Abstract
The rapid deforestation in the state of Tabasco due to extensive livestock farming has resulted in the decrease of the original forest cover. Only 4% of the original vegetation remains and that vegetation is concentrated in the mountainous regions of the state. This destructive process continues due to support by the current government livestock policies. Under these circumstances, the traditional silvopastoral systems of dispersed trees can present an option for reversing and mitigating deforestation practices. The objective of this study was to generate information on the tree species common to silvopastoral systems of dispersed trees in the pastures for two mountainous areas in Tabasco. In the study, 64 tree species, representing 26 plant families were identified. All species were characterized as multipurpose, with at least three reported uses and a maximum of seven for each species. In total, nine categories of local uses were identified for the trees. The main category of use was fuel (firewood), followed by timber and shade for the livestock. Although leguminous species (Fabaceae) were dominant, these species were utilized for uses other than the provision of fodder. Since 12 of the total species identified were recognized as sources of food for animals; the assumption that livestock farmers do not recognize the utility of these species for improving production yields is apparent. The results suggest that there is potential need to expand research and offer further education on the subject in Tabasco.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In the Tabasco State, Mexico, extensive livestock ranching is one of the main activities for the rural communities. The growth of livestock ranching has developed as a consequence of the elimination of the local vegetation. Until the second half of the 1950s, the state was covered in large part by rainforest vegetation (Toledo et al. 1995). Five decades of governmental incentive policies for the development of extensive livestock ranching, particularly in the ejidos or communal lands (Sánchez et al. 2005), have reduced the area of forests and natural rainforests from 49% coverage in 1940, to 8% in 1992 (Palacio-Prieto et al. 2000) and to 4% in the first decade of the 21st century (INEGI 2005). Currently, remnants of the rainforest are mostly concentrated in the Sierra Sur of Tabasco, the mountainous region bordering the neighboring Chiapas State. Possibly, these remnants of rainforest will be converted into pasture lands; where, in spite of the technical, financial and environmental problems that livestock farming is facing, this practice continues to be promoted.
An alternative that can reverse this process of deforestation is the implementation of silvopastoral systems as means of land use, characterized by the biological interaction of perennial woody plants with grassland areas and/or animals. In this case, the fundamental goals are the diversification and optimization of production with a focus on the sustainability of the lands utilized for local livestock practices (Casanova-Lugo et al. 2014); and restricting further advance of livestock production in the remaining forested areas. In this context, dispersed trees in pastures (DTP), the second most frequently employed silvopastoral systems in the mountain range of Tabasco, becomes the most feasible option for the initiation of change in the local livestock culture (Grande et al. 2010). Under this system, trees are retained in pastures as they fulfil diverse functions for both the producer and the environment. Furthermore, they create a favorable habitat for certain species and improve the connectivity among tree-covered landscapes (Esquivel-Mimenza et al. 2011; González-Valdivia et al. 2014; Harvey and González 2007). Additionally, recent studies have documented that these systems promote successful carbon capture and the conservation of water and air (Jose 2009; Casanova-Lugo et al. 2011; Nair 2012).
Although there is a generalized culture of acceptance and practice of DTP among producers in Tabasco; relevant information is lacking on the use of the local trees. For example, information is needed on the factors that affect decision making or offer an empirical basis for developing important strategies to incorporate trees into livestock farming, thereby fostering conservation of woody species in these systems. Hence, the objective of this study has been to identify the uses of dispersed trees by farmers in the pastures of the Sierra Sur in the Tabasco State, Mexico, as an initial approach for the promotion of silvopastoral management on the basis of folk knowledge and for increasing the success of its implementation and adoption, as suggested by Cabrera-Pérez et al. (2013).
Materials and methods
Study area
The study was conducted from August to December 2013 at Villa Luz and Zunu-Patastal in the municipality of Tacotalpa (Sierra sub-region) and in Santo Tomás, Nuevo Progreso and Ignacio Allende in the municipality of Tenosique (Fig. 1). These five localities are located in the mountainous areas of Tabasco State (Mexico), forming part of the same mountainous province that extends towards Chiapas State (Mexico) and Guatemala from 17°15′ and 17°45′N to 90°38′ and 93°46′W, with altitudes varying from 50 mm to 1000 m. The area is located at the margins of the protected areas within the Sierra of Tabasco and the Usumacinta Canyon, which border the state of Chiapas. Furthermore, Tenosique is adjacent to Guatemala, whose rain forest is better conserved. The physiographic conditions are similar, although variations exist in the average annual temperature and precipitation; and the local land use conditions (INEGI 2009).
