Abstract
Introduction
Receiving negative performance feedback can elicit negative emotional reactions which can interfere with feedback acceptance and use. This study investigated emotional responses of family physicians’ participating in a multi-source feedback (MSF) program, sources of these emotions, and their influence upon feedback acceptance and use.
Methods
The authors interviewed 28 volunteer family physician participants in a pilot study of MSF, purposefully recruited to represent the range of scores. The study was conducted in 2003–2004 at Dalhousie University.
Results
Participants’ emotional reactions to feedback appeared to be elicited in response to an internal comparison of their feedback with self-perceptions of performance. Those agreeing with their feedback; i.e., perceiving it as generally consistent with or higher than self-perceptions responded positively, while those disagreeing with their feedback; i.e., seeing it as generally inconsistent with or lower than self-perceptions, generally responded with distress. For the latter group, these feelings were often strong and long-lasting. Some eventually accepted their feedback and used it for change following a long period of reflection. Others did not and described an equally long reflective period but one which focused on and questioned MSF procedures rather than addressed feedback use. Participants suggested providing facilitated reflection on feedback to enhance assimilation of troubling emotions and interpretation and use of feedback.
Conclusions
Negative feedback can evoke negative feelings and interfere with its acceptance. To overcome this, helpful interventions may include raising awareness of the influence of emotions, assisting recipients to focus their feedback on performance tasks, and providing facilitated reflection on feedback.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ashford S.J., Blatt R., VandeWalle D (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: a review of research on feedback- seeking behaviour in organizations Journal of Management 29(6): 773–799
Atwater L.E. Waldman D.A., Brett J.F. (2002). Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback Human Resources Management Review 41(2): 193–208
Bandura A. (1995). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control Freeman and Company, New York
Bennett H., Gatrell J., Packham R. (2004). Medical appraisal: collecting evidence of performance through 360 feedback Clinician in Management 12: 165–171
Boud D., Keough R., Walker D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning Kogan Page, London
Boud, D. (2002). The unexamined life is not the life of learning: rethinking assessment for lifelong learning. Professional lecture presented at Trent Park, Middlesex University, London UK
Bracken D.W., Timmreck C.W., Church A.H. (2001). The Handbook for Multisource Feedback Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Brett J.F., Atwater L. (2001). 360 Feedback: accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness Journal of Applied Psychology 86(5): 930–942
DeNisi A., Kluger A.N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executives 14(1): 129–139
Evans R., Elwyn G., Edwards A. (2004). Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians British Medical Journal 328(7450): 1240–1245
Fidler H., Lockyer J.M., Toews J., Violato C. (1999). Changing physician’ practices: the effect of individual feedback Academic Medicine 74(6): 702–714
Freidson E. (1994). Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gielen S., Dochy F., Diericks S. (2003). Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes true assessment effects In: Sigers M., Dochy F., Cascallar E. (eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: in Search of Qualities and Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 37–54
Goodstone M., Diamante T. (1998). Organizational use of therapeutic change: strengthening multisource feedback systems through interdisciplinary coaching Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 50(3): 152–163
Hall, W., Violato, C., Lewkonia, R., Lockyer, J., Fidler, H., Toews, J., et al. (1999). Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: The physician achievement review. Canadian Medical Association Journal 61:52–57
Johns C. (2002). Guided Reflection: Advancing Practice Blackwell publishing, Oxford, UK
Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory Psychological Bulletin 119: 254–284
Lipner R.S., Blank L.L., Leas B.F., Fortna G.S. (2002). The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification Acad Med 77(10): S64–S66
Lockyer J., Violato C., Fidler H. (2003). Likelihood of change: a study assessing surgeon use of multisource feedback data Teaching & Learning In Medicine 15(3): 168–174
Moon J. (1999). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice Stylus Publishing, Herdon, VA
Mory E.H. (2004). Feedback research revisited In: Jonassen D (ed) Handbook for Education Communications and Technology. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 745–783
Nova Scotia Physician Achievement Review (NSPAR) Program. (2005). <http://www.nspar.ca/>. Accessed 04/04/06. College of Physician and Surgeons of Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS
Ramsey P.G., Wenrich M.D., Carline J.D., Inui T.S., Larson E.B., LoGerfo J.P. (1993) Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance JAMA 269: 1655–60
Rice P.L., Ezzy D. (2000). Qualitative Research Methods Oxford University Press, Victoria, Australia
Sargeant J., Mann K., Ferrier S. (2005). Exploring family physicians’ reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness Medical Education 39(5): 497–504
Sargeant J.M., Mann K.V., Ferrier S.N., Langille D., Muirhead P.D., Hayes V.M. (2003). Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study Academic Medicine 10(Suppl): S42–S44
Smither J.W., London M., Reilly R.R. (2005). Does performance improve following multi source feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings Personnel Psychology 58: 33–66
Violato C., Marini A., Toews J., Lockyer J., Fidler H. (1997) Feasibility and psychometric properties of using peers, consulting physicians, co-workers, and patients to assess physicians Acad Med 72(10): S82–S84
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Suzanne Ferrier MSc, research associate, and Philip Muirhead MD, family physician, for their assistance with data interpretation and analysis. We are also grateful to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia for their continuing support of our research. The study was funded by research grants from the Medical Council of Canada and the Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D. et al. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv in Health Sci Educ 13, 275–288 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x