Abstract
Marine phycosphere harbors unique cross-kingdom associations with enormous ecological significance in aquatic ecosystems as well as relevance for algal biotechnology industry. During our investigating the microbial composition and bioactivity of marine phycosphere microbiota (PM), a novel lightly yellowish and versatile bacterium designated strain AM1-D1T was isolated from cultivable PM of marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum amtk4 that produces high levels of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins (PSTs). Strain AM1-D1T demonstrates notable bioflocculanting bioactivity with bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS), and microalgae growth-promoting (MGP) potential toward its algal host. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain AM1-D1T was affiliated to the members of genus Sulfitobacter within the family Rhodobacteraceae, showing the highest sequence similarity of 97.9% with Sulfitobacter noctilucae NB-68T, and below 97.8% with other type strains. The complete genome of strain AM1-D1T consisted of a circular 3.84-Mb chromosome and five circular plasmids (185, 95, 15, 205 and 348 Kb, respectively) with the G+C content of 64.6%. Low values obtained by phylogenomic calculations on the average nucleotide identity (ANI, 77.2%), average amino acid identity (AAI, 74.7%) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH, 18.6%) unequivocally separated strain AM1-D1T from its closest relative. The main polar lipids were identified as phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine, diphosphatidylglycerol, one unidentified phospholipid and one unidentified lipid. The predominant fatty acids (> 10%) were C18:1 ω7c, C19:0 cyclo ω8c and C16:0. The respiratory quinone was Q-10. The genome of strain AM1-D1T was predicted to encode series of gene clusters responsible for sulfur oxidation (sox) and utilization of dissolved organic sulfur exometabolites from marine dinoflagellates, taurine (tau) and dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) (dmd), as well as supplementary vitamin B12 (cob), photosynthesis carotenoids (crt) which are pivotal components during algae-bacteria interactions. Based on the evidences by the polyphasic characterizations, strain AM1-D1T represents a novel species of the genus Sulfitobacter, for which the name Sulfitobacter alexandrii sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is AM1-D1T (= CCTCC 2017277T = KCTC 62491T).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The genus Sulfitobacter was established by Sorokin (1995), and belongs to Roseobacter group which is the most widely distributed bacteria in the marine environment, and harbors enormous ecological significance during oceanic elemental cycles and interactions with marine eukaryotes (Buchan 2005; Wagner-Döbler and Biebl 2006). Sulfitobacter pontiacus isolated from the Black Sea is the type species of this genus (Sorokin 1995). At the time of writing, the genus Sulfitobacter includes 23 validated species (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/ sulfitobacter) that were all isolated from marine environments (Wang et al 2021). Marine phycosphere harbors dynamic and cross-kingdom algae-bacteria interactions (ABI) which play crucial roles in aquatic ecosystems (Seymour et al. 2017). Within the phycosphere interface, the exopolysaccharides (EPS) produced by algae-associated bacterial consortia serves as one essential intermediary component during those dynamic interactions (Amin et al. 2012; Cho et al. 2004; Yang et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2020). Previously, we performed the Phycosphere Microbiome Project (PMP) to convey microbial structures of phycosphere microbiota (PM) of marine harmful algal blooms (HAB) dinoflagellates (Duan et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2018, 2020a, b; Yang et al. 2020a, b, c; Zhang et al. 2015a, b, 2020; Zhou et al. 2021). We found Sulfitobacter spp. was one dominant genus distributed in diverse PM of six toxic HAB Alexandrium spp. (Fig. S1) (Zhang et al. 2015a, b). After isolating the cultivable PM, a new lightly yellowish and versatile bacterium designated strain AM1-D1T was isolated from Alexandrium minutum amtk4 that produces high levels of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins (PSTs) (Chou et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2015b; Yang et al. 2020a, b, c). We found that strain AM1-D1T produces active bioflocculanting EPS (Duan et al. 2020; Mu et al. 2019), and also demonstrates obvious microalgae growth-promoting (MGP) ability. To specify its phylogenetic position, in this study, we proposed that strain AM1-D1T represents a novel species of the genus Sulfitobacter based on polyphasic characterizations. Additionally, whole-genomic mining of strain AM1-D1T gained insight into the application of this new isolate for furthering exploration of bacterial PST biosynthesis and detailed mechanisms underlying those dynamic algae-bacteria interactions (Amin et al. 2012; Seymour et al. 2017).
