Abstract
Biological control systems are integral to New Zealand’s success as a nation reliant on exporting quality agricultural, forestry and horticultural products. The likely impacts of climate change projections to 2090 on one weed and four invertebrate management systems in differing production sectors were investigated, and it was concluded that most natural enemies will track the changing distributions of their hosts. The key climate change challenges identified were: disparities in natural enemy capability to change distribution, lack of frosts leading to emergence of new pests and additional pest generations, non-target impacts from range and temperature changes, increased disruptions caused by extreme weather events, disruption of host-natural enemy synchrony, and insufficient genetic diversity to allow evolutionary adaptation. Five classical biological control systems based on the introduced species Longitarsus jacobaeae, Cotesia kazak, Aphelinus mali, Microctonus aethiopoides and Microctonus hyperodae are discussed in more detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Climate change has generated considerable discussion and research into possible effects on agroecosystems (Fuhrer 2003). As the location, nature and productivity of agricultural and natural environments change, so will the composition, distribution and phenology of the beneficial invertebrates that safeguard their productivity and sustainability (Cock et al. 2011). Most studies of the impacts of climate change focus on individual species, whereas biological control systems involve interactions between species at different trophic levels.
Berg et al. (2010) analysed published literature for two traits that impact on a species dealing with climate change: thermal sensitivity and dispersal ability. They found pronounced differences among trophic groups e.g. species living in soil, have a weaker thermal response traits compared with those above ground. They emphasised that temperature-induced mismatch in development could result with serious consequences.
Under climate change, the effectiveness of some biological control agents (BCAs) may change. Stireman et al. (2005) predicted that the frequency and intensity of pest outbreaks will increase as climate becomes more variable and disrupts the stability of existing biological control systems. Reviews by Hance et al. (2007) and Thomson et al. (2010) summarise ways that climate change is likely to influence natural enemies of agricultural pests. Here, we analyse potential impacts on biological control systems in New Zealand (NZ).
NZ is long narrow country stretching over 1,600 km between 34° and 47° South. It consists of two main islands (North and South), and a number of smaller islands. The climate varies from warm subtropical in the far north to cool temperate in the far south, with severe alpine conditions in the mountainous areas. The mountain chains along its length block the prevailing westerly winds, dividing the country into dramatically different climate regions. The West Coast of the South Island is the wettest area (2,000–10,000 mm rainfall per year), whereas just over 100 km away, the plains to the east are the driest with some districts averaging below 400 mm/year−1.
NZ’s latitudinal range, diversity of climates and relative lack of biodiversity in its mostly European species-based agricultural ecosystems makes it an ideal place in which to examine the effects of climate change on biological control systems. Species innocuous in their natural range have become pest and weed problems in the absence of their co-evolved BCAs. Conversely, classical biocontrol systems are very successful (Ferguson et al. 2007). BCAs have become a principal means of pest control in NZ’s agricultural systems and are integral in the successful integrated pest management (IPM) programmes of the largest export crops such as kiwifruit and pipfruit. NZ is ranked fourth after USA, Australia and Canada for number of classical BCA introductions (Cock et al. 2010).
Here, we review the possible impacts of climate change on biological control systems in NZ, and present five illustrative case studies from a range of weed and pest biocontrol systems. While most relevant to NZ, the results are applicable to biological control systems in other temperate countries.
Climate projections for New Zealand
The climate change scenarios and data used for all analyses in this study had the following characteristics (see Mullan et al. 2008 for more details):
-
Projected years: base 1990 (average observed from 1980 to 1999), 2040 (average projection for 2030–2049), 2090 (average projection for 2080–2099).
-
Carbon emission scenarios: 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scenarios A1B (medium emissions) and A2 (high emissions).
-
Global climate models (GCMs): the prediction for NZ’s future climates were based on 12 GCMs that best fitted NZ, based on validation against the observed climates of the 20th century.
-
Clim variables: mean monthly temperature expressed as a mean anomaly from the base period, mean monthly rainfall as a percentage of that of the base period. Relative humidity is likely to be very similar to current values, though absolute humidity may differ.
-
Spatial resolution: large-scale model predictions were statistically down-scaled to a 0.05° latitude/longitude resolution grid based on the NZ Geodetic Datum projection (approximately 5 km resolution).
The Mullan et al. (2008) 12-model average A1B scenario projected that temperatures would increase by about 1 °C by 2040, and 2 °C by 2090, with the changes most pronounced in the north of the South Island, and the North Island. Westerly winds will strengthen in winter and spring and decrease in summer and autumn, resulting in changes in rainfall patterns. For 2040 the changes in annual precipitation ranged from an increase of 7.5 % (west coast of the South Island) to a decrease of 5 % (along the eastern regions from the central South Island north to the upper North Island, and around up to Northland, the northernmost region in NZ), relative to 1990. For 2090 the projected changes in annual precipitation range from an increase of over 10 % (west coast of the South Island) to a decrease of 7.5 % (along the eastern coastal strip from the central South Island north to the upper North Island, and in Northland), relative to 1990.
