Abstract
For this study, 68 plum samples were collected from 12 provinces of China. Low molecular weight RNAs were extracted and used for dot-blot, reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), return–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and biological indexing using cucumber. Results showed that 15 out of the 68 plum samples were positive for Hop stunt viroid (HSVd). Four positive samples were selected for cloning and sequence analysis. Results indicated that most HSVd sequences from the plum in China had 1–3 nucleotide changes from the closest HSVd in GenBank. In addition, the sample PB21 (cv. ‘Friar’) collected from Hebei province had one sequence with a 15-nt duplication (named HSVd D-15) at the 244/245 position in the lower central region. By biological indexing, cucumber seedlings, an indicator plant for HSVd, were inoculated with RNAs directly extracted from the original plum source (PB21, cv. ‘Friar’). Nucleotide sequencing analysis of the progeny showed that HSVd, but not HSVd-D15, was recovered from inoculated cucumbers. Although very unlikely, the possibility that this extra sequence was the result of a PCR artifact cannot be completely ruled out.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Viroids are the smallest known plant pathogens, consisting of a noncoding, single-stranded, 246–475 nt circular RNA that is autonomously replicated by enlisting host-encoded proteins (Flores et al. 1997), mediated through specific conformations (Owens et al. 1986; Visvader et al. 1985). Hop stunt viroid (HSVd) belongs to the Pospiviroidae family and is found in a wide range of hosts, including hop, cucumber, grapevine, citrus, plum, peach, pear (Shikata 1990), apricot, and almond (Astruc et al. 1996; Cañizares et al. 1999).
Genome enlargement has been reported in only two known viroids, Coconut cadang–cadang viroid (CCCVd), and Citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd). A series of terminal repeats containing 41, 50, 55, and 100 nucleotides were detected that were unique to CCCVd (Haseloff et al. 1982). Unusual variants of CEVd D-92, D-104 from a hybrid tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. × Lycopersicon peruvianum) (Semancik et al. 1994; Semancik and Duran-Vila 1999) and CEVd D-96 from eggplant (Fadda et al. 2003), have been reported. Recently, the transmission of CEVd D-92 and D-104 to Gynura aurantiaca demonstrated that other plant species were also capable of processing and replicating these structures. Two additional enlarged CEVd variants (D-87 and D-76) and three transient forms (D-38, D-40, and D-43) from hybrid tomato have been reported recently (Szychowski et al. 2005).
This report describes the molecular variability of hop stunt viroid (HSVd) present in plum trees of different regions in China and an unusual variant of HSVd, temporarily named HSVd D-15, which originated from a natural host plum.
Materials and Methods
Plant and Viroid Sources
The 68 plum samples were collected from 12 provinces of China. The samples consisted of six leaf samples (Nos. PL1-PL6) and 62 bark samples (Nos. PB1-PB62) (Table 1).
Preparation of Low Molecular Weight RNAs
Low molecular weight RNAs were extracted according to Li et al. (1995). In brief, 2 g of tissue was powdered in liquid nitrogen, extracted with 4 ml of 1M K2HPO4 containing 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol, and homogenized with 4 ml phenol:chloroform (1:1, v/v). After eliminating polysaccharides by 2-methoxyethanol extraction and CTAB precipitation, 2M LiCl was used to precipitate low molecular weight RNAs. The resulting preparation was dissolved in 20 μl distilled water.
Dot-blot Hybridization
RNA extracts of 2 μl and diluted plasmid controls were heated for 15 min at 65°C, quickly chilled on ice, and applied to nylon membranes (Hybond-N+ Amersham Biosciences). These were hybridized overnight at 50°C using a HSVd-specific DNA probe labeled with digoxigenin using the DIG High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit 1 (Roche).
RT-PCR Amplification, Cloning, and Sequencing
In order to detect and clone viroids from the plum and inoculated cucumber plants, RT-PCR primers were designed according to the HSVd sequence from the plum, based on acc. no. D13764 (Table 2). The primers lie in the strictly central conserved region (CCR) of HSVd and contain the unique endonuclease restriction site SmaI (underlined in Table 2). Reverse transcription was conducted using 3 μl RNA extract, 4 μl M-MLV 5 × buffer, 4 μl 2.5 mmol/l dNTPs, 2 U/μl RNasin, 1 μl R1 primer (20 μmol/l), and 10 U/μl M-MLV reverse transcriptase. Water was added to a final volume of 20 μl. The cDNA synthesis was conducted at room temperature for 10 min and 42°C for 1 h.
The PCR reaction utilized 25 μl 2 × Taq PCR MasterMix, 1 μl of each primer pair (R2 and F3; 20 μmol/l), and 3 μl first-strand cDNA reaction mixture. Water was added to a final volume of 50 μl. PCR parameters consisted of 94°C for 5 min and 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 53°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension step of 72°C for 7 min. After RT-PCR, electrophoresis confirmed the presence of a PCR product of the expected size. The products were purified with the PCR purification kit (Tiangen). The resulting fragments were cloned into a pGEM-T vector (Promega) and transformed into E. coli DH5α. The cDNA clones from all isolates were identified by restriction analysis. Selected clones were sequenced using an automated DNA sequencer (ABI Prism 3730XL DNA Analyzer) and analyzed by DNAman Version 5.2.2.
