PURPOSE
Functional disturbances are common after anterior resection for rectal cancer. This study was designed to compare functional and physiologic outcome after low anterior resection and total mesorectal excision with a colonic J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis.
METHODS
Functional and physiologic variables were analyzed in patients randomized to a J-pouch (n = 36) or side-to-end anastomosis (n = 35). Postoperative functional outcome was investigated with questionnaires. Anorectal manometry was performed preoperatively and at six months, one year, and two years postoperatively.
RESULTS
There was no statistical difference in functional outcome between groups at two years. Maximum neorectal volume increased in both groups but was approximately 40 percent greater at two years in pouches compared with the side-to-end anastomosis. Anal sphincter pressures volumes were halved postoperatively and did not recover during follow-up of two years. Male gender, low anastomotic level, pelvic sepsis, and the postoperative decrease of sphincter pressures were independent factors for more incontinence symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS
Colonic J-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis gives comparable functional results two years after low anterior resection. Neorectal volume had no detectable influence on function. There was a pronounced and sustained postoperative decrease in sphincter pressures.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
WG Lewis IG Martin ME Williamson et al. (1995) ArticleTitleWhy do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 38 259–63 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC1cfmsFM%3D Occurrence Handle7882788
AS Miller WG Lewis ME Williamson PJ Holdsworth D Johnston PJ Finan (1995) ArticleTitleFactors that influence functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 82 1327–30
J Hida M Yasutomi K Fujimoto et al. (1996) ArticleTitleFunctional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch: prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size Dis Colon Rectum 39 986–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA1M%2Fmslc%3D Occurrence Handle8797646
YH Ho S Yu ES Ang F Seow-Choen F Sundram (2002) ArticleTitleSmall colonic J-pouch improves colonic retention of liquids–randomized, controlled trial with scintigraphy Dis Colon Rectum 45 76–82 Occurrence Handle11786768
F Lazorthes R Gamagami P Chiotasso G Istvan S Muhammad (1997) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 40 1409–13 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FmvFyltw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9407976
K Zgraggen CA Maurer S Birrer D Giachino B Kern MW Buchler (2001) ArticleTitleA new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection: the transverse coloplasty pouch Ann Surg 234 780–5 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200112000-00009 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnot1ehsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11729384
YH Ho S Brown SM Heah et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates Ann Surg 236 49–55 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200207000-00009 Occurrence Handle12131085
FT Huber B Herter JR Siewert (1999) ArticleTitleColonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection Dis Colon Rectum 42 896–902 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzjslansQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10411436
P Mathur RI Hallan (2002) ArticleTitleThe colonic J-pouch in colo-anal anastomosis Colorectal Dis 4 304–12 Occurrence Handle12780572
A Barrier P Martel D Gallot L Dugue A Sezeur M Malafosse (1999) ArticleTitleLong-term functional results of colonic J pouch versus straight coloanal anastomosis Br J Surg 86 1176–9
JS Joo JF Latulippe O Alabaz EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (1998) ArticleTitleLong-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 41 740–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czgslKktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9645742
F Lazorthes P Chiotasso RA Gamagami G Istvan P Chevreau (1997) ArticleTitleLate clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis Br J Surg 84 1449–51 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2168.1997.00578.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FislKrsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9361611
N Dehni E Tiret JD Singland et al. (1998) ArticleTitleLong-term functional outcome after low anterior resection: comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 41 817–22 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czktFGjtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9678365
M Machado J Nygren S Goldman O Ljungqvist (2003) ArticleTitleSimilar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 238 214–20 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200308000-00009 Occurrence Handle12894014
InstitutionalAuthorNameAnonymous (1997) ArticleTitleImproved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial N Engl J Med 336 980–7
O Hallböök L Påhlman M Krog SD Wexner R Sjödahl (1996) ArticleTitleRandomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection Ann Surg 224 58–65 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199607000-00009 Occurrence Handle8678619
O Hallböök PO Nystrom R Sjodahl (1997) ArticleTitlePhysiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 40 332–8 Occurrence Handle9118750
JM Jorge A Habr-Gama (2000) ArticleTitleThe value of sphincter asymmetry index in anal incontinence Int J Colorectal Dis 15 303–10 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ptV2jsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11151434
