Abstract
In contrast to earlier in the HIV/AIDS pandemic, net of other demographic factors, formal education acts as a preventative factor in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite this trend, there has been almost no research on the causal mechanisms behind the widely reported education effect. Consistent with the education effect, structural equation modeling of the influence of education attainment on condom use with Demographic Health Survey data from nine sub-Saharan Africa nations collected between 2003 and 2005 finds that net of control variables, there is a robust, positive influence of education on condom use among sexually risky adults. Information-transfer and attitude change, the two most commonly assumed educational influences on the use of condoms, are tested, and although education attainment increases acquisition of basic facts and the inculcation of positive attitudes about HIV/AIDS, these factors have only weak influence on condom use. Given this, a new hypothesis about education’s enhancement of health reasoning is developed from neuro-developmental and decision-making research. Modeling finds that education robustly influences health reasoning ability and this factor mediates a significant proportion of the education effect on condom use. The results raise concern about the enormous effort by NGOs in the region to use mainly fact- and attitude-based educational programs to reduce future HIV infections. Future research on the causal mechanisms behind the association between education and HIV/AIDS prevention should focus how on schooling enhances the cognitive skills needed for health reasoning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
A substantial literature on health consistently reports that attainment of formal education is negatively related with disease and premature mortality, as education often acts as a “social vaccine” lowering unhealthy risk-taking and leading to effective preventative [1–6]. As a recent analysis of 11 sub-Saharan African (hereafter SSA) nations and other studies find, the impact of formal education on the spread of HIV infection in SSA has shifted over time from being an unusual risk factor in a period marked by widespread misunderstanding and misinformation about the disease in the region until the mid-1990s when education became a social vaccine among younger cohorts [7–13]. While there is much conjecture over the cause behind the widely-reported association between education and health, along with frequent calls for gaining a clear scientific understanding of the education effect, there has been virtually no research aimed at identifying the causal mechanism [14–17]. With nationally representative Demographic Health Survey (hereafter DHS) data from nine SSA countries, initial analysis tests two of the most common assumptions about how education increases the use of latex condoms as a HIV preventative strategy among adults with multiple, non-spousal, sexual partners, a population at high-risk of contracting HIV.
Upon finding that these assumptions are only weakly supported, a new hypothesis emerging from neuro-developmental and decision-making research about the causal influence of education is tested in subsequent analysis. Implications of the results raise concern about the enormous effort by NGOs in SSA to use mainly fact- and attitude-based educational programs to reduce future HIV infections.
Hypotheses
Since the mid-1990s, educational attainment has shifted to be a protective factor against HIV infection in SSA [7, 18]. Most of the protective shift has been attributed to changes in behaviors explicitly targeted in HIV prevention curricula: abstinence, being faithful to one sexual partner, and condom use for individuals with multiple sexual partners [19]. Similarly, in the data used here, net of economic status and other demographic characteristics, there is an association between education and the HIV prevention strategy of latex condom use among sexually risky adults in SSA. Specially, the number of years of formal education is positively associated with condom use among adults with non-spousal, multiple sexual partners. Attending school has a direct effect on health and prevention of disease; but what is it about education that leads to better health?
The first of the two most commonly assumed causal mechanisms is the “information-transfer” argument: Formal education increases an individual’s basic facts about the physical causes and prevention of disease, and this information translates directly into better decisions about risk and health [15, 20]. In the case of HIV and AIDS in SSA, it is widely assumed that basic facts about heterosexual transmission of the virus and about condoms taught in school and in out-of-school programs leads to engagement in preventative behavior [21–28]. This yields the first hypothesis (H1): Formal education will be associated with knowing basic facts about HIV transmission and condoms; and knowing these facts will lead to increased use of condoms.
The second most commonly assumed causal mechanism is the “attitude-change” argument: formal education imparts a more positive attitude about people living with HIV and AIDS (hereafter PLWHA), and such an attitude reduces stigma and creates openness to adopt preventative strategies among more educated individuals. The second hypothesis (H2) is: Formal education will be associated with holding a positive attitude about PLWHA; and holding this attitude will lead to increased use of condoms.
