Abstract
Hyperaspis trifurcata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) is a native predator of the wild cochineal scale, Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in North America. Here we have determined its life cycle and voracity when reared on first instar nymphs of D. opuntiae and estimated its population parameters using five diets based on different developmental stages of its prey: (a) first instar nymphs, (b) second instar nymphs, (c) young adults, (d) gravid adult females, and (e) a mixed diet which included all the developmental stages. The tests were conducted under laboratory conditions: 25 ± 2 °C, 60 ± 10 % RH and 12:12 (L:D) h. H. trifurcata developmental times were 5.9, 3.1, 3.6, 3.1, 8.9 and 11.4 days for the eggs, first, second, third and fourth instar larvae, and pupae, respectively. Overall there were 36.6 days from egg to adult emergence. Females consumed a mean of 5293 ± 361 first instar D. opuntiae nymphs during their lifetime, and there was no significant difference in developmental time between males and females. H. trifurcata could complete its life cycle when reared on any developmental stage of D. opuntiae. Nevertheless, the highest fecundity (237.4 ± 25.8 eggs) was obtained when they were fed the mixed diet, and the lowest fecundity and fertility were obtained when they were fed first or second instar nymphs, with a fecundity of 57.8 ± 10 and 140.5 ± 13 eggs and a fertility of 72 and 80 %, respectively. Moreover, the mixed diet increased the net reproduction rate (Ro = 112) and prolonged the generation time (T = 68.4 days) compared with females reared on first or second instar nymphs where Ro = 27.3 and 66.3 and T = 56.2 and 62.4 days, respectively. These parameters indicate that H. trifurcata has potential as a biological control agent of D. opuntiae.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae), or wild cochineal scale, is a primary pest of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae) and other cultivated and wild Opuntia species throughout Mexico (Portillo and Vigueras 2006; Vanegas-Rico et al. 2010), Brazil (Oliveira et al. 2013), Spain, Ethiopia, Italy, Turkey, Lebanon and Israel (Portillo 2009; García Morales et al. 2016; Spodek et al. 2014). Although O. ficus-indica is native to Mexico (Griffith 2004), it is the cactus that is most widely cultivated worldwide (Nobel 2002) and it is used in the food industry, as a forage plant for livestock and to prevent erosion in desert regions (Le Houérou 1996; Flores-Valdéz 1995; Stintzing and Carle 2005; Sáenz et al. 2006; Corrales-García 2009).
Dactylopius opuntiae feeds directly on the plant causing chlorosis and premature dropping of cladodes and fruits. Severe infestations (>75 % of the cladode surface) can result in death of the plant (Mann 1969; Vanegas-Rico et al. 2010, 2015). In Brazil, the damage caused by D. opuntiae on O. ficus indica used as forage resulted in the loss of 100,000 ha, valued at 25 million dollars (Lopes et al. 2009). In Mexico, damage to fruit and nopalitos (edible young Opuntia cladodes) resulted in lower yields and higher production costs (Badii and Flores 2001; Portillo and Vigueras 2006).
Dactylopius opuntiae is controlled mainly by organophosphate insecticides (Badii and Flores 2001), which can have deleterious effects on human health (Galloway and Handy 2003) and the environment (Arias-Estévez et al. 2008). Residues of these insecticides on the crop also limit international trade. To reduce insecticide use, alternative management strategies have been explored, such as the use of mineral oils, resistant genotypes, detergents, plant extracts and mycoinsecticides (Palacios-Mendoza et al. 2004; de Brito et al. 2008; Vigueras et al. 2009; de Santos et al. 2011; Borges et al. 2013a, b). However, the results have been unsatisfactory and new strategies, such as the use of natural enemies, require exploration.
Arthropod natural enemies associated with D. opuntiae and other Dactylopiidae include only predators (Mann, 1969; Zimmermann et al. 1979; Vanegas-Rico et al. 2010) of which the Coccinellidae Chilocorus cacti L. and Hyperaspis trifurcata Schaeffer are the most abundant in Mexico and USA (Mann 1969; Gilreath and Smith 1988; Badii and Flores 2001; Rodríguez-Leyva et al. 2010; Vanegas-Rico et al. 2010, 2015). Chilocorus cacti preys on a variety of insects and insect scales such as Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead and Aspidiotus destructor Signoret (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) (Pluke et al. 2005; Vanegas-Rico et al. 2010; Hernández-Fuentes et al. 2012). On the contrary, H. trifurcata is a highly specific predator on the Dactylopius genus (Gilreath and Smith 1988; Rodríguez-Leyva et al. 2010; Vanegas-Rico et al. 2010; 2015). Hyperaspis trifurcata preys on all developmental stages of Dactylopiidae (Vanegas-Rico et al. 2010). However, there are no formal studies on the basic biology of this predator, which could contribute to determining its regulatory capacity. The objective of this study was to determine the biological cycle, voracity and life history of H. trifurcata reared on D. opuntiae.
