Abstract
Montado decline has been reported since the end of the nineteenth century in southern Portugal and increased markedly during the 1980s. Consensual reports in the literature suggest that this decline is due to a number of factors, such as environmental constraints, forest diseases, inappropriate management, and socioeconomic issues. An assessment on the pattern of montado distribution was conducted to reveal how the extent of land management, environmental variables, and spatial factors contributed to montado area loss in southern Portugal from 1990 to 2006. A total of 14 independent variables, presumably related to montado loss, were grouped into three sets: environmental variables, land management variables, and spatial variables. From 1990 to 2006, approximately 90,054 ha disappeared in the montado area, with an estimated annual regression rate of 0.14 % year−1. Variation partitioning showed that the land management model accounted for the highest percentage of explained variance (51.8 %), followed by spatial factors (44.6 %) and environmental factors (35.5 %). These results indicate that most variance in the large-scale distribution of recent montado loss is due to land management, either alone or in combination with environmental and spatial factors. The full GAM model showed that different livestock grazing is one of the most important variables affecting montado loss. This suggests that optimum carrying capacity should decrease to 0.18–0.60 LU ha−1 for livestock grazing in montado under current ecological conditions in southern Portugal. This study also showed that land abandonment, wildfire, and agricultural practices (to promote pastures, crops or fallow lands) were three significant variables influencing montado loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The Portuguese montado (such as the dehesa land cover type in Spain) is an agro-silvo-pastoral system in which cork oak (Quercus suber) and/or holm oak (Quercus [ilex] rotundifolia) are the dominant tree species with varying densities usually in combination with livestock grazing and agriculture in the herbaceous layer (Aronson et al. 2009; Pinto-Correia et al. 2011b; Vicente and Alés 2006). Montado/dehesa areas account for about 3.5–4.0 Mha in the southwestern Iberian Peninsula, assuming great importance in southern Europe (Olea and San Miguel-Ayanz 2006).
The montado is characterised as an agroforestry multifunctional system, as it produces a range of goods and services currently in demand (Pinto-Correia et al. 2011a; Surová et al. 2011, 2014), including the following: cork; charcoal; firewood; acorns and pasture for livestock; wild game, aromatic, and medicinal plants; and recreational services, such as ecotourism (Bugalho et al. 2009; Coelho and Campos 2009; Joffre et al. 1999; Sá-Sousa 2014). According to Aronson et al. (2009), Coelho et al. (2012), Godinho et al. (2011), Plieninger (2007), and Pulido et al. (2001), the montado also supports other important ecosystems services, such as carbon sequestration, soil conservation, groundwater recharge and quality protection, and biodiversity conservation. Given their environmental and socioeconomic importance, montado/dehesa systems are regarded as high nature value farmlands (HNVF), according to European classification criteria (Almeida et al. 2013; Paracchini et al. 2008; Pinto-Correia and Godinho 2013), and are included in Annex I of the European Union Habitats Directive (92/43/CEE).
A decline in montado/dehesa area has been reported throughout the Mediterranean region, especially in Portugal, Spain, Morocco, France, and Italy (Brasier 1996; Cano et al. 2006; Gallego et al. 1999; Linaldeddu et al. 2013). As far as Portugal is concerned, montado decline has been reported since the end of the nineteenth century and is related to the intensive tree exploitation for charcoal and firewood production, man-made fires to promote open areas for crops and pastures for livestock grazing, failure in juvenile tree regeneration due to livestock browsing, and poorly understood diseases (Carvalho 1870). Surprisingly, most factors indicated in 1870 as threatening the montado continue to pose a threat today. The significance of such factors in the past is not known, but as they were highlighted at the time, it is assumed they must have been relevant. Paradoxically, references to threats in the past actually demonstrate the overall continuing resilience of the system, since it has survived the long term despite a number of pressures. Nevertheless, this raises the question of the limits of the montado in terms of sustainability: so far it has survived, but is it sustainable in the future in the face of a range of pressures of various kind (e.g. Bugalho et al. 2009; Cabral et al. 1992; Costa et al. 2010; Leitão 1902; Pinto-Correia and Mascarenhas 1999; Natividade 1950)?
Despite the observed trend of montado decline during the past century, the seriousness of the problem increased markedly during the 1980s (Brasier and Scott 1994; Cabral et al. 1992). A similar increase in the trend toward decline has been reported for the dehesa in Spain (Brasier and Scott 1994; Cano et al. 2003; Moreira et al. 2006; Plieninger 2006).
Review of the literature suggests that this decline is mainly related to the following: environmental constraints, such as soil type and hydrological conditions (Costa et al. 2008, 2010; Cubera and Moreno 2007); drought (David et al. 1992; Pelegrín et al. 2008); and wildfires (Catry et al. 2012; Díaz-Delgado et al. 2002; Silva and Catry 2006). In addition, some known diseases (e.g., Phytophthora cinnamomi fungus) and insect attacks also favour this decline because their effects are amplified by the already stressed conditions of the montado (Brasier 1996; Camilo-Alves et al. 2013; Linaldeddu et al. 2013; Moreira and Martins 2005; Pérez-Sierra et al. 2013). Furthermore, there are other factors leading to montado change, including the following: inappropriate management, with a sharp increase in mechanisation and unsustainable livestock stocking rates (Acácio et al. 2010; Cadima et al. 1995; Costa et al. 2010; Del Pozo 2004; Plieninger 2006, 2007); vulnerability of the agricultural economy (Pinto-Correia 2000); rural depopulation; and the abandonment of traditional agricultural activities (Pinto-Correia 1993; Pinto-Correia and Vos 2004; Sheffer 2012). Briefly, such factors are mainly associated with changes in public policies (national and European), market mechanism and other socio-economic factors.
Several studies have examined long-term dehesa change in Spain (Cano et al. 2003; Plieninger 2006) and long-term montado change in Portugal (Acácio et al. 2009, 2010; Costa et al. 2009, 2011), but the focus was always on the local area and/or a single municipality. To support policy decisions regarding montado management, large-scale analyses of changes are needed to understand the overall process and to assess the role of policy.
