Skip to main content
Log in

Microsatellite Instability as a Marker in Predicting Metachronous Multiple Colorectal Carcinomas After Surgery

A Cohort-Like Study

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: In case-control studies, it was reported that microsatellite instability might be helpful in predicting the development of metachronous multiple colorectal cancers. The purpose of this cohort-like study was to determine whether microsatellite instability is a novel independent marker in predicting metachronous colorectal carcinomas after colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-eight colorectal carcinoma patients were surveyed by periodic colonoscopy for at least three years after surgery. Among these, DNA from paraffin-embedded sections was available for 272 cases. DNA of these cases was studied for six microsatellite markers (five dinucleotide repeats, one mononucleotide repeat). Microsatellite instability phenotype was defined as alterations in one or more loci. RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 74 months, and the median number of colonoscopies was 4.6. The percentage of microsatellite instability-positive cases was 26.4 percent (72/272). Seventeen metachronous colorectal carcinomas were detected during the follow-up period. Incidences of metachronous colorectal carcinomas in microsatellite instability-positive and microsatellite instability-negative cases were 15.3 and 3 percent, respectively (P < 0.001). The cumulative five-year incidence of metachronous colorectal carcinomas was significantly higher in microsatellite instability-positive cases than in microsatellite instability-negative cases (12.5 vs. 2.5 percent, P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis of the relationship between incidence of metachronous colorectal carcinomas and possible risk factors (namely, coexistence of adenoma at the time of surgery, family history of colorectal carcinoma , history of extracolonic malignancy, and microsatellite instability status) showed that microsatellite instability and coexistence of adenoma were significant independent risk factors for the occurrence of metachronous colorectal carcinomas, with values of P = 0.001 and 0.02, respectively. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that microsatellite instability can be regarded as a novel independent and important marker for predicting the development of metachronous colorectal carcinoma after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SH Landis T Murray S Bolden PA Wingo (1998) ArticleTitleCancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin 48 6–29

    Google Scholar 

  2. RL Cali RM Pitsch AG Thorson et al. (1993) ArticleTitleCumulative incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 36 388–393

    Google Scholar 

  3. K Togashi F Konishi A Ozawa et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePredictive factors for detecting colorectal carcinomas in surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 43 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. F Chen M Stuart (1994) ArticleTitleColonoscopic follow-up of colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 37 568–572

    Google Scholar 

  5. O Kronborg E Hage E Deichgraeber (1983) ArticleTitleThe remaining colon after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: Dis Colon Rectum 26 172–176

    Google Scholar 

  6. SB Sengupta CY Yin PB Boulos MD Silva VR Sams JD Delhanty (1997) ArticleTitleGenetic instability in patients with metachronous colorectal cancers. Br J Surg 84 996–1000

    Google Scholar 

  7. S Masubuchi F Konishi K Togashi et al. (1999) ArticleTitleThe significance of microsatellite instability in predicting the development of metachronous multiple colorectal carcinomas in patients with nonfamilial colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 85 1917–1924

    Google Scholar 

  8. K Shitoh F Konishi S Masubuchi S Senba T Tsukamoto K Kanazawa (1998) ArticleTitleImportant microsatellite markers in the investigation of replication errors (RER) in colorectal carcinomas. Jpn J Clin Oncol 28 538–541

    Google Scholar 

  9. S Senba F Konishi T Okamoto et al. (1998) ArticleTitleClinicopathologic and genetic features of nonfamilial colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors. Cancer 82 279–285

    Google Scholar 

  10. CG Moertel JA Bargen MB Dockerty (1958) ArticleTitleMultiple carcinomas of the large intestine. Gastroenterology 34 85–98

    Google Scholar 

  11. D Hojman RA Garriz I Markman (1966) ArticleTitleMultiple malignant tumors of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 9 121–126

    Google Scholar 

  12. S Warren O Gates (1932) ArticleTitleMultiple primary malignant tumors: Am J Cancer 16 1358–1414

    Google Scholar 

  13. HJ Bussey MH Wallace BC Morson (1967) ArticleTitleMetachronous carcinoma of the large intestine and intestinal polyps. Proc R Soc Med 60 208–210

    Google Scholar 

  14. WE Enker S Dragacevic (1978) ArticleTitleMultiple carcinomas of the large bowel: Ann Surg 187 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  15. H Muta M Noguchi M Perucho et al. (1996) ArticleTitleClinical implications of the microsatellite instability in colorectal cancers. Cancer 77 265–270

    Google Scholar 

  16. LA Aaltonen P Peltomaki FS Leach et al. (1993) ArticleTitleClue to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science 260 812–816

    Google Scholar 

  17. SN Thibodeau G Bren D Schaid (1993) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science 260 816–819

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y Ionov MA Peinado S Malkhosyan D Shibata M Perucho (1993) ArticleTitleUbiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis. Nature 363 558–561

    Google Scholar 

  19. M Konishi R Kikuchi-Yanoshita K Tanaka et al. (1996) ArticleTitleMolecular nature of colon tumors in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, familial polyposis, and sporadic colon cancer. Gastroenterology 111 307–317

    Google Scholar 

  20. H Kim J Jen B Vogelstein SR Hamilton (1994) ArticleTitleClinical and pathological characteristics of sporadic colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors in microsatellite sequences. Am J Pathol 145 148–156

    Google Scholar 

  21. L Cawkwell D Li FA Lewis I Martin MF Dixon P Quirke (1995) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite instability in colorectal cancer: Gastroenterology 109 468–471

    Google Scholar 

  22. A Horii HJ Han M Shimada et al. (1994) ArticleTitleFrequent replication errors at microsatellite loci in tumors of patients with multiple primary cancers. Cancer Res 54 3373–3375

    Google Scholar 

  23. S Bulow LB Svendsen A Mellemgaard (1990) ArticleTitleMetachronous colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 77 502–505

    Google Scholar 

  24. HJ Jarvinen M Aarnio H Mustonen et al. (2000) ArticleTitleControlled 15-years trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 118 829–834

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Shitoh, K., Konishi, F., Miyakura, Y. et al. Microsatellite Instability as a Marker in Predicting Metachronous Multiple Colorectal Carcinomas After Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 329–333 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6177-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6177-1

Keywords

Navigation