Materials and methods
Insect rearing
Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes were used for rearing D. opuntiae. The cladodes were one-year old, 2 to 4 cm thick and were grown in pots (Ø = 20 cm × 20 cm high) in a substrate of tezontle (porous volcanic gravel) and compost (30:70). The D. opuntiae colony was established from individuals collected from two regions of Mexico in May 2012: Milpa Alta, Mexico City (19°10′49″N, 98°59′24.7″ W, 2554 masl) and Tlalnepantla, Morelos (19°00′22″N, 98°58′10″W, 2105 masl). A modified version of the ‘cut cladode technique’ of Aldama-Aguilera and Llanderal-Cázares (2003) was used to increase numbers. Briefly, this technique involved perforating the basal end of each cladode with a wooden stake, leaving them to scar for 24 h, and then hanging them vertically from metal grids. An open waxed paper bag (4 cm2) containing gravid D. opuntiae females was attached to the apex of each cladode with a wooden toothpick and other cladodes placed horizontally beneath to capture any nymphs that did not initially fasten on to the vertical cladodes. The infested cladodes were maintained under controlled conditions of 26 ± 2 °C, 60 ± 10 % RH and 12:12 h L:D regime and the colony was allowed to grow for use in experiments.
The H. trifurcata colony was established from adults that were collected in June 2012 from the same regions as the D. opuntiae. Adults were placed in entomological cages (70 × 55 × 40 cm) comprised of a wooden frame covered by a mesh fabric to allow ventilation. Access to water was provided via a cotton wick inserted into a 25 ml glass vial of water. Cladodes infested with D. opuntiae were introduced into the cages to provide food and substrates for H. trifurcata oviposition. Infested cladodes were withdrawn weekly and H. trifurcata larvae transferred to another cage with the same characteristics to complete their development. All of the assays with H. trifurcata were conducted at 25 ± 2 °C, 60 ± 10 % RH and 12:12 (L:D) h. In addition, all the ladybird adults, both during rearing and experimentation, were offered a complementary diet (mixture of water, honey and brewer’s yeast in a 20:40:40 proportion), which was replaced daily. We offered this diet because in previous observations in the laboratory some adults of H. trifurcata, which had access only to fresh water, lived just six to eight weeks. In addition, Dreyer et al. (1997) indicated that honey was useful to increase longevity in the rearing of Hyperaspis notata Mulsant.
Determining the developmental time and longevity of H. trifurcata
We used a cohort of 100 H. trifurcata eggs that were 0–6 h old. Each egg was placed in a hard gelatin capsule No 2 (2 ml) and observed twice daily (at 10:00 and 18:00 h), and the times of hatching or ecdysis of each individual were recorded. The chorion or exuviae were removed as they were formed. Adults that emerged were placed individually into Petri dishes (Ø = 3.0 cm). Both larvae and adults of H. trifurcata were provided with an excess of first instar D. opuntiae nymphs as prey and the duration of each development stage and the longevity of the adults was recorded. When the H. trifurcata larvae became adults they were sexed using the methods of Gordon (1985).
Quantifying the voracity of H. trifurcata
First instar larvae of H. trifurcata (n = 30) were maintained individually in gelatin capsules and provided daily with known densities of first instar D. opuntiae nymphs. As the larvae grew the number of first instar D. opuntiae nymphs provided was increased so that there were always more available than they required (i.e. 20, 40, 80, 160, 180 for first, second, third and fourth instar larvae, and adults, respectively). The number of D. opuntiae nymphs consumed daily by each life stage was recorded until the adults died and the mean daily consumption rate and total consumption rate for each life stage was calculated. A control group was established for each density of D. opuntiae nymphs provided (20, 40, 80, 160 and 180 nymphs, respectively) in gelatin capsules to determine the mean number of nymphs that died from causes other than predation.