Thus, the goal of this study is to present the changes detected in the montado distribution pattern for southern Portugal as a whole from 1990 to 2006 and determine the relative effects of selected environment, land management, and spatial factors on montado land cover change. According to the previous considerations regarding montado decline trends, we hypothesise that land management factors play more of a major role in causing recent montado change than environmental factors.
Materials and methods
Study area
This study was conducted in southern Portugal (Fig. 1), a region with vegetation dominated by cork oak (Q. suber) and holm oak (Q. [ilex] rotundifolia) species (Bugalho et al. 2009; Pinto-Correia et al. 2011b). The study area covered approximately 4.1 × 106 ha (Fig. 1), which accounts for 46 % of mainland Portugal. The selected area is in accordance with published biogeographic boundaries (Costa et al. 1998), which consist of the following several layers: phytogeographic (flora and vegetation), geomorphologic, lithologic, and pedologic, as well as bioclimate. In fact, about 72 % of the area selected is located in the so-called ‘Luso-Extremadurense’ province, one of the largest biogeographic provinces in the Iberian Peninsula. Its soils originate from palaeozoic siliceous material, and the original vegetation associations of Mesomediterranic cork oak (Sanguisorbo agrimoniodis-Quercetum suberis), holm oak (Pyro bourgaenae-Quercetum rotundifoliae), and pyrenean oak (Arbuto unedonis-Quercetum pyrenaicae) have been converted almost entirely into montado systems.
Cartographic data sources
The areas and distributions of montado land cover in 1990 and 2006 in the study area were obtained from the CORINE land cover (CLC) (scale 1:100,000) of 1990 and 2006. Due to the degree of heterogeneity of tree density and the understory uses of the montado, this multifunctional system does not entirely fit into a single CLC category (van Doorn and Pinto-Correia 2007). In fact, for the calculation of the CLC-1990 and CLC-2006 montado areas, the following land cover categories were used: ‘244-agroforestry areas’, ‘311-broadleaved forest’, and ‘313-mixed forest’. For this procedure, spatial analyses were conducted to accurately extract montado areas using auxiliary geo-referenced data, such as the national land cover map of 1990 (LCM-1990) and the second level of the national land cover map of 2007 (LCM-2007-N2) (both at 1:25,000 scales), produced by the National Centre for Geographic Information and the Portuguese Geographic Institute, respectively. Additionally, data from the National Forest Inventories (IFN-1995 and IFN-2005) produced by the Portuguese Forestry Services as well as high-resolution true-colour orthophotomaps (2005) were also used in particular situations where uncertainty remained after the previously described processes. Thus, for 1990, all patches categorised as ‘montado’ in the LCM-1990 were used, and they were intersected with the 244-, 311-, and 313-land cover categories from the CLC-1990 to extract only the proportion that corresponded to montado areas maintaining the cartographic characteristics of the CLC project. Finally, the same three land cover categories (244, 311, and 313, extracted from CLC-2006) were used to produce the montado map for 2006. These patches were overlaid with all patches classified as ‘heterogeneous agricultural areas’ in the LCM-2007-N2 and the montado areas mapped within each category. The IFN-1995 and IFN-2005 were used to reduce uncertainty in the final classification; visual interpretation and screen-digitised processing of the very high-resolution orthophotomaps served the same purpose.
Trends regarding changes in montado land cover during the 1990–2006 period were estimated using the UTM grid (with 10 × 10-km cell size) overlapped on each montado map to determine the montado area for each year and 10 × 10-km cell (henceforth simply referred to as cells). A total of 487 cells were examined in the study area, for which montado loss and gain were quantified by comparing the two maps.
Factors affecting montado land cover change
In the period of study (1990–2006), most of the change in montado land cover was attributed to loss processes, while observed gain values were insignificant throughout the study area. Thus, the analysis of recent patterns of montado land cover change only focusses on the loss processes.
Factors influencing montado loss were divided into three sets of explanatory variables: environmental (ENV), land management (LMA), and spatial (SPA) (Table 1). The stratification of these factors allows for the study of their combined effects as well as the relative influence on the spatial distribution of montado loss. Furthermore, the SPA set allows whether to quantify SPA influence on distribution of montado loss values or to correct the possible presence of spatial autocorrelation in the data (Borcard et al. 1992; Legendre 1993; Plant 2012).
Environmental set
The environmental set is composed of four variables: one of these (FIRE) represents the burnt area from 1990 to 2006, and the other three correspond to different soil fertility levels (SOIL1, SOIL2, and SOIL3) (Table 1). The GIS shapefile ‘burnt areas’ was provided by the Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests (ICNF). Soil fertility levels were obtained and adapted from the classification produced for the STRIDE-Amb. 12 final report (CEEM 1996). Fire and soils variables were superimposed on the 10 × 10-km grid layer using GIS software (ArcGis 10 and ESRI 2011), and proportional values for each variable were extracted for each 10 × 10-km cell.
Land management set
The five variables comprising the land management set were obtained from the Portuguese General Census of Agriculture (GCA) carried out in 1999 (Table 1). The GCA information is provided at the parish level. Indeed, data of the five variables were extracted for each 10 × 10-km cell by calculating the proportional area by parish within each 10 × 10-km cell. These five variables include the following: UAA_NU, the proportion of useful agricultural area not used in each 10 × 10-km cell, which was used as an indirect measure of rural abandonment; LSTOCK, the estimated grazing intensity obtained by converting cattle, goat, and sheep numbers into livestock units (LU), while the LU of each livestock type was summarised to obtain total LU per 10 × 10-km cell; NPAST, the proportion of area under montado cover occupied by improved natural pasture land; PCFL, the proportion of area under montado cover occupied by pasture, crops, and/or fallow land; and NCROP, the proportion of area under montado without crops.
Spatial set
The spatial set is composed of six variables: three basic (X, Y, and AC) and three derived variables (XY, X2, and Y2) (Table 1). It is well known that land cover data exhibit spatial autocorrelation, meaning that closest pairs of points have the tendency to be more similar than points at larger distances (Overmars et al. 2003). Therefore, regarding land cover change analysis is crucial to understand and incorporate the spatial correlations of the dependent variables in statistical models. Before statistical modelling, the existence of any autocorrelation in montado loss (dependent variable) was assessed using Moran’s I. To capture the spatial autocorrelation of montado loss values, an autocovariate term (AC) (Dormann et al. 2007) was calculated using the R package spdep (Bivand et al. 2010). Moreover, for this set of variables, a second-order polynomial of centred spatial coordinates (X2 and Y2) was computed to capture a larger-scale spatial variation (Legendre and Legendre 1998; Miller et al. 2007).
