Abstract
PURPOSE: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis remains the “gold standard” in surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Pouchitis occurs mainly in patients with a background of ulcerative colitis, although the reasons for this are unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize differences in pouch bacterial populations between ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous pouches. METHODS: After ethical approval was obtained, fresh stool samples were collected from patients with ulcerative colitis pouches (n = 10), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 7) pouches, and ulcerative colitis ileostomies (n = 8). Quantitative measurements of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were performed. RESULTS: Sulfate-reducing bacteria were isolated from 80 percent (n = 8) of ulcerative colitis pouches. Sulfate-reducing bacteria were absent from familial adenomatous polyposis pouches and also from ulcerative colitis ileostomy effluent. Pouch Lactobacilli, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides sp, and Clostridium perfringens counts were increased relative to ileostomy counts in patients with ulcerative colitis. Total pouch enterococci and coliform counts were also increased relative to ileostomy levels. There were no significant quantitative or qualitative differences between pouch types when these bacteria were evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfate-reducing bacteria are exclusive to patients with a background of ulcerative colitis. Not all ulcerative colitis pouches harbor sulfate-reducing bacteria because two ulcerative colitis pouches in this study were free of the latter. They are not present in familial adenomatous polyposis pouches or in ileostomy effluent collected from patients with ulcerative colitis. Total bacterial counts increase in ulcerative colitis pouches after stoma closure. Levels of Lactobacilli, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides sp, Clostridium perfringens, enterococci, and coliforms were similar in both pouch groups. Because sulfate-reducing bacteria are specific to ulcerative colitis pouches, they may play a role in the pathogenesis of pouchitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S Korgsen MR Keighley (1999) ArticleTitleA comparison of function and patient satisfaction after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Colorectal Dis 15 272–276
IR Daniels J Benyon ND Carr (1999) ArticleTitleAn audit of quality of life and functional outcome following restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch surgery in familial adenomatous polyposis coli. Colorectal Dis 15 292–296
KA Kelly (1992) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter-sparing operations for chronic ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg 163 5–11
VW Fazio Y Ziv JM Church (1995) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis: Ann Surg 222 120–127
AP Meagher R Farouk RR Dozois KA Kelly JH Pemberton (1999) ArticleTitleJ-Ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: Br J Surg 85 800–803
JL Lohmuller JH Pemberton RR Dozois D Ilstrup J van Heerden (1990) ArticleTitlePouchitis and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 211 622–629
RJ Nicholls P Belliveau M Neill M Wilks S Tabaqchali (1981) ArticleTitleRestorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: Gut 22 462–468
B Philipson A Brandberg R Jagenburg et al. (1975) ArticleTitleMucosal morphology, bacteriology and absorption in intraabdominal ileostomy reservoir. Scan J Gastroenterol 10 145–153
HJ De Silva PR Millard N Soper M Kettlewell N Mortensen DP Jewell (1991) ArticleTitleEffects of fecal stream and stasis on ileal pouch mucosa. Gut 32 1166–1169
RL Moskowitz NA Shephard RJ Nicholls (1986) ArticleTitleAn assessment of inflammation in the reservoir after restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal reservoir. Int J Colorectal Dis 1 167–174
DG Nasmyth PG Godwin MF Dixon NS Williams D Johnston (1989) ArticleTitleIleal ecology after pouch-anal anastomosis or ileostomy. Gastroenterology 96 814–824
M Pitcher E Beatty GR Gibson et al. (1995) ArticleTitleSulphate-reducing bacteria: Gut 36 63–824
T Florin GR Gibson G Neale et al. (1990) ArticleTitleA role for sulphate reducing bacteria in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 98 5–9
GR Gibson J Cummings G Macfarlane (1991) ArticleTitleGrowth and activity of sulphate reducing bacteria in gut contents of healthy subjects and patients with ulcerative colitis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 86 103–111
J Levine CJ Ellis JK Furne et al. (1998) ArticleTitleFecal hydrogen sulfide production in ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 93 83–87
A Teske C Wawer G Muyzer NB Ramsing (1996) ArticleTitleDistribution of sulphate-reducing bacteria in a stratified fjord as evaluated by most-probable-number counts and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol 62 1405–1415
KE Levin JH Pemberton SF Phillips AR Zinmeister AE Pezim (1992) ArticleTitleRole of oxygen free radicals in the etiology of pouchitis. Dis Colon Rectum 35 452–456
WJ Sandborn WJ Tremaine KP Batts et al. (1995) ArticleTitleFecal bile acids, short-chain fatty acids, and bacteria after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not differ in patients with pouchitis. Dig Dis Sci 40 1474–1483
N Shephard L Hulten GN Tygat et al. (1989) ArticleTitlePouchitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 4 204–229
MR Clausen M Tvede N Mortensen (1992) ArticleTitleShort chain fatty acids in pouch contents in patients with and without pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Gastroenterology 103 1144–1153
LF McKay MA Eastwood WG Brydon (1985) ArticleTitleMethane excretion in man: Gut 26 69–74
Y Peled D Weinberg A Hallak et al. (1987) ArticleTitleFactors affecting methane production in humans: Dig Dis Sci 32 267–271
T Ishioka N Kuwabara Y Ohashi K Wakabayashi (1986) ArticleTitleInduction of colorectal tumours in rats by sulphated polysaccharides. Rev Toxicol 17 215–224
T Ohkhusa (1985) ArticleTitleProduction of experimental ulcerative colitis in hamsters by dextran sodium sulphate and changes in intestinal microflora. Jap J Gastroenterol 82 1327–1336
M Aslam J Batten T Florin et al. (1992) ArticleTitleHydrogen sulphide induced damage to the colonic mucosal barrier in the rat. Gut 33 69–1336
T Florin G Neale GR Gibson SL Christl JH Cummings (1991) ArticleTitleMetabolism of dietary sulphate: Gut 32 766–773
WA Kmiot D Youngs R Tudor H Thompson MR Keighley (1993) ArticleTitleMucosal morphology, cellular proliferation and fecal bacteriology in acute pouchitis. Br J Surg 80 1445–1449
A Corfield B Warren D Bartolo SA Wagner JR Clamp (1992) ArticleTitleMucin changes in ileoanal pouches monitored by metabolic labelling and histochemistry. Br J Surg 79 1209–1203
M Filipe (1979) ArticleTitleMucin in human gastrointestinal epithelium: Invest Cell Pathol 2 195–216
JC Coffey MW Bennett JH Wang et al. (2001) ArticleTitleUpregulation of Fas-Fas-L (CD95/CD95L) mediated epithelial apoptosis: J Surg Res 98 27–32
F Shanahan (2000) ArticleTitleProbiotics and inflammatory bowel disease: Inflam Bowel Dis 6 107–115
DF Newton JH Cummings S MacFarlane GT MacFarlane (1998) ArticleTitleGrowth of a human intestinal Desulfovibrio desulfuricans in continuous cultures containing defined populations of saccharolytic and amino acid fermenting bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 85 372–380
P Gionchetti F Rizzello A Venturi P Brigidi et al. (2000) ArticleTitleOral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: Gastroenterology 119 305–309
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Duffy, M., O’Mahony, L., Coffey, J.C. et al. Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Colonize Pouches Formed for Ulcerative Colitis but Not for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 384–388 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6187-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6187-z