observed for mixotrophic condition, whereas for phototrophic growth it was only 0.9 g l−1. I. galbana showed maximum lipid productivity of 0.45 g l−1 day−1 at a light intensity (100 μmol m−2 s−1) under a photoperiod of (18/6 h) with molasses/glucose (20:80 w/w). This study demonstrates the potential utilization of low cost and waste by-products as carbon sources. Microalgal biomass produced could be used as a feedstock for production of biofuel, PUFA, aquaculture and for other pharmaceutical applications.