Statistical analysis
To understand the underlying causes of recent tendencies for montado change, the amount of montado area lost in each 10 × 10-km cell from 1990 to 2006 was defined as a dependent variable.
The relationships between the dependent variable (montado loss) and the independent variables were analysed by means of a three-stage statistical analysis involving: (1) exploratory analysis; (2) model building; and (3) variance partitioning. The first stage was performed using exploratory plots and linear regression models for screening the response curve shape (Zuur et al. 2009). This procedure was useful for verifying if the montado loss values increased (or decreased) linearly with a specific independent variable. Exploratory analysis revealed that the main relationships between the dependent and independent variables were unlikely to be linear. Consequently, it was decided that the generalised additive model (GAM) (Hastie and Tibshirani 1990) should be used to assess the relationships between the covariates and montado loss. The GAM is more flexible than the generalised linear model (GLM), allowing for both linear and complex additive response shapes as well as a combination of the two within the same model (Wood and Augustin 2002). As with the GLM method, GAM models use a link function to establish a relationship between the mean of the response variable and a ‘smoothed’ function of explanatory variables.
The second statistical stage (model building) started with a univariate GAM analysis for all independent variables and predictors (Table 1). This analysis was appropriate for verifying the significance of each independent variable in explaining the montado loss values. Only variables with univariate significance p values <0.25 were used in posterior analyses (Tabachnick and Fidell 2001). To check multicolinearity, pairwise Pearson correlations among all predictors were computed, and pairs with r > 0.7 were excluded from further analyses (Tabachnick and Fidell 2001). Multivariate models were then constructed independently for each set of predictors (SPA, ENV, and LMA) using a GAM with an identity link function and Gaussian error term (Wood 2006) to select the most parsimonious models to be used in further analyses. Generalised cross validation (GCV) was used as a criterion for estimating the smoothing parameters (Wood 2006). For each set of predictors, models with all possible combinations of remaining variables (following univariate analysis) were devised and compared with Akaike information criteria corrected for small samples (AICc) (Burnham and Anderson 2002). Models with ∆AICc < 4 are considered to have great relevance as candidate models (Burnham and Anderson 2002). Akaike weights (w i ) were also calculated as model selection criteria (Burnham and Anderson 2002), where the highest w i represents the best model for ecological interpretations. The goodness-of-fit for each model was measured by means of deviance statistics (D2) (Venables and Ripley 2002).
In the third stage, variance partitioning was used to specify which proportion of the variation in montado loss values is explained by each of the three factor sets exclusively as well as which proportions are attributable to interactions between factors (Borcard et al. 1992; Legendre 1993). The effects of different factors on the distribution of montado loss values may coincide with each other or counteract one another; therefore, the sum of the amount of explained variation by each set of variables usually differs from the total amount explained by the three sets together. Thus, seven fractions representing explained variation were obtained by means of the partitioning method: (1) the pure effect of ENV; (2) the pure effect of SPA; (3) the pure effect of LMA; (4) the shared effect of ENV + SPA; (5) the shared effect of ENV + LMA; (6) the shared effect of SPA + LMA; and (7) the shared effect of ENV + SPA + LMA. The D2 was used as a measure of variance explained by each GAM model (Guisan and Zimmermann 2000). All statistical analyses were conducted using R 2.14.2 (R Development Core Team 2011) software, using the mgcv package for GAMs (Wood 2006).
Results
Factors affecting montado land cover change
In the study area, it was estimated that montado covered approximately 1,310,756 ha in 1990, while, in 2006, it decreased to 1,220,702 ha (Fig. 2a, b). In 1990, approximately 16.3 % (from a total of 487 cells) had more than 60 % of montado area, while, in 2006, there was only 13.2 %, reflecting a sharp decrease during the 16-y period (Fig. 2c, d). From 1990 to 2006, no cells showed a gain in montado area greater than 500 ha (Fig. 2e). At the same time, 42 cells exhibited montado loss values ranging from 500 to 1,000 ha, while 143 cells showed a loss of 100–500 ha (Fig. 2e). During the 1990–2006 period, an area of 90,054 ha of montado was lost, corresponding to an annual regression rate of 5628.4 ha year−1. In total, the rate of montado regression estimated for the period from 1990 to 2006 was, on average, 1.4 % cell−1 decade−1.
Model selection
After univariate analysis, multicollinearity inspection, and model selection, the number of predictors in the spatial set was reduced to three (AC, X, and Y). The five land management set predictors (UAA_NU, LSTOCK, NPAST, PCFL, and NCROP) were retained. For the environmental set, the four original predictors (FIRE, SOIL1, SOIL2, and SOIL3) were also retained.
To gauge the influence of spatial variables on montado loss values, seven possible additive models were used with the three other variables. Of these models, only one was considered plausible (∆ i < 4), which selected with high probability the autocovariate term (AC), X, and Y coordinates, showing that the spatial distribution of montado loss values is also influenced by spatial factors (AICc [w i ] = 0.96) (Table 2). In the model selected, the AC term plays a crucial role in the spatial distribution of montado loss values (p < 0.001) (Table 3) due to the spatial autocorrelation verified in these values (Moran’s I = 0.09, p < 0.001). During the environmental modelling procedure, 15 candidate models were tested, of which only five plausible models were found to explain the variability of montado loss values (∆ i < 4) (Table 2). The best model shows that montado loss values are optimally explained by the additive effect of FIRE and SOIL2 (AICc [w i ] = 0.24) (Table 2). Finally, in the case of land management variables, out of 31 candidate-adjusted models, only three models were selected as being plausible for explaining the variability contained in the dataset (∆ i < 4) (Table 2). Based on Akaike weights, the model with the additive effect of UAA_NU + LSTOCK + PCFL + NCROP (model 1) presented the highest value (AICc [w i ] = 0.45) (Table 2).