The climate is humid and warm with abundant rainfall throughout the year (Am) or during summer (Am) (INEGI 2000). In Tacotalpa, the average annual temperature is 25.6 °C. The average maximum monthly temperature is 29.2 °C in May, and the average minimum monthly temperature is 22 °C in December and January. The annual precipitation is 4014 mm, with an average monthly maximum of 588 mm in October and an average monthly minimum of 132 mm in April. In Tenosique, the average annual temperature is 26.3 °C. The average maximum monthly temperature is 30.5 °C in May, and the average minimum temperature is 22 °C in December and January. The annual precipitation is 3282 mm (INEGI 2000).
Soil is predominantly Fluvisol Gleyc; with structure characterized as that of a recent alluvial, clayey marsh soil, with high organic matter content, water saturation, fine texture and poor permeability. These sites are appropriate for sustaining pastures and small areas of permanent seasonal agriculture due to their moderate to low fertility.
A large portion of the rainforest remnants of Tabasco can be found in this area. The vegetation is characterized by fragments of rainforest contained within a mosaic of secondary vegetation of varying ages, which is the result of agricultural and pastoral livestock activities on flat or semi-flat surfaces (Ochoa-Gaona et al. 2008). The rainforest remnants, in their most conserved state, reach 30 meters in height and consist of three tree strata, including an herbaceous strata formed by plants from the Araceae and Marantaceae families, ferns, lianas and several types of orchids (Grande et al. 2010). The most common tree and palm species: Attalea butyracea (Mutis ex L.f.) Wess.Boer (american oil palm), Calophyllum brasiliense Cambess. (barí), Castilla elastica Sessé (rubber tree), Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. (ceiba), Cordia alliodora (Ruíz & Pav.) Oken (cypre), Nectandra ambigens (S.F.Blake) C.K.Allen (laurel), Sabal mexicana Mart. (Mexican palmetto), Spondias mombin L. (jocote), Tabebuia rosea (Bertol) DC. (pink poui) (Grande et al. 2010; Maldonado et al. 2008).
Criteria for site selection
Before sampling sites were selected through numerous field visits and surveys carried out in the region to identify the livestock systems utilizing DTP (Fig. 2). A detailed questionnaire was used to obtain biophysical information on the local management system, including age, type of management, tree species used and planting density, among other parameters (Table 1). Afterwards, sites (sampling units) that fulfilled the following criteria were selected: minimum of 24 trees ha−1 with a diameter at breast height > 10 cm and grazed for a minimum period 8 h day−1. A total of 16 ranches were selected: six were located in the community of Tacotalpa and 10 in Tenosique. Within each ranch, an area of approximately 1 ha was randomly selected for analysis.
Floristic inventory
In each sampling unit, all the trees were counted and identified. The mensuration techniques utilized for these systems were described in Martínez-Encino et al. (2013). The description of the functional types was based on Pennington and Sarukhán (2005) and Jiménez et al. (2010), who characterized the main uses and the origins of the trees at the study sites. The identification and final taxonomic determinations were conducted by comparisons with specimens in the Plant Collection of the Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco.
Ethnobotanical data
The taxonomic identities of the species were determined and the origin data (natural or introduced) were collected and representative samples were deposited at UJAT herbarium with collection numbers of first author (CRVP) (see Table 2). Afterwards, landowners (Appendix Table 3) of the locations where the dispersed tree systems had been characterized were asked to participate in a specially designed individual survey. Using tree samples, interviewees were asked to identify species by their vernacular names and to list their local uses. In this way, the categories for tree use were created to represent those locally known and mentioned.
Results
Of the 64 woody species recorded in the floristic inventory, 62 were identified (Table 2). The reported tree uses in the surveyed localities were placed under nine use categories: (1) timber (2) firewood, (3) fodder, (4) fruit trees, (5) fences, (6) posts, (7) shade, (8) medicinal and (9) for attracting honeybees, in addition to the option of undetermined use (UD). All species studied had multiple uses according to the criteria established by Cabrera-Pérez et al. (2013).