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
Strain AM1-D1T was isolated from the cell culture of Alexandrium minutum amtk4 according to our protocols described previously (Yang et al. 2018a; Zhang et al. 2015a, 2020; Zhou et al. 2021). The isolation medium of marine agar (MA, Difco, BD) 2216 was supplemented with algal culture extract of LZT09 at approximate 0.05 mg/L (Yang et al. 2021). The strain was routinely cultivated on MA at 30 °C, or maintained as a glycerol suspension (20%, v/v) and stored at − 80 °C for long-term preservation. Five reference type strains, including S. noctilucae NB-68T (= KCTC 32122T = JCM 18833T = DSM 100978T), S. noctilucicola NB-77T (= KCTC 32123T = JCM 18834T) and S. geojensis MM-124T (= KCTC 32124T = JCM 18835T) purchased from Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC, Republic of Korea), Roseobacter denitrificans OCh 114T (= ATCC 33942T = DSM 7001T = JCM 21267T) obtained from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM, Japan), and S. pacificus SCM2-10T (= LMG 27113T = NBRC 109915T) obtained from the NITE Biological Resource Center (NBRC) were used for the comparative study of the taxonomic position of strain AM1-D1T.
16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis
PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA gene was performed using an universal bacterial primers of 27F/1492R according the standard procedure (Yang et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2021), and sequenced at MajorBio (Shanghai, China). The identifications of phylogenetic neighbor and the calculations of gene similarity values using the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained by both PCR amplification, and extracted 16S rRNA region from the bacterial genomes were achieved using online EzTaxon server (http://www.ezbiocloud.net). Reference sequences of type strains were downloaded from the NCBI database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA 7.0 after multiple alignment of the data via ClustalW. Phylogenetic distances were calculated according to neighbour-joining (NJ), maximum-parsimony (MP) and maximum-likelihood (ML) methods. In each case, bootstrap values were calculated based on 1000 replications to evaluate the phylogenetic tree topology.
Phenotypic, physiological and biochemical characterizations
Cell morphology was observed by light microscope (Olympus CX21) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) JEM-1200; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The morphology of cell colonies were observed after 24 h incubation on MA plates at 30 °C. Motility was tested microscopically under the phase-contrast mode by the hanging drop technique. Growth range and optimum at different temperatures (4, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 37, 40, 45 and 50 °C), and pH values (4.0–11.0, at 0.5 unit interval) was investigated in marine broth (MB) incubated at 30 °C for 2 days. Growth at various NaCl concentrations (0–11.0%, w/v, interval of 0.5%) was investigated in MB at 30 °C for 2 days. The following sterile buffer system: pH 4.0–5.0, 0.1 M citric acid/0.1 M sodium citrate; pH 6.0–8.0, 0.1 M KH2PO4/0.1 M NaOH; pH 9.0–10.0, 0.1 M NaHCO3/0.1 M Na2CO3; pH 11.0, 0.05 M Na2HPO4/0.1 M NaOH, was used to adjust the desired pH of the test media. Growth under anaerobic condition was determined after incubation in an anaerobic chamber (Bactron EZ-2; Shellab) grown on MA plate and cultivated at 30 °C for 2 week. Growth was determined by monitoring OD600nm using an Agilent spectrophotometer. Oxidase activity was determined using a 1% (v/v) solution of tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine. Catalase activity was detected by assessing production of bubbles after addition of a drop of 3% (w/v) H2O2. Hydrolysis of aesculin, casein, DNA, gelatin, starch and Tween 80, Voges–Proskauer and methyl red tests, production of indole, phenylalanine deaminase, phosphatase, nitrate and nitrite reduction and Simmon’s citrate were determined as described by Smibert and Krieg (1994). Activities of extracellular enzymes were determined by using API 20E, API 20NE and API ZYM strips (bioMérieux, Marcyl’E´toile, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Chemotaxonomic characteristics
Strain AM1-D1T was incubated in MB in order to extract the fatty acids. The exponential-phase of the cell culture was harvested, and the fatty acids were analyzed as described by Sasser (1990). Identification and quantification of cellular fatty acids were performed using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System (MIDI) (Sherlock version 6.1; MIDI database TSBA6.0). Polar lipids of were extracted using a chloroform/methanol system, separated by two-dimensional silica gel TLC, and analyzed according to the procedures described by Tindall et al. (1987). Respiratory quinones were extracted and determined by HPLC method as described previously (Hiraishi et al. 1996).