Extreme rainfall events may occur about twice as often by 2090 under an A1B scenario and three to four times as often under an A2 scenario. Severe droughts are projected to occur at least twice to four times as frequently in drought-prone regions. As warmer air holds more moisture, there could also be increased winter snowfalls to low elevations in some regions, although the duration of seasonal snow lying on the ground would be shortened.
Likely challenges arising from climate change on NZ biological control systems
International literature on the effects of climate change on invertebrates was reviewed and circulated amongst NZ biological control specialists. A workshop was held where their specific opinion and analysis was sought on the likely impacts of climate change on major NZ biological control systems. Five illustrative case studies were then selected for more detailed investigation.
Climate change effects on a biological control system may manifest at different scales from geographic distributions to evolutionary changes in natural enemy populations. Summarised below are the six key challenges to maintaining biological control under climate change identified by the contributors.
Species distributions
The crops and forages produced in a region will change as growers choose those that optimise economic returns in the prevailing climate and markets. As climate change is a gradual process, it is predicted that pests and their BCAs will move with the host plants. Increased temperatures will extend the southern range of cold-limited species and increase the altitude at which they can survive. A 2 °C rise in temperature from 1990 to 2090 is equivalent to a shift of current northern hemisphere conditions of 600 km latitude or 330 m in elevation (Parry 1989). As this approximates to 6 km per year latitude or 3.3 m per year elevation, most invertebrates would be capable of tracking such changes. However, managed releases may be necessary for some BCAs with low dispersal rates. In addition, the time taken for biological control systems to integrate into a new area may be influenced by availability of nutritional resources and overwintering or aestivation sites.
The expectation that everything will move south will be modified by disparities in the climate tolerances of hosts and their BCAs. Diapause, which allows populations to survive winter conditions, is often induced by photoperiod rather than temperature, while temperature plays a more important role in aestivation (Tauber and Tauber 1976). Because of NZ’s mild climate, the ranges of some continental species already extend beyond their native latitudinal limits [e.g. Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)]. Therefore further geographical shifts in latitude and associated seasonal photoperiods may impact on host-parasitoid relationships in unpredictable ways.
Milder winters and longer growing seasons
Milder winters will allow both increased use of subtropical species in NZ production systems and establishment of new pests and weeds. NZ has been exposed to airborne species from Australia for millennia, but most frost-sensitive species have not established (Phillips et al. 2006). Without co-evolved BCAs, some invaders will become pests, while others, such as hyperparasitoids, may disrupt existing biological control systems.
Longer growing seasons may allow species like aphids and thrips to multiply too rapidly for their BCAs to keep pace. In addition, there are “sleeper pests”, species already in the country which are kept in check by factors such as host unavailability and cold. For example, a rare outbreak of tropical armyworm Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) occurred in autumn 2011 when above average temperatures allowed an extra generation to develop (Gerard et al. 2011). Other minor pests persisting in isolated microhabitats or regularly arriving from Australia by wind [e.g. tropical grass webworm Herpetogramma licarsisalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) (Dymock et al. 2009)] may also increase in significance.
There is potential for pre-emptive action against sleeper pests, particularly if biological control has already been successful overseas. The successful biological control of mist flower Ageratina riparia, (Asteraceae) in NZ provides an example (Barton et al. 2007). Although a threat to NZ indigenous ecosystems, in Hawaii it is also a pasture weed (Trujillo 1985). Without biological control, climate change projections suggest that mist flower would become an invasive pasture weed over much of NZ.
An increase of 2 °C is likely to improve the efficacy of BCAs that are limited currently by cool temperatures within the NZ host range, e.g. some glasshouse BCAs may be able to effect control in the field, and Agasicles hygrophila Selman & Vogt (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) extends its coverage of alligator weed Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae) (Stewart et al. 1995). Conversely, Irish Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) may perform poorly against the clover root weevil Sitona lepidus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the northern North Island, as currently in subtropical Northland (Gerard et al. 2010).
Non-target impacts
Climate change may alter how BCAs interact with non-target species. With its vulnerable indigenous and productive ecosystems, NZ has legislation and biosecurity processes in place to protect native species and existing biological control systems from non-target impacts (Barratt et al. 2010). The role of temperature was highlighted during risk assessments on a potential fungal BCA for banana passionfruit (Passiflora tripartita (Juss.) Poir. and P. tarminiana Coppens & Barney Passifloraceae). While host range testing at ambient temperatures in Hawaii indicated adequate host specificity for release in NZ, further testing at NZ temperatures showed that the host range expanded to include the commercial Passiflora edulis Sims and possibly the indigenous P. tetrandra Banks & Solander (Barton 2005).
The potential for ‘spillover’ damage to non-target species can increase when previously isolated species are brought into contact through spatial or temporal shifts. For example, greater use of lucerne Medicago sativa L (Fabaceae) in drought-prone regions would increase the abundance of M. aethiopoides in the environment, a species known to attack a range of native weevils (Barratt et al. 1997).
Climate variability
Most biological control systems perform best under a stable environment. Therefore changes in frequency and magnitude of climate extremes may be of more significance than changes in mean conditions. While many species have mechanisms to cope with extremes, they require time to acclimatize and/or enter a resistant state.