Quantifying the reproductive success of H. trifurcata
To quantify fecundity, 11 groups of ten adult male and ten adult female H. trifurcata (less than 8 h old) were placed into each of 11 Petri dishes (Ø = 8 cm) with an excess of first instar D. opuntiae for 48 h to allow copulation (Omkar and Srivastava 2002; Félix et al. 2004). Then each pair was placed in an individual Petri dish (Ø = 8 cm) and randomly assigned to one of five treatments, defined by the age of the prey they would subsequently be offered. These treatments were (a) first instar D. opuntiae nymphs (2–4 days old), (b) second instar D. opuntiae nymphs (8–10 days old), (c) young adult D. opuntiae females (20–25 days old), (d) gravid D. opuntiae females (26–33 days old), and (e) a mixed diet that included all development stages of D. opuntiae. All diets were offered ad libitum. Twenty-two replicate pairs of H. trifurcata were established per treatment, but those that did not oviposit within the first 14 days were excluded from subsequent analysis. Ultimately each treatment had at least 17 replicates. In all treatments the prey items were introduced into each dish on a labeled Petri dish lid (Ø = 3.0 cm), which was replaced daily. An artificial substrate for oviposition was also placed into each dish. This substrate consisted of thick black paper (4 cm2) to which wax from adult D. opuntiae (dried at 50 °C for three days) was attached, making it attractive for oviposition. The inert substrate was replaced daily and the number of eggs quantified. The fertility was obtained by sampling eggs of six random females per day in each treatment. We maintained the daily group of eggs per female in a labeled Petri dish lid and checked emergence every six to seven days. All dishes were placed randomly in trays.
Data analysis
Longevity of females and males was compared using a t test (p ≤ 0.05) with the software package SPSS ver. 21.0 (SPSS 2012). Daily voracity (V 0) during each development stage was estimated using the equation of Soares et al. (2003):
where V 0 is the number of prey consumed, A is the number of prey offered, a 24 is the number of prey alive after 24 h, and ra24 is the proportion of prey alive in the absence of a predator after 24 h. Daily and total voracity were compared between development stages and between sexes with ANOVA or a t test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05) with SPSS (SPSS 2012).
Fecundity and fertility were recorded daily during the entire life of the females, but the data were grouped by week for the analysis and were limited to the first eight weeks of life to avoid bias in the last weeks when there were fewer surviving females. The pre-oviposition time, fecundity and fertility data were normalized (log10) prior to analysis using ANOVA and means comparisons (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05) (Atlihan and Özögkçe 2002). The life table was constructed from the pivoting age (x), the specific survival age (lx) and the specific fecundity age (mx) using the Birch (1948) method. These values were obtained from the experiments on life cycle and fecundity and were used to estimate the population parameters using the computer programme of Maia et al. (2000) in the software package Lifetable SAS (SAS Institute 2000). The programme included a Jackknife method to estimate confidence levels for all parameters (Maia et al. 2000).
Results
Life cycle
The incubation period of eggs lasted a mean of 5.9 days, and there was no significant difference between the sexes (t = −0.374, df = 81, p = 0.709). H. trifurcata has four larval instars. The duration of the third and fourth instars was significantly longer in females than males (third instar t = 2.3, df = 81, p = 0.03; fourth instar t = 2.3, df = 81, p = 0.02). The overall larval developmental time of females (36.6 days) was, therefore, longer than that of males (35.1 days) (t = 2.8, df = 81, p = 0.006). Eighty-three percent of H. trifurcata survived to adulthood and emerged at a 1:1 sex ratio. Adult female H. trifurcata lived significantly longer (48.0 ± 1.8 days) than males (40.6 ± 1.9 days) (t = 2.76, df = 81, p = 0.007). Mortality of eggs (6 %), first instar larvae (5.3 %) and the remaining larval instars (4.6 %) was higher than pupal mortality (2.3 %) (Table 1).