Phylogenomic calculations and functional genes analysis
The genome sequences of type strains of Sulfitobacter were available until December 2020, and downloaded from GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome). The up-to-date bacterial core gene set (UBCG) was used to construct a phylogenetic tree using the genomes of strain AM1-D1T and other type strains of Sulfitobacter. DNA G+C content of strain AM1-D1T was calculated based on its whole-genome sequence. Three measures of similarities based on the average nucleotide identity (ANI), average amino acid identity (AAI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were calculated using online OrthoANI tool and GGDC tool (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/distcalc2.php), respectively, using the default parameters. Additionally, the identification of essential functional genes and clusters related to quorum sensing (lux), dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) (dmd), photosynthetic capacity (puf, bch), carbon monoxide oxidation (cox), tau gene, sulfur oxidation (sox), Vitamin B12 (cob), carotenoids (crt), and nitrogen metabolism (napA, nasA, narB, narG, norB, nirS) in the genomes of strain AM1-D1T and its close relatives were performed using BLAST based on InterPro (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro) database and IMG database (https://img.jgi.doe.gov).
Core-genome alignment and phylogenetic analysis
All predicted protein-coding genes and amino acids annotated from available 16 genome of type strains of the genus Sulfitobacter were selected and compared using an all-versus-all BLAST search. This analysis identified shared reciprocal best matches (defined as > 70% nucleotide identity or > 40% amino acid identity) in all pair-wise genome comparisons (core orthologues, CO) of 17 type strains of Sulfitobacter including strain AM1-D1T. The core orthologous genes were individually aligned using MUSCLE (Tatusov et al. 2000). The resulting nucleotide alignments were concatenated to create a core-genome alignment using IQ-TREE v1.6.12 (http://www.iqtree.org). The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed by neighbour-joining method with MEGA 7 (https://www.megasoftware.net/home). Additionally, the core orthologous and unique proteins were used to construct a Venn diagram using the VennPainter tool (Lin et al. 2016).
Bacterial EPS bioflocculanting and MGP bioactivity assays
Extraction of bacterial EPS produced by strain AM1-D1T and bioflocculating activity evaluation were performed according to our procedures reported previously (Duan et al. 2020; Mu et al 2019; Zhang et al 2021). The prepared EPS was dissolved in distilled water for furthering bioflocculation activity (BFC) assay (Mu et al. 2019). Briefly, the measures using kaolin clay suspension flocculation (KCSF) assay calculated as flocculation rate (FR) were used and performed at a 96-well microplate mode with at least triplicates. Microalgae growth-promoting (MGP) activity of strain AM1-D1T toward A. minutum amtk4 in a co-culture system was performed as reported previously (Gonzalez and Bashan 2000).
Results and discussion
Morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics
Strain AM1-D1T was observed to form lightly yellowish colonies when grown on MA at 30 °C for 2 days. Cells of strain AM1-D1T were Gram-negative, rod-shaped with polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) granules inside (Fig. 1). It’s motile, aerobic and weak positive for anaerobic growth. TEM observation showed that the cells of strain AM1-D1T were approximately 0.3–0.4 μm wide and 0.7–2.1 μm long (Fig. S1), which were smaller than the related type strains. Growth occurred at 15–37 °C (optimum, 30 °C) at pH 5–10 (optimum, pH 7.0) in the presence of 1–4% (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 3%). Oxidase and catalase activities were both positive. Other phenotypic features distinguishing strain AM1-D1T from its close relatives are summarized in the species description (Table 1). Compared with its five close relatives, strain AM1-D1T exhibited a wider temperature grow range, but a narrower NaCl grow range. In API 20NE tests, only two strains, S. pacificus SCM2-10T and S. geojensis MM-124T were positive for nitrate reduction, but strain AM1-D1T and other three type strains were all negative for nitrate reduction. In API ZYM tests, strain AM1-D1T and S. pacificus SCM2-10T were positive for acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, but positive for lipase (C14).