Droughts and floods are followed frequently by pest outbreaks because of the loss of BCAs. Field data indicate that parasitoids are generally more sensitive than their hosts, and lag behind in population recovery (Thomson et al. 2010 and references therein). In NZ, outbreaks of a native scarab Costelytra zealandica (White) often occur in pasture two to four years after a severe drought (East and Willoughby 1980). Pathogens that limit C. zealandica larval populations have limited survival in dry soils (O’Callaghan et al. 1989) and severe droughts that reduce larval populations to low densities result in low infection rates in the next couple of generations.
One distinctive characteristic of NZ’s landscape is its great variety with abrupt contrasts over relatively short distances. This creates many microhabitats that can act as refuges which buffer species against catastrophic weather events and help prevent widespread extinction of BCAs operating in a region. Non-crop habitat manipulation, as in NZ vineyards, also provides shelter (Jonsson et al. 2010).
Host-enemy synchrony
Hance et al. (2007) state that “a key factor determining how climate change may affect the range and abundance of insect populations is the extent to which individual species react independently of the community of which they are a component. Alteration of the synchronisation between host and parasitoids, by divergence of their thermal preferences, can disrupt the equilibrium between host and parasitoid.” This synchronisation need not be perfect: some host escape can stablise an otherwise unstable interaction (Godfray et al. 1994).
Although diapause does not feature strongly in indigenous species, it is retained by exotic species in NZ (Morris 1989). Should the species in a biological control system have contrasting factors regulating diapause, then it is possible for a large mismatch, control failure and local extinction. Above-average warm temperatures in summer 1981 disrupted the diapause-induced synchrony between the horticultural pest, passionvine hopper Scolypopa australis Walker (Homoptera: Ricaniidae), and its normally univoltine egg parasitoid Centrodora scolypopae Valentine (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) resulting in the parasitoid having an unsuccessful partial second generation (Gerard 2004). Modelling of a simple host-parasitoid system showed that disruption of synchrony once in 25 years did not affect the long-term stability, but the system failed when it occurred more frequently than once in 20 years (Godfray et al. 1994).
Many weed BCAs in NZ are seed feeders and the timing of flowering is a factor affecting BCA performance. Populations of the nodding thistle receptacle weevil (Rhinocyllus conicus Frölich) peak in early summer irrespective of region, but nodding thistle (Carduus nutans L.) inflorescence densities peak in late summer in the South Island (Kelly and Wood 1991). This poor synchrony results in less than 9 % seed predation compared to 35–50 % in the North Island where the inflorescence densities peak three weeks earlier. Increasing temperatures may improve control in this system in the South Island.
Capacity for evolutionary adaptation
Species have responded to climatic changes throughout their evolutionary history (Root et al. 2003). Where there are no barriers to dispersal, there may be little selection pressure. However, where dispersal is not possible, such as on islands, the rates of evolutionary change in populations under climate change will depend on levels of heritable variation, genetic interactions among traits, and population processes (Lynch and Lande 1993). An important consideration for biological control is that some populations of introduced BCAs possess relatively little genetic variation. For example NZ populations of the herbivorous beetle, Lochmaea suturalis Thomson (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), introduced for biological control of heather (Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull), are descended from only two females collected in northern England. Genetic studies comparing NZ and UK populations are consistent with severe bottlenecking of the NZ material (Landcare Research unpublished data). It may be possible to reduce impacts of climate change on the efficacy of some NZ BCAs by increasing their genetic variability and potential for adaptation through introduction of additional genetic stock.
Case studies
This section outlines five case studies that demonstrate potential responses of NZ biological control systems to climate change across a range of scales.
Ragwort biological control
This system, using ragwort flea beetle Longitarsus jacobaeae (Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae) from Europe to control the northern Eurasian weed ragwort Jacobaea vulgaris Gaertn. (Asteraceae), shows how the geographic distribution of BCAs may shift in response to climate change, with resulting changes in local pest suppression. Longitarsus jacobaeae, released in NZ in 1983 (Syrett 1989), has proved an effective ragwort BCA (Gourlay et al. 2008). However, ragwort suppression has failed on the west coast of South Island and some higher altitude and/or westerly regions of North Island (Gourlay et al. 2008). The immature stages of L. jacobaeae feed on the roots of ragwort, and a study of a closely related species in Tasmania implicates water-logging as a cause of larval mortality (Potter et al. 2007).
Data from three surveys (Gourlay et al. 2005 and references therein) in NZ were combined to produce a relationship of L. jacobaeae adult numbers and mean annual rainfall, with an upper rainfall threshold for ragwort suppression around 1670 mm/year−1 (Fig. 1). Points above a threshold of 3.5 maximum mean beetles per rosette (the vegetative stage of this biennial) were those sites where ragwort density trends indicated successful biological control while those below 3.5 had no indicationgfs that beetles were reducing ragwort densities. This allowed a preliminary geographic information system analysis (based on an interpolated mean annual rainfall surface, 1971–2000) to be carried out using the thresholds of 1,670 mm/year−1 (above which control is likely to be ineffective) and 870 mm/year−1 [required for ragwort to survive (Wardle 1987)]. This model produced a map of current successful biocontrol (Fig. 2) which broadly concurs with reports of current L. jacobaeae efficacy. The model was then used to estimate how projected changes in rainfall might affect the effectiveness of ragwort biological control in 2040 and 2090 (Table 1).
