PURPOSE
Obstetric sphincter tears lead to anal incontinence in 40 to 60 percent of affected women. Primary repair is usually performed without identifying the internal anal sphincter. Since 1999 digestive surgeons have participated in the primary repair of such tears at our hospital. The intention was to perform separate repair of the internal and external anal sphincter in cases of combined tears to achieve a lower incontinence rate than is usually reported after conventional primary repair. The aim of the present study was to evaluate our results after anatomic primary repair.
METHOD
A follow-up study was undertaken after all primary repairs performed in 1999 and 2000. It included anal ultrasonography manometry and an assessment of incontinence (Wexner score).
RESULTS
A total of 74 women sustained obstetric sphincter tears during the study period, and 71 (96 percent) were assessed after a median of 27 months (range, 14–39 months). Nine women declined investigation with ultrasonography/manometry. Incontinence was present in 22 women (31 percent), of whom 17 had gas incontinence only. The symptoms were mild (Wexner score 1–2) in 11 women (50 percent). None of 17 women with normal ultrasonography results were incontinent versus 20 of 45 with pathologic ultrasonographic results (P = 0.001). The mean sphincter length, squeeze pressure, and resting pressure were significantly higher in women with Wexner scores of 0–2 vs. women with a score of more than 2. Sphincter length was inversely correlated with the degree of incontinence (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The incontinence rate after anatomic primary repair is low compared with the last decade’s reported results after conventional primary repair. A short anal sphincter after repair is associated with a poorer outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
J Zetterstrom A Lopez B Anzen M Norman B Holmstrom A Mellgren (1999) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair Obstet Gynecol 94 21–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzhs1Gktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10389712
JP Pirhonen SE Grenman K Haadem et al. (1998) ArticleTitleFrequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland: result of difference in manual help to the baby’s head Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 77 974–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmsFSqsA%3D%3D
CJ Walsh EF Mooney GJ Upton RW Motson (1996) ArticleTitleIncidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair Br J Surg 83 218–21 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283ks12ksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8689168
AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson CI Bartram (1994) ArticleTitleThird degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair BMJ 308 887–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3islGrsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8173367
AC Poen RJ Felt-Bersma RL Strijers GA Dekker MA Cuesta SG Meuwissen (1998) ArticleTitleThird-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair Br J Surg 85 1433–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvltlaqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9782032
H Gjessing B Backe Y Sahlin (1998) ArticleTitleThird degree obstetric tears; outcome after primary repair Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77 736–40 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhtFagtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9740521
M Nazir E Carlsen AF Jacobsen BI Nesheim (2002) ArticleTitleIs there any correlation between objective anal testing, rupture grade, and bowel symptoms after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture? An observational cohort study Dis Colon Rectum 45 1325–31 Occurrence Handle12394430
TM Pinta ML Kylanpaa TK Salmi KA Teramo PS Luukkonen (2004) ArticleTitlePrimary sphincter repair: are the results of the operation good enough? Dis Colon Rectum 47 18–23 Occurrence Handle14719146
AH Sultan AK Monga D Kumar SL Stanton (1999) ArticleTitlePrimary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106 318–23 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzltlarsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10426237
JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s7gsFOnug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8416784
CJ Vaizey E Carapeti JA Cahill MA Kamm (1999) ArticleTitleProspective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems Gut 44 77–80 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FotFKmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9862829 Occurrence Handle10.1136/gut.44.1.77
AB Williams CI Bartram S Halligan JA Spencer RJ Nicholls WA Kmiot (2001) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery using three-dimensional endosonography Obstet Gynecol 97 770–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzktFOjug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11339932
T Tetzschner M Sorensen G Lose J Christiansen (1996) ArticleTitleAnal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103 1034–40 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FhslSqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8863705
M Fitzpatrick M Behan PR O’Connell C O’Herlihy (2000) ArticleTitleA randomized clinical trial comparing primary overlap with approximation repair of third-degree obstetric tears Am J Obstet Gynecol 183 1220–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FkvF2ltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11084569
M Pescatori G Anastasio C Bottini A Mentasti (1992) ArticleTitleNew grading and scoring for anal incontinence: evaluation of 335 patients Dis Colon Rectum 35 482–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383jtlOltQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1568401
JW De Leeuw ME Vierhout PC Struijk WC Hop HC Wallenburg (2001) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 80 830–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvovFKjsQ%3D%3D
GR Hool ML Lieber JM Church (1999) ArticleTitlePostoperative anal canal length predicts outcome in patients having sphincter repair for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 42 313–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jvValtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10223749
AA Abou-Zeid (2000) ArticleTitlePreliminary experience in management of fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter injury Dis Colon Rectum 43 198–202 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lvF2ltQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10696894
AH Sultan MA Kamm RJ Nicholls CI Bartram (1994) ArticleTitleProspective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy Dis Colon Rectum 37 1031–3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FgvFaiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7924711
JJ Tjandra WR Han BS Ooi A Nagesh M Thorne (2001) ArticleTitleFaecal incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy is often associated with coexisting occult sphincter defects: a study using endoanal ultrasonography ANZ J Surg 71 598–602 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1445-2197.2001.02211.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrgtlChtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11552935
AB Williams JA Spencer CI Bartram (2002) ArticleTitleAssessment of third degree tears using three-dimensional anal endosonography with combined anal manometry: a novel technique Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109 833–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zos1OrsA%3D%3D
Lierse W, Frohmüller H, Steltzner F, Stegner H-E. Applied anatomy of the pelvis. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987
SM Hussain J Stoker AW Zwamborn et al. (1996) ArticleTitleEndoanal MRI of the anal sphincter complex: correlation with cross-sectional anatomy and histology J Anat 189 677–82 Occurrence Handle8982844
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Reprints are not available.
About this article
Cite this article
Norderval, S., Öian, P., Revhaug, A. et al. Anal Incontinence After Obstetric Sphincter Tears: Outcome of Anatomic Primary Repairs. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 1055–1061 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0887-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0887-2