Abstract
The paper presents the concept of decision aiding process as an extension of the decision process. The aim of the paper is to analyse the type of activities occurring between a “client” and an “analyst” both engaged in a decision process. The decision aiding process is analysed both under a cognitive point of view and an operational point of view: i.e. considering the “products”, or cognitive artifacts the process will deliver at the end. Finally the decision aiding process is considered as a reasoning process for which the update and revision problems hold.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abualsamh, R. A., Carlin, B., & McDaniel, R. R. (1990). Problem structuring heuristics in strategic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 159–174.
Allais, M. (1979). The so-called Allais paradox and rational decisions under uncertainty. In O. Hagen & M. Allais (Eds.), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox (pp. 437–681). Reidel: Dordrecht.
Bana e Costa, C. A. (1996). Les problématiques de l’aide à la décision: vers l’enrichissement de la trilogie choix-tri-rangement. RAIRO/ Recherche Opérationnelle, 30(2), 191–216.
Bana e Costa, C. A., Ensslin, L., Correa, E. C., & Vansnick, J.-C. (1999). Decision support systems in action: integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process. European Journal of Operational Research, 113, 315–335.
Banville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J.-M., & Boulaire, C. (1998). A stakeholder approach to MCDA. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15, 15–32.
Bell, D., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. (1988). Decision making: descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Belton, V., Ackermann, F., & Shepherd, I. (1997). Integrated support from problem structuring through alternative evaluation using COPE and V-I-S-A. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 115–130.
Benson, K. J. (1975). The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 229–249.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, Th. (1966). The social construction of reality: a treatise its the sociology of knowledge. New York: Garden City.
Binbasioglu, M. (2000). Problem structuring support for collaboration and problem solving. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 40, 54–63.
Borcherding, K., Eppel, T., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1991). Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Science, 37(12), 1603–1619.
Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A., & Vincke, Ph. (2000). Evaluation and decision models: a critical perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A., & Vincke, Ph. (2007). Evaluation and decision models: stepping stones for the analyst. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Brailsford, S. C., Potts, C. N., & Smith, B. M. (1999). Constraint satisfaction problems: algorithms and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 119, 557–581.
Brown, R. V. (1989). Toward a prescriptive science and technology of decision aiding. Annals of Operations Research, 19, 467–483.
Brown, R. V., & Vári, A. (1992). Towards a research agenda for prescriptive decision science: the normative tempered by the descriptive. Acta Psychologica, 1–3, 33–48.
Buchanan, J., Henig, E. J., & Henig, M. (1998). Objectivity and subjectivity in the decision making process. Annals of Operations Research, 80, 333–345.
Capurso, E., & Tsoukiàs, A. (2003). Decision aiding and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the EURO Working Group on MCDA, Fall 2003. Available on line at http://www.inescc.pt/~ewgmcda.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York: Wiley.
Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. New York: Wiley.
Chu, P., Moskowitz, H., & Wong, R. T. (1988). Robust interactive decision-analysis (RID): an overview. Acta Psychologica, 68, 255–269.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olson, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.
Corner, J., Buchanan, J., & Henig, M. (2001). Dynamic decision problem structuring. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10(3), 129–142.
Courtney, J. F., & Paradice, D. B. (1993). Studies in managerial problem formulation systems. Decision Support Systems, 9, 413–423.
David, A. (2001). Models implementation: a state of the art. European Journal of Operational Research, 134, 459–480.
De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S. O., Lo Cascio, S., & Munda, G. (2000). Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation, an empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34, 267–282.
Dias, L. C., & Tsoukiàs, A. (2004). On the constructive and other approaches in decision aiding. In C. A. Hengeller, J. Figueira & J. Clímaco (Eds.), Proceedings of the 56th meeting of the EURO MCDA working group (pp. 13–28). CCDRC, Coimbra, October 2004.
Eden, C. (1988). Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research, 36, 1–13.
Eden, C. (1994). Cognitive mapping and problem structuring for system dynamics model building. System Dynamics Review, 10, 257–276.
Eden, C., Jones, S., & Sims, D. (1983). Messing about in problems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility theory for decision making. New York: Wiley.
Fishburn, P. C. (1982). Nontransitive measurable utility. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 26, 31–67.
French, S. (1988). Decision theory—an introduction to the mathematics of rationality. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
Friend, J. K., & Hickling, A. (1987). Planning under pressure: the strategic choice approach. New York: Pergamon Press.
Genard, J.-L., & Pirlot, M. (2002). Multiple criteria decision aid in a philosophical perspective. In D. Boyssou, E. Jacquet-Lagrèze, P. Perny, R. Slowinski, D. Vanderpooten & Ph. Vincke (Eds.), Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: essays in honour of Bernard Roy (pp. 89–117). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Habermas, J. (1990). Logic of the social sciences. Boston: MIT Press.
