Abstract
PURPOSE: The role of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer has changed because of advances in sphincter-preserving surgery. Our aim was to evaluate the results of this operation in the five-year period following introduction of the concept of total mesorectal excision METHODS: Data on all patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer between 1992 and 1997 were collected prospectively. All patients had had total mesorectal excision. Curative resection was defined as absence of macroscopic disease after resection and local recurrence as any infiltration or tumor identified in the pelvis, alone or combined with distant disease. Survival and local recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. RESULTS: Of 165 abdominoperineal resections performed, 106 were for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum. The male:female ratio was 50:56, with a median age of 65 (range, 33–85) years. There was one postoperative death. Twenty-seven patients received short-course preoperative radiotherapy (25 Gy over 1 week), whereas 22 had a longer course, with concomitant chemotherapy in 2. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered in 29, postoperative radiotherapy in 4, and combined therapy in 8. After curative resection (n = 91), survival at five years was 76 percent and differed significantly by stage. Recurrence at any site was 7 percent (3/34) for Stage I, 27 percent (6/26) for Stage II, and 53 percent (16/31) for Stage III. Nine patients presented with local recurrence, with an overall rate at five years of 10 percent. Isolated locale recurrence was observed in only 5 percent of patients CONCLUSIONS: After abdominoperineal resection and total mesorectal excision, good rates of local control may be achieved provided surgical technique is meticulous.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AL Martling T Holm LE Rutqvist BJ Moran RJ Heald B Cedemark (2000) ArticleTitleEffect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project Lancet 356 93–96
E Kapiteijn CA Marijnen ID Nagtegaal et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer N Engl J Med 345 638–646
S Zaheer JH Pemberton R Farouk RR Dozois BG Wolff D Ilstrup (1998) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum Ann Surg 227 800–811
RJ Heald RK Smedh A Kald R Sexton BJ Moran (1997) ArticleTitleAbdominoperineal excision of the rectum—an endangered operation Dis Colon Rectum 40 747–751
WE Enker K Havenga T Polyak H Thaler M Cranor (1997) ArticleTitleAbdominoperineal resection via total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve preservation for low rectal cancer World J Surg 21 715–720
RJ Heald (1988) ArticleTitleThe “Holy Plane” of rectal surgery J R Soc Med 81 503–508
P Micheau JP Moreau JP Chavoin et al. (1981) ArticleTitleRevascularisation using the greater omentum. Results of an experimental study in dogs. Clinical perspectives (author’s transl) [in French] J Chir (Paris) 118 197–205
JM Hay A Fingerhut JC Paquet Y Flamant (1997) ArticleTitleManagement of the pelvic space with or without omentoplasty after abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum: a prospective multicenter study. The French Association for Surgical Research Eur J Surg 163 199–206
PJ Marsh RD James PF Schofield (1995) ArticleTitleDefinition of local recurrence after surgery for rectal cancer Br J Surg 82 465–468
A Nissan JG Guillem PB Paty et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAbdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center Dis Colon Rectum 44 27–36
M Killingback P Barron OF Dent (2001) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the rectum without total mesorectal excision Dis Colon Rectum 44 473–483
AF Leong (2000) ArticleTitleSelective total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 43 1237–1240
L Påhlman (2001) ArticleTitleInvited editorial Dis Colon Rectum 44 35–36
EL Bokey PH Chapuis OF Dent et al. (1997) ArticleTitleFactors affecting survival after excision of the rectum for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 40 3–10
E Rullier F Zerbib C Laurent et al. (1999) ArticleTitleIntersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 42 1168–1175
WE Enker HT Thaler ML Cranor T Polyak (1995) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectum excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum J Am Coll Surg 181 335–346
AR Dixon WA Maxwell J Thornton-Holmes (1991) ArticleTitleCarcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 78 308–311
K Renner HR Rosen G Novi N Holbling R Schiessel (1999) ArticleTitleQuality of life after surgery for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 42 1160–1167
P Luna-Perez P Corral S Labastida D Rodriguez-Coria S Delgado (1999) ArticleTitleInguinal lymph node metastases from rectal adenocarcinoma J Surg Oncol 70 177–180
RB Arenas A Fichera D Mhoon F Michelassi (1998) ArticleTitleTotal mesenteric excision in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer Arch Surg 133 608–612
SM Heah KW Eu YH Ho AF Leong F Seow-Choen (1997) ArticleTitleHartmann’s procedure vs. abdominoperineal resection for palliation of advanced low rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 40 1313–1317
MM Grumann EM Noack IA Hoffmann PM Schlag (2001) ArticleTitleComparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer Ann Surg 233 149–156
AS Allal S Bieri A Pelloni et al. (2000) ArticleTitleSphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers Br J Cancer 82 1131–1137
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Dehni, N., McFadden, N., McNamara, D.A. et al. Oncologic Results Following Abdominoperineal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Low Rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 867–874 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6675-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6675-1