Article PDF
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
L. Amgoud (2003) “A formal framework for handling conflicting desires” T. D. Nielsen N. L. Zhang (Eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 7th European Conference (ECSQARU 2003), Vol. 2711 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer Verlag Berlin, Germany 552–563
L. Amgoud and S. Kaci, “On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 2004, (to appear).
L. Amgoud and N. Maudet, “Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report),” in S. Benferhat and E. Giunchiglia (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2002): Special session on Argument, Dialogue and Decision, pp. 399–407, (2002).
L. Amgoud N. Maudet S. Parsons (1998) “Modelling dialogues using argumentation” E. Durfee (Eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi–Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998) IEEE Press Boston MA, USA 31–38
L. Amgoud S. Parsons N. Maudet (2000) “Arguments dialogue, and negotiation” W. Horn (Eds) Proceedings of the European Conference on Articial Intelligence (ECAI 2000) IOS Press Amsterdam, Netherlands 338–342
Aristotle in W. D. Ross (ed.), Topics, Clarendon: Oxford, UK, 1928.
T. J. M. Bench-Capon (1997) ArticleTitle“Argument in artificial intelligence and law” Arti. Intell. Law 5 IssueID4 249–261 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008242417011
G. Brewka (1991) Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
C.I. Chesñevar A. Maguitman R. Loui (2000) ArticleTitle“Logical models of argument” ACM Comput. Surveys 32 IssueID4 337–383 Occurrence Handle10.1145/371578.371581
F. Dignum B. Dunin-Keplicz R. Berbrugge (2000) “Agent theory for team formation by dialogue” C. Castelfranchi Y. Lespérance (Eds) Intelligent Agents VII: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-2000), Vol. 1986 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer Verlag Berlin Germany 150–166
F. Dignum B. Dunin-Keplicz R. Berbrugge (2001) ArticleTitle“Creating collective intention through dialogue” Logic J. IGPL 9 IssueID2 289–303 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jigpal/9.2.289
J. Doyle. (1979) ArticleTitle“A truth maintenance system” Artifi. Intelli 12 231–272 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(79)90008-0
P. M. Dung (1995) ArticleTitle“On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games” Artifi. Intell 77 IssueID2 321–358 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
M. Elhadad (1995) ArticleTitle“Using argumentation in text generation” J. Pragmatics 24 189–220 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0378-2166(94)00096-W
M. Elvang-Gransson, P. Krause, and J. Fox, “Acceptability of arguments as ‘logical uncertainty’”. in M Clarke, R. Kruse, and S. Moral (eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU 1993), No. 747 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, pp. 85–90, 1993.
FIPA, “Communicative act library specification”, Technical Report XC00037H, Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, 2001.
J. Fox, P. Krause, and S. Ambler, “Arguments, contradictions and practical reasoning”. in: B. Neumann (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Arti.cial Intelligence (ECAI-1992), Vienna, Austria, pp. 623–627, 1992.
J. Fox S. Parsons (1998) “Arguing about beliefs and actions” A. Hunter S. Pasons (Eds) Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms, No. 1455 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer Verlag Berlin, Germany 266–302
A. García G.R. Simari (2004) ArticleTitle“Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach” Theory Practice Logic Program 4 95–138 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1471068403001674
M. Georgeff (1987) ArticleTitle“Planning” Annu Rev Computer Sci. 2 359–400 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.cs.02.060187.002043
P. Gárdenfors (1988) Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States MIT Press Cambridge MA, USA
T. F. Gordon and N. Karacapilidis, “The Zeno argumentation framework”, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AI and Law, ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, pp. 10–18, 1997.
C. L. Hamblin (1970) Fallacies Methuen London, UK
D. Hitchcock P. McBurney S. Parsons (2001) “A framework for deliberation dialogues” H. V. Hansen C. W. Tindale J. A. Blair R. H. Johnson (Eds) Proceedings of the 4th biennial conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of argumentation (OSSA 2001) Ontario Canada
E. J. Horvitz J. S. Breese M. Henrion (1988) ArticleTitle“Decision theory in expert systems and artificial intelligence” Int. J. Approx. Reason 2 247–302 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0888-613X(88)90120-X
J. Hulstijn, “Dialogue models for enquiry and transaction”. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2001.
J. Hulstijn L. Torre Particlevan der (2004) “Combining goal generation and planning in an argumentation framework” A. Hunter J. lang (Eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on Argument Dialogue and Decision at the International Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2004) Whistler Canada
A. Kakas and P. Moraitis, “Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents”, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2003), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 883–890, 2003.
N. C. Karunatillake, N. R. Jennings, I. Rahwan, and T. Norman, “Argument-based negotiation in a social context”, in S. Parsons, N. Maudet, P. Moraitis, and I. Rahwan (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArtMAS 2005), 2005.