The tree species identified in these livestock systems with dispersed trees of varying densities in pastures represented 26 botanical families (Fig. 3). Of the total tree species studied, 25% belonged to the family Fabaceae (leguminous plants), followed by Malvaceae (9%). The families Anacardiaceae, Bignoniaceae, Boraginaceae, Moraceae and Sapindaceae each represented 5% of the total trees. The rest of the species were dispersed among 21 families, altogether representing 38% of the total samples. Finally, 3% tree species (2 species) remained unidentified.
Discussion
A study carried out in the state of Tabasco by Grande et al. (2010) in silvopastoral systems that are characterized by dispersed trees in pastures demonstrated that 31.4% of the reported tree species came from the legume family. Similarly, other studies in the tropical regions has reported similar trends (Cabrera-Pérez et al. 2013; González-Valdivia et al. 2012) and in fact, in a dry seasonal forest, approximately 38% of all plant species were identified as Fabaceae members (Casanova-Lugo et al. 2014). Earlier studies coincide with the results of the current study, suggesting that the legume family has the greatest presence in livestock systems with dispersed trees in pastures. However, only four of 16 species (Dialium guianensis (Aubl.) Sanwith, Enterolobium cyclocarpum (Jacq.) Griseb., Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp., and Lonchocarpus guatemalensis Benth.) were mentioned as sources of fodder; whereas most were considered shade providers for the local livestock (12 of 16 Fabaceae species). This observation is relevant since majority of the leguminous plants are potential sources of fodder (15 species) and may form part of living fences (8 species) or provide timber products (7 species). This pattern was common for all of the botanical families studied and their respective species in the context of studied livestock systems, similar to the pattern encountered by Cabrera-Pérez et al. (2013) in the mountain range of Tenosique. The potential increase in the profitability and productivity of livestock farming do not appear to be promoted in the Tabasco region, including the use of leguminous plants as fodder. Thus, education on the subject should be provided to the producers if this region.
Producers reported a total of 9 uses for DTP (Fig. 4). Of the mentioned uses, 83% of the species were useful for firewood, followed by use for timber products (61%), shade for animals (55%), fruit trees (45%), attracting honeybees (44%), medicinal uses (31%) and living fences (22%). Only 16% of the species were reported as sources of fodder, and finally, 11% were cited for use in creating posts. All species had at least 3 reported uses, reflecting the tendency to include these types of tree species in the agro-ecosystems in the mountainous regions of Tabasco.
Similarly, Casanova-Lugo et al. (2014) reported 80% of the tree species in a regenerating dry tropical forest in Michoacán were used for fodder, 38% for firewood, 32% for diverse timber uses, 27% for manufacturing tools, 24% for obtaining medicines, 22% for attracting honeybees, 16% for fruits and 14% for delimiting parcels by means of living fences, in addition to their use for posts and shade (14 and 7%, respectively). However, González-Gómez et al. (2006) indicate that in the silvopastoral systems with natural regeneration, trees are mainly used for firewood (28.3%), posts (25.2%), medicine for humans (15.2%), preparation of indigenous tools (14.6%), human consumption (13.5%) and medicine for animals (3.3%). Cabrera-Pérez et al. (2013) reported that the flora in the Tenosique mountain range is mainly used for firewood, whereas its use as animal fodder is quite limited. These findings are in agreement with the present study, given that firewood was identified as the main use for dispersed trees in pastures, although the proportion of species for said use is greater in comparison to that reported by González-Gómez et al. (2006). However, the use of trees species of dry forests and secondary forests as fodder or as a fodder compliment is more common, in addition to its usage as green manure (Pinedo-Vasquez et al. 1990).
The differences in the results and in the proportions of species per category of use may be explained by the nature of the studied systems and the conditions specific to each region. In general and in agreement with Ochoa-Gaona et al. (2012) and Cabrera-Pérez et al. (2013), species of DTP in the mountainous regions of Tabasco demonstrate multiple uses. Of the total number of species, 90.5% have three to five reported uses, whereas nearly 10% have six or seven documented uses (Fig. 5).