Voracity of H. trifurcata
Voracity of H. trifurcata against first instar nymphs of D. opuntiae varied significantly between developmental stages (F 4,10 = 1100.721, p < 0.001) (Table 2). Individual females and males consumed around 5293 ± 361 and 4932 ± 436 nymphs each in total throughout their lives, and there was no significant difference between the sexes (t = 0.64, df = 22, p = 0.526). Total prey intake during the larval stage (over all instars) was only 9 % of the total number of prey consumed throughout the entire life cycle (Table 2). Of the larval instars, fourth instars were the most voracious. Maximum consumption was recorded on day 21 (69.4 ± 0.3 nymphs). Recently emerged adults killed 89.0 ± 0.24 nymphs and their voracity increased gradually up to a maximum of 152.3 ± 0.45 nymphs at 32 days of age.
Reproductive success of H. trifurcata
Females of H. trifurcata laid their eggs individually, and in 99 % of cases they were located amongst the wax fibres of their prey, particularly gravid female prey. The period of pre-oviposition was between five and six days, and there were significant differences among treatments (F 4,92 = 2.934, p = 0.025). Females reared on first instar nymphs had a longer pre-oviposition time than those feeding on a mixed diet, although the difference was only one day (Table 3).
There were significant differences amongst treatments in longevity (F 4,92 = 6.525, p ≤ 0.001), fecundity (F 4,92 = 26.2, p ≤ 0.001) and fertility (F 4,92 = 21.2, p ≤ 0.001). Overall the three parameters were similar when adult females of D. opuntiae were included in the diet, and superior to treatments fed only first or second instar nymphs (Table 3). The females fed with young adults or the mixed diet lived 25 and 14 days longer, respectively, than those reared on first or second instar nymphs (Table 3). H. trifurcata reared on adult females produced 35–170 % more eggs than those reared on first or second instar nymphs, while those fed on the mixed diet had higher fecundity. The lowest fecundity was seen in treatments with first and second instar nymphs, which was significantly different from the treatments with adult prey (Table 3).
Fecundity in the first eight weeks of life was significantly different amongst treatments (F4,92 = 12.7, p < 0.001). Overall the highest fecundity (eggs per female per day) was recorded during the third week for the following treatments: first instar nymphs (12.4 ± 0.9), gravid females (22.5 ± 1.3) and mixed diet (25.6 ± 1.2). The average number of eggs produced in the mixed diet treatment was double that in the first instar nymph treatment (Fig. 1). Of the total number of eggs, 50 % were obtained on days 23, 34, 40, 37 and 41 in the first instar nymphs, second instar nymphs, young adults, gravid females and mixed diet treatments, respectively (Fig. 1).
During the first eight weeks of life, there were days when no oviposition occurred. These days were more frequent in the first instar nymph treatment (1.6 ± 0.7 days), while there was on average <0.6 days without oviposition in the other treatments. After the ninth week, the number of days with no oviposition increased in all treatments: first instar nymphs, 2.2 ± 0.3; second instar nymphs, 2.6 ± 0.4; young adults, 2.2 ± 0.5; gravid females, 0.6 ± 0.2; and mixed diet, 1.9 ± 0.6 days (Fig. 2). Fertility oscillated between 88 and 90 % in treatments that included adult female prey during the eight weeks of assessment, while it oscillated between 72 and 81 % in the first and second instar prey treatments.
Life tables
The treatments that included adult females in the diet had higher values for generation time and net reproduction rate than those fed with first instar nymphs, and resulted in an important difference in the intrinsic rate of increase (rm) for the first instar nymph treatment relative to all the other treatments (p < 0.05) (Table 4). The intrinsic rate of increase (rm), the finite rate of increase (λ) and the doubling time (DT) of the treatments with second instar nymphs were similar (p > 0.05) to those of the treatments that included adult female D. opuntiae as prey (Table 4).
Discussion
In Mexico and the USA there are at least 20 species of native predators that feed, at least occasionally, on Dactylopius species (Mann 1969; Gilreath and Smith 1988; Rodríguez-Leyva et al. 2010). However, the basic biology of most of these species is unknown. In this study, we determined that H. trifurcata could complete its life cycle when reared on first instar nymphs of D. opuntiae. The development time was 36.0 days for females, which is within the range found for other species in the genus, such as Hyperaspis raynevali Mulsant and Hyperaspis pantherina Fürsch reared on Pseudococcidae and Ortheziidae, respectively (Kanika-Kiamfu et al. 1992; Booth et al. 1995). It was also within the range of values reported for Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) reared on Dactylopius tomentosus Lamarck (Baskaran et al. 2002).