The spatial model explained 44.6 % of total variation, showing a close association of the autocovariate term with the observed montado loss values (Tables 3, 4). The environmental model explained 35.5 % of the variation, indicating that montado loss values were significantly influenced by burnt area and soil quality (Tables 3, 4). The loess curve of the burnt area plot (Fig. 3a) exhibited a sharp increase in montado loss values, ranging from 0.40 to 0.65 of burnt area. The land management model showed the highest percentage of explained variance (51.8 %) (Table 4). Montado loss values were markedly influenced by LSTOCK, PCFL, UAA, and NCROP variables (Table 3). The shape of the loess curve of the LU plot shows that montado loss values are close to zero when the number of LU per cell ranges from 1,800 to approximately 6,000, which corresponds to a grazing intensity of 0.18–0.60 LU ha−1, and rapidly increases in cells where the LU is greater than 6,000 LU cell−1 (Fig. 3b). Figure 3c shows that UAA_NU has a positive effect on montado loss values, indicating that loss values increase in cells where the percentage of UAA_NU is higher. This suggests that the abandonment of agricultural land, in particular in marginal areas, such as mountain regions, has a negative impact on the montado system. Finally, the loess curve of the PCFL plot shows that montado loss is negatively influenced by an increase in the proportion of pasture, crops, and/or fallow land under montado cover (Fig. 3d).
The full model accounted for 61.0 % of the explained variation (Table 4). The largest proportion of montado loss was accounted for by the shared effects of the land management, environmental, and spatial sets (27.3 %). The greatest pure effect was associated with the land management model (9.7 %), whereas spatial (4.7 %) and environment (3.0 %) sets had moderate influences on montado loss values (Fig. 4). Other shared pair effects were 1.5 and 3.7 % for ES and EL, respectively (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the shared effect of the land management and spatial set (11.1 %) indicates that the combined effects of these two sets had a considerable influence on montado loss values.
Discussion
As indicated previously, this study had one key objective: to analyse the comparative importance of environment, land management, and spatial factors on recent montado changes.
The influence of environment, land management, and spatial factors on recent montado change
For the period of 1990–2006, the estimated regression rate of montado (0.14 % year−1) obtained in this study falls within ranges previously reported by Costa et al. (2011), which were 0.16–0.22 % and 0.26 % year−1 for cork oak and holm oak, respectively, and those of Plieninger (2006), who reported with 0.04–0.27 % year−1 for holm oak. These results apparently point to an overall trend toward montado/dehesa decline throughout the western Iberian Peninsula, regardless of different spatial–temporal scales of analysis. The hypothesis is that decline in different parts of this area may be accounted for by the same causes.
This study demonstrates that most of the variation in recent large-scale montado loss is explained by land management either alone or in combination with environmental and spatial effects. Considering only pure effects, land management variables account for most of the variability in montado loss. An important land management and spatial component effect on montado loss was also observed.
Variation partitioning showed that spatial variables were also important in explaining recent montado loss. Spatial data, such as land cover data, have a tendency to be dependent (spatial autocorrelation), which means that when using spatial models, some variance may be explained by neighbouring values (e.g. Overmars et al. 2003; Plant 2012; Wu et al. 2009). The great spatial effect on recent montado loss (spatial, ES, and LS in Fig. 4) may be attributed to human disturbances not taken into account in this study [e.g., soil degradation due to the intensification of agriculture during the ‘wheat campaign’ that occurred during the 1930s–1960s (Baptista 1995; Stoate et al. 2001)], seed dispersal and natural regeneration, and intrinsic processes at landscape scales (relief, local water balance, etc.) (e.g. Hubbell et al. 2001; Rutherford et al. 2008). Another reason for spatially autocorrelated patterns of montado loss values may be spatial interactions between montado and other land cover/use types not examined in this study (e.g. Ramírez and Díaz 2008; Rivest et al. 2011). As indicated by the results of this study and by others on land cover change, statistical models that do not account for autocorrelation in spatial data might overestimate the importance of covariates (Lichstein et al. 2002; Plant 2012). This also might include variables that have only slight or no relevance on dependent variables (Overmars et al. 2003) and thus could lead to erroneous ecological conclusions and inappropriate management recommendations (Wu et al. 2009).
This study showed that using different intensities in livestock grazing is one of the most important variables for determining montado loss, as other authors have argued (e.g. Berrahmouni et al. 2007; Blondel 2006; Blondel et al. 2010; Bugalho et al. 2011; Gaspar et al. 2008; Plieninger 2007). As seen in Fig. 3b, the U-shaped curve response reflects the intrinsic relationship between the montado system and the different intensities of livestock grazing. This is clear evidence that ungrazed cells are associated with higher montado loss values, probably because these cells tend to have a more developed understory, which may have caused physiological stress due to the competition between oak trees and the understory for soil water content (Costa et al. 2010; David et al. 2007; Moreno et al. 2007). Furthermore, the water-deficit stress in montado trees could have been enhanced by the climatic conditions that occurred during the research period with long sequences of drier years (Costa et al. 2009; Mourato et al. 2010). Additionally, quick overgrowth of flammable shrubs (e.g., Cistus spp.) promotes an increased risk of severe wildfires in the absence of livestock grazing (Joffre et al. 1999). Furthermore, it was verified in the U-shaped curve that montado loss values were close to zero when LU per hectare ranged from 0.18 to 0.60. This suggests that the optimum montado carrying capacity for livestock grazing is 0.18–0.60 LU ha−1 in the current ecological conditions for southern Portugal. However, the selected livestock variable did not consider the duration of grazing, which is an important factor that should be considered for a more precise assessment (Calvo et al. 2012). Nevertheless, several authors showed that the carrying capacity in drier areas of the south-eastern Iberian Peninsula is close to 1.0 animals ha−1 or less (Baeza 2004; Calvo et al. 2012; Correal et al. 1992). Indeed, the obtained results show that montado loss values promptly increase when the livestock grazing intensity is greater than 0.60 LU ha−1, likely indicating that a frequent overgrazing situation exists above this value. Too much grazing pressure leads to soil compaction (4.20 kg cm−2 in heavily grazed oak stands), which reduces water infiltration, increases water run-off, and promotes soil erosion, and leads to soil degradation (Lima et al. 2000; Pulido and Díaz 2002; Coelho et al. 2004). Furthermore, overgrazing eliminates natural regeneration of oaks due to livestock acorn predation and browsing or trampling of seedlings (Pulido and Díaz 2005).