Notably, the majority of tree species (84%) found in livestock systems are remnants of the native vegetation or the result of natural succession. In contrast, only 16% of the trees were non native species, including Annona muricata L., Bactris gasipaes Kunth, Cocos nucifera L., Spathodea campanulata P. Beauv., Mammea americana L., Gmelina arborea Roxb., Persea Americana Mill., Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck, Theobroma bicolor Bonpl., and Tectona grandis L.f. (Fig. 6).
In relation to their origins and in agreement with Beer et al. (2003), several trees present in pastures are remnants of the original rainforest and are conserved for their ability to offer shade and their use as timber. In other cases, farmers plant trees, such as fruit trees or introduced species. However, many native and non native trees have begun to regenerate naturally and maintain significant populations in pastures; some of these trees are the product of natural seed dispersal by wind, birds, livestock, and other herbivores, whereas others regenerate from stumps (Beer et al. 2003). In addition to shade, DTP offer other benefits for livestock, such as high quality fruits and fodder in comparison to grasses; especially during the dry season, when the digestibility and nutritional quality of tropical grasses are considerably reduced (González-Valdivia 2003). This allows producers to increase their income because in addition to obtaining traditional livestock products (meat, milk and cheese); they are also able to commercialize fruits, firewood and timber. Furthermore, with DTP, producers also provide environmental services, such as the capture of carbon and the conservation of biodiversity, ultimately contributing to improved soil quality and the conservation of water and air quality (Jose 2009).
Conclusion
Leguminous plants (Fabaceae) are the most abundant in the local silvopastoral systems such as the dispersed trees in pastures (DTP) found in the mountainous regions of Tabasco. These plants do not appear to be utilized for their limited potential as fodder; but, rather for other uses such as fuel and timber. All tree flora encountered in the DTP systems were used for fuel and timber, although the use of trees as shade for livestock was also observed to be important. Overall, tree species possess a great diversity of uses (nine reported uses); in this study, all species were characterized as having multiple uses (more than three). In addition to being sources of firewood, timber, and shade; they also serve as posts, offer fodder and fruit, attract honeybees and have important medicinal uses. Finally, the majority of dispersed trees were remnants of the original native vegetation. Therefore, these systems contribute to the conservation of woody species through their use and should be promoted in areas with livestock in the Tabasco State, Mexico.
References
Beer J, Ibrahim M, Somarriba E, Barrance A, Leakey R (2003) Establecimiento y manejo de árboles en sistemas agroforestales. In: Cordero J, Boshier DH (eds) Árboles de Centroamérica: un manual para extensionistas. OFI/CATIE, Oxford, pp 197–242
Cabrera-Pérez S, Ochoa-Gaona S, Mariaca-Méndez R, González-Valdivia N, Guadarrama-Olivera MA, Gama L (2013) Vulnerabilidad por aprovechamiento y distribución de especies leñosas desde la perspectiva comunitaria en la reserva del Cañón del Usumacinta, Tenosique, Tabasco, México. Polibotánica 35:143–172
Casanova-Lugo F, Petit-Aldana J, Solorio-Sánchez J (2011) Agroforestry systems as an alternative for carbon sequestration in the Mexican tropics. Rev Chapingo Ser Cie 17:5–118
Casanova-Lugo F, González-Gómez JC, Flores-Estrada MX, López-Santiago G, García-Gómez M (2014) Estructura, composición y usos de los árboles de la selva baja caducifolia en Apatzingán, Michoacán. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 17:255–259
Esquivel-Mimenza H, Ibrahim M, Harvey CA (2011) Dispersed trees in pasturelands of cattle farms in a tropical dry ecosystem. Tropical and subtropical. Agroecosystems 14:933–941
González-Gómez JC, Madrigal-Sánchez X, Ayala Burgos A, Juárez-Caratachea A, Gutiérrez-Vázquez E (2006) Especies arbóreas de uso múltiple para la ganadería en la región de Tierra Caliente del Estado de Michoacán, México. Livest Res Rural Dev 18:1–4