Hyperaspis trifurcata has a higher survival rate (83 %), compared with previous studies on C. montrouzieri (70.7 %) (Baskaran et al. 2002) and Sympherobius barberi (Banks) (16 %) (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) (Pacheco-Rueda et al. 2011) reared on Dactylopius species. That could suggest that H. trifurcata is better adapted to exploit this type of prey, which, among other distinguishing characteristics of the family, produces and accumulates carminic acid. This is thought to be a deterrent against predation (Eisner et al. 1994) and a component of the immune system (Hernández-Hernández et al. 2003) and could contribute to the prevention of parasitism (Stanley 2006). On the other hand, this adaptation of H. trifurcata to consume Dactylopius species does not avoid that Homalotylus cockerelli (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) reaches parasitism levels from 3 to 46 % on larvae and pupae of this coccinellid in some regions of Mexico and the USA (Gilreath and Smith 1988; Vanegas-Rico et al. 2015).
The voracity of H. trifurcata reared on first instar nymphs increased progressively with age. This is likely to be a function of the increase in size and nutritional requirements (Omkar and Bind 2004) and has also been observed in other Hyperaspis species (Reyd et al. 1991). Although the consumption of first instar nymphs was greater than that of other species (Santos et al. 2009), the proportion of prey consumed during the larval stages of H. trifurcata was only 9 % of the total amount consumed during the insect’s lifetime. This figure differs from that reported for H. raynevali (Reyd et al. 1991), H. notata (Dreyer et al. 1997) and Hyperaspis marmottani Fairm (Umeh 1982), which consumed around 50 % of their lifetime food requirements during the larval stages. Hyperaspis trifurcata adults consumed 91 % of their total prey requirement and thus have greater potential to exert a major effect on D. opuntiae populations.
The effect of prey age structure has implications for the biological control effectiveness of H. trifurcata. This result is similar to previous reports on H. raynevali (Reyd and Le Rü 1992) and Hyperaspis senegalensis hottentotta Mulsant (Kiyindou et al. 1990) consuming Phenacoccus manihoti Matilde-Ferrero (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). The mixed diet, which included all of the developmental stages of D. opuntiae, was the treatment that resulted in the highest fecundity in H. trifurcata: 59, 81 and 408 % higher than when provided with young adults, second instar nymphs or first instar nymphs, respectively. There was also an increase in their longevity and fertility. This phenomenon has been observed in other species of Coccinellidae suggesting that their prey in certain development stages, or a combination of stages, may be important to maximizing egg production (Ponsonby and Copland 2007).
A diet based on first instar nymphs can be considered as standard for small coccinellid larvae (Ponsonby and Copland 2000), but they may be an insufficient source of nutrients for adult coccinellids. This nutrient deficit could lead to cannibalism (Hemptinne et al. 2000; Snyder et al. 2000; Cottrell 2005) or predation of other development stages of the prey (Ponsonby and Copland 2007). In our study, we observed that H. trifurcata first took immature prey from the mixed diet, probably because they were more vulnerable (Honda and Luck 1995; Ponsonby and Copland 2007) or because they contained less carminic acid than adults (Flores-Alatorre et al. 2014). Moreover, H. trifurcata consumed only a small portion of the biomass of the adult prey. Overall a daily maximum of five adult female D. opuntiae with feeding marks were recorded, but none were consumed entirely. Partial feeding on the adult prey may be due not only to nutritional requirements, but also to other factors such as a functional response (Vanegas-Rico et al. unpublished data) or greater gains may be achieved from consuming only a part of their prey (Cohen 1995). The mixed diet was probably the model most closely resembling field conditions where the pest populations overlap and each development stage is used according to the needs of the predator.
The mixed diet offered to H. trifurcata was assumed to be nutritionally different from the other development stages offered individually and, in general, increased longevity, fecundity and fertility. Nevertheless, with the mixed diet, generation time was longer than when first instar nymphs were provided (Table 4). In other words, the mixed diet improved the net reproduction rate but prolonged generation time. This phenomenon resulted in a difference in the intrinsic rate of increase (rm) that was significant only for those provided with a diet of first instar nymphs (0.059), contrasting with the other diets that included second instar nymphs or adults (0.067, 0.068, 0.069, 0.069). The population parameters of D. opuntiae were not previously reported. However, each female is capable of laying up to 154 eggs in her lifetime in a 1:1 sex ratio (Flores-Hernández et al. 2006). This fecundity rate is lower than any fecundity rate of H. trifurcata reared in the present study on diets that contained D. opuntiae adults.