It’s attractively noted that for the bacterial isolation sources, total 8 type strains of genus Sulfitobacter, including AM1-D1T, S. delicatus and S. dubius (Ivanova et al. 2004), S. faviae (Kumari et al. 2016), S. pacificus (Fukui et al. 2015), S. porphyrae (Fukui et al. 2014), S. pseudonitzschiae (Hong et al. 2015), S. undariae (Park et al. 2015) and S. algicola (Wang et al 2021) were isolated from diverse marine dinoflagellates and planktons. This interesting finding may indicate those species might involve in potential cross-kingdom associations with their hosts (Amin et al. 2012).
16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis
The extracted 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains AM1-D1T and its close relatives were subjected to phylogenetic analysis. The similarity identification using EzBioCloud alignment indicated that strain AM1-D1T shared 16S rRNA gene similarities of 97.9% with S. noctilucae NB-68T, and less than 97.8% with all other Sulfitobacter species, and below 97.5% with all type strains of the genus Roseobacter (Shiba 1991). Phylogenetic tree constructed based on NJ method demonstrated that AM1-D1T form a monophyletic group compared with other species of the genus Sulfitobacter, which was outside the group formed by the type strains of S. noctilucae, S. noctilucicola, S. pacificus, S. geojensis and S. sabulilitoris (Fig. 2). The phylogenetic relationship was also supported by the ML (Fig. S2) and MP trees (Fig. S3).
Phylogenomic comparison of Sulfitobacter species genomes
The phylogenomic comparisons based on ANI, AAI and dDDH values between strain AM1-D1T and other type strains of the genus Sulfitobacter with available genomes are showed in Fig. S4. The ANI, AAI and dDDH values between strain AM1-D1T and S. noctilucae NB-68T were 77.2, 74.7 and 18.6%, respectively. For S. sabulilitoris HSMS-29T, the ANI, AAI and dDDH values were 78.0, 71.2 and 19.3%, respectively. For Roseobacter denitrificans OCh 114T, those three values were 71.8, 68.4 and 14.2%, respectively. All values are far lower than the thresholds (95–96% for ANI, 97% for AAI and 70% for dDDH) generally accepted for new species delineation (Meier-Kolthoff et al. 2013; Richter and Rosselló-Móra 2009). Additionally, based on the constructed phylogenomic tree (Fig. 3), strain AM1-D1T formed a separate branch clustered with S. sabulilitoris HSMS-29T which was isolated from a marine sand sample collected from the Yellow Sea, South Korea (Park et al. 2019). In addition, the comparison of genomic characteristics including the genomic sizes, G+C contents and gene numbers also can clearly distinguish strain AM1-D1T from its closely related species within the genus Sulfitobacter, and also those phylogenetic neighbors within other genus. These results strongly support the species delineation of strain AM1-D1T from other type strains of the genus Sulfitobacter, and hence strain AM1-D1T is proposed as a novel species of Sulfitobacter.
Chemotaxonomic analysis
As shown in Table 2, the chemotaxonomic analysis of the cellular fatty acids showed that the predominant fatty acid profiles (> 10%) of strain AM1-D1T were C18:1 ω7c (42.1%), C19:0 cyclo ω8c (23.5%) and C16:0 (15.2%). Additionally, two other fatty acid compositions with lower portions including C18:1 ω7c 11-methyl (7.3%) and C18:0 (3.7%) were also found in strain AM1-D1T. The result was in agreement with those of the other members of Sulfitobacter. However, strain AM1-D1T also possessed high amount of C19:0 cyclo ω8c (23.5%) and minor amount of C12:1 3-OH (2.7%). These unique components can be used to clearly distinguish strain AM1-D1T from its closely related species. The isoprenoid quinone of strain AM1-D1T was ubiquinone-10 (Q-10). The main polar lipids of strain AM1-D1T were determined as diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylcholine (PC), one unidentified phospholipid (PL) and one unidentified lipid (L). Unlike its closet relative, Sulfitobacter noctilucae NB-68T had DPG, PG, PE and minor amounts of three unidentified lipids (L1-3) as the major polar lipids profile (Fig. S5). Both characterizations were consistent with the common chemotaxonomic profile of the other members of Sulfitobacter (Sorokin 1995; Fukui et al. 2014, 2015; Park et al. 2015, 2019; Wang et al 2021).
