Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Usefulness of Laboratory Data in the Management of Right Iliac Fossa Pain in Adults

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the usefulness of inflammatory markers in the management of patients with right iliac fossa pain.

Patients and Methods

A single site, prospective observational study was conducted from October 2001 to April 2003. Patients with right iliac fossa pain referred to the surgeon were included. Blood samples were obtained for C-reactive protein, leukocyte, and granulocyte analysis. Clinical, surgical, and histopathologic data were collected. Analysis of inflammatory parameters was performed with logistic regression and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were compared.

Results

C-reactive protein increased with the severity of appendicitis and predicted accurately perforation (r2 = 0.613; P < 0.0005), showing the highest accuracy among inflammatory markers (areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve were 0.846, 0.753, and 0.685 for C-reactive protein, leukocyte and granulocytes, respectively; P < 0.001). Accuracy improved when C-reactive protein and leukocytes were combined; positive and negative predictive values were 93.2 percent and 92.3 percent, respectively.

Conclusions

C-reactive protein is a helpful marker in the management of patients with right iliac fossa pain; the predictive value improves when combined with leukocyte count. A patient with normal C-reactive protein and leukocytes has a very low probability of appendicitis and should not undergo surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis. Nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 2002;137:799–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gill B, Jenkins J. Cost-effective evaluation and management of acute abdomen. Surg Clin North Am 1996;76:71–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 2001;286:1748–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A, Koepsell T. Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:933–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 1999;229:344–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balthazar EJ, Rofsky NM, Zucker R. Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:768–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001;136:556–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Walker S, Haun W, Clark J, McMillin K, Zeren F, Gilliland T. The value of limited computed tomography with rectal contrast in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2000;180:450–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu HP, Lin CY, Chang CF, Chang YJ, Huang CY. Predictive value of C-reactive protein at different cutoff levels in acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:449–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Role of leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Am Surg 2005;71:344–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson S, Olander B, Pira U, Granstrom L. White blood cell count, leucocyte elastase activity, and serum concentrations of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein after open appendicectomy. Eur J Surg 1997;163:123–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Caglayan F, Cakmak M, Caglayan O, Cavusoglu T. Plasma D-lactate levels in diagnosis of appendicitis. J Invest Surg 2003;16:233–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grönroos JM, Forsstrom JJ, Irjala K, Nevalainen TJ. Phospholipase A2, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clin Chem 1994;40:1757–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallan S, Asberg A. The accuracy of C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis - a meta-analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997;57:373–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg 2004;91:28–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marchand A, Van Lente F, Galen RS. The assessment of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Clin Pathol 1983;80:369–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eriksson S, Granstrom L, Bark S. Laboratory tests in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand 1989;155:117–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dueholm S, Bagi P, Bud M. Laboratory aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A blinded, prospective trial concerning diagnostic value of leukocyte count, neutrophil differential count, and C-reactive protein. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:855–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oosterhuis WP, Zwinderman AH, Teeuwen M, et al. C reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg 1993;159:115–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Söndenaa K, Buan B, Söreide JA, et al. Rapid C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1992;52:585–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eriksson S, Granstrom L, Carlstrom A. The diagnostic value of repetitive preoperative analyses of C-reactive protein and total leucocyte count in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994;29:1145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Ravn H, et al. Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis. World J Surg 2000;24:479–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Körner H, Söreide JA, Söndenaa K. Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Eur J Surg 1999;165:679–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grönroos JM, Grönroos P. Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1999;86:501–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eriksson S, Granstrom L, Olander B, Wretlind B. Sensitivity of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein concentrations in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg 1995;161:41–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Paajanen H, Mansikka A, Laato M, Ristamaki R, Pulkki K, Kostiainen S. Novel serum inflammatory markers in acute appendicitis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2002;62:579–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tepel J, Sommerfeld A, Klomp HJ, Kapischke M, Eggert A, Kremer B. Prospective evaluation of diagnostic modalities in suspected acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004;389:219–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 2004;230:472–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu HP, Huang CY, Chang YJ, Chou CC, Lin CY. Use of changes over time in serum inflammatory parameters in patients with equivocal appendicitis. Surgery 2006;139:789–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Paajanen H, Mansikka A, Laato M, Kettunen J, Kostiainen S. Are serum inflammatory markers age dependent in acute appendicitis? J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:303–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Unalmiser S. Accuracy of serum C-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon’s clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1270–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Irwig L, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, et al. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ 2002;324:669–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Albu E, Miller BM, Choi Y, Lakhanpal S, Murthy RN, Gerst PH. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:49–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Birchley D. Patients with clinical acute appendicitis should have pre-operative full blood count and C-reactive protein assays. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Morino M, Pellegrino L, Castagna E, Farinella E, Mao P. Acute nonspecific abdominal pain: A randomized, controlled trial comparing early laparoscopy versus clinical observation. Ann Surg 2006;244:881–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Abou-Nukta F, Bakhos C, Arroyo K, et al. Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours. Arch Surg 2006;141:504–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis. Implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 2007;245:886–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Andersson RE. The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J Surg 2007;31:86–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank José M. Rodriguez-Barbero, M.D. for the review of the histopathologic diagnosis, T. Pascual-Duran, M.D. for his help with the laboratory techniques, and the Nursing Team of the Emergency Department in the University Hospital of Getafe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain

    Pablo Ortega-Deballon M.D., Ph.D., Juan C. Ruiz de Adana-Belbel M.D., Ph.D., Alberto Hernández-Matías M.D., Javier García-Septiem M.D. & Mariano Moreno-Azcoita M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Pablo Ortega-Deballon M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan C. Ruiz de Adana-Belbel M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alberto Hernández-Matías M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Javier García-Septiem M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mariano Moreno-Azcoita M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Ortega-Deballon M.D., Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Ortega-Deballon, P., Ruiz de Adana-Belbel, J.C., Hernández-Matías, A. et al. Usefulness of Laboratory Data in the Management of Right Iliac Fossa Pain in Adults. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1093–1099 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9265-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9265-9

Key words

Search

Navigation