This paper reports aspects of the basic biology of H. trifurcata reared on D. opuntiae. Although its biological potential has not been completely assessed, the parameters measured for H. trifurcata indicate that it is a potential candidate for testing as a biological control agent of D. opuntiae in Opuntia ecosystems and agroecosystems.
References
Aldama-Aguilera C, Llanderal-Cázares C (2003) Cochineal: comparison of production methods in cut cladodes. Agrociencia 37:11–19
Arias-Estévez M, López-Periago E, Martínez-Carballo E, Simal-Gándara J, Mejuto JC, García-Río L (2008) The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123:247–260
Atlihan R, Özögkçe MS (2002) Development, fecundity and prey consumption of Exochomus nigromaculatus feeding on Hyalopterus pruni. Phytoparasitica 30:443–450
Badii MH, Flores AE (2001) Prickly pear cacti pests and their control in Mexico. Fla Entomol 84:503–505
Baskaran RK, Srinivasan TR, Muthumeena K, Muthulakshmi S, Mahadevan NR (2002) Life-table of Australian ladybird beetle (Cryptolaemus montruozieri) feeding on mealybugs (Maconellicoccus hirsutus and Dactylopius tomentosus). Ind J Agric Sci 72:54–56
Birch LC (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Anim Ecol 17:15–26
Booth RG, Cross A, Fowler SV, Shaw RH (1995) The biology and taxonomy of Hyperaspis pantherina (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and the classical biological control of its prey, Orthezia insignis (Homoptera: Ortheziidae). Bull Entomol Res 85:307–314
Borges LR, Santos DC, Falcão HM, da Silva DM (2013a) Selection of cactus pear clones regarding resistance to carmine cochineal Dactylopius opuntiae (Dactylopiidae). Acta Hort 995:359–366
Borges LR, Santos DC, Falcão HM, da Silva DM (2013b) Use of biodegradable products for the control of Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in cactus pear. Acta Hort 995:379–386
Cohen AC (1995) Extra-oral digestion in predaceous terrestrial Arthropoda. Annu Rev Entomol 40:85–103
Corrales-García J (2009) Industrialization of cactus pads and fruit in Mexico: challenges and perspectives. Acta Hort 811:103–112
Cottrell TE (2005) Predation and cannibalism of lady beetle eggs by adult lady beetles. Biol Control 34:159–164
De Brito CH, Batista E, de Albuquerque IC, de Luna Batista J (2008) Avaliação de produtos alternativos e pesticidas no controle da cochonilha-docarmim na Paraíba. Rev Biol Ciencia da Terra 8:1–5
de Santos PS, da Silva MAQ, Monteiro AC, Gava CAT (2011) Improving photoprotection of Beauveria bassiana conidia for biological control of the cactus pest Dactylopius opuntiae in the semiarid region northeast of Brazil. Biocontrol Sci Tech 21:893–902
Dreyer BS, Neuenschwander P, Baumgärther J, Dorn S (1997) Trophic influences on survival, development and reproduction of Hyperaspis notata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J Appl Ent 121:249–256
Eisner T, Ziegler R, McCormick JL, Eisner M, Hoebeke ER, Meinwald J (1994) Defensive use of an acquired substance (carminic acid) by predaceous insect larvae. Cell Mol Life Sci 50:610–615
Félix AP, Vasconcelos J, Brazão CJ, Franquinho Aguilar AM, Rocha P (2004) Aspectos bioecológicos de Hyperaspis pantherina Fürsch (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) predator de Orthezia insignis Browne (Homoptera: Ortheziidae). Bol San Veg Plagas 30:347–354
Flores-Alatorre HL, Abrego-Reyes V, Reyes-Esparza JA, Angeles E, Alba-Hurtado F (2014) Variation in the concentration of carminic acid produced by Dactylopius coccus (Hemiptera: Dactylopidae) at various maturation stages. J Econ Entomol 107:1700–1705
Flores-Hernández A, Murillo-Amador B, Rueda-Puente EO, Salazar-Torres JC, García-Hernández JL, Troyo-Diéguez E (2006) Reproducción de cochinilla silvestre Dactylopius opuntiae (Homoptera: Dactylopiidae). Rev Mex Biodiv 77:97–102
Flores-Valdéz CA (1995) Nopalitos production, processing and marketing, agroecology, cultivation and uses of cactus pear. In: Barbera G, Inglese P, Pimienta-Barrios E (eds) FAO Plant production and protection paper 132, pp 92–99
Galloway T, Handy R (2003) Inmmunotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides. Ecotoxicology 12:345–363