R-PAGE
RNA extracts were separated by return–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (R-PAGE) under nondenaturing and denaturing conditions, and revealed by silver staining (Li et al. 1995).
Biological Indexing
Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Suyo) seedlings of the cotyledon stage were inoculated with low molecular weight RNA extracted from plum, dissolved at various concentrations in 100 mmol/l Tris–HCl; pH 7.5, 10 mmol/l EDTA.
Prediction of the Secondary Structure of Viroid RNA
The predicted secondary structures of minimum free energy for the viroid RNAs were analyzed using an Mfold RNA folding package available on the Internet (Mfold version 3.0, http://www.bioinfo.rpi.edu/applications/mfold/old/rna/form3.cgi, or version 0.01, http://www.bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mfold/).
Results
Dot-blot Hybridization
Dot-blot hybridization revealed that 15 of the 68 plum samples were positive for HSVd (Fig. 1). The positives included one leaf sample (PL5) and 14 bark samples (PB2, 6, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 45, 48, 53, 55, 56, 57, 61), collected from Beijing, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Xinjiang, and Shanxi provinces in China.
Cloning and Sequence Analysis
Four positive samples were selected for cloning and sequence analysis. Five independent cDNA clones were sequenced for each sample (Table 3). After comparing the sequence obtained from this isolate with the previously reported HSVd in GenBank, we found that most HSVd sequences from the plum in China had 1–3 nucleotide changes from the HSVd sequence in GenBank. However, in one sample PB21 (cv. ‘Friar’) collected from Hebei province, a sequence with a 15 nt duplication (named HSVd D-15) at the 244/245 position was found in the lower part of the central region. More clones from this sample were selected for sequence analysis. Thirteen individual clones were sequenced; in addition to eight normal HSVd clones, five enlarged HSVd D-15 clones were obtained. The five D-15 clones all displayed a 15 nt duplication at the 244/245 position (Fig. 2). The result of SmaI restriction enzyme analysis showed that a unit length cDNA fragment of HSVd D-15 migrated slower than normal HSVd unit length cDNA (Fig. 3). Multiple alignment analysis of the two different sequences of HSVd D-15 (A and B) with the sequence of HSVd from the sample PB21 (acc. no. EF076831) is shown in Fig. 4.
R-PAGE Analysis
In order to detect the HSVd circular RNA structure, RNA extracts were obtained from the plum samples PB6, PB16, PB19, and PB21 and electrophoresed in 5% polyacrylamide gel using R-PAGE protocol. The results indicated that only one band corresponding to the normal class of circular HSVd molecule was detectable in all the samples, including PB21 (cv. ‘Friar’), from which HSVd D-15 was successfully amplified (Fig. 5). It is likely that the concentration or the replication of HSVd D-15 in the original plum tissue was too low to detect it directly by R-PAGE analysis.
Biological Indexing
In order to investigate their biological properties further, cucumber seedlings were inoculated with RNA directly extracted from the original plum source (PL5, PB6, PB16, PB21). Approximately six weeks post inoculation, the cucumber showed obvious symptoms; i.e., the leaf blades became small and undulated, and their edges turned downward. Internodes from the younger parts of infected plants were shorter than those of healthy plants, and the whole plant had become stunted. Symptoms of the cucumbers inoculated with RNA directly extracted from PB21 were similar to those of PL5, PB6, and PB16. Then the low molecular weight RNA was extracted from symptomatic leaves of cucumbers inoculated with PB21 and analyzed for the presence of HSVd D-15 using dot-blot, RT-PCR, cloning, and sequencing. We have screened 50 independent HSVd cDNA clones by SmaI digestion assay, but only HSVd of normal size was detectable. We have also sequenced four cDNA clones from the progeny propagated in cucumber. The sequences are compared with those in the original source (i.e., plum cv. ‘Friar’) in Table 4.
Nucleotide Sequences and Secondary Structure of HSVd and HSVd D-15
The predicted secondary structure of minimum free energy was the highly base-paired rodlike structural characteristic of HSVd and HSVd D-15 (Fig. 6). The overall base pairing of the molecule seemed to be stably maintained in HSVd D-15, except for the region corresponding to the duplicated sequence.
Discussion
The results of cloning and sequence analysis showed a certain degree of sequence variation for plum isolates of HSVd in China. Most HSVd sequences from the plum had 1–3 nucleotide changes, as compared with the closest HSVd in GenBank; however, they were not differentiated from the other stone fruit isolates reported in other parts of the world (Sano et al. 1989; Kofalvi et al. 1997; Amari et al. 2001). In fact, the sequence of HSVd (acc. nos. EF076831 and EF076834) from plum (cv. ‘Friar’) was identical with the one from apricot (acc. no. Y09345 and AJ297830) in Spain and Turkey, respectively. All results suggest that there is no clear relationship among the type of sequence variation, host specificity, and geographic origin in HSVd plum isolates.