The climate change projections show an increase from 34.5 % in 2000 to 35.5 % in 2090 in the area where biological control is likely to fail because mean annual rainfall exceeds the model threshold of 1,670 mm. In the northern part of North Island, where annual rainfall is projected to decrease, areas with effective ragwort suppression should expand (moving from “too wet” to “good control”). In South Island in particular, there should be areas where ragwort extends its range (as rainfall increases above the 870 mm/year-1 threshold) but where L. jacobaeae should follow the range expansion of the plant and suppress the weed (“too dry” to “good control”). In the east some areas may become too dry for ragwort (“good control” to “too dry”). Overall, although some significant changes are predicted to occur on a local scale, the national level changes to the ragwort-flea beetle biocontrol system as a result of climate change are predicted to be small.
Tomato fruitworm biological control
This case study suggests how climate change may allow more pest generations to develop each season, potentially exacerbating pest threats beyond the ability of current BCAs to maintain effective suppression.
Helicoverpa armigera is the key insect pest of NZ processing tomatoes in the main growing regions in the North Island, where it damages up to 30 % of fruit in unsprayed late season crops (Walker and Cameron 1990). Two larval parasitoids were successfully introduced into NZ to control this pest: Cotesia kazak (Telenga) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from southern Europe in 1977, and Microplitis croceipes (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from USA in 1986 (Walker and Cameron 1989). These now cause 60–80 % parasitism of H. armigera (Cameron et al. 2006). C. kazak is the dominant parasitoid and it usually kills before the larvae are able to locate and damage tomato fruit (Cameron et al. 2001). The parasitoids form the basis of an IPM programme to control H. armigera on processing tomato crops (Walker et al. 2010).
Helicoverpa armigera normally has three generations per year in the north of the North Island, but in cooler summers and in cooler regions there are usually two generations a year (Walker and Cameron 1990). Despite the parasitoid presence, the third generation can lead to severe crop losses and is an important disincentive to the processing industry from planting late crops of sweet corn and tomatoes.
The timing of H. armigera flights in NZ is successfully predicted from a generational day-degree requirement of 475° above a threshold temperature of 11 °C (G. Walker, pers. comm.). These parameters suggest more rapid development in NZ populations than in Australia (Allsopp et al. 1991) and Japan (Jallow and Matsumura 2001) but slower than those in Greece (Mironidis and Savopoulou-Soultani 2008). Since the threshold temperature for development of the parasitoids is similar to that for the pest (data from Tillman and Powell 1991; Tillman et al. 1993), the generation time ratios (GTR) are constant with temperature. GTR is used as an indicator of biocontrol suppression (Mills 2006). The (GTR) for C. kazak GTR = 0.39 is lower than that of M. croceipes GTR = 0.52, which matches the observation that C. kazak is the more effective BCA (Walker et al. 2010).
These development parameters were used to calculate the expected number of H. armigera generations per year across NZ (Fig. 3). The results suggest that even under a moderate emissions scenario, H. armigera is expected to become increasingly problematic, and by 2090 may be affecting late season crops of tomato and corn in the eastern South Island plains, where C. kazak is not currently present. However, it is not yet known how the parasitoid complex may react under conditions sufficient for four host generations per season, since this does not currently occur in NZ. Given that C. kazak has not been as effective at controlling M. armigera in warmer areas overseas (Carl 1978), the future viability of the current IPM systems may be compromised in these areas.
Woolly apple aphid biological control
This example shows how differences in the developmental temperature thresholds and diapause behaviours of pest and BCA can interact in different ways, making it difficult to predict the outcomes from climate change.
The woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausemann) (Hemiptera: Pemphigidae), is a serious pest of apples throughout the world. It has a short development time, with many overlapping generations per year. In NZ, populations persist year round on the shoots and exposed roots of apple trees, and reproduction is almost exclusively asexual.
Management of E. lanigerum in NZ orchards relies on the introduced parasitoid Aphelinus mali (Hald.) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) as part of an IPM system (Shaw and Walker 1996). Like its host, A. mali has multiple overlapping generations, with 5–15 per year having been reported internationally (Hagen and van den Bosch 1968). However, A. mali has a winter diapause as in the Northern Hemisphere (Trimble et al. 1990), whereas the aphid continues to develop year-round. The early spring period is critical in this biological control system, since bud burst creates optimal conditions for reproduction of the aphid before post-diapause parasitoids may have matured. Therefore, the IPM system in NZ may require spring insecticide application to temporarily suppress E. lanigerum until A. mali becomes active (Shaw and Wallis 2009).