García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB (2016) ScaleNet: a literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database http://scalenet.info/catalogue/Dactylopius%20opuntiae/ Accessed 25 Apr 2016
Gilreath ME, Smith JW Jr (1988) Natural enemies of Dactylopius confusus (Homoptera: Dactylopiidae): exclusion and subsequent impact on Opuntia (Cactaceae). Environ Entomol 17:730–738
Gordon RD (1985) The Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) of America North of Mexico. J. NY Entomol Soc 93:1–912
Griffith MP (2004) The origins of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence. Am J Bot 91:1915–1921
Hemptinne JL, Lognay G, Gauthier C, Dixon AFG (2000) Role of surface chemical signals in egg cannibalism and intraguild predation in ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecol 10:123–128
Hernández-Fuentes LM, Urías-López MA, López-Arroyo JI, López-Arriaga JG (2012) Uso de atrayentes y suplementos alimenticios para el incremento de depredadores de Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Acta Zool Mex (ns) 28:145–160
Hernández-Hernández F, García-Gil de Muñoz F, Rojas-Martínez A, Hernández-Martínez S, Lanz-Mendoza H (2003) Carminic acid dye from the homopteran Dactylopius coccus hemolymph is consumed during treatment with different microbial elicitors. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 54:37–45
Honda JY, Luck RF (1995) Scale morphology effects on feeding behavior and biological control potential of Rhyzobius lophanthae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 88:441–450
Kanika-Kiamfu J, Kiyindou A, Brun J, Iperti G (1992) Comparaison des potentialités biologiques de trois coccinelles prédatrices de la cochenille farneuse du manioc Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Entomophaga 37:277–282
Kiyindou A, Le Rü B, Fabres G (1990) Influence de la nature et de l’abondance des proies sur l’augmentation des effectifs de deux coccinelles prédatrices de la Cochenille du manioc au Congo. Entomophaga 35:611–620
Le Houérou HN (1996) The role of cacti (Opuntia spp.) in erosion control, land reclamation, rehabilitation and agricultural development in the Mediterranean Basin. J Arid Environ 33:135–159
Lopes EB, Brito CH, Albuquerque IC, Batista JL (2009) Desempenho do óleo de laranja no controle da cochonilha-do-carmim em palma gigante. Engenharia Ambiental 6:252–258
Maia AHN, Luiz AJB, Campanhola C (2000) Statistical inference on associate fertility life table parameters using Jacknife technique: computational aspects. J Econ Entomol 93:511–518
Mann J (1969) Cactus-feeding insects and mites. US Natl Mus Bull 256:1–158
Nobel PS (2002) Cacti: biology and uses. University of California, Berkeley
Oliveira CM, Auad AM, Mendes SM, Frizzas MR (2013) Economic impact of exotic insect pest in Brazilian agriculture. J Appl Entomol 137:1–15
Omkar, Bind RB (2004) Prey quality dependent growth, development and reproduction of a biocontrol agent, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 14:665–673
Omkar, Srivastava S (2002) The reproductive behaviour of an aphidophagous ladybeetle, Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Europ J Entomol 99:465–470
Pacheco-Rueda I, Lomeli-Flores JR, Rodríguez-Leyva E, Ramírez-Delgado M (2011) Ciclo de vida y parámetros poblacionales de Sympherobius barberi Banks (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) criado con Dactylopius opuntiae Cockerell (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). Acta Zool Mex (ns) 27:325–340
Palacios-Mendoza C, Nieto-Hernández R, Llanderal-Cázares C, González-Hernández H (2004) Efectividad biológica de productos biodegradables para el control de la cochinilla silvestre Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Dactylopiidae). Acta Zool Mex (ns) 20:99–106
Pluke RW, Escribano A, Michaud JP, Stansly PA (2005) Potential impact of lady beetles on Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in Puerto Rico. Fla Entomol 88:123–128
Ponsonby DJ, Copland JW (2000) Maximum feeding potential of larvae and adults of the scale insect predator, Chilocorus nigritus with a new method of estimating food intake. BioControl 45:295–310
Ponsonby DJ, Copland JW (2007) Influence of host density and population structure on egg production in the coccidophagous ladybird, Chilocorus nigritus F. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Agric For Entomol 9:287–296