P. Krause S. Ambler M. Elvang-Gøransson J. Fox (1995) ArticleTitle“A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty” Computational Intelligence 11 113–131
R. Loui (1987) ArticleTitle“Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference” Computational Intelligence 3 100–106
N. Maudet B. Chaib-draa (2003) ArticleTitle“Commitment-based and dialogue-game based protocols-new trends in agent communication language” Knowledge. Eng. Rev 17 IssueID2 157–179 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0269888902000486
P. McBurney S. Parsons (2003) “ Dialogue Game Protocols” M.-P. Huget (Eds) Communication in Multiagent Systems, Vol. 2650 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer Verlag Berlin, Germany 269–283
P. McBurney R. M. Eijk Particlevan S. Parsons L. Amgoud (2003) ArticleTitle“A dialogue-game protocol for agent purchase negotiations” J. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7 IssueID2 235–273 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024787301515
J. McCarthy (1980) ArticleTitle“Circumscription-a form of non-monotonic reasoning” Artifi. Intell 13 27–39 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(80)90011-9
S. Parsons C. Sierra N. Jennings (1998) ArticleTitle“Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing” J. Logic Comput 8 IssueID3 261–292 Occurrence Handle10.1093/logcom/8.3.261
S. Parsons M. J. Wooldridge L. Amgoud (2003) ArticleTitle“Properties and complexity of formal inter-agent dialogues” J Logic Comput 13 IssueID3 347–376 Occurrence Handle10.1093/logcom/13.3.347
J. L. Pollock (1987) ArticleTitle“Defeasible Reasoning” Cognitive Sci 11 481–518 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80017-4
J. L. Pollock (1998) ArticleTitle“The logical foundations of goal-regression planning in autonomous agents” Artifi Intell 106 IssueID2 267–334 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00100-3 Occurrence HandleMR1669744
H. Prakken, C. Reed, and D. N. Walton. “Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence”. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on arti.cial intelligence and law, ACM Press: New York NY, USA, pp. 32–41, 2003.
H. Prakken G. Sartor (2001) “The role of logic in computational models of legal argument: a criticial survey” A. Kakas F. Sadri (Eds) Computational Logic: From Logic Programming into the Future (In honour of Bob Kowalski) Vol 2048 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer Verlag Berlin, Germany 342–343
H. Prakken G. Vreeswijk (2002) “Logics for defeasible argumentation” D. Gabbay F. Guenthner (Eds) Handbook of Philosophical Logic vol 4 EditionNumber2 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, Netherlands 219–318
I. Rahwan, “Interest-based negotiation in multi-agent systems”. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 2004.
I. Rahwan S. D. Ramchurn N. R. Jennings P. McBurney S. Parsons L. Sonenberg (2003) ArticleTitle“Argumentation Based Negotiation” Knowledge Eng. Rev 18 IssueID4 343–375 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0269888904000098
C. Reed T. J. Norman (Eds) (2004) Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Vol. 9 of Argumentation Library Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands
R. Reiter (1980) ArticleTitle“A logic for default reasoning” Artif Intell 13 81–132 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4
S. V. Rueda A. J. García G. R. Simari (2002) ArticleTitle“Argument-based negotiation among BDI agents” Computer Sci. Technol 2 IssueID7 1–8
F. Sadri, F. Toni, and P. Torroni. “Logic agents, dialogues and negotiation: an abductive approach”. In: K. Stathis, and M. Schroeder (eds.), Proceedings of the AISB 2001 Symposium on Information Agents for E-Commerce, 2001.
G. R. Simari, A. J. Garcia, and M. Capobianco, “Actions, planning and defeasible reasoning”, in Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Whistler BC, Canada, pp. 377–384, 2004.
G. R. Simari R. P. Loui (1992) ArticleTitle“A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation” Artifi. Intell 53 125–157 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-A
K. Sycara, “ The PERSUADER”, In: D. Shapiro (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
F. H. Eemeren Particlevan R. F. Grootendorst F. S. Henkemans (1996) Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Applications Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale NJ, USA
B. Verheij (2003) ArticleTitle“Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic” Artifi. Intell. Law 11 IssueID1–2 167–195 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36
D.N. Walton (1996) Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning Erlbaum Mahwah NJ, USA
D. N. Walton E. C. W. Krabbe (1995) Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning SUNY Press Albany NY, USA
P. R. Wurman M. P. Wellman W. E. Walsh (2001) ArticleTitle“A parametrization of the auction design space” Games and Economic Behavior 35 IssueID1–2 304–338 Occurrence Handle10.1006/game.2000.0828
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rahwan, I. Guest Editorial: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 11, 115–125 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-3079-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-3079-0