The partial and full multivariate models used in this study also demonstrate that UAA_NU and wildfires are two important variables influencing montado loss. Indeed the UAA_NU is an indirect measure of rural abandonment and reflects some stress-producing socioeconomic factors that contribute to montado loss. In the study area, both the Algarve hills and the southern littoral Alentejo exhibited the highest UAA percentages and significant montado loss values. This can be explained by high depopulation rates in these areas, leading to the abandonment of agricultural land and, therefore, to gradual shrub encroachment dominated by Cistus spp., which can result in increased fire risk (Bernaldez 1991). These results clearly show that wildfires are a significant montado loss predictor, and a close positive relationship was found between burnt area percentage and montado loss, mainly in the Algarve hills and northern area of the study. This agrees with previous findings reported for southern Portugal, and a significant proportion of national burnt montado area, from 1990 to 2005, occurred in this region (Silva and Catry, 2006). Particularly, during the 2003–2005 period, a total of more than 48,000 ha of burnt montado area was located in the Algarve hills (Moreira et al. 2009; Silva and Catry 2006).
Finally, analysis of statistical models also showed that montado loss is best explained when PCFL is included in models. This variable represents land management under montado cover promoting pasture, crops, and/or fallow land associated with livestock production. In cells with low percentages of pasture, crops, or fallow land, high montado loss values were observed. This probably occurred due to the absence of land management under the montado and/or the combination of livestock grazing leading to greater shrub encroachment. Thus, wildfire hazard and soil water competition may cause disturbance and degradation to these ecosystems (Acácio et al. 2009; Cubera and Moreno 2007; Schaffhauser et al. 2011). Furthermore, some studies focussing on water dynamics in the montado system have shown that pasture and crops promoted under montado cover do not compete more strongly than shrubs with oak trees for available soil water resources (Cubera and Moreno 2007; Montero et al. 2004). Indeed, soil fertilisation for pastures and crops seems to favour an increase in the water-use efficiency of oak trees and an improvement of their photosynthetic rate and hydric status during the dry period (Cubera and Moreno 2007; Montero et al. 2004). To sum up, the results of this study demonstrate that the progressive disappearance of grazing at sustainable livestock levels and cereal cultivation in long rotation cycles result in shrub encroachment and subsequent montado decline.
Conclusion
The findings of this study strongly support the hypothesis that land management, rather than environmental factors, is the main driver of change in the condition of the montado, and, consequently, its spatial pattern and change. Management practices are mostly associated with the intensity and type of grazing (livestock type, breeds, density, length of time in pasture, etc.) and shrub control techniques (soil mobilisation and surface shrub cutting). On one hand, a relationship is demonstrated between loss of management and the consequent dramatic reduction in human intervention, shrub encroachment, and decay in the montado due to fire or the return to dense maquis-type land cover. On the other hand, it is shown how increased livestock grazing pressures also lead to montado decline through progressive soil compaction and prevention of natural regeneration, thus producing increasingly large areas within the montado that lack trees. Recent changes in management practices are closely related to the effects of the common agricultural policy (CAP), and since Portugal joined the European Union, the CAP has been the major instrument for state intervention in agricultural systems (Pinto-Correia and Godinho 2013; Primdahl and Swaffield 2010). There is, therefore, the issue of an incongruence between stated public objectives regarding the montado and public policies that affect this system (Pinto-Correia et al. 2014; Pinto-Correia and Primdahl 2009). On one hand, strategies related to nature conservation, cultural heritage, and tourism promote the montado as an important system to be preserved and enhanced due to its cultural and natural values. There is a legal protection of the trees in the system, and there are even agro-environmental schemes that foster the protection and planting of trees in the montado (Pinto-Correia et al. 2011b). On the other hand, coupled livestock payments are maintained in Portugal as part of the Pilar I program. This leads to the intensification of livestock production, with increased grazing intensity and a general change from sheep to cattle grazing, causing much higher impact on montado balance (Almeida et al. 2013; Pinto-Correia et al. 2014). During the past 15 y, these trends have resulted in strong pressures on montado balance, and they will be maintained most likely in the present framework program, as the same coupled payments are maintained in the present Pilar I regulation in Portugal. The findings of this study clearly show that a better balance in terms of management reduces the risk of montado decline. Public policy should, therefore, be revised to ensure that the range of sectoral policies remains in check with the strategies set for the preservation of the montado at the national level.