This system contains several factors that suggest that climate change could influence biological control success. First, the aphid and parasitoid differ in their thermal development thresholds: aphid = 5.2 °C (Asante et al. 1991), parasitoid = 8.3 °C (Asante and Danthanarayana 1992). Since the aphid’s threshold temperature is lower than that of the parasitoid, a simple GTR model (Fig. 4) shows the GTR is high at temperatures below about 10 °C, and biological control is expected to be less successful in cool areas. This is indeed the case, with biological control being ineffective in countries with cool, cloudy summers (DeBach and Rosen 1991). Under projected future warming, then, biological control might be expected to be more successful overall. Secondly, if diapause persists under future climates, warmer winters may allow greater aphid population increase during parasitoid diapause and greater damage to orchards in spring. This runs counter to the previous argument which was based on threshold temperatures alone.
Figure 5 shows the predicted GTR for E. lanigerum and A. mali in NZ under current and future climates, taking both factors into account. This analysis suggests that climate change effects on this biological control system are likely to be minor, with perhaps slightly better suppression overall, especially in the North Island. However, the results suggest that E. lanigerum might complete up to one additional generation during the winter, so that pest densities might be slightly greater in early spring. Therefore, a targeted aphicide spray in early spring is likely to remain an important part of the IPM systems for NZ apples (Shaw and Wallis 2009).
Lucerne weevil biological control
This case study exemplifies: (i) how the performance of BCAs can be critically dependent on subtleties of their interactions with host populations, (ii) how a subtle but critically important population interaction seems to have arisen from a peculiarity of NZ’s climate, and (iii) how this could be affected by climate change.
Lucerne is expected to become an increasingly important fodder crop in eastern parts of NZ as they become generally drier. Lucerne weevil, Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a weevil of Mediterranean origin, became a severe lucerne pest in NZ following its discovery in 1975 (Esson 1975). In 1982, a Moroccan biotype of the endoparasitic wasp M. aethiopoides Loan was introduced to provide biological control (Goldson et al. 1990).
In NZ, as in Australia (Cullen and Hopkins 1982) and southern Europe (Aeschlimann and Vitou 1988), S. discoideus has one generation per year. The weevil aestivates away from the crop and returns in autumn to commence reproduction which continues until spring. The parasitoid over-summers as a non-developing larva in an aestivating host and then resumes its development once its host has returned to the lucerne. Under these conditions, M. aethiopoides has two generations for every host generation (GTR = 0.5). This occurs in its natural range in Europe, and in Australia where M. aethiopoides is not a particularly effective BCA (Hopkins 1989). However, in NZ, around 3 % of S. discoideus populations do not aestivate and remain active within the crop. These weevils support an additional three parasitoid generations. This unusual population interaction reduces the GTR to 0.2, and is thought to be critical to the very effective control of S. discoideus exerted by M. aethiopoides in NZ (Goldson et al. 1990; Kean and Barlow 2000). The basis for this uniquely NZ population interaction is most likely connected to seasonal differences in climate, interacting with day length, between NZ and other regions such as Australia and Mediterranean Europe.
Projections using the “match climates” functions of CLIMEX (Sutherst et al. 2007) indicate that areas of NZ where the BCA is currently successful may become increasingly similar to Australian areas where it is ineffective (Fig. 6). It is speculated that if the success of M. aethiopoides at controlling S. discoideus in NZ is related to climate, then as NZ’s climate becomes more like that of Australia, there is a risk that this BCA may become less effective (Goldson 2007).
Argentine stem weevil biological control
This case study exemplifies: (i) how within-species genetic variation enables a BCA to adapt to annually changing conditions, and (ii) how this could assist this BCA to cope with climate change.
Argentine stem weevil, Listronotus bonariensis (Kuschel) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), was first recorded in NZ in 1927 (Marshall 1937) and now occurs in pasture throughout the country. In 1991, an asexually reproducing South American endoparasitic wasp, Microctonus hyperodae Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), was introduced for biological control of L. bonariensis (McNeill et al. 2002). Two main M. hyperodae genotypes were released, one from east of the South American Andes mountains and another from the west (Phillips et al. 2008).
Figure 7 shows the frequency of eastern M. hyperodae at the Lincoln site from 1991 to 2001 (Phillips et al. 2008). The eastern genotype dominated in 1993 and 1994, which were particularly cool years, and the western genotype dominated in 1998, which was particularly warm. The presence of both M. hyperodae genotypes in NZ has enabled the BCA to make annual adaptive responses to seasonal temperature variations. This has enabled a stronger and more persistent suppressive effect to be exerted on L. bonariensis than if just one genotype had been present (Phillips et al. 2008).
At Lincoln, adults of the eastern genotype emerge earlier in summer than western adults (Phillips et al. unpublished). Although few hosts are available for parasitism at this time, it enables an extra parasitoid generation before autumn. In contrast, the western genotype’s later emergence coincides with an abundance of hosts, but reduces the number of generations possible before autumn. It is hypothesised that the eastern genotype becomes dominant following seasons with cool autumns because they have an additional generation compared to their western competitors. However, the western genotype becomes dominant when the autumns are warm because it undergoes the same number of generations as its eastern competitor, and had an initial higher reproductive rate (Phillips et al. unpublished).
In Table 2, the above hypothesis was used to show the balance between the M. hyperodae genotypes under projected future climates. Under current climate conditions the dominant genotype will vary between cool and warm seasons, while medium term (2040) warming will generally favour the western genotype, but strong long-term warming (scenario 2090 A2) will favour the eastern genotype. These results demonstrate how climate change is likely to impose new selection pressures on BCAs, and how genetic diversity within BCAs, especially in asexual species, will be important for them to adapt to those new pressures.
