Skip to main content
Log in

The Management of 38 Anastomotic Leaks After 1,684 Intestinal Resections

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the management of anastomotic leaks and assess the impact of outpatient leak presentation on clinical outcome.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients with clinical anastomotic leaks from 1,684 adult patients undergoing large and small intestinal anastomosis in a tertiary referral center between January 1, 2003 and September 1, 2005 were studied. All pediatric patients and adult patients with esophageal and gastric leaks were excluded. Charts were reviewed for information on anastomotic leak management, discharge status before leak presentation, length of stay, readmissions, and mortality.

Results

The overall leak rate was 2.3 percent. Eighty-seven percent of patients (n = 33) were managed operatively. Forty-two percent of patients (n = 16) were discharged after initial operation and presented as outpatients with anastomotic leak. The discharge and inpatient groups were comparable in respect to total length of stay (26.9 vs. 33.4 days) and number of readmissions (2 vs. 1.5). The overall mortality of 5 percent (n = 2) originated from the discharge group. A greater percentage of discharge patients required intensive care unit stays for more than two weeks (25 vs. 14 percent) and very long hospital admissions lasting more than two months (31 vs. 9 percent). A smaller percentage of the discharge group patients had their ostomies reversed (31 vs. 50 percent).

Conclusions

The primary management of clinical anastomotic leak remains intestinal diversion. Although length of stay was shorter in the discharge group, the number of patients who experienced significant intensive care unit stays and very long hospital stays was greater. Within the discharge group, mortality was higher and fewer patients had their ostomies reversed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FJ Thornton AB Barbuk (1997) ArticleTitleWound healing: healing in the gastrointestinal tract Surg Clin North Am 77 549–573 Occurrence Handle9194880 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szjvVehsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70568-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. JG Docherty JR McGregor AM Akyol GD Murray DJ Galloway (1995) ArticleTitleComparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery Ann Surg 2 176–184 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199502000-00008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. SD Wexner SM Cera (2005) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis Surg Clin North Am 85 35–47 Occurrence Handle15619527 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.suc.2004.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. AJ Senagore (2005) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease Surg Clin North Am 85 19–24 Occurrence Handle15619525 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.suc.2004.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. InstitutionalAuthorNameClinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) ArticleTitleA comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer N Engl J Med 350 2050–2059 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa032651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CS McArdle DC McMillian DJ Hole (2005) ArticleTitleImpact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer Br J Surg 92 1150–1154 Occurrence Handle16035134 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvkvVKksA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.5054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. HG Walker SW Bell MJ Rickard et al. (2004) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer Ann Surg 240 255–259 Occurrence Handle15273549 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000133186.81222.08

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. RP Kiran CP Delaney AJ Senagore M Steel T Garafalo VW Fazio (2004) ArticleTitleOutcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery J Am Coll Surg 198 877–883 Occurrence Handle15194068 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D Schrag KS Panageas E Riedel et al. (2003) ArticleTitleSurgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection J Surg Oncol 83 68–79 Occurrence Handle12772198 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jso.10244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SD Wexner PS Hermanek (2000) ArticleTitleRole of surgeon as a variable in treatment of rectal cancer Semen Surg Oncol 19 329–335 Occurrence Handle10.1002/ssu.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R Golub RW Golub R Cantu HD Stein (1997) ArticleTitleA multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses J Am Coll Surg 184 364–372 Occurrence Handle9100681 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3lsFegtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. JT Makela H Kiviniemi S Laitinen (2003) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 46 653–660 Occurrence Handle12792443 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6627-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. A Vignali VW Fazio IC Lavery et al. (1997) ArticleTitleFactors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients J Am Coll Surg 185 113–121 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00891-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E Rullier C Laurent JL Garrelon (1998) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer Br J Surg 85 355–358 Occurrence Handle9529492 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ptVaruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. LT Sorensen T Jorgensen LT Kirkeby B Skovdal B Vennits P Wille-Jorgensen (1999) ArticleTitleSmoking and alcohol abuse are major risk reactors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery Br J Surg 86 927–931 Occurrence Handle10417567 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzkvVKmsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01165.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. FD Griffen CD Knight JM Whitaker CD Knight (1990) ArticleTitleA double stapling technique for low anterior resection Ann Surg 211 745–752 Occurrence Handle2357137 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c3ptVeitA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. SW Bell KG Walker MJ Rickard et al. (2003) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage after curative resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence Br J Surg 90 1261–1266 Occurrence Handle14515297 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svltl2htQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. T Nakamura AJ Pikarsky FM Potenti et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAre complications of subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis related to the original disease? Am Surg 67 417–420 Occurrence Handle11379639 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3psFWmtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. TR Schrock CW Deveney JE Dunphy (1973) ArticleTitleFactors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses Ann Surg 177 513–518 Occurrence Handle4540874 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE3s7ns1SrtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. EL Bokey PH Chapuis MT Pheils et al. (1981) ArticleTitleElective resection for diverticular disease and carcinoma Dis Colon Rectum 24 181–182 Occurrence Handle7227131 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3M7ovVajtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02962329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. HT Debas FB Thomson (1972) ArticleTitleA critical review of colectomy with anastomosis Surg Gynecol Obstet 135 747–752 Occurrence Handle5084246 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE3s%2FjsVamsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A Dwivedi F Chahin S Agrawal et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease Dis Colon Rectum 45 1309–1315 Occurrence Handle12394427 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6415-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. S Benoist Y Panis V Pannegeon et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCan failure of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal abscess be predicted? Am J Surg 184 148–153 Occurrence Handle12169359 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00912-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. L Basse D Hjort-Jakobsen P Billesbolle M Werner H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitleA clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection Ann Surg 232 51–57 Occurrence Handle10862195 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czitVCqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200007000-00008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. DR Urback ED Kennedy M Cohen (1999) ArticleTitleColon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systemic review and meta-analysis Ann Surg 229 174–180 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199902000-00003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J Hoffman MH Shokouh-Amiri P Damm R Jensen (1987) ArticleTitleA prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 30 449–452

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celia M. Divino M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Byrn, J.C., Schlager, A., Divino, C.M. et al. The Management of 38 Anastomotic Leaks After 1,684 Intestinal Resections. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 1346–1353 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0653-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0653-8

Key words

Navigation