References
Acácio V, Holmgren M, Rego F, Moreira F, Mohren GMJ (2009) Are drought and wildfires turning Mediterranean cork oak forests into persistent shrublands? Agrofor Syst 76:389–400. doi:10.1007/s10457-008-9165-y
Acácio V, Holmgren M, Moreira F, Mohren GMJ (2010) Oak persistence in Mediterranean landscapes: the combined role of management, topography, and wildfires. Ecol Soc 15(4):40
Almeida M, Guerra C, Pinto-Correia T (2013) Unfolding relations between land cover and farm management: high nature value assessment in complex silvo-pastoral systems. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish. J Geogr 113(2):97–108. doi:10.1080/00167223.2013.848611
Aronson J, Santos Pereira J, Pausas JG (eds.) (2009) Cork oak woodlands on the edge: ecology, adaptative management, and restoration. Island Press, New York
Baeza MJ (2004) El manejo del matorral en la prevención de incendios forestales. In: Vallejo VR, Alloza JA (eds) Avances en el estudio de la gestión del monte Mediterráneo. Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo, Valencia
Baptista FO (1995) Agriculture, rural society and the land question in Portugal. Sociologia Ruralis. XXXV:309–321
Bernaldez GF (1991) Ecological consequences of the abandonment of traditional land use systems in central Spain. Options Méditerranéennes 15:23–29
Berrahmouni N, Escute X, Regato P, et al. (2007) Beyond cork: a wealth of resources for people and nature. Lessons from the Mediterranean. WWF Mediterranean, Rome
Bivand R, with contributions by Micah Altman, Anselin L, Assunção R, Berke O et al (2010) spdep: Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package version 0.5-27
Blondel J (2006) The “design” of Mediterranean landscapes: a millennial story of human and ecological systems during the historic period. Hum Ecol 34:713–729. doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9030-4
Blondel J, Aronson J, Bodiou JY, Boeuf G (2010) The Mediterranean region: biological diversity in space and time. Oxford University Press, New York
Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055. doi:10.2307/1940179
Brasier CM (1996) Phytophthora cinnamomi and oak decline in southern Europe—environmental constraints including climate change. Ann For Sci 53:347–358. doi:10.1051/forest:19960217
Brasier CM, Scott JC (1994) European oak declines and global warming: a theoretical assessment with special reference to the activity of Phytophthora cinnamomi. EPPO Bull 24(1):221–232. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.1994.tb01063.x
Bugalho M, Plieninger T, Aronson J, Ellatifi M, Crespo DG (2009) Open woodlands: a diversity of uses (and overuses). In: Aronson J, Pereira JS, Pausas JG (eds) Cork oak woodlands on the edge. Ecology, adaptive management, and restoration, 1st edn. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Island Press, Washington, pp 33–45
Bugalho MN, Caldeira MC, Pereira JS, Aronson J, Pausas JG (2011) Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 9:278–286. doi:10.1890/100084
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York 488 pp
Cabral MT, Ferreira MC, Moreira T (1992) Diagnóstico das causas da anormal mortalidade dos sobreiros a Sul do Tejo. Scientia Gerundensis 18:205–214
Cadima ISP, Capelo J, Gomes AA (1995) Relação entre variáveis ambientais, tipos de conducão dos povoamentos e a mortalidade do sobreiro nos concelhos de Sines, Grândola e Santiago do Cacém. Silva Lusitana 3(1):85–107
Calvo L, Baeza J, Marcos E, Santana V, Papanastasis VP (2012) Post-fire management of shrublands. In: Moreira F et al (eds). Post-fire management and restoration of Southern European forest. Managing forest ecosystems, vol 24. Springer, New York. pp 293–319
Camilo-Alves CSP, Clara MIE, Ribeiro NMCA (2013) Decline of Mediterranean oak trees and its association with Phytophthora cinnamomi: a review. Eur J For Res 132:411–432
Cano F, Navarro RM, Ferrer AG (2003) Evolución de la cubierta de alcornoque en un monte afectado por seca (la Alcaidesa-Cádiz) mediante una secuencia de fotografías aéreas. Ecología 17:131–144
Cano F, Cerrillo RMN, Ferrer AG, Orden MS (2006) Detection of forest decline using Ikonos sensor for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) Woods in South Spain. Geocarto Int 21(3):13–18
Carvalho EFFN (1870) O passado, presente e futuro dos montados. Estudo Económico-Agrícola no Distrito de Beja. Dissertation, Instituto Geral de Agricultura, Lisbon
Catry FX, Moreira F, Pausas JG, Fernandes PM, Rego F, Cardillo E, Curt T (2012) Cork oak vulnerability to fire: the role of bark harvesting, tree characteristics and abiotic factors. PLoS One 7(6):e39810. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039810
CEEM (1996) A região de Évora numa perspectiva de Ecologia da Paisagem. Relatório Final do Programa STRIDE-Amb. 12, Universidade de Évora, Évora
Coelho IS, Campos P (2009) Mixed cork oak-stone pine woodlands in the Alentejo region of Portugal. In: Aronson J, Pereira JS, Pausas JG (eds) Cork oak woodlands on the edge. Ecology, adaptive management, and restoration, 1st edn. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Island Press, Washington, pp 153–161
Coelho COA, Laouina A, Ferreira AJD, Hamza A, Chaker M, Naafa R, Regaya K, Boulet AK, Keizer JJ, Carvalho TMM (2004) Changes in land use and land management practices affecting land degradation within forest and grazing ecosystems in the Western Mediterranean. In: Schnabel S, Ferreira A (eds) Advances in geoecology 37: sustainability of agrosilvopastoral systems—dehesas, montados. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen, pp 137–153
Coelho MB, Paulo JA, Palma JHN, Tomé M (2012) Contribution of cork oak plantations installed after 1990 in Portugal to the Kyoto commitments and to the landowners economy. Forest Policy Econ 17:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.005
Correal E, Robledo A, Ríos S (1992) Recursos forrajeros herbáceos y leñosos de zonas áridas y semiáridas. 43 Reunión de la Federación Europea de Zootecnia, Madrid
Costa JC, Aguiar C, Capelo J, Lousã M, Neto C (1998) Biogeografia de Portugal Continental. Quercetea 0:5–56
Costa A, Madeira M, Oliveira AC (2008) The relationship between cork oak growth patterns and soil, slope and drainage in a cork oak woodland in Southern Portugal. For Ecol Manag 255:1525–1535. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.008
Costa A, Pereira H, Madeira M (2009) Landscape dynamics in endangered cork oak woodlands in Southwestern Portugal (1958–2005). Agrofor Syst 77:83–96. doi:10.1007/s10457-009-9212-3
Costa A, Pereira H, Madeira M (2010) Analysis of spatial patterns of oak decline in cork oak woodlands in Mediterranean conditions. Ann For Sci 67:204. doi:10.1051/forest/2009097
