Abstract
Purpose
Treating hemorrhoids by stapled hemorrhoidopexy has become increasingly common, because the procedure results in less pain and allows the patient to return to work earlier than with open hemorrhoidectomy. However, the durability of stapled hemorrhoidopexy has not been evaluated. This study was designed to assess initial results, analyze complications and failures, and document both the need for repeated procedures and the outcomes of follow-up to five years.
Methods
From 1998 to 2004, 258 patients underwent modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy. The appearance of the anus was scored preoperatively, immediately after the procedure, at three months, and at one to five years postoperatively. The anatomy score ranged from 1 (normal anus) to 7 (worst prolapse). We also evaluated operation time, analgesia, staple line position, postoperative pain score, technical failures, postoperative complications, need for repeated procedures, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analyses were used to identify correlations and differences, and the variables were analyzed in relation to the final outcome.
Results
The patients were observed for a median of 34 (range, 18–78) months. The median postoperative pain score was 4 (Visual Analog Scale 1–10) on the day of stapled hemorrhoidopexy; additional external procedures resulted in significantly higher pain (P < 0.05). Stapled hemorrhoidopexy was repeated in 31 patients (12 percent), and 38 patients (14.7 percent) had subsequent excisions. Technical failures occurred in 18 of 258 patients (7 percent). The median anatomy score decreased from 6 (range, 3–7) preoperatively to 1 (range, 1–6) at last follow-up, irrespective of one or a repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy, surgical excision, or technical failure. The risk of reintervention was greatest during the first year after a stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Overall, patient satisfaction was high and correlated significantly with the anatomy score (r = 0.46, P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The pain after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was low, recovery was rapid, complications were few, and patient satisfaction was high. A recurrent (or persistent) prolapse was alleviated by a repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for cure. However, there was a high risk of reintervention after a stapled hemorrhoidopexy, and this should be further evaluated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:669–74.
Kirsch JJ, Staude G, Herold A. Haemorrhoidektomien nach Longo und Millighan-Morgan. Chirurg 2001;72:180–5.
Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Millighan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1049–53.
Maw A, Eu K-W, Seow-Choen F. Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:826–8.
Wexner SD. The quest for painless surgical treatment of hemorrhoids continues. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:174–8.
Raahave D, Loud FL. Additional faecal reservoirs or hidden constipation: a link between functional and organic bowel disease. Dan Med Bull 2004;51:442–5.
Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, June 3–6, 1998, Rome, Italy. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna 1998:777–84.
Corman ML, Gravie JF, Hager T, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party: indications, contraindications and technique. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:304–10.
Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1837–45.
Ng K-H, Ho K-S, Ooi B-S, Tang C-L, Eu K-W. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 2006;93:226–30.
Halberg M, Raahave D. Perirectal, retroperitoneal and mediastinal gas after stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Ugeskr Læger 2006;168:3139–40.
Ho Y-H, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu K-W. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1449–55.
Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1437–44.
Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M, et al. Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1846–51.
Beattie GC, McAdams TK, McIntoch SA, Loudon MA. Day case stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 2005;8:56–61.
Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:1376–81.
Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 Oct 18;CD005393.
Welling DR, Wollf BG, Dozois RR. Piles of defeat. Napoleon at Waterloo. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:303–5.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Research Fund in Frederiksborg County and the Olga Bryde Nielsens Fund for research grants, Christine Petersen M.D. for her aid with histologic specimens, and Jens Albrechtsen M.D. for doing the examinations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Raahave, D., Jepsen, L.V. & Pedersen, I.K. Primary and Repeated Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: Follow-Up to Five Years. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 334–341 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9102-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9102-6