Genome comparison of strain AM1-D1 T
Circular representation of the genome of strain AM1-D1T including one circular chromosome and five circular plasmids is shown in Fig. 4. The size of the whole genome of strain AM1-D1T is 4.69 Mb with one chromosome of 3.84 Mb with a DNA G+C content of 64.9%. And the lengths of five plasmids were 185, 95, 15, 205 and 348 Kb with their corresponding G+C contents of 65.6, 60.3, 58.7, 63.7 and 61.6%, respectively (Table 1). Based on the complete genome sequence, the whole genomic DNA G+C content of strain AM1-D1T was calculated as 64.6%, which was higher than its five closely related type strains. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the cells of strain AM1-D1T were approximately 0.3–0.4 μm wide and 0.7–2.1 μm long (Fig. S1), which were smaller than the related strains.
According to NCBI database records, total 17 genomes of type strains of Sulfitobacter were chosen to conduct the core- and pan-genome analysis. The constructed two functional curves showed that the total gene families and core gene families reached to maximal and minimal values of 16,295 and 1530, respectively (Fig. 5). The gene accumulation curve exhibited an increasing tendency with the increasing number of the pan-genome genes. But the core-genome curve showed a descending trend (Fig. 5). Therefore, the pan-genome was considered in an open state since the pan-genome trend curve did not reach a plateau with the increasing numbers of bacterial strains. In contrast, the core genome curve was thought to be conserved. As shown in Fig. 5, the gene occurrence plot showed that 1530 core genes were shared by 17 type Sulfitobacter genomes, accounting for 33.2% to 45.8% of the genome repertoire, respectively. Additionally, about 7.7% to 25.5% of unique genes were only found in S. dubius DSM 16472T and S. pseudonitzschiae DSM 26824T, respectively, indicating a species-specific profile within Sulfitobacter members.
Comparative analysis of function genes
The distribution of functional categories of core and unique genes was compared and the result is shown in Fig. 6. It indicated that the most abundant functions in core genes of Sulfitobacter spp. were associated with amino acid transport and metabolism, general function prediction only, translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis, and energy production and conversion, which were closely related to necessary nutrients obtaining from varied environments and maintaining a basic lifestyle. Function unknown accounted for a large proportion, which indicated current lacking of in-depth revealing of Sulfitobacter genomes. For KEGG assignment, the five most abundant core genes were distributed into KEGG categories about amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, nucleotide metabolism and overview, suggesting adaptive evolution exist within member of the genus Sulfitobacter. However, genes related to cellular, development, digestive system, immune diseases, immune system and substance dependence were only assigned in core genes. Functional analysis revealed that the abundances and categories of core and unique genes assigned into KEGG categories were diverse in member of the genus Sulfitobacter. Additionally, series of essential functional gene clusters responsible for vitamin B12 (cob), photosynthesis pigments carotenoids (crt), cysteine biosynthesis (cys), sulfur oxidation (sox), and utilization of two dissolved organic sulfur (DOS) exometabolites from marine dinoflagellates, taurine (tau) and DMSP (dmd) (Landa et al. 2019; Landry et al. 2018), were found in the genome of strain AM1-D1T (Fig. 3), which are pivotal components governing the dynamic algae-bacteria interactions (Amin et al. 2012).
Bacterial EPS bioflocculanting and MGP potential
Based on our bacterial bioflocculanting assay, the extracted EPS produced by strain AM1-D1T were subjected to BFC bioactivity screening assay (Mu et al. 2019). The comparison of BFC of series of EPS concentrations on KCSF was performed. Pane A in Fig. 7 shows the concentration-dependent manner of BBF bioactivity of EPS produced by strain AM1-D1T. It can be seen that the BFC reached the maximum of 92.5 ± 6.2% at 0.40 g L−1 of bacterial EPS produced by strain AM1-D1T, which exhibiting higher bioflocculanting deficiency compared with the strains we previously reported (Duan et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2020a, b, c; Yang et al. 2021; Zhang et al 2021). For MGP assay, strain AM1-D1T demonstrated obvious microalgae growth-promoting activity when co-cultured with host A. minutum amtk4 (pane B in Fig. 7). Those results clearly indicate that strain AM1-D1T is a new MGPB isolated from marine phycosphere, and produces novel bioactive bioflocculating EPS with potential environmental and biotechnological implications (Mu et al 2019; Duan et al. 2020; Yang et al 2021; Zhang et al 2021).