While these arguments are widely assumed to be true, to our knowledge they have never been directly tested in relation to HIV/AIDS in SSA even though they are central to assumptions about how education influences health [15, 29]. Importantly, the analysis below shows that although attending school is robustly associated with acquiring basic facts about sexual transmission and a positive attitude about PLWHA, these achievements are only weakly related to condom use, and a significant proportion of education’s association with this prevention strategy remains unexplained.
A plausible causal mechanism behind the education effect on health is that schooling enhances higher-order cognitive skills (such as reasoning, novel problem-solving, effortful thinking, and task planning) that in turn help individuals transform basic facts into deeper knowledge that enhances risk assessment and decision-making skills. Recent research on neuro-development and decision-making establish three interrelated findings that support this mechanism.
First, neuro-development of high-order cognitive skills occurs at least through late adolescence and is highly responsive to environmental stimulation, such as that which routinely occurs in formal education. Studies of child neurological and psychiatric disorders and normally developed children without any clinical disorders show that higher-order cognitive skills occurs through late adolescence and is a distinct set of cognitive capacities [30–34]. Furthermore, a set of developmental fMRI experiments finds that when school-aged children solve new mathematics problems similar to those commonly used in mathematics curricula, the brain areas associated with higher-order cognitive skills are activated (i.e. recruited activations in the superior parietal cortices most prominently, the dorsolateral prefrontal, occipital–temporal, and premotor/supplementary cortices, the basal ganglia, and insula) [35].
Second, exposure to formal education is monotonically and linearly associated with enhanced higher-order cognitive skills. A meta-analysis of over 50 studies using naturalistic observation, post-hoc statistical comparisons, and cohort-sequential analysis concludes that for every year of school attended, net of socio-economic factors, there is a monotonic increase in cognitive skills related to IQ [36]. Also quasi-experimental studies of unschooled and schooled adults in subsistence-level farming communities finds that small amounts of schooling as a child yields higher-order cognitive skills among adults net of social and economic status, and work conditions [37–41].
Third, higher-order cognitive skills expressed as better numeracy are associated with better risk assessment and decision-making skills. Numeracy is chiefly learned in formal education, and experiments on risk assessment and the use of effective heuristics for decision making repeatedly find that such skills are positively associated with numeracy and higher-order cognitive skills [42, 43].
Taken together, these findings suggest a third hypothesis (H3): More years of formal education will be associated with better high-order reasoning skills; and these skills will enhance reasoning about HIV/AIDS transmission and prevention, which will lead to more condom use.
Methods
Data from nine national Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS: Cameroon, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania) collected from 2003 to 2005 are analyzed. The analytical sample is made up of sexual-risky adults (age 15–59); defined as those adults reporting sexual active with multiple partners as a single or in addition to a spouse in the 12 months preceding the DHS survey (N = 19,800). Sexually abstinent and faithful adults, including faithful polygamists, are excluded from the sample. Analysis sample sizes are Cameroon: 4,869; Ghana: 1,805; Guinea: 1,839; Kenya: 1,917; Leshoto: 3,043; Malawi: 1,413; Rwanda: 929; Senegal: 1,481; Tanzania: 2,504.
The variables in the estimated models include:
Dependent Variable:Condom (latex) use is measured by respondent’s report on use during last intercourse; and, across the nine country sample, 35% of respondents with multiple non-spousal sexual partners report condom use at last intercourse. Condom use has been shown to be an effective protective behavior against HIV infection among populations in developing nations [44, 45]. The percentage of subjects reporting use of a condom during the last sexual intercourse in the analytic sample by country is: Cameroon: 41; Ghana: 33; Guinea: 30; Kenya: 32; Leshoto: 33; Malawi: 31; Rwanda: 24; Senegal: 47; Tanzania: 28.
Independent Variables: Educational Attainment is the numeric value of the last grade successfully completed by the respondent, with a mean of 7 years (s.d. 4), and the sample included 14% unschooled adults. Basic Facts, the variable to test H1, is a count of correct answers to seven prompted questions about HIV transmission by the respondent (e.g. “Can people reduce their chances of getting AIDS virus by using a condom every time they have sex?”), with a mean and of 1.7 (s.d. 1.09). Attitudes, the variable to test H2, is a latent variable constructed from three attitudinal questions that were asked in all 9 countries regarding attitudes about PLWHA (e.g. “If a female teacher has the AIDS virus, should she be allowed to continue teaching in school?”) with a mean of 1.57 (s.d. 1.07). The DHS did not directly survey higher-order cognitive skills such as unique problem solving and working memory, but it did assess subjects’ ability to synthesize and apply information to reason about HIV transmission and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), therefore H3 is tested with a latent variable measuring Health Reasoning comprised of self-generated responses about complex myths about HIV and sexual disease transmission in both males and females. Correct answers required reasoning with information to produce deeper knowledge about the disease, and the variable has a mean of 0.94 (s.d. 0.84).
