Abstract
This article contributes to the literature on network strategies and institutional transitions in emerging economies in Asia by identifying a realistic, intermediate phase between the early and late phases of institutional transitions suggested by Peng (2003). Focusing on the intermediate phase, we advance two arguments based on network strength and network content. First, in terms of network strength, we leverage earlier insights that networks can be classified as strong ties and weak ties. Consequently, we suggest that as institutional transitions unfold, strong-tie-based networks, instead of being phased out, are being transformed into weak-ties-based networks. Second, from a network content standpoint, we argue that the various scale and scope of institutional transitions shape the content of different networks which focus on business-to-government (B2G) ties and business-to-business (B2B) relationships. Our propositions delineate how different transitions of political and legal institutions affect the evolution of B2G and B2B networks. Overall, we suggest that networks not only differ in strength but also in content, and that their evolution is driven by the impact of different dimensions of institutional transitions governing B2G and B2B relationships.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adler, P., & Kwan, S. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27: 17–40.
Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G., & Liu, S. 2000. Navigating China's changing economy: Strategies for private firms. Business Horizon, January–February: 5–15.
Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. 2004. Turnaround in Asia: Laying the foundation for understanding this unique domain. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 5–24.
Amsden, A., Kochanowicz, J., & Taylor, L. 1995. The market meets its match: Restructuring the economies of Eastern European. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Audia, P., Locke, E., & Smith, K. 2000. Paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 837–853.
Biggart, N., & Delbridge, R. 2004. Systems of exchange. Academy of Management Review, 29: 28–49.
Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 600–628.
Bruton, G., Ahlstrom, D., & Wan, J. 2001. Turnaround success of large and midsize Chinese owned firms: Evidence from Hong Kong and Thailand. Journal of World Business, 36: 146–165.
Burt, R. 1992. Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 345–423.
Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. 2002. The co-evolution of institutional environments and organizational strategies: The rise of family business groups in ASEAN region. Organization Studies, 23: 1–29.
Carney, M. 2004a. The institutions of industrial restructuring in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 171–188.
Carney, M. 2004b. The globalization and regeneration of Asian business networks. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management Special Issue Conference on Asian Business Networks, Shanghai, December.
Chen, C., Peng, M. W., & Saparito, P. 2002. Individualism, collectivism, and opportunism: A cultural perspective on transaction cost economics. Journal of Management, 28: 567–583.
Child, J., & Lu, Y. 1996. Institutional constraints on economic reform: The case of investment decisions in China. Organization Science, 7: 60–77.
Child, J., & Tse, D. 2001. China's transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 5–21.
Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Commons, J. 1934. Institutional economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. 2002. Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 45–57.
Das T., & Teng, B. 2002. Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27: 445–456.
Delios, A., & Singh, K. 2005. Strategy for success in Asia. Singapore: Wiley.
Djelic, M., & Quack S. (Eds.). 2003. Globalization and institutions. Cheltemham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Doh, J., & Pearce, J. 2004. Corporate entrepreneurship and real options in transitional policy environments: Theory development. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 645–664.
Fisman, R. 2001. Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91: 1095–1102.
Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. 2000. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11: 183–196.
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.
Gulati, R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619–652.
Gupta, V., & Wang, J. 2004. From corporate crisis to turnaround in East Asia: A study of China Huajing Electronics Group Corporation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 213–233.
Hansen, M. T. 1998. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82–111.
Hayek, F., 1973. Law, legislation, and liberty. Rules and order, vol. 1, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hellman, J., & Schankerman, M. 2000. Intervention, corruption, and capture: The nexus between enterprises and state. Economics of Transition, 8: 325–368.
Hillman, A., Keim, G., & Schuler, D. 2004. Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30: 837–857.
Hite, J., & Hesterly, W. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 275–286.
Hoskisson, R., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 249–267.
Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. 2002. Courts and relational contract. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18: 221–277.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. The future of business groups in emerging economies: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 268–285.
Kim, H., Hoskisson, R., Tihanyi, L., & Hong, J. 2004. The evolution and restructuring of diversified business groups in emerging markets: The lessons from chaebols in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 25–48.