Taxonomic conclusion
On the basis of phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic analyses, strain AM1-D1T represents a novel species of the genus Sulfitobacter. Therefore, we formally propose Sulfitobacter alexandrii sp. nov., and AM1-D1T as the type strain. Strain AM1-D1T appears to be a versatile bacterium with potential for environmental and biotechnological applications including microalgae growth-promoting potential and the production of natural EPS biosurfactans.
Description of Sulfitobacter alexandrii sp. nov.
Sulfitobacter alexandrii (a.le.xan'dri.i. N.L. gen. n. alexandrii of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum, the isolation source of the type strain).
Cells are Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, non-sporulating, non-motile, rod-shaped with approximately 0.3–0.4 μm wide and 0.7–2.1 μm long with PHA granules inside. Colonies are circular, convex, smooth, lightly yellowish grown on MA for 2 days at 30 °C. Growth occurs at 15–37 °C, optimum at 30 °C. Grows at 1.0–4.0% (w/v) NaCl with an optimum at 3.0% (w/v) NaCl. Tolerates a range of pH between 5.0 and 10.0 with the optimum at 7.0. Aesculin and Tween 20 are hydrolysed. Gelatin, Tween 40 and 80 are not hydrolysed. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite. Indole is not produced from tryptophan and glucose fermentation does not occur. Oxidase and catalase are both positive. Positive for urease activities, alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, acid phosphatase and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, and negative for lipase (C14), cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase and α-fucosidase. The predominant cellular fatty acids are C18:1 ω7c, C19:0 cyclo ω8c and C16:0. The predominant isoprenoid quinone is Q-10. The main polar lipids are phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and diphosphatidylglycerol. The genome has 3.84-Mb circular chromosome and five circular plasmids of the lengths of 185, 95, 15, 205 and 348 Kb, respectively, with the genomic DNA G+C content of 64.6 mol%.
The type strain is AM1-D1T (= CCTCC AB 201696T = KCTC 52626T), which was isolated from phycosphere microbiota of highly-toxic and HAB dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum amtk4 which was collected from a Milkfish culture pond at TungKang Taiwan during an algal bloom occurred in July, 1994, and then routinely cultivated in the laboratory. The DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA gene sequences of the strain AM1-D1T is MH197128. The complete genome sequences of strain AM1-D1T have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers CP018076, CP018077, CP018078, CP018079, CP018080 and CP018081 for its circular chromosome and five circular plasmids, respectively.
Availability of data and materials
Strain AM1-D1T has been deposited in two independent international culture centers (CCTCC in China, and KCTC in South Korea) with the deposition no. CCTCC AB 201696 and KCTC 52626, respectively.
Abbreviations
- AAI:
-
Average amino acid identity
- ABI:
-
Algae-bacteria interactions
- ANI:
-
Average nucleotide identity
- MGPB:
-
Microalgae growth-promoting bacteria
- dDDH:
-
Digital DNA–DNA hybridization
- DPG:
-
Diphosphatidylglycerol
- DMSP:
-
Dimethylsulfoniopropionate
- EPS:
-
Exopolysaccharides
- HAB:
-
Harmful algal blooms
- MA:
-
Marine agar
- MB:
-
Marine broth
- ML:
-
Maximum likelihood
- MP:
-
Maximum parsimony
- NJ:
-
Neighbour joining
- PC:
-
Phosphatidylcholine
- PE:
-
Phosphatidylethanolamine
- PG:
-
Phosphatidylglycerol
- PHB:
-
Polyhydroxybutyrate
- PL:
-
Phospholipids
- PM:
-
Phycosphere microbiota
- PMP:
-
Phycosphere microbiome project
- UBCG:
-
Up-to-date bacterial core gene
References
Amin SA, Parker MS, Armbrust EV (2012) Interactions between diatoms and bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:667–684
Buchan A, González JM, Moran MA (2005) Overview of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(10):5665–5677
Cho JC, Vergin KL, Morris RM, Giovannoni SJ (2004) Lentisphaera araneosa gen. nov., sp. nov, a transparent exopolymer producing marine bacterium, and the description of a novel bacterial phylum, Lentisphaerae. Environ Microbiol 6:611–621
Chou HN, Chen YM, Chen CY (2004) Variety of PSP toxins in four culture strains of Alexandrium minutum collected from southern Taiwan. Toxicon 43:337–340