Control Variables: Included is Gender, Age, Martial status (marriage and cohabitation or unmarried), Residence (urban or rural), Index of economic resources, and Country. Also included is the Heckman self-selection probability to control for potential selection bias resulting from restricting the sample size to individuals with multiple non-spousal sexual partners; which was calculated in two steps: (1) with data from all respondents to the DHS, a logistic regression estimates the probability of having multiple sexual partners as a function of demographic characteristics; and, (2) derived from the equation in step 1, the predicted probability of each subject being in the analysis sample (i.e. those with multiple sexual partners) is entered into estimation of models testing the hypotheses.
Estimation: To test the hypotheses, structural equation models (SEM) of measurement and structural components are estimated in stages, examining the influence of formal education on condom usage through the mediation of Basic Facts, Attitudes, and Health Reasoning. In the first stage, we examine the covariation among observed variables through a system of equations to estimate the direct and indirect influence of education on acquisition of facts, positive attitudes, and health reasoning. The second stage of the model then estimates these variables’ influence on condom use for individuals with multiple non-spousal sexual partners [46–48]. This measurement model consists of relationships among observed variables for two latent constructs: Attitudes and Health Reasoning.
Results
Figure 1 shows the estimate of the total association between formal education and condom use among sexually risky adults across all countries, before the inclusion of the hypothesized mediating factors are introduced. Net of background variables including economic resources, every additional year of education increases the likelihood of condom use at last sexual intercourse by 0.20. The preventative effect of formal education is considerable: Among sexually risky adults, compared with the uneducated, individuals with 12 years of education are almost twice as likely to use a condom.
To understand the mediating roles of information and attitudes, we expand the model to examine the first step in the information-transfer (H1) and attitude-change (H2) hypotheses, Fig. 2 shows estimates of the influence of formal education on knowing basic facts about HIV transmission and possessing positive attitudes about PLWHA. In both cases as the hypotheses predicted, each additional year of formal education has a robust and significant influence on the acquisition of facts (0.19) and attitudes (0.43) net of the control variables.
As shown in Fig. 3, estimating the full model of information and attitudes mediating the relationship between education and condom use reveals only weak effects of facts and attitudes, and undermines both commonly assumed causal mechanisms behind the education effect on health decisions (H1 and H2). Although education influences an individual’s ability to retain basic facts about modes of HIV infection and inculcates a positive attitude, facts and attitude are not a sufficient explanation for the education effect on condom use. For sexually risky adults, facts and positive attitude increase condom use by 0.10, and thus the indirect effect of education via basic facts and attitude is respectively only 0.02 and 0.04 of the standard deviation in condom use for each additional year of education in comparison to the remaining direct effect of education of 0.14 of the standard deviation. These two factors only partially mediate the effect of education on use of a condom, accounting for just one-fourth of a year of education’s original influence.
The limited influence of both the information-transfer and attitude-change mechanisms begs the question of what is responsible for the observed persistent effect of education on condom use for risky adults? As described above, the education-enhanced cognition hypothesis offers a plausible causal agent in the education effect. Figure 4 shows the addition of the Health Reasoning construct as a third potential mediating factor, and there are three notable findings in this model. First, like Basic facts and Attitude, formal education influences reasoning about HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, but the education effect on reasoning (0.56) is stronger than its effect on acquisition of basic facts (0.18) and positive attitude (0.43).