The exact process of HSVd D-15 generation is unknown. Genome enlargement observed in CEVd and CCCVd has helped to identify the mechanisms responsible for genome enlargement in viroids. Since HSVd D-15 was not stably maintained in cucumber, it would be suggested that this is a poor host for HSVd D-15 or that HSVd D-15 could not effectively compete with HSVd in the setting of a mixed infection. Moreover, “elongated” forms of CEVd were reported in plants that had been inoculated for an extensive period of time. The other possibility is that two months of cucumber infection could not sustain or build up a high titer of HSVd D-15. It is well accepted, however, that a similar event takes place on HSVd from fruit trees during long incubation periods and that long incubation under cultivation produces variable mutations in viruses and viroid populations. Although very unlikely, the possibility that this extra sequence was the result of a PCR artifact cannot be completely ruled out.
To our knowledge, this is the first report of HSVd duplication. Further investigation is required to obtain purified HSVd D-15 from the plum (cv.‘Friar’) and to examine its biological properties.
References
Amari K, Gomez G, Myrta A, Di Terlizzi B, Pallás V (2001) The molecular characterization of 16 new sequence variants of Hop stunt viroid reveals the existence of invariable regions and a conserved hammerhead-like structure on the viroid molecule. J Gen Virol 82:953–962
Astruc N, Marcos JF, Macquaire G, Candresse T, Pallás V (1996) Studies on the diagnosis of hop stunt viroid in fruit trees: Identification of new hosts and application of a nucleic acid extraction procedure based on non-organic solvents. Eur J Plant Pathol 102:837–846
Cañizares MC, Marcos JF, Pallás V (1999) Molecular characterization of an almond isolate of hop stunt viroid (HSVd) and conditions for eliminating spurious hybridization in its diagnostics in almond samples. Eur J Plant Pathol 105:553–558
Fadda Z, Daròs JA, Flores R, Duran-Vila N (2003) Identification in eggplant of a variant of citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd) with a 96 nucleotide duplication in the right terminal region of the rod-like secondary structure. Virus Res 97:145–149
Flores R, Di Serio F, Hernández C (1997) Viroids: the noncoding genomes. Semin Virol 8:65–73
Haseloff J, Mohamed NA, Symons RH (1982) Viroid RNAs of cadang-cadang disease of coconuts. Nature 299:316–321
Kofalvi SA, Marcos JF, Canizares MC, Pallás V, Candresse T (1997) Hop stunt viroid (HSVd) sequence variants from Prunus species: evidence for recombination between HSVd isolates. J Gen Virol 78:3177–3186
Li SF, Onodera S, Sano T, Yoshida K, Wang GP, Shikata E (1995) Gene diagnosis of viroids: Comparisons of return-PAGE and hybridization using DIG-labelled DNA and RNA probes for practical diagnosis of hop stunt, citrus exocortis and apple scar skin viroids in their natural host plants. Ann Phytopath Soc Japan 61:381–390
Owens RA, Hammond RW, Gardner RC, Kiefer MC, Thompson SM, Cress DE (1986) Site-specific mutagenesis of potato spindle tuber viroid cDNA: alterations within premelting region 2 that abolish infectivity. Plant Mol Biol 6:179–192
Sano T, Hataya T, Terai Y, Shikata E (1989) Hop stunt viroid strains from dapple fruit disease of plum and peach in Japan. J Gen Virol 70:1311–1319
Semancik JS, Duran-Vila N (1999) Viroids in plants: shadows and footprints of a primitive RNA. In: Domingo E, Webster R, Holland J (eds) Origin and Evolution of Viruses. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 37–64
Semancik JS, Szychowski JA, Rakowski AG, Symons RH (1994) A stable 436 nucleotide variant of citrus exocortis viroid produced by terminal repeats. J Gen Virol 75:727–732
Shikata E (1990) New viroids from Japan. Semin Virol 1:107–115
Szychowski JA, Vidalakis G, Semancik JS (2005) Host-directed processing of Citrus exocortis viroid. J Gen Virol 86:473–477
Visvader JE, Forster AC, Symons RH (1985) Infectivity and in vitro mutagenesis of monomeric cDNA clones of citrus exocortis viroid indicates the site of processing of viroid precursors. Nucleic Acids Res 13:5843–5856
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Basic Research and Development Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2006CB100203), Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 6072022), National Science Foundation of China (30771403), and Opening Project of State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. We thank Prof. Jia Kegong and Miss Guo Shufang at the Fruit Science Experimental Station of China Agricultural University in Linzhang County in Hebei province, for their kindly help in collecting plum samples, and Prof. Teruo Sano at Hirosaki University of Japan for his valuable comments and the critical reading of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, YA., Wang, HQ., Wu, ZJ. et al. Molecular Variability of Hop stunt viroid: Identification of a Unique Variant with a Tandem 15-nucleotide Repeat from Naturally Infected Plum Tree. Biochem Genet 46, 113–123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-007-9134-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-007-9134-6