Duan YH, Jiang ZW, Wu Z, Sheng Z, Yang X, Sun JY, Zhang XL (2020) Limnobacter alexandrii sp. nov., a thiosulfate-oxidizing, heterotrophic and EPS-bearing Burkholderiaceae isolated from cultivable phycosphere microbiota of toxic Alexandrium catenella LZT09. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113:1689–1698
Fukui Y, Abe M, Kobayashi M, Satomi M (2015) Sulfitobacter pacificus sp. nov., isolated from the red alga Pyropia yezoensis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 107:1155–1163
Fukui Y, Abe M, Kobayashi M, Shimada Y, Saito H, Oikawa H, Yano Y, Satomi M (2014) Sulfitobacter porphyrae sp. nov., isolated from the red alga Porphyra yezoensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:438–443
Gonzalez LE, Bashan Y (2000) Increased growth of the microalga chlorella vulgaris when coimmobilized and cocultured in alginate beads with the plant-growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1527–1531
Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T (1996) Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 42:457–469
Hong Z, Lai Q, Luo Q, Jiang S, Zhu R, Liang J, Gao Y (2015) Sulfitobacter pseudonitzschiae sp. nov., isolated from the toxic marine diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:95–100
Ivanova EP, Gorshkova NM, Sawabe T, Zhukova NV, Hayashi K, Kurilenko VV, Alexeeva Y, Buljan V, Nicolau DV, Mikhailov VV, Christen R (2004) Sulfitobacter delicatus sp. nov. and Sulfitobacter dubius sp. nov., respectively from a starfish (Stellaster equestris) and sea grass (Zostera marina). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:475–480
Kwak MJ, Lee JS, Lee KC, Kim KK, Eom MK, Kim BK, Kim JF (2014) Sulfitobacter geojensis sp. nov., Sulfitobacter noctilucae sp. nov., and Sulfitobacter noctilucicola sp. nov., isolated from coastal seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3760–3767
Kumari P, Bhattacharjee S, Poddar A, Das SK (2016) Sulfitobacter faviae sp. nov., isolated from the coral Faviaveroni. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:3786–3792
Landa M, Burns AS, Durham BP, Esson K, Nowinski B, Sharma S, Vorobev A, Nielsen T, Kiene RP, Moran MA (2019) Sulfur metabolites that facilitate oceanic phytoplankton-bacteria carbon flux. ISME J 13:2536–2550
Landry ZC, Vergin K, Mannenbach C, Block S, Yang Q, Blainey P, Carlson C, Giovannoni S (2018) Optofluidic single-cell genome amplification of sub-micron bacteria in the ocean subsurface. Front Microbiol 9:1152
Lin G, Chai J, Yuan S, Mai C, Cai L, Murphy RW, Zhou W, Luo J (2016) VennPainter: a tool for the comparison and identification of candidate genes based on venn diagrams. PLoS ONE 11:e0154315
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M (2013) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60
Mu J, Wang D, Yang G, Cui X, Yang Q (2019) Preparation and characterization of a substitute for Ruditapes philippinarum conglutination mud as a natural bioflocculant. Bioresour Technol 281:480–484
Park S, Kim IK, Lee JS, Yoon JH (2019) Sulfitobacter sabulilitoris sp. nov., isolated from marine sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:3230–3236
Park S, Jung YT, Won SM, Park JM, Yoon JH (2015) Sulfitobacter undariae sp. nov., isolated from a brown algae reservoir. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1672–1678
Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131
Sasser M (1990) Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids, MIDI Technical Note #101, pp1–7
Seymour JR, Amin SA, Raina JB, Stocker R (2017) Zooming in on the phycosphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton–bacteria relationships. Nat Microbiol 2:1–12
Shiba T (1991) Roseobacter litoralis gen. nov., sp. nov., and Roseobacter denitrificans sp. nov., aerobic pink-pigmented bacteria which contain Bacteriochlorophyll a. Syst Appl Microbiol 14:140–145
Sorokin DY (1995) Sulfitobacter pontiacus gen. nov., sp. nov. a new heterotrophic bacterium from the Black Sea, specialized on sulfite oxidation. Mikrobiologiya 64:354–365
Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV (2000) The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28:33–36
Tindall BJ, Tomlinson GA, Hochstein LI (1987) Polar lipid composition of a new halobacterium. Syst Appl Microbiol 9:6–8