Second, the inclusion of Health Reasoning in the model renders the earlier weak effects of basic facts and attitudes on condom use for risky adults statistically non-significant, or zero, and the indirect influence of years of education on condom use via reasoning is over one-fourth of a standard deviation (0.30) for every year of education. This robust effect size is shown in Fig. 5, which plots the predicted probabilities of condom use during last sexual intercourse for individuals with multiple non-spousal sexual partners. The causal path of formal education through Health Reasoning, even after controlling for the respondents’ Basic Facts and Attitude, significantly increases condom use during last sexual intercourse. An individual with 8 years of schooling doubles in their probability of condom use from 21% to almost 44% in comparison to an individual with no schooling, and the completion of senior secondary school (12 years) increases the predicted probability of condom use to 56%.
Third, the addition of Health Reasoning to the model completely mediates the initial direct effect of education on condom use among sexually risky adults, as the direct effect of education drops to a statistically insignificant value.
Limitations
Firstly, while the use of the DHS with its standard survey procedure and set of questions across national collections on similarly-defined nationally representative samples of adults in SSR adds significant validity to the results, as with all such omnibus data sets there is a need for caution in generalizing from limited measures. For example, the only available measure in the DHS of condom use—“condom use by respondent during last sexual intercourse”—is a restricted measure of proclivity compared to a measure of consistent condom use, and past research suggest that the former is not as related to HIV prevalence and engagement in protective behavior as the later [49]. Nevertheless, a number of other studies employing the last-intercourse measure found significant effects on reduction of HIV infection, and a significant positive association between condom-at-last-sex and consistent condom use [50–58]. So too, the measures about reasoning about HIV and STDs are proxies of cognitive skills and are not as direct as some reported in the literature on the links among education and cognition and health, but the ones used here do replicate the findings of more detailed and direct testing of cognitive skills [11].
Second, it should be noted that the DHS does not have indicators of social psychological outcomes from education such as self-efficacy and greater empowerment that in addition to facts and attitudes are often hypothesized as potential routes through which education could influence protective behavior, usually in the context of equality of social power in negotiations with a sexual partner. And although the path through health reasoning accounted for the entire education effect on condom use among sexually risky adults in SSA, future research should test other outcomes, particularly social psychological ones, relative to the cognitive argument advanced here. Similarly, it would be useful in future research to examine possible interactions between education and social-economic environments that might enhance or hinder the former’s effects on condom use.
Third, the DHS data allow one to go only so far in understanding the psychological process behind the model. At what point does more effective reasoning become a habit that turns the use of protective behavior into a habit? How exactly does improved health reasoning influence practice? The results here bring these kinds of questions to the fore, and answers require future detailed research on the links in the model tested here.
Conclusion
As a whole, these results strongly indicate that education-enhanced cognition is a plausible causal mechanism through which formal education enhances prevention strategies among sexually risky adults in SSA. The results of the second model indicate that the two commonly hypothesized mechanisms—information-transfer and attitude-change—linking formal education to sexual behavior in the HIV and AIDS pandemic are not sufficient explanations of the causal impact of education. Although education does increase acquisition of facts and positive attitude, these only weakly influence preventive condom use among sexually risky adults in SSA, and neither accounts for most of the observed co-variation between education and condom use. An adult’s ability to reason about HIV infection also increases with exposure to formal education as a child, but unlike facts and positive attitude, reasoning ability increases the likelihood of condom use, accounting for nearly all of the co-variation between education and condom use net of the adult’s demographic characteristics and economic resources. These results have important implications for both scientific research and HIV and AIDS prevention policy.
Future research on parsing out the causal mechanism of education should move towards the argument of education-enhanced cognition, and could effectively address what it is about education that enhances cognition and enables individuals well into adulthood to translate information into protective health decisions. The findings presented here support a growing research literature that finds enhanced cognitive and problem-solving skills through formal education [35–37, 59, 60]. Certainly minimum amounts of accurate information are necessary for effective reasoning and decision-making about health, but information alone is not sufficient to enable an individual to effectively use provided information across the myriad of social, environmental, and cultural risk factors related to HIV infection in SSA. The ability to effectively reason about disease and health plays a crucial role in education’s “social vaccine” against HIV infection [7, 61, 62].
The results also suggest why there was a shift in SSA from formal education acting as a risk factor earlier in the pandemic to acting as a social vaccine since the mid-1990s [7]. As misinformation was replaced with more accurate facts, such as HIV was indeed a real disease and heterosexual acts could cause infection in both males and females, the greater reasoning capacity on average among more schooled individuals likely enabled them to take the facts and form a more accurate assessment of their risks and an understanding of the need for protective behaviors [11]. Just as early in the pandemic, more educated individuals may continue to have greater opportunity for sexual liaisons, but now armed with accurate information their more effective reasoning skills makes them more likely to practice safer sex.