Hatchuel, A. (2001). Towards design theory and expandable rationality: the unfinished program of Herbert Simon. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 260–273.
Hatchuel, A., & Molet, M. (1986). Rational modelling in understanding and aiding human decision making: about two case studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 178–186.
Humphreys, P. C., Svenson, O., & Vári, A. (1983). Analysis and aiding decision processes. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1981). Judgement under uncertainty—heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kakas, A. C., Mancarella, P., & Dung, P. M. (1994). The acceptability semantics for logic programs. In Proceedings of ICLP94 (pp. 504–519).
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking. A path to creative decision making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Keller, L. R., & Ho, J. L. (1988). Decision problem structuring: generating options. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18, 715–728.
Kouvelis, P., & Yu, G. (1997). Robust discrete optimization and its applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Lacan, J. (1968). The language of the self: the function of language in psychoanalysis. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Lacan, J. (1995). Écrits. Paris: Seuil. First edition in 1966.
Landry, M. (1995). A note on the concept of problem. Organization Studies, 16, 315–343.
Landry, M., Malouin, J. L., & Oral, M. (1983a). Model validation in operations research. European Journal of Operational Research, 14, 207–220.
Landry, M., Pascot, D., & Briola, D. (1983b). Can DSS evolve without changing our view of the concept of problem? Decision Support Systems, 1, 25–36.
Landry, M., Banville, C., & Oral, M. (1996). Model legitimisation in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 92, 443–457.
Larichev, O. I., & Moshkovich, H. M. (1995). Unstructured problems and development of prescriptive decision making methods. In P. Pardalos, Y. Siskos & H. Zopounidis (Eds.), Advances in multicriteria analysis (pp. 47–80). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Lehaney, B., Martin, S., & Clarke, S. (1997). A review of problem structuring methodologies. Systemist, 19, 11–28.
Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: Wiley.
MacGregor, D. G., Lichtenstein, S., Baron, J., & Bossuyt, P. (1991). Problem structuring aids for quantitative estimation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 101–120.
Mackenzie, K. (1986). Virtual positions and power. Management Science, 32, 622–642.
Masser, I. (1983). The representation of urban planning-processes: an exploratory review. Environment and Planning B, 10, 47–62.
Massey, A. P., & Wallace, W. A. (1996). Understanding and facilitating group problem structuring and formulation: mental representations, interaction, and representation aids. Decision Support Systems, 17, 253–274.
Maturana, M. R., & Varela, F. J. (1984). Autopoiesis and cognition. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 530–554.
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Théoret, A. (1976). The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246–272.
Montgomery, H. (1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: towards a process models of decision making. In P. C. Humphreys, O. Svenson & A. Vári (Eds.), Analysing and aiding decision processes (pp. 343–369). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Montgomery, H., & Svenson, O. (1976). On decision rules and information processing strategies for choices among multiattribute alternatives. Skandinavian Journal of Psychology, 17, 283–291.
Moraïtis, P., & Tsoukiàs, A. (2003). Decision aiding and argumentation, 2003. Presented at EUMAS-03 Workshop. Available on line at http://www.lamsade.dauphine.fr/~tsoukias/recent.html.
Mousseau, V. (1995). Eliciting information concerning the relative importance of criteria. In P. Pardalos, Y. Siskos & C. Zopounidis (Eds.), Advances in multicriteria analysis (pp. 17–43). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Mousseau, V. (1997). Compensatoriness of preferences in matching and choice. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 22(1), 3–20.
Mousseau, V., Dias, L. C., Figueira, J., Gomes, C., & Clímaco, J. N. (2003). Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 72–93.
Newstead, S. E., Thompson, V. A., & Handley, S. J. (2002). Generating alternatives: a key component in human reasoning? Memory and Cognition, 30, 129–137.
Norese, M. F. (1988). A multidimensional model by a multiactor system. In B. R. Munier & M. F. Shakun (Eds.), Compromise, negotiation and group decision (pp. 263–276). Reidel: Dordrecht.
Norese, M. F. (1996). A process perspective and multicriteria approach in decision-aiding contexts. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 5, 133–144.
Norese, M. F., & Ostanello, A. (1984). Planning processes and technician interventions: an integrated approach. Sistemi Urbani, 2, 247–259.
Norese, M. F., & Ostanello, A. (1989). Identification and development of alternatives: introduction to the recognition of process typologies. In A. G. Lockett & G. Islei (Eds.), LNEMS: Vol. 335. Improving decision making in organisations (pp. 112–123). Springer: Berlin.
Nutt, P. C. (1984). Types of organizational decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 414–450.
