Skip to main content
Log in

Functional Outcome, Quality of Life, and Complications After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Selected Septuagenarians

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Concerns about morbidity and functional outcome have lead some authors to suggest that ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should not be performed in older patients. This article evaluates the outcome of selected septuagenarians undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at this institution. METHODS: Seventeen of 1,911 patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were older than the age of 70 at the time of surgery. Functional outcome, quality of life, and manometric data were assessed prospectively, whereas complications were assessed by chart review. RESULTS: There was one mortality related to sepsis after small-bowel obstruction and one reoperation at 18 months for pelvic abscess. Minor complications occurred in five patients. Median (interquartile range) quality of life and health and levels of energy and happiness (scored out of 10) were 9 (7–10), 9 (7–10), 8 (5–10), and 9.5 (7–10), respectively. Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 quality of life scores were not different from those for the healthy population older than 65 years. There was complete continence in 38 percent, rare incontinence in 12 percent, and some incontinence in 50 percent. Nobody was usually or always incontinent. Overall, 82 percent would undergo pouch surgery again, and 89 percent would recommend it to others. CONCLUSIONS: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an acceptable surgical option for selected healthy, motivated septuagenarians with ulcerative colitis who are eager to preserve fecal continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AG Parks RJ Nicholls (1978) ArticleTitleProctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis BMJ 2 85–88

    Google Scholar 

  2. PM Sagar W Lewis PJ Holdsworth D Johnston C Mitchell J MacFie (1993) ArticleTitleQuality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic ileal reservoir compares favorably with that of patients with medically treated colitis Dis Colon Rectum 36 584–592

    Google Scholar 

  3. VW Fazio Y Ziv JM Church et al. (1995) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients Ann Surg 222 120–127

    Google Scholar 

  4. P Setti-Carraro JK Ritchie KH Wilkinson RJ Nicholls PR Hawley (1994) ArticleTitleThe first 10 years’ experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis Gut 35 1070–1075

    Google Scholar 

  5. IC Lavery WB Tuckson KA Easley (1989) ArticleTitleInternal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy Dis Colon Rectum 32 950–953

    Google Scholar 

  6. WB Tuckson IC Lavery VW Fazio et al. (1991) ArticleTitleManometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation Am J Surg 161 90–96

    Google Scholar 

  7. VW Fazio MG O’Riordain IC Lavery et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLong term function and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy Ann Surg 230 575–584

    Google Scholar 

  8. JJ Bauer SR Gorfine IM Gelernt MT Harris I Kreel (1997) ArticleTitleRestorative proctocolectomy in patients older than fifty years Dis Colon Rectum 40 562–565

    Google Scholar 

  9. P Reissman TA Teoh EG Weiss et al. (1996) ArticleTitleFunctional outcome of the double stapled ileoanal reservoir in patients more than 60 years of age Am Surg 62 178–183

    Google Scholar 

  10. DN Samarasekera JF Stebbing MG Kettlewell et al. (1996) ArticleTitleOutcome of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis Gut 38 574–577

    Google Scholar 

  11. HT Tan AB Connolly D Morton MR Keighley (1997) ArticleTitleResults of restorative proctocolectomy in the elderly Int J Colorectal Dis 12 319–322

    Google Scholar 

  12. JH Pemberton KA Kelly RW Beart SuffixJr RR Dozois BG Wolff DM Ilstrup (1987) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results Ann Surg 206 504–513

    Google Scholar 

  13. JM Salesmans FM Ngengast EJ Luhbers JH Kuijpers (1992) ArticleTitlePostoperative and long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis coli Dig Dis Sci 37 1882–1889

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y Takao R Gilliland JJ Nogueras et al. (1998) ArticleTitleIs age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis? Ann Surg 227 187–194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Delaney, C.P., Dadvand, B., Remzi, F.H. et al. Functional Outcome, Quality of Life, and Complications After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Selected Septuagenarians. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 890–894 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6323-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6323-9

Keywords

Navigation