The second implication of this study is a need to critically assess the effectiveness of the substantial investments by bi- and multi-lateral agencies, NGOs, and governments in the region whose prevention programs chiefly target the acquisition of accurate facts and a positive attitude [29, 63]. The recent observations that formal education prevents new infections among younger adults in SSA are most likely due to the reasoning ability that education strengthens, rather than the heavy focus of NGO-based prevention programs on fact acquisition and attitude change [18, 29, 64–68].
Increasing facts and positive attitude about the modes of HIV transmission without a corresponding ability to apply these facts to complex social, cultural, and economic realities is an inadequate strategy to combat the spread of HIV. Without a more concerted effort to expand access to and quality of basic schooling and adult educational programming in SSA, the reasoning gap will continue to grow as the world’s largest population of unschooled and low-schooled people continue to be at greater risk of HIV infection. Current interventions may be successful in increasing the unschooled and low-schooled ability to retain facts about modes of transmission, but are not adequately providing the reasoning skills to apply these facts to effective behavioral strategies.
One-third of the world’s out-of-school children and the world’s largest unschooled adult population reside in SSA [69]. The results here support the recommendation that governments and NGOs in the region should focus on the cognitive benefits of including formal education as an integral part in the prevention of HIV and AIDS in the region. The results also show that education is so crucial for population health that beyond facilitating general access to schooling, SSA governments must embrace the primary goal of reducing barriers to regular school attendance, such as reducing school-related fees and biases towards schooling for females, as well as committing appropriate resources to raise the educational quality of mass public schooling.
References
Adams SJ. Educational attainment and health: evidence from a sample of older adults. Educ Econ. 2002;10(1):97–109.
Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff. 2002;21(2):60–76.
Backlund E, Sorlie PD, Johnson NJ. A comparison of the relationships of education and income with mortality: the national longitudinal mortality study. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(10):1373–84.
Feinstein L, Sabates R, Anderson TM, Sorhaindo A, Hammond C. What are the effects of education on health? In: Desjardins R, Schuller T, editors. Measuring the effects of education on health and civic engagement: proceedings of the Copenhagen symposium. Paris: OECD; 2006. p. 171–313.
Furnée CA, Groot W, van den Brink HM. The health effects of education: a meta-analysis. Eur J Pub Health. 2008;18(4):417–21.
Kitagawa EM, Hauser PM. Differential mortality in the United States: a study in socioeconomic epidemiology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1973.
Baker D, Collins JM, Leon J. Risk factor or social vaccine? The historical progression of the role of education in HIV and AIDS infection in sub-Saharan Africa. Prospects: Q Rev Comp Educ. 2009;38(4):467–86.
de Walque D, Nakiyingi-Miiro JS, Busingye J, Whitworth JA. Changing association between schooling levels and HIV-1 infection over 11 years in a rural population cohort in south-west Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10(10):993–1001.
Gow J. The HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa: implications for U.S. policy. Health Aff. 2002;21(3):57–69.
Kelly MJ. The encounter between HIV/AIDS and education. Harare: UNESCO, Sub-Regional Office for Southern Africa; 2000.
Peters E, Baker D, Dieckmann N, Leon J, Collins J. Explaining the education effect on health: a naturally-occurring experiment in Ghana. Psych Sci. 2010;in press
Bertozzi S, Martz T, Piot P. The Evolving HIV/AIDS response and the urgent tasks ahead: a timeline of events from 1981. Health Aff. 2009;28(6):1578–90.
Gregson S, Waddell H, Chandiwana S. School education and HIV control in sub-Saharan Africa: from discord to harmony? J Int Dev. 2001;13(4):467–85.
Lleras-Muney A. The relationship between education and adult mortality in the United States. Rev Econ Stud. 2005;72(1):189–221.
Mirowsky J, Ross CE. Education, social status, and health. New York: Aldine de Gruyer; 2003.
Phelan JC, Link BG, Diez-Roux A, Kawachi I, Levin B. “Fundamental causes” of social inequalities in mortality: a test of the theory. J Health Soc Behav. 2004;45(3):265–85.