Conclusions
The main effect of the projected climate change for the next century in NZ will be for species ranges to move south to follow their preferred climate conditions and shifting crop distributions. However, some species may not, either because of poor dispersal ability or spatially disjoint habitats. A major barrier will be Cook Strait, which may require BCAs to be actively imported into the South Island.
The overall southward trend will be complicated by several factors. First, there is expected to be a change in the frequency of weather patterns resulting in more subtle changes such as the east becoming drier while the west becomes wetter. This will influence the future distributions of some pests and their BCAs. Related to this, the frequency of extreme weather events will increase, which may temporarily disrupt some biological control systems. Pests and their BCAs may respond differently to the north–south influence of temperature, the east–west influence of rainfall, and the unchanging seasonal photoperiod cycle, resulting in unique new combinations for which we cannot currently predict the outcome. In these new situations, the success of biological control systems may depend on adaptation to local conditions, yet many introduced BCAs in NZ may lack the genetic diversity needed for effective adaptation.
Meanwhile, warming in the north of the North Island will open up opportunities for new crops, with their associated pests and diseases. National, inter-island, and local biosecurity are likely to be increasingly important to NZ for managing the associated risks.
In their study of climate change and invertebrate genetic resources for food and agriculture, Cock et al. (2011) observed that there are many gaps in our knowledge of how the beneficial invertebrates in agricultural ecosystems will be affected by climate change. In spite of its dependence on effective biological control systems, this study highlighted that NZ has a similar gaps. There is a need for decision makers in government and industry to understand the wider issues in maintaining effective biological control systems in the face of change and recognition given to the type of information needed.
References
Aeschlimann J-P, Vitou J (1988) Comparing infestations by Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Mediterranean and Australian Medicago spp. accessions (Leguminosae) in Southern France. J Aust Entomol Soc 27:275–278
Allsopp PGG, Daglish J, Taylor MFJ, Gregg PC (1991) Measuring development of Heliothis species. In: Zalucki MP (ed) Heliothis: research methods and prospects. Springer, New York, USA, pp 90–101
Asante SK, Danthanarayana W (1992) Development of Aphelinus mali an endoparasitoid of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum at different temperatures. Entomol Exp Appl 65:31–37
Asante SK, Danthanarayana W, Heatwole H (1991) Bionomics and population growth statistics of apterous virginoparae of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum, at constant temperatures. Entomol Exp Appl 60:261–270
Barratt BIP, Evans AA, Ferguson CM, Barker GM, McNeill MR, Phillips CB (1997) Laboratory nontarget host range of the introduced parasitoids Microtonus aethiopoides and M. hyperodae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) compared with field parasitism in New Zealand. Environ Entomol 26:694–702
Barratt BIP, Howarth FG, Withers TM, Kean J, Ridley GS (2010) Progress in risk assessment for classical biological control. Biol Control 52:245–254
Barton J (2005) Infidelity ends hopes of a passion-filled relationship. In: What’s new in biological control of weeds? 34: 1–2. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/20646/wtsnew34.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2012
Barton J, Fowler SV, Gianotti AF, Winks CJ, Beurs Md, Arnold GC, Forrester G (2007) Successful biological control of mist flower (Ageratina riparia) in New Zealand: agent establishment, impact and benefits to the native flora. Biol Control 40:370–385
Berg MP, Kiers ET, Driessen G, van der Heijden MI, Kooi BW, Kuenen F, Liefting M, Verhoef HA, Ellers J (2010) Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world. Glob Change Biol 16:587–598
Cameron PJ, Walker GP, Herman TJB, Wallace AR (2001) Development of economic thresholds and monitoring systems for Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in tomatoes. J Econ Entomol 94:1104–1112
Cameron PJ, Walker GP, Herman TJB, Wallace AR (2006) Incidence of the introduced parasitoids Cotesia kazak and Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in tomatoes, sweet corn, and lucerne in New Zealand. Biol Control 39:375–384
Carl KP (1978) Heliothis armigera: parasite survey and introduction of Apanteles kazak to New Zealand. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Delemont, Switzerland
Cock MJW, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Barratt BIP, Bigler F, Bolckmans K, Cônsoli FL, Haas F, Mason PG, Parra JRP (2010) Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the convention on biological diversity threaten the future of biological control? BioControl 55:199–218
Cock MJW, Biesmeijer JC, Cannon RJC, Gerard PJ, Gillespie D, Jiménez JJ, Lavelle PM, Raina SK (2011) Climate change and invertebrate genetic resources for food and agriculture: state of knowledge, risks and opportunities. Background study paper no. 54. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/022/mb390e.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2011
Cullen JM, Hopkins DC (1982) Rearing, release and recovery of Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) imported for the control of Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in south eastern Australia. J Aust Entomol Soc 21:279–284