Costa A, Madeira M, Santos JL, Oliveira AC (2011) Change and dynamics in Mediterranean evergreen oak woodlands landscapes of Southwestern Iberian Peninsula. Landsc Urban Plan 102:164–176. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.04.002
Cubera E, Moreno G (2007) Effect of land-use on soil water dynamic in dehesas of Central-Western Spain. Catena 71:298–308. doi:10.1890/100084
David TS, Cabral MT, Sardinha RMA (1992) A mortalidade dos sobreiros e a seca. Finisterra 27:17–24
David TS, Henriques MO, Kurz-Besson C, Nunes J, Valente F, Vaz M, Pereira JS, Siegwolf R, Chaves MM, Gazarini LC, David JS (2007) Water-use strategies in two co-occurring Mediterranean evergreen oaks: surviving the summer drought. Tree Physiol 27:793–803
Del Pozo JL (2004) El manejo silvícola: la gestión de encinares y alcornocales ante el síndrome de la seca. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Dirección general para la biodiversidad
Díaz-Delgado R, Lloret F, Pons X, Terradas J (2002) Satellite evidence of decreasing resilience in Mediterranean plant communities after recurrent wildfires. Ecology 83(8):2293–2303
Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling D, Kuhn I, Ohlemuller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Schroder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x
ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands
Gallego FJ, Perez de Algaba A, Fernandez-Escobar R (1999) Etiology of oak decline in Spain. Eur J For Pathol 29(1):17–27. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0329.1999.00128.x
Gaspar P, Escribano M, Mesías FJ, Rodriguez de Ledesma A, Pulido F (2008) Sheep farms in the Spanish rangelands (dehesas): typologies according to livestock management and economic indicators. Small Rumin Res 74:52–63. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.03.013
Godinho S, Santos AP, Sá-Sousa P (2011) Montado management effects on the abundance and conservation of reptiles in Alentejo, Southern Portugal. Agrofor Syst 82:197–207. doi:10.1007/s10457-010-9346-3
Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186
Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, London
Hubbell SP, Ahumada JA, Condit R, Foster RB (2001) Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a neotropical forest. Ecol Res 16:859–875
Joffre R, Rambal S, Ratte JP (1999) The dehesa system of southern Spain and Portugal as a natural ecosystem mimic. Agrofor Syst 45:57–79. doi:10.1023/A:1006259402496
Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673. doi:10.2307/1939924
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Leitão JM (1902) Os montados de azinho no Distrito de Beja. Dissertation, Instituto de Agronomia e Veterinária, Lisbon
Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr 72:445–463
Lima MB, Bernardo DAF, Madeira e Madeira MEB, Graça JM, Félix ALT, Rita F, Custódio SIG, Varela JLM, Silva ICCP, Bouça E (eds) (2000) Sistemas agrários tradicionais no Algarve—contributos para o seu estudo. Direcção Regional de Agricultura do Algarve, Faro
Linaldeddu BT, Scanu B, Maddau L, Franceschini A (2013) Diplodia corticola and Phytophthora cinnamomi: the main pathogens involved in holm oak decline on Caprera Island (Italy). Forest Pathol. doi:10.1111/efp.12081
Miller J, Franklin J, Aspinall R (2007) Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models. Ecol Model 202:225–242. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.012
Montero MJ, Obrador JJ, Cubera E, Moreno G (2004) The role of dehesa land use on tree water status in Central-Western Spain. In: Schnabel S, Ferreira A (eds) Advances in geoecology 37: sustainability of agrosilvopastoral systems—dehesas, montados. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen, pp 125–136
Moreira AC, Martins JMS (2005) Influence of site factors on the impact of Phytophthora cinnamomi in cork oak stands in Portugal. For Pathol 35(3):145–162
Moreira AC, Medeira C, Maia I, Quartin V, Matos MC, Cravador A (2006) Studies on the association of the Quercus suber decline disease with Phytophthora cinnamomi in Portugal. Boletín de Información de CIDEU 1:31–38
Moreira F, Catry F, Duarte I, Acácio V, Silva JS (2009) A conceptual model of sprouting responses in relation to fire damage: an example with cork oak (Quercus suber L.) trees in Southern Portugal. Plant Ecol 201:77–85. doi:10.1007/s11258-008-9476-0
Moreno MG, Obrador JJ, Garcıía E, Cubera E, Montero MJ, Pulido F, Dupraz C (2007) Driving competitive and facilitative interactions in oak dehesas through management practices. Agrofor Syst 70:25–40
Mourato S, Moreira M, Corte-Real J (2010) Interannual variability of precipitation distribution patterns in Southern Portugal. Int J Climatol 30:1784–1794
Natividade JV (1950) Subericultura. Ministério da Agricultura, Pescas e Alimentação, Direcção-Geral das Florestas, Lisboa
Olea L, San Miguel-Ayanz A (2006) The Spanish dehesa: a traditional Mediterranean silvopastoral system linking production and nature conservation. 21st General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Badajoz (Spain). April 2006 Opening paper. Available http://www.doctorrange.com/PDF/Dehesa.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2014
Overmars KP, Koning GHJ, Veldkamp A (2003) Spatial autocorrelation in multiscale land use models. Ecol Model 164:257–270
Paracchini ML, Petersen JE, Hoogeveen Y, Bamps C, Burfield I, van Swaay C (2008) High nature value farmland in Europe: an estimate of the distribution patterns on the basis of land cover and biodiversity data. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Pelegrín GE, Peguero PJJ, Camarero JJ, Fernández-Cancio A, Navarro CR (2008) Drought and forest decline in the Iberian Peninsula: a simple explanation for a complex phenomenom? In: Sánchez JM (ed) Droughts: causes, effects and predictions. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 27–68. ISBN 978-1-60456-285-9
Pérez-Sierra A, López-García C, León M, García-Jiménez J, Abad-Campos P, Jung T (2013) Previously unrecorded low-temperature Phytophthora species associated with Quercus decline in a Mediterranean forest in eastern Spain. For Pathol 43:331–339. doi:10.1111/efp.12037
Pinto-Correia T (1993) Threatened landscape in Alentejo, Portugal: the montado and other “agro-silvo-pastoral” systems. Landsc Urban Plan 24:43–48. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(93)90081-N
Pinto-Correia T (2000) Future development in Portuguese rural areas: how to manage agricultural support for landscape conservation? Landsc Urban Plan 50:95–106. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00082-7
Pinto-Correia T, Godinho S (2013) Chapter 4 changing agriculture- changing landscapes: What is going on in the high valued montado landscapes of southern Portugal? In: Ortiz-Miranda D, Moragues-Faus A, Arnalte-Alegre E (eds) Agriculture in Mediterranean Europe: between old and new paradigms (Research in Rural Sociology and Development), vol 19. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 75–90
