Abstract
In order to understand better non-target effect and potential uses, the host specificity of two parasitoid species (Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope Noyes & Menezes and Leptomastix dactylopii Howard) (both Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) for six mealybug species [Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell), Phenacoccus madeirensis Green, Phenacoccus solani Ferris, Planococcus citri (Risso),Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni-Tozzetti) and Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret)] (all Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) was studied through behavioral observations and laboratory rearing. The selected mealybug species represent major subfamilies and tribes of Pseudococcidae. Except for F. virgata, all mealybug species induced examinations by Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope and L. dactylopii. Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope was specific to P. madeirensis, which was the only mealybug species selected for oviposition and suitable for complete development of the parasitoid. No encapsulation of Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope in P. madeirensis was observed. Leptomastix dactylopii accepted multiple species for oviposition, with the ranking of species preference as P. citri > P. viburni > P. longispinus > P. solani > P. madeirensis. Only P. citri, P. longispinus and P. viburni supported the development of L. dactylopii. Parasitoids developing in P. longispinus and P. viburni suffered from high encapsulation rates, while no encapsulation was observed when developing in P. citri. The results of this study suggest that Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope is highly host specific. Leptomastix dactylopii, on the other hand, has a wider host range. The use of Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope in a mealybug biological control program is limited to P. madeirensis and L. dactylopii to P. citri. The results presented in this study also lead us to question the accuracy of the reported host range of L. dactylopii, which include all six mealybug species tested.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alleyne M., Wiedenmann R.N. (2001). Suitability of lepidopteran stemborers for parasitization by novel-association endoparasitoids. BioControl 46:1–23
Barlett B.R. (1978). Pseudococcidae. In: Clausen C.P. (ed). Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (Agriculture Handbook volume 480), Washington DC, pp. 137–170
Ben-Dov, Y. (1994). A Systematic Catalogue of the Mealybugs of the World (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with Data on Geographical Distribution, Host Plants, Biology and Economic Importance. Intercept, Andover
Blumberg D. (1997). Parasitoid encapsulation as a Defense Mechanism in the Coccoidea (Homoptera) and its importance in biological control. Biol. Control 8:225–236
Blumberg D., Van Driesche R.G. (2001). Encapsulation rates of three encyrtid parasitoids by three mealybug species (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) found commonly as pests in commercial greenhouses. Biol. Control 22:191–199
Briese D.T. (2005). Translating host-specificity test results into the real world: The need to harmonize the yin and yang of current testing procedures. Biol. Control 35:208–214
Chong, J.-H., 2005. Biology of the Mealybug Parasitoid, Anagyrus loecki, and its Potential as a Biological Control Agent of the Madeira Mealybug, Phenacoccus madeirensis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Chong, J.-H. and R.D. Oetting, 2002. Mealybugs. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Insect and Disease Management on Ornamentals. The Society of American Florist, Alexandria VA, pp. 71–77
Conover W.J. (1999). Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY
Copland M.J.W., Tingle C.C.D., Saynor M., Panis A. (1985). Biology of glasshouse mealybugs and their predators and parasitoids. In: Hussey N.W., Scopes N.E.A. (eds). Biological Pest Control: T(edhe Glasshouse Experience. Blanford Press, Poole, pp. 82–86
DeBach P., Barlett B.R. (1964). Methods of colonization, recovery and evaluation. In: DeBach P. (ed). Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp. 402–426
Downie D.A., Gullan P.J. (2004). Phylogenetic analysis of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) based on DNA sequences from three nuclear genes, and a review of the higher classification. Syst. Entomol. 29:238–259
Van Driesche R.G., Hoddle M. (1997). Should arthropod parasitoids and predators be subject to host range testing when used as biological control agents. Agr. Human Values 14:211–226