S Åkervall S Fasth S Nordgren T Öresland L Hulten (1989) ArticleTitleRectal reservoir and sensory function studied by graded isobaric distension in normal man Gut 30 496–502
A Fürst K Burghofer L Hutzel KW Jauch (2002) ArticleTitleNeorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 45 660–7 Occurrence Handle12004217
YH Ho M Tan F Seow-Choen (1996) ArticleTitleProspective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses Br J Surg 83 978–80 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymH3cfotVI%3D Occurrence Handle8813791
F Guillemot J Leroy M Boniface et al. (1991) ArticleTitleFunctional assessment of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir and excision of the anal transition zone Dis Colon Rectum 34 967–72 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D3snosVw%3D Occurrence Handle1935475
E Mochiki T Nakabayashi H Suzuki et al. (2001) ArticleTitleBarostat examination of proximal site of the anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer after low anterior resection World J Surg 25 1377–82 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FjtlSntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11760737
IC Otto K Ito C Ye et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCauses of rectal incontinence after sphincter-preserving operations for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 39 1423–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC38vltVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8969670
ME Williamson WG Lewis PJ Finan AS Miller PJ Holdsworth D Johnston (1995) ArticleTitleRecovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 38 411–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB3snoslU%3D Occurrence Handle7720451
MG O’Riordain RG Molloy P Gillen A Horgan WO Kirwan (1992) ArticleTitleRectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum Dis Colon Rectum 35 874–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A1c%2Fht1I%3D Occurrence Handle1511649
S Nakahara H Itoh R Mibu et al. (1988) ArticleTitleClinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 31 762–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaD3cvjvFc%3D Occurrence Handle3168661
RE Perry GJ Blatchford MA Christensen AG Thorson SE Attwood (1990) ArticleTitleManometric diagnosis of anal sphincter injuries Am J Surg 159 112–6
CT Bombeck O Vaz J DeSalvo PE Donahue LM Nyhus (1987) ArticleTitleComputerized axial manometry of the esophagus. A new method for the assessment of antireflux operations Ann Surg 206 465–72 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieD38zgtFU%3D Occurrence Handle3662658
PG Horgan PR O’Connell CA Shinkwin WO Kirwan (1989) ArticleTitleEffect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function Br J Surg 76 783–6
T Hallgren S Fasth D Delbro S Nordgren T Öresland L Hultén (1993) ArticleTitlePossible role of the autonomic nervous system in sphincter impairment after restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 80 631–5
CF Kollmorgen AP Meagher BG Wolff JH Pemberton JA Martenson DM Ilstrup (1994) ArticleTitleThe long-term effect of adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function Ann Surg 220 676–82 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2s%2FjvFc%3D Occurrence Handle7979617
PB Paty WE Enker AM Cohen BD Minsky H Friedlander-Klar (1994) ArticleTitleLong-term functional results of coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer Am J Surg 167 90–4
M Dahlberg B Glimelius W Graf L Påhlman (1998) ArticleTitlePreoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer: results from a randomized study Dis Colon Rectum 41 543–9
P Gervaz N Rotholtz M Pisano et al. (2001) ArticleTitleQuantitative short-term study of anal sphincter function after chemoradiation for rectal cancer Arch Surg 136 192–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ptlensA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11177140
K Ammann W Kirchmayr A Klaus et al. (2003) ArticleTitleImpact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on anal sphincter function in patients with carcinoma of the mid rectum and low rectum Arch Surg 138 257–61 Occurrence Handle12611569
N Dehni DA McNamara RD Schlegel M Guiguet E Tiret R Parc (2002) ArticleTitleClinical effects of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function after proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 45 1635–40 Occurrence Handle12473887
O Hallböök R Sjödahl (1996) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum Br J Surg 83 60–2
A Nesbakken K Nygaard OC Lunde (2001) ArticleTitleOutcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 88 400–4 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01719.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mtVejsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11260107
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank specialist nurses Gunilla Sundin and Annica Wistedt for performing and coordinating the anorectal physiology investigations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the Stockholm County Council, Public Health and Medical Services Committee and the Swedish Research Council, grant #09101.
Reprints are not available.
About this article
Cite this article
Machado, M., Nygren, J., Goldman, S. et al. Functional and Physiologic Assessment of the Colonic Reservoir or Side-to-End Anastomosis After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Two-Year Follow-Up. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 29–36 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0772-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0772-z