Pinto-Correia T, Mascarenhas JM (1999) Contribution to the extensification/intensification debate: new trends in the Portuguese Montado. Landsc Urban Plan 46:125–131. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00036-5
Pinto-Correia T, Primdahl J (2009) When rural landscapes change functionality: constraints and development options for multifunctional landscapes. Examples from contrasting case-studies in Portugal and Denmark. In: Brouwer F, van der Heide M (eds) Multifunctional rural land management: economics and policies. Earthscan, London, pp 213–234
Pinto-Correia T, Vos W (2004) Multifunctionality in Mediterranean landscapes—past and future. New Dimens Eur Landsc 4:135–164
Pinto-Correia T, Barroso F, Surová D, Menezes H (2011a) The fuzziness of montado landscapes: progress in assessing user preferences through photo-based surveys. Agrofor Syst 82:209–224. doi:10.1007/s10457-010-9347-2
Pinto-Correia T, Ribeiro N, Sá-Sousa P (2011b) Introducing the montado, the cork and holm oak agroforestry system of Southern Portugal. Agrofor Syst 82:99–104
Pinto-Correia T, Menezes H, Barroso F (2014) The landscape as an asset in Southern European fragile agricultural systems: contrasts and contradictions in land managers attitudes and practices. Landsc Res 39(2):205–217. doi:10.180/01426397.2013.790948
Plant R (2012) Spatial data analysis in ecology and agriculture using R. CRC Press, Boca raton
Plieninger T (2006) Habitat loss, fragmentation, and alteration: quantifying the impact of land-use changes on a Spanish dehesa landscape by use of aerial photography and GIS. Landsc Ecol 21:91–105. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-8294-1
Plieninger T (2007) Compatibility of livestock grazing with stand regeneration in Mediterranean holm oak parklands. J Nat Conserv 15:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2005.09.002
Primdahl J, Swaffield S (eds) (2010) Globalization and agricultural landscapes. Change patterns and policy trends in developed countries. CUP, Cambridge
Pulido FJ, Díaz M (2002) Dinámica de la regeneración natural del arbolado de encina y alcornoque. In: Pulido FJ, Campos P, Montero G (eds) La gestión forestal de las dehesas. IPROCOR, Mérida, pp 39–62
Pulido FJ, Díaz M (2005) Regeneration of a Mediterranean oak: a whole-cycle approach. Ecoscience 12:92–102. doi:10.2980/i1195-6860-12-1-92.1
Pulido FJ, Díaz M, Hidalgo-de-Trucios S (2001) Size structure and regeneration of Spanish holm oak Quercus ilex forests and dehesas: effects of agroforestry use on their long-term sustainability. For Ecol Manag 146:1–13. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00443-6
R Development Core Team (2011). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
Ramírez JA, Díaz M (2008) The role of temporal shrub encroachment for the maintenance of Spanish holm oak Quercus ilex dehesas. For Ecol Manag 255(5):1976–1983. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.019
Rivest D, Rolo V, López-Díaz L, Moreno G (2011) Shrub encroachment in Mediterranean silvopastoral systems: Retama sphaerocarpa and Cistus ladanifer induce contrasting effects on pasture and Quercus ilex production. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141(3):447–454. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.018
Rutherford GN, Bebi P, Edwards PJ, Zimmermann NE (2008) Assessing land use statistics to model land cover change in a mountainous landscape in the European Alps. Ecol Model 212:460–471
Sá-Sousa P (2014) The Portuguese montado: conciliating ecological values with human demands within a dynamic agroforestry system. Ann For Sci 71(1):1–3. doi:10.1007/s13595-013-0338-0
Schaffhauser A, Curt T, Tatoni T (2011) Fire-vegetation interplay in a mosaic structure of Quercus suber woodlands and Mediterranean maquis under recurrent fires. For Ecol Manag 262(5):730–738. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.003
Sheffer E (2012) A review of the development of Mediterranean pine–oak ecosystems after land abandonment and afforestation: are they novel ecosystems? Ann For Sci 69(4):429–443. doi:10.1007/s13595-011-0181-0
Silva JS, Catry F (2006) Forest fires in cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal. Int J Environ Stud 63:235–257. doi:10.1080/00207230600720829
Stoate S, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, Snoo GR, Eden P (2001) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manag 63:337–365
Surová D, Surový P, Ribeiro NA, Pinto-Correia T (2011) Integration of landscape preferences to support the multifunctional management of the montado system. Agrofor Syst 82:225–237. doi:10.1007/s10457-011-9373-8
Surová D, Pinto-Correia T, Marusak R (2014) Visual complexity and the montado do matter: landscape pattern preferences of user groups in Alentejo, Portugal. Ann For Sci 71(1):15–24. doi:10.1007/s13595-013-0330-8
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
van Doorn AM, Pinto-Correia T (2007) Differences in land cover interpretation in landscapes rich in cover gradients: reflections based on the montado of South Portugal. Agrofor Syst 70(2):169–183. doi:10.1007/s10457-007-9055-8
Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York
Vicente AM, Alés RF (2006) Long term persistence of dehesas. Evidences from history. Agrofor Syst 67:19–28. doi:10.1007/s10457-005-1110-8
Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R, vol 66. CRC Press, Boca raton
Wood S, Augustin N (2002) GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling. Ecol Model 157:157–177
Wu D, Liu J, Zhang G, Ding W, Wang W, Wang R (2009) Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into cellular automata model: an application to the dynamics of Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis Lour.). Ecol Model 220:3490–3498
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by FEDER through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors—COMPETE and National Funds through FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology under the Strategic Project PEst-C/AGR/UI0115/2011 and Pest-OE/AGR/UIO115/2014. Research associated with this paper was also funded by the FCT as part of the POPH-QREN-Tipologia 4.1 Programme: scholarship SFRH/BD/77897/2011 was awarded to S. Godinho. N. Guiomar was also funded by the FCT scholarship with the reference SFRH/BD/35848/2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godinho, S., Guiomar, N., Machado, R. et al. Assessment of environment, land management, and spatial variables on recent changes in montado land cover in southern Portugal. Agroforest Syst 90, 177–192 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9757-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9757-7