González-Valdivia NA (2003) Dos sistemas silvopastoriles Como Refugios de vida silvestre en el municipio de Estelí. Master of Science thesis Universidad Autónoma de Nicaragua, León
González-Valdivia N, Ochoa-Gaona S, Ferguson BG, Pozo-de la Tijera C, Kampichler C, Pérez-Hernández I (2012) Análisis comparativo de la estructura y composición de comunidades arbóreas de un paisaje agropecuario en Tabasco, México. Rev Mex Biodivers 83:83–99
González-Valdivia N, Barba-Macías E, Hernández-Daumás S, Ochoa-Gaona S (2014) Avifauna en sistemas silvopastoriles en el Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano, Tabasco, México. Rev Biol Trop 62:1031–1052
Grande D, de León F, Nahed J, Pérez-Gil F (2010) Importance and function of scattered trees in pastures in the Sierra region of Tabasco, Mexico. R J B Sci 5:75–87
Harvey CA, González JA (2007) Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodivers Conserv 16:2257–2292
INEGI (2000) Cuaderno estadístico municipal de Tenosique. Gobierno del Estado de Tabasco, Villahermosa
INEGI (2005) Conjunto nacional del uso de suelo y vegetación a escala 1:250,000. Serie II: DGG-INEGI. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, México, Ciudad de México
INEGI (2009) Censo Agropecuario 2007, VII Censo Agrícola: Ganadero y Forestal, Aguascalientes. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Ciudad de México
Jiménez QM, Rojas-Rodríguez FE, Rojas-Chacón VL, Rodríguez S, Feeny C (2010) Árboles maderables de Costa Rica: Ecología y Silvicultura. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, INBIO, Santo Domingo de Heredia
Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: An overview. Agroforest Syst 76:1–10
Maldonado M, Grande DJ, Fuentes EE, Hernández S, Pérez-Gil F, Gómez A (2008) Los sistemas silvopastoriles de la región tropical húmeda de México: El caso de Tabasco. Zootec Trop 26:305–308
Martínez-Encino C, Villanueva-López G, Casanova-Lugo F (2013) Densidad y composición de árboles disperses en potreros en la sierra de Tabasco, México. Agrociencia 47:483–496
Nair PKR (2012) Carbon sequestration studies in agroforestry systems: A reality-check. Agrofor Syst 86:243–253
Ochoa-Gaona S, Pérez I, de Jong B (2008) Fenología reproductiva de las especies arbóreas del bosque tropical de Tenosique, Tabasco, México. Rev Biol Trop 56:657–673
Ochoa-Gaona S, Zamora-Cornelio LF, Cabrera-Pérez S, González-Valdivia NA, Pérez-Hernández I, López-Moreno V (2012) Flora leñosa útil de la sierra de Tenosique, Tabasco. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Villahermosa
Palacio-Prieto JL, Bocco G, Velázquez A, Mas JF, Takaki FT, Victoria A, Luna-González G, Gómez-Rodríguez G, López-García J, Palma M, Trejo-Vázquez I, Peralta H, Prado MJ, Rodríguez A, Mayorga-Saucedo R, González MF (2000) La condición actual de los recursos forestales en México: Resultados del Inventario Nacional forestal 2000. Invest Geogr/Mexico 43:183–203
Pennington TD, Sarukhán J (2005) Árboles Tropicales de México: Manual para la Identificación de las Principales Especies. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ecología: Fondo de Cultura Económica, México
Pinedo-Vasquez M, Zarin D, Jipp P, Chota-Inuma J (1990) Use-values of tree species in a Communal Forest reserve in Northeast Peru. Conserv Biol 4:405–416
Sánchez MD, Harvey CA, Grijalva A, Medina A, Vílchez S, Hernández B (2005) Diversidad, composición y estructura de la vegetación en un agropaisaje ganadero en Matiguás, Nicaragua. Rev Biol Trop 53:387–414
Toledo V, Batis AI, Becerra R (1995) La selva útil: etnobotánica cuantitativa de los grupos indígenas del trópico húmedo de México. Interciencia 20:177–178
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Villanueva-Partida, C.R., Casanova-Lugo, F., González-Valdivia, N.A. et al. Traditional uses of dispersed trees in the pastures of the mountainous region of Tabasco, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 93, 383–394 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0125-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0125-2