Ostanello, A. (1990). Action evaluation and action structuring—different decision aid situations reviewed through two actual cases. In C. A. Bana e Costa (Ed.), Readings in multiple criteria decision aid (pp. 36–57). Springer: Berlin.
Ostanello, A. (1997). Validation aspects of a prototype solution implementation to solve a complex MC problem. In J. N. Clímaco (Ed.), Multicriteria analysis (pp. 61–74). Springer: Berlin.
Ostanello, A., & Tsoukiàs, A. (1993). An explicative model of ‘public’ interorganizational interactions. European Journal of Operational Research, 70, 67–82.
Paschetta, E., & Tsoukiàs, A. (2000). A real world MCDA application: evaluating software. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 9, 205–226.
Pidd, M. (1988). From problem-structuring to implementation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, 115–121.
Poulton, E. C. (1994). Behavioral decision theory: a new approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raiffa, H. (1970). Decision analysis—introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Addison–Wesley: Reading. Traduction française: Analyse de la décision: introduction aux choix en avenir incertain, Dunod, 1973
Rios Insua, D., & Martin, J. (1991). On the foundations of robust decision making. In S. Rios (Ed.), Decision theory and decision analysis: trends and challenges (pp. 103–111). Kluwer Academic: Berlin.
Rosenhead, J. (1989). Rational analysis of a problematic world. New York: Wiley. 2nd revised edition in 2001.
Roy, B. (1993). Decision science or decision-aid science? European Journal of Operational Research, 66, 184–203.
Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Roy, B. (1998). A missing link in OR-DA, robustness analysis. Foundation of Control Engineering, 23(3), 141–160.
Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Paris: Economica.
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley. Second revised edition, 1972.
Schaffer, G. (1988). Savage revisited. In D. Bell, H. Raiffa & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: descriptive, normative and prescriptive interactions (pp. 193–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shakun, M. F. (1991). Airline buyout: evolutionary systems design and problem restructuring in group decision and negotiation. Management Science, 37, 1291–1303.
Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behaviour: a study of decision making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Mac Millan.
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1983). Preference reversals: a broader perspective. American Economic Review, 73, 596–605.
Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts Savage’s axiom? Behavioral Science, 19, 368–373.
Smith, G. F. (1988). Towards a heuristic theory of problem structuring. Management Science, 34, 1489–1506.
Smith, G. F. (1989). Representational effects on the solving of an unstructured decision problem. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 19, 1083–1090.
Stamelos, I., & Tsoukiàs, A. (2003). Software evaluation problem situations. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 273–286.
Svenson, O. (1996). Decision making and the search for fundamental psychological regularities: what can we learn from a process perspective? Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 65, 252–267.
Sycara, K. (1991). Problem restructuring in negotiation. Management Science, 37, 1248–1268.
Tsoukiàs, A. (2003). From decision theory to decision aiding methodology. Technical report, 2003-21, DIMACS, Rutgers University, to appear in European Journal of Operational Research.
Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31–48.
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281–299.
Tversky, A. (1977). On the elicitation of preferences: descriptive and prescriptive considerations. In D. Bell, R. L. Keeney & H. Raiffa (Eds.), Conflicting objectives in decisions (pp. 209–222). Wiley: New York.
Vanderpooten, D. (2002). Modelling in decision aiding. In D. Bouyssou, E. Jacquet-Lagrèze, P. Perny, R. Slowinski, D. Vanderpooten & Ph. Vincke (Eds.), Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: essays in honour of Bernard Roy (pp. 195–210). Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht.
Vári, A., & Vescenyi, J. (1983). Pitfalls of decision analysis: examples of r and d planning. In Analysing and aiding decision processes (pp. 183—195). North Holland: Amsterdam.
Vincke, Ph. (1992). Multicriteria decision-aid. New York: Wiley.
Vincke, Ph. (1999a). Robust and neutral methods for aggregating preferences into an outranking relation. European Journal of Operational Research, 112(2), 405–412.
Vincke, Ph. (1999b). Robust solutions and methods in decision aid. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 8(3), 181–187.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Second edition in 1947, third in 1954.
von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavorial research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wakker, P. P. (1989). Additive representations of preferences—a new foundation of decision analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: W.W. Norton.
Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change; principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.
Weber, E. U., & Çoskunoǧlu, O. (1990). Descriptive and prescriptive models of decision making: implications for the development of decision aid. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Mans and Cybernetics, 20, 310–317.
Weber, M., & Borcherding, K. (1993). Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 67, 1–12.
Wong, H.-Y., & Rosenhead, J. (2000). A rigorous definition of robustness analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 176–182.
Woolley, R. N., & Pidd, M. (1981). Problem structuring: a literature review. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 32, 197–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsoukiàs, A. On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective. Ann Oper Res 154, 3–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0187-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0187-z