DeBach P, Rosen D (1991) Biological control by natural enemies, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Dymock JJ, Gibb AR, Suckling DM (2009) Monitoring and predicting populations of the tropical grass webworm (Herpetogramma licarsisalis) a pest of kikuyu pasture in Northland. Proc NZ Grassl Assoc 71:25–30
East R, Willoughby BE (1980) The effects of pasture defoliation in summer on grass grub (Costelytra zealandica) populations. NZ J Agric Res 23:547–562
Esson MJ (1975) Notes on the biology and distribution of three recently discovered exotic weevil pests in Hawkes Bay. Proc 28th NZ Weed Pest Cont Conf 28: 208–212
Ferguson CM, Moeed A, Barratt BIP, Hill RL, Kean JM (2007) BCANZ—biological control agents introduced to New Zealand. http://www.b3nz.org/bcanz Accessed 15 May 2012)
Fuhrer J (2003) Agroecosystem responses to combinations of elevated CO2, ozone, and global climate change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 97:1–20
Gerard PJ (2004) Synchronisation of the parasitoid Centrodora scolypopae with its host Scolypopa australis. NZ Plant Prot 57:10–12
Gerard PJ, Wilson DJ, Eden TM (2010) Clover root weevil biocontrol distribution in the North Island—release tactics and outcomes. Proc NZ Grassl Assoc 72:85–89
Gerard PJ, Addison PJ, Hedley P, Bell NL, Vink CJ (2011) Outbreak of armyworms in eastern Bay of Plenty. NZ Plant Prot 64:285
Godfray HCJ, Hassell MP, Holt RD (1994) The population dynamic consequences of phenological asynchrony between parasitoids and their hosts. J Anim Ecol 63:1–10
Goldson SL (2007) Climate change in biological control. In: Newton PCD, Carran RA, Edwards GR, Niklaus PA (eds) Agroecosystems in a changing climate. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 329–332
Goldson SL, Proffitt JR, McNeill MR (1990) Seasonal biology and ecology in New Zealand of Microctonus aethiopoides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Sitona spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with special emphasis on atypical behaviour. J Appl Ecol 27:703–722
Gourlay AH, Fowler SV, Rattray G (2005) Abundance of ragwort flea beetle (Longitarsus jacobaeae) at five sites on the West Coast, South Island, New Zealand. Landcare research contract report. http://wwwold.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/researchpubs/0405-131Gourlay.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2012
Gourlay AH, Fowler SV, Rattray G (2008) Is ragwort flea beetle (Longitarsus jacobeae) performance reduced by high rainfall on the West Coast, South Island, New Zealand? In: Julien MH, Sforza R, Bon MC, Evans HC, Hatcher PE, Hinz HL, Rector BG (eds) Proceedings of the XII international symposium on biological control of weeds. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 545–551
Hagen KS, van den Bosch R (1968) Impact of pathogens, parasites and predators on aphids. Annu Rev Entomol 13:325–384
Hance T, van Baaren J, Vernon P, Boivin G (2007) Impact of extreme temperatures on parasitoids in a climate change perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 52:107–126
Hopkins DC (1989) Widespread establishment of the sitona weevil parasite Microctonus aethiopoides, and its effectiveness as a control agent in South Australia. In: Stahle PP (ed) Proceedings of the 5th Australasian conference of grassland invertebrate ecology. D&D Printing, Melbourne, Australia, pp 49–53
Jallow MFA, Matsumura M (2001) Influence of temperature on the rate of development of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl Entomol Zool 36:427–430
Jonsson M, Wratten SD, Landis DA, Tompkins JML, Cullen R (2010) Habitat manipulation to mitigate the impacts of invasive arthropod pests. Biol Invasions 12:2933–2945
Kean JM, Barlow ND (2000) Long-term assessment of the biological control of Sitona discoideus by Microctonus aethiopoides and test of a model. Biocontrol Sci Technol 10:215–221
Kelly D, Wood R (1991) Why nodding thistle receptacle weevil destroys so little nodding thistle seed in Canterbury. In: Proceedings of the 44th New Zealand weed and pest control conference. pp 280–283
Lynch M, Lande R (1993) Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. In: Kareiva P, Kingsolver J, Huey R (eds) Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer Assocs Inc., Sunderland, USA, pp 234–250
Marshall GAK (1937) New Curculionidae (Col.) in New Zealand. Trans R Soc NZ 67:316–340
McNeill MR, Goldson SL, Proffitt JR, Phillips CB, Addison PJ (2002) A description of the commercial rearing and distribution of Microctonus hyperodae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for biological control of Listronotus bonariensis (Kuschel) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biol Control 24:167–175
Mills NJ (2006) Accounting for differential success in the biological control of homopteran and lepidopteran pests. NZ J Ecol 30:61–72
Mironidis GK, Savopoulou-Soultani M (2008) Development, survivorship, and reproduction of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under constant and alternating temperatures. Environ Entomol 37:16–28
Morris M (1989) Evidence for diapause in indigenous New Zealand insects: a review. NZ J Zool 16:431–434
Mullan B, Wratt D, Dean S, Hollis M (2008).Climate change effects and impacts assessment: a guidance manual for local government in New Zealand. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/climate/climate-change-effect-impacts-assessments-may08/index.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2011