Ross CE, Wu C. The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev. 1995;60(5):719–45.
Hargreaves JR, Bonell CP, Boler T, Boccia D, Birdthistle I, Fletcher A, et al. Systematic review exploring time trends in the association between educational attainment and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2008;22(3):403–14.
Kirby D. Changes in sexual behaviour leading to the decline in the prevalence of HIV in Uganda: confirmation from multiple sources of evidence. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(Suppl 2):ii35–41.
Nayga RM. Effect of schooling on obesity: is health knowledge a moderating factor? Educ Econ. 2001;9(2):129–37.
Adih WK, Alexander CS. Determinants of condom use to prevent HIV infection among youth in Ghana. J Adolesc Health. 1999;24(1):63–72.
Caldwell JC, Caldwell P, Quiggin P. The social context of AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Dev Rev. 1989;15(2):185–234.
Glick P, Sahn D. Are Africans practicing safer sex? Evidence from demographic and health surveys for eight countries. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2008;56(2):397–439.
Heald S. It’s never as easy as ABC: understandings of AIDS in Botswana. AJAR. 2002;1(1):1–10.
Houston V, Hovorka A. HIV/AIDS messages in Malawi and their implications for effective responses. AJAR. 2007;6(3):205–14.
Kirby D, Short L, Collins J, Rugg D, Kolbe L, Howard M, et al. School-based programs to reduce sexual risk behaviors: a review of effectiveness. Public Health Rep. 1994;109(3):339–60.
Merson MH, O’Malley J, Serwadda D, Apisuk C. The history and challenge of HIV prevention. Lancet. 2008;372(9637):475–88.
Snelling D, Omariba DWR, Hong S, Georgiades K, Racine Y, Boyle MH. HIV/AIDS knowledge, women’s education, epidemic severity, and protective sexual behaviour in low- and middle-income countries. J Biol Sci. 2007;39(3):421–42.
Horton R, Das P. Putting prevention at the forefront of HIV/AIDS. Lancet. 2008;372(9637):421–2.
Blair C. How similar are fluid cognition and general intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behav Brain Sci. 2006;29(02):109–25.
Duncan J, Burgess P, Emslie H. Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33(3):261–8.
Eslinger PJ, Flaherty-Craig CV, Benton AL. Developmental outcomes after early prefrontal cortex damage. Brain Cogn. 2004;55(1):84–103.
Shallice T, Burgess P. Higher-order cognitive impairments and frontal lobe lesions in man. Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 125–38.
Waltz JA, Knowlton BJ, Holyoak KJ, Boone KB, Mishkin FS, Santoa MM, et al. A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychol Sci. 1999;10(2):119–25.
Eslinger PJ, Blair C, Wangb JL, Lipovsky B, Realmuto J, Baker DP, et al. Developmental shifts in fMRI activations during visuospatial relational reasoning. Brain Cogn. 2009;69(1):1–10.
Ceci SJ. How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Dev Psychol. 1991;27(5):703–22.
Christian K, Bachman HJ, Morrison FJ. Schooling and cognitive development. In: Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko E, editors. Environmental effects on cognitive abilities. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. p. 287–335.
Cole M. Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1996.
Luria AR. Cognitive development: its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1976.
Stevenson HW, Parker T, Wilkinson A, Bonnevaux B, Gonzalez M, Greenfield PM. Schooling, environment, and cognitive development: a cross-cultural study. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1978;43(3):1–92.
Stevenson HW, Chen C, Booth J. Influences of schooling and urban-rural residence on gender differences in cognitive abilities and academic achievement. Sex Roles. 1990;23(9):535–51.
Bruine de Bruin W, Parker AM, Fischhoff B. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92(5):935–56.
Peters E, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Mazzocco K, Dickert S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(5):408–14.
Hearst N, Chen S. Condom promotion for AIDS prevention in the developing world: is it working? Stud Fam Plann. 2004;35(1):39–47.
Padian NS, Buvé A, Balkus J, Serwadda D, WJr Cates. Biomedical interventions to prevent HIV infection: evidence, challenges, and way forward. Lancet. 2008;372(9638):585–99.