Wagner-Döbler I, Biebl H (2006) Environmental biology of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Annu Rev Microbiol 60:255–280
Wang CN, Liu Y, Wang J, Du ZJ, Wang MY (2021) Sulfitobacter algicola sp. nov., isolated from green algae. Arch Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02213-w
Yang Q, Feng Q, Zhang B, Gao J, Sheng Z, Xue Q, Zhang X (2021) Marinobacter alexandrii sp. nov., a novel yellow-pigmented and algae growth-promoting bacterium isolated from marine phycosphere microbiota. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-021-01551-5
Yang Q, Jiang Z, Zhou X, Zhang R, Xie Z, Zhang S, Wu Y, Ge Y, Zhang X (2020a) Haliea alexandrii sp. nov., isolated from phycosphere microbiota of the toxin-producing dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70(2):1133–1138
Yang Q, Zhang X, Li L, Zhang R, Feng L, Zhang R, Feng L, Mu J (2018) Ponticoccus alexandrii sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from the marine toxigenic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 111:995–1000
Yang Q, Jiang Z, Zhou X, Xie Z, Wang Y, Wang D, Zhang X (2020b) Saccharospirillum alexandrii sp. nov., isolated from the toxigenic marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella LZT09. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:820–826
Yang X, Jiang Z, Zhang J, Zhou X, Zhang X, Wang L, Yu T, Wang Z, Bei J, Dong B, Dai Z, Yang Q, Chen Z (2020c) Mesorhizobium alexandrii sp. nov., isolated from sphycosphere microbiota of PSTs-producing marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum amtk4. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113:907–917
Zhang X, Li G, Ge Y, Iqbal MN, Yang X, Cui Z, Yang Q (2021) Sphingopyxis microcytisis sp. nov., a novel bioactive exopolysaccharides-bearing Sphingomonadaceae isolated from the Microcytis phycosphere. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-021-01563-1
Zhang X, Ma L, Tian X, Huang H, Yang Q (2015a) Biodiversity study of intracellular bacteria closely associated with paralytic shellfish poisoning dinoflagellates Alexandrium tamarense and A. minutum. Int J Environ Resour 4:23–27
Zhang X, Tian X, Ma L, Feng B, Liu Q, Yuan L, Fan Q, Huang H, Yang Q (2015b) Biodiversity of the symbiotic bacteria associated with toxic marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense. J Biosci Med 3:23–28
Zhang X, Yang X, Wang S, Jiang Z, Xie Z, Zhang L, Yang Q (2020) Draft genome sequences of nine cultivable heterotrophic proteobacteria isolated from phycosphere microbiota of toxic Alexandrium catenella LZT09. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e00281-e320
Zhou X, Zhang X, Jiang Z, Yang X, Zhang X, Yang Q (2021) Combined characterization of a new member of Marivita cryptomonadis, strain LZ-15-2 isolated from cultivable phycosphere microbiota of toxic HAB dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella LZT09. Braz J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00463-w
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Prof. Hong-non Chou at National Taiwan University for kindly providing the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum amtk4. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41876114), Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong (2020B0202080004), Special Fund of Yinling of Guangdong (2020A1313030131), and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang (LY18D060007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
QY and XLZ conceived the project and designed the experiments; QY and YMG performed the experiments; QY, NMI, XY and XLZ analyzed the data; QY and XZ drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA gene sequences of the strain AM1-D1T is MH197128. The complete genome sequences of strain AM1-D1T have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers CP018076 to CP018081 for its circular chromosome and five circular plasmids, respectively.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Q., Ge, Ym., Iqbal, N.M. et al. Sulfitobacter alexandrii sp. nov., a new microalgae growth-promoting bacterium with exopolysaccharides bioflocculanting potential isolated from marine phycosphere. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 114, 1091–1106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-021-01580-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-021-01580-0