O’Callaghan M, Jackson TA, Noonan MJ (1989) Ecology of Serratia entomophila in soil. In: Stahle PP (ed) Proceedings of the 5th Australasian conference on grassland invertebrate ecology. D.D. Printing, Melbourne, Australia, pp 69–75
Parry ML (1989) The potential impact on agriculture of the ‘greenhouse effect’ In: Bennett RM (ed) The ‘greenhouse effect’ and UK Agriculture. Centre for Agricultural Strategy, Reading, UK, pp. 24–46
Phillips CB, Townsend H, Vink CJ (2006) Blown in the wind or border slippage? What natural dispersal of exotic species to New Zealand has to do with biosecurity. Biosecurity 69:14–15
Phillips CB, Baird DB, Iline II, McNeill MR, Proffitt JR, Goldson SL, Kean JM (2008) East meets west: adaptive evolution of an insect introduced for biological control. J Appl Ecol 45:948–956
Potter KJB, Ireson JE, Allen G (2007) Survival of larvae of the ragwort flea beetle, Longitarsus flavicornis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in water-logged soil. Biocontrol Sci Technol 17:756–770
Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweigk C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60
Shaw PW, Walker JTS (1996) Biological control of woolly apple aphid by Aphelinus mali in an integrated fruit production programme in Nelson. In: Proceedings of 49th New Zealand weed and pest control conference. pp 59–63
Shaw PW, Wallis DR (2009) Early-season use of insecticides for management of woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum) in Nelson apple orchards. NZ Plant Prot 62:291–295
Stewart CA, Julien MH, Worner SP (1995) The potential geographical distribution of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) and a biological control agent, Agasicles hygrophila, in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of 48th New Zealand weed and pest control conference. pp 270–275
Stireman JO, III, Dyer LA, Janzen DH, Singer MS, Lill JT, Marquis RJ, Ricklefs RE, Gentry GL, Hallwachs W, Coley PD, Barone JA, Greeney HF, Connahs H, Barbosa P, Morais HC, Diniz IR (2005) Climatic unpredictability and parasitism of caterpillars: implications of global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2:17384–17387
Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Kriticos DJ (2007) CLIMEX Version 3: user’s guide. Hearne Scientific Software Pty Ltd. http://www.hearne.com.au. Accessed 29 Sept 2011
Syrett P (1989) Senecio jacobaea L, ragwort (Asteraceae). In: Cameron PJ, Hill RL, Bain B, and Thomas WP (eds) Review of biological control of invertebrate pests and weeds in New Zealand 1874 to 1987. CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp. 361–366
Tauber MJ, Tauber CA (1976) Insect seasonality: diapause Maintenance, termination, and postdiapause development. Annu Rev Entomol 21:81–107
Thomson LJ, Macfadyen S, Hoffmann AA (2010) Predicting the effects of climate change on natural enemies of agricultural pests. Biol Control 52:296–306
Tillman GP, Laster ML, Powell JE (1993) Development of the endoparasitoids Microplitis croceipes, Microplitis demolitor, and Cotesia kazak (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Helicoverpa zea and H. armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 86:360–362
Tillman PG, Powell JE (1991) Developmental time in relation to temperature for Microplitis croceipes, M. demolitor, Cotesia kazak (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and Hyposoter didymator (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), endoparasitoids of the tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 20:61–64
Trimble RM, Blommers LHM, Helsen HHM (1990) Diapause termination and thermal requirements for postdiapause development in Aphelinus mali at constant and fluctuating temperatures. Entomol Exp Appl 56:61–69
Trujillo EE (1985) Biological control of Hamakua pa-makani with Cercosporella sp. in Hawaii. In: Delfosse ES (ed) Proceedings of VI international symposium on biological control of weeds, 19–25 August 1984, Vancouver, Canada. Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada, pp 661–671
Walker GP, Cameron PJ (1989) Status of introduced larval parasitoids of tomato fruitworm. In: Proceedings of the 42nd New Zealand weed and pest control conference. pp 229–232
Walker GP, Cameron PJ (1990) Pheromone trapping and field scouting for tomato fruitworm in tomatoes and sweet corn. In: Proceedings of the 42nd New Zealand weed and pest control conference. pp 17–20
Walker GP, Herman TJB, Kale AJ, Wallace AR (2010) An adjustable action threshold using larval parasitism of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in IPM for processing tomatoes. Biol Control 52:30–36
Wardle DA (1987) The ecology of ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.)—a review. NZ J Ecol 10:67–76
Acknowledgments
The project was funded by MAF Policy (Project 0910-11689) and the paper by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (LINX0804 Ecosystems Bioprotection). The authors thank Barbara Barratt, Jenny Dymock, Linda Faulkner, Travis Glare, Garry Hill, Lynley Hayes Trevor Jackson, Geoff Ridley, Cor Vink, Sue Worner, and Sue Zydenbos for contributing their expert insights, opinions and support at the climate change/biocontrol workshop at Lincoln.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Dirk Babendreier
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerard, P.J., Barringer, J.R.F., Charles, J.G. et al. Potential effects of climate change on biological control systems: case studies from New Zealand. BioControl 58, 149–162 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-012-9480-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-012-9480-0