Koka, B., & Prescott, J. 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 795–816.
Li, J., & Zhou, K. 2004. The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China: A strategic perspective. Paper presented at the Asian Pacific Journal of Management Special Issue Conference on Asian Business Networks, Shanghai, December.
Madhavan, R., Koka, B., & Prescott, J. 1998. Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 439–459.
Maheshwari, S. K., & Ahlstrom, D. 2004. Turning around a state owned enterprise: The case of Scooters India Limited. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 75–101.
March, J. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87.
Mizruchi, M. & Stearns, L. 2001. Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making. American Sociological Review, 66: 647–671.
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. 2000. Understanding institutions. In C. Menard (Ed.), Institutions, contracts, and organizations: Perspectives from new institutional economics. Edward Elgar.
O'Neill, H., Rondinelli, D., & Wattanakul, T. 2004. Ownership and its impact on coping with financial crisis: differences in state-, mixed, and privately-owned enterprises in Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 49–74.
Park, S. H. & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 455–477.
Peng, M. W. 2000. Business strategies in transition economies. Thosand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–286.
Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2): 492–528.
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 486–501.
Peng, M. W., Lee, S.-H., & Wang, D. 2005. What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, 33(3): 622–633.
Pistor, K., Raiser, M., & Gelfer, S. 2000. Law and finance in transition economies. Economics of Transition, 8: 325–368.
Powell, W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295–336.
Rangan, S. 2000. The problem of search and deliberation in economic action: When social networks really matter. Academy of Management Review, 25: 813–828.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 369–386.
Shieh, G., 1992. “Boss” island: The subcontracting network and micro-entrepreneurship in Taiwan's development. New York: Peter Lang.
Steensma, H. K., Tihanyi, L., Lyles, M., & Dhanaraj, C. 2005. The evolving value of foreign partnerships in transitioning economies. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 213–235.
Tsang, E. W. 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2): 64–73.
Uzzi, B. 1996. Social structure & competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35–67.
White, S. 2004. Stakeholders, structure and the failure of corporate governance reform initiatives in post-crisis Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 102–122.
Whitley, R. 1994. Dominant forms of economic organization in market economies. Organization Studies, 15: 153–182.
Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1–33.
Wu, W., & Leung, A. 2004. Does a micro-macro link exist between managerial value of reciprocity, social capital, and firm performance? The case of SMEs in China. Paper presented at the Asian Pacific Journal of Management Special Issue Conference on Asian Business Networks, Shanghai, December.
Xin, K., & Pearce, J. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1641–1658.
Yao, X., Wang, H., & Tang, F. 2004. Social network and growth of small and medium sized firms: Evidence from a capitalistic city of mainland China. paper presented at the Asian Pacific Journal of Management Special Issue Conference on Asian Business Networks, Shanghai, December.
Zhou, Q., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Institutional quality, networking strategy, and firm performance: A cross-country analysis. Paper presented at the Academy of International Business conference, Quebec City, July.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Mike W. Peng (Ph.D., University of Washington) is a professor of global strategy at the University of Texas at Dallas, where he holds the university's first ever Provost's Distinguished Research Professorship. He was formerly an associate professor at the Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University. He is the author of nearly 40 scholarly articles and three books, including, most recently, Global Strategy (2006). He has served on the editorial boards of AMJ, AMR, JIBS, and SMJ, and acted as a guest editor for JIBS and JMS. He is the first elected officer of the Global Strategy Interest Group at the Strategic Management Society. This is his fifth contribution to APJM.
Jessie Qi Zhou is a Ph.D. candidate in international business at the Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University. Her research interest includes strategy in emerging economies, network strategy, and organizational learning. Her main theoretical interest is institutional theory, with a focus on how institutional distance affects MNE strategies. The comparative analysis of firms' strategic choices across countries in response to different institutional environments is also of particular interest to her. Her work has been presented at the Academy of Management and Academy of International Business conferences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, M.W., Zhou, J.Q. How Network Strategies and Institutional Transitions Evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific J Manage 22, 321–336 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-005-4113-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-005-4113-0