Portillo L (2009) Biogeography of Dactylopiidae and human factor. Acta Hort 811:235–240
Portillo L, Vigueras AV (2006) A review of the cochineal species in Mexico, host and natural enemies. Acta Hort 728:249–256
Reyd G, Le Rü B (1992) Influence de la prédation des larves d’Hyperaspis raynevali et d’Hexochomus flaviventris (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) sur les colonies de la cochenille du manioc Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Étude en conditions contrôlées. Entomophaga 37:317–325
Reyd G, Gery R, Ferran A, Iperti G, Brun J (1991) Étude de la consommation alimentaire d’Hyperaspis raynevali (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) prédateur de la cochenille farineuse du manioc Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Entomophaga 36:161–171
Rodríguez-Leyva E, Lomeli-Flores JR, Vanegas-Rico JM (2010) Enemigos naturales de la grana cochinilla del nopal Dactylopius coccus Costa (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). In: Portillo L, Vigueras AL (eds) Conocimiento y aprovechamiento de la grana cochinilla. Colegio de Postgraduados. Estado de México, México, pp 101–112
Sáenz C, Berger H, Corrales J, Galleti L, García V, Higuera I, Mondragón C, Rodríguez-Félix A, Sepúlveda E, Varnero MT (2006) Utilización agroindustrial del nopal. FAO-CACTUSNET No. 162, pp 1–182
Santos SAP, Pereira JA, Torres LM, Noguera AJA (2009) Voracity of coccinellid species on different phenological stages of the olive pest Saissetia oleae (Homoptera: Coccidae). Appl Ecol Environ Res 7:359–365
SAS Institute (2000) User’s guide, version 9. SAS Institute, Cary
Snyder WE, Joseph SB, Preziosi RF, Moore AJ (2000) Nutritional benefits of cannibalism for the lady beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) when prey quality is poor. Environ Entomol 29:1173–1179
Soares AO, Coderre D, Schanderl H (2003) Effect of temperature and intraspecific allometry on predation by two phenotypes of Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ Entomol 32:939–944
Spodek M, Ben-Dov Y, Protasov A, Carvalho CJ, Mendel Z (2014) First record of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Dactylopiidae) from Israel. Phytoparasitica 42:377–379
SPSS (2012) SPSS for Windows, release. version 21.0. SPSS, Chicago
Stanley D (2006) Prostaglandins and other eicosanoids in insects: biological significance. Ann Rev Entomol 51:25–44
Stintzing FC, Carle R (2005) Cactus stems (Opuntia spp.): a review on their chemistry, technology, and uses. Molec Nut Food Res 49:175–194
Umeh EDNN (1982) Biological studies on Hyperaspis marmottani Fairm. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a predator of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Mat-Ferr. (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). J Appl Entomol 94:530–532
Vanegas-Rico JM, Lomeli-Flores JR, Rodríguez-Leyva E, Mora-Aguilera G, Valdez JM (2010) Natural enemies of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) on Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller in Central Mexico. Acta Zool Mex (ns) 26:415–433
Vanegas-Rico JM, Lomeli-Flores JR, Rodríguez-Leyva E, Pérez-Panduro A, Hernández-González H, Marín-Jaramillo A (2015) Hyperaspis trifurcata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) y sus parasitoides en el centro de México. Rev Colombiana de Entomol 41:194–199
Vigueras AL, Cibrián-Tovar J, Pelayo-Ortiz C (2009) Use of botanical extracts to control wild cochineal (Dactylopius opuntiae Cockerell) on cactus pear. Acta Hort 811:229–234
Zimmermann HG, Erb HE, McFayden RE (1979) Annotated list of some cactus-feeding insects of South America. Acta Zool Lilloana 33:101–112
Acknowledgments
Thank to the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT, Mexico) for a full doctoral of science scholarship to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Patrick De Clercq.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vanegas-Rico, J.M., Rodríguez-Leyva, E., Lomeli-Flores, J.R. et al. Biology and life history of Hyperaspis trifurcata feeding on Dactylopius opuntiae . BioControl 61, 691–701 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9753-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9753-0