Duncan OD. Introduction to structural equation models. New York: Academic Press; 1975.
Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.
Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 1998.
Luke N. Economic status, informal exchange, and sexual risk in Kisumu, Kenya. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2008;56(2):375–96.
Cleland J, Ali MM. Sexual abstinence, contraception, and condom use by young African women: a secondary analysis of survey data. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1788.
Glick P, Sahn D. Are Africans practicing safer sex? Evidence from demographic and health surveys for eight countries. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2008;56(2):397–439.
Hargreaves JR, Bonell CP, Morison LA, Kim JC, Phetla G, Porter JD, et al. Explaining continued high HIV prevalence in South Africa: socioeconomic factors, HIV incidence and sexual behaviour change among a rural cohort, 2001–2004. AIDS. 2007;21(Supplement 7):S39–48.
Rehle T, Shisana O, Pilay V, Zuma K, Puren A, Parker W. National HIV incidence measures—new insights into the South African epidemic. S Afr Med J. 2007;97(3):194–9.
Adih WK, Alexander CS. Determinants of condom use to prevent HIV infection among youth in Ghana. J Adolesc Health. 1999;24(1):63–72.
Brockerhoff M, Biddlecom AE. Migration, sexual behavior and the risk of HIV in Kenya. Int Migr Rev. 1999;33(4):833–56.
Hendriksen ES, Pettifor A, Lee SJ, Coates TJ, Rees HV. Predictors of condom use among young adults in South Africa: the reproductive health and HIV research unit national youth survey. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7):1241–8.
Prata N, Morris L, Mazive E, Vahidnia F, Stehr M. Relationship between HIV risk perception and condom use: evidence from a population-based survey in Mozambique. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006;32(4):192–200.
Tassiopoulos K, Kapiga S, Sam N, Ao TT, Hughes M, Seage GRIII. A case-crossover analysis of predictors of condom use by female bar and hotel workers in Moshi, Tanzania. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(2):552–60.
Blair C, Gamson D, Thorne S, Baker D. Rising mean IQ: cognitive demand of mathematics education for young children, population exposure to formal schooling, and the neurobiology of the prefrontal cortex. Intelligence. 2005;33(1):93.
Stevenson HW, Chen C, Lee SY, Fuligni AJ. Schooling, culture, and cognitive development. In: Lynn Okagaki RJS, editor. Directors of development: influences on the development of children’s thinking. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991. p. 243–68.
Keselman A, Kaufman DR, Patel VL. “You can exercise your way out of HIV” and other stories: the role of biological knowledge in adolescents. Sci Educ. 2004;88(4):548–73.
Keselman A, Kaufman DR, Kramer S, Patel VL. Fostering conceptual change and critical reasoning about HIV and AIDS. J Res Sci Teach. 2007;44(6):844–63.
Gleason-Morgan D. Dispelling common myths about HIV infection. J Pediatr Health Care. 1991;5(5):264–6.
Green EC, Halperin DT, Nantulya V, Hogle JA. Uganda’s HIV prevention success: the role of sexual behavior change and the national response. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(4):335–46.
Paul-Ebhohimhen V, Poobalan A, van Teijlingen E. A systematic review of school-based sexual health interventions to prevent STI/HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(4):1–13.
Plummer ML, Wight D, Obasi AIN, Wamoyi J, Mshana G, Todd J, et al. A process evaluation of a school-based adolescent sexual health intervention in rural Tanzania: the MEMA kwa Vijana programme. Health Educ Res. 2007;22(4):500–12.
Cohen S. Beyond slogans: lessons from Uganda’s experience with ABC and HIV/AIDS. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12:132–5.
Dworkin SL, Ehrhardt AA. Going beyond “ABC” to include “GEM”: critical reflections on progress in the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):13–8.
UNESCO. EFA global monitoring report: education for all by 2015, will we make it? Paris: UNESCO; 2008.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by NSF Grant SES-0826712, and the authors thank Ashley Frost and Francis Dodoo for comments on earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The views and opinions presented here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Agency for International Development or the U.S. Government.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, D.P., Leon, J. & Collins, J.M. Facts, Attitudes, and Health Reasoning About HIV and AIDS: Explaining the Education Effect on Condom Use Among Adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Behav 15, 1319–1327 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9717-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9717-9