Haye T., Goulet H., Mason P.G., Kuhlmann U. (2005). Does fundamental host range match ecological host range?. A retrospective case study of a Lygus plant bug parasitoid. Biol. Control 35:55–67
de Jong P.W., van Alphen J.J.M. (1989). Host size selection and sex allocation in Leptomastix dactylopii Howard, a parasitoid of Planococcus citri. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 50:161–169
van Klinden R.D. (2000). Host specificity testing: Why do we do it and how can we do it better. In: Van Driesche R.G., Heard T.A., McClay A., Reardon R. (eds). Proceedings of Session: Host-Specificity Testing of Exotic Arthropod Biological Control Agents – the Biological Basis for Improvement in Safety. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, WV, pp. 54–68
Kuhlman U. and Mason P.G. (2003). Use of field host range surveys for selecting candidate non-target species for physiological host specificity testing of entomophagous biological control agents. In: Van Driesche R.G. (ed). Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, Honolulu, Hawaii, 14–18 January 2002. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, pp. 370–377
van Lenteren J.C., Babendreier D., Bigler F., Burgio G., Hokkanen H.M.T., Kurke S., Loomans A.J.M., Menzler-Hokkanen H.M.T., van Rijn P.C.J., Thomas M.B., Tommasini M.G., Zeng Q.Q. (2003). Environmental risk assessment of exotic natural enemies used in inundative biological control. Biol. Control 48:3–38
Louda S.M., Arnett A.E., Rand T.A., Russell F.L., (2003). Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation. Cons. Biol. 17:73–82
Morehead S.A. and Feener D.H. (2000). An experimental test of potential host range in the ant parasitoid Apocephalus paraponerae. Ecol. Entomol. 25:332–340
Nechols J.R., Kauffman W.C., Schaefer P.W. (1992). Significance of host specificity in classical biological control. In: Kauffman W.C., Nechols J.R. (eds). Selection Criteria and Ecological Consequences of Importing Natural Enemies. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, USA, pp. 41–52
Noyes J.S. and Hayat M. (1994). Oriental Mealybug Parasitoids of the Anagyrini (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK
Oetting R., Hudson W., Braman K., (2002). XIII. Ornamental, lawn and turf insects. In: Guillebeau P., Roberts P., Hinkle N. (eds). Summary of Losses from Insect Damage and Costs of Control in Georgia 2001. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, pp. 21–23
Onstad D.W., McManus M.L. (1996). Risks of host range expansion by parasites of insects. BioScience 46:430–435
Sagarra L.A., Vincent C., Stewart R.K., (2001a). Suitability of nine mealybug species (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) as hosts for the parasitoid Anagyrus kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Flr. Entomol. 84:112–116
Sagarra L.A., Vincent C., Stewart R.K., (2001b). Body size as an indicator of parasitoid quality in male and female Anagyrus kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 91:363–367
SAS Institute, 1999. SAS User Guide, Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
Sheppard A.W., van Klinken R.D., Heard T.A. (2005). Scientific advances in the analysis of direct risks of weed biological control agents to nontarget plants. Biol. Control 35:215–226
Strand M.R., Obrycki J.J. (1996). Host specificity of insect parasitoids and predators. BioScience 46:422–429
Townsend M.L., Oetting R.D., Chong J.-H. (2000). Management of the mealybug Phenacoccus madeirensis. Proc. South. Nurs. Assoc. Res. Conf. 45:162–166
Acknowledgments
We thank J. Noyes of Natural History Museum, London, UK for identification of Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope, and N. Gamble of the Callaway Garden, Pine Mountain, GA for allowing us to collect L. dactylopii and F. virgata in the Cecil B. Days Butterfly Center. L. S. Osborne of the University of Florida, Mid-Florida Research and Education Center, Apopka, FL, provided starter culture of A. loecki and important discussion on the original of the parasitoid species. We appreciate the valuable comments provided by two anonymous reviewers. We also thank M. Townsend, S. Stevens and R. Harris of the University of Georgia, as well as B. Wiltz of Louisiana State University, for their technical assistance and insect colony maintenance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chong, JH., Oetting, R.D. Specificity of Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope and Leptomastix dactylopii for six mealybug species. BioControl